Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Rib Mountain 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#13
2. Oakfield 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#313
3. Elkhart Lake 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#333
4. Ashippun 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#431
5. Allenton 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#506
6. Dellwood 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#753
7. Rudolph 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#872
8. Cochrane 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#931
9. Lake Sherwood 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#991
10. La Valle 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#1,062
11. Lowell 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#1,186
12. Kellnersville 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#1,247
13. Radisson 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#1,251
14. Wheeler 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,337
15. Hager City 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,341
16. Aniwa 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,358
17. Nelsonville 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,481
18. Ogdensburg 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,502
19. Sayner 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,523
20. Zoar 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,586
21. Greenbush 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,631
22. Boaz 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,635
23. Pulcifer 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,643
24. Pine River 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,656
25. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,758
26. Barronett 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,796
27. Springbrook 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,836
28. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,862
29. Leopolis 100.0% 29.8% (+70.2)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,903
30. Sister Bay 88.3% 29.8% (+58.5)#30 33.1% (+55.2)#2,248
31. Brandon 87.5% 29.8% (+57.7)#31 33.1% (+54.4)#2,280
32. Hancock 85.7% 29.8% (+55.9)#32 33.1% (+52.6)#2,386
33. Suring 85.7% 29.8% (+55.9)#33 33.1% (+52.6)#2,388
34. Eland 85.7% 29.8% (+55.9)#34 33.1% (+52.6)#2,399
35. Dalton 85.7% 29.8% (+55.9)#35 33.1% (+52.6)#2,403
36. Chelsea 85.7% 29.8% (+55.9)#36 33.1% (+52.6)#2,409
37. North Freedom 84.0% 29.8% (+54.2)#37 33.1% (+50.9)#2,490
38. Mauston 83.7% 29.8% (+53.9)#38 33.1% (+50.5)#2,504
39. Birch Hill 83.3% 29.8% (+53.5)#39 33.1% (+50.2)#2,531
40. Rockdale 83.3% 29.8% (+53.5)#40 33.1% (+50.2)#2,542
41. Kiel 82.2% 29.8% (+52.4)#41 33.1% (+49.1)#2,614
42. Marshall 81.8% 29.8% (+52.0)#42 33.1% (+48.7)#2,628
43. Dane 80.0% 29.8% (+50.2)#43 33.1% (+46.9)#2,740
44. Unity 80.0% 29.8% (+50.2)#44 33.1% (+46.9)#2,762
45. Middle Village 80.0% 29.8% (+50.2)#45 33.1% (+46.9)#2,785
46. Milltown 77.8% 29.8% (+48.0)#46 33.1% (+44.6)#2,931
47. Amberg 77.8% 29.8% (+48.0)#47 33.1% (+44.6)#2,956
48. Cashton 77.1% 29.8% (+47.3)#48 33.1% (+43.9)#2,997
49. Elcho 76.9% 29.8% (+47.1)#49 33.1% (+43.8)#3,024
50. Boyceville 76.5% 29.8% (+46.7)#50 33.1% (+43.3)#3,053
51. Boscobel 75.5% 29.8% (+45.7)#51 33.1% (+42.4)#3,128
52. Osceola 75.3% 29.8% (+45.5)#52 33.1% (+42.1)#3,137
53. Tainter Lake 75.0% 29.8% (+45.2)#53 33.1% (+41.9)#3,155
54. Cazenovia 75.0% 29.8% (+45.2)#54 33.1% (+41.9)#3,224
55. Chetek 73.9% 29.8% (+44.1)#55 33.1% (+40.8)#3,304
56. Forestville 72.7% 29.8% (+42.9)#56 33.1% (+39.6)#3,425
57. Abrams 72.7% 29.8% (+42.9)#57 33.1% (+39.6)#3,442
58. Waterloo 72.6% 29.8% (+42.9)#58 33.1% (+39.5)#3,455
59. Coon Valley 71.4% 29.8% (+41.6)#59 33.1% (+38.3)#3,567
60. Taylor 71.4% 29.8% (+41.6)#60 33.1% (+38.3)#3,584
61. Prairie Du Sac 70.8% 29.8% (+41.0)#61 33.1% (+37.6)#3,660
62. Bancroft 70.4% 29.8% (+40.6)#62 33.1% (+37.2)#3,696
63. Plain 69.6% 29.8% (+39.8)#63 33.1% (+36.4)#3,793
64. Park Falls 69.5% 29.8% (+39.7)#64 33.1% (+36.4)#3,798
65. Ashland 69.5% 29.8% (+39.7)#65 33.1% (+36.3)#3,799
66. Cumberland 69.1% 29.8% (+39.3)#66 33.1% (+36.0)#3,840
67. Viola 68.8% 29.8% (+39.0)#67 33.1% (+35.6)#3,872
68. Lake Tomahawk 68.0% 29.8% (+38.2)#68 33.1% (+34.9)#3,955
69. Union Grove 67.0% 29.8% (+37.2)#69 33.1% (+33.9)#4,033
70. Reeseville 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#70 33.1% (+33.5)#4,097
71. Avoca 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#71 33.1% (+33.5)#4,126
72. Milladore 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#72 33.1% (+33.5)#4,142
73. Granton 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#73 33.1% (+33.5)#4,154
74. White Lake 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#74 33.1% (+33.5)#4,191
75. Deer Park 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#75 33.1% (+33.5)#4,201
76. Ceex Haci 66.7% 29.8% (+36.9)#76 33.1% (+33.5)#4,257
77. Kewaunee 65.4% 29.8% (+35.6)#77 33.1% (+32.3)#4,337
78. Abbotsford 65.3% 29.8% (+35.5)#78 33.1% (+32.1)#4,358
79. North Fond Du Lac 64.8% 29.8% (+35.0)#79 33.1% (+31.6)#4,424
80. Oxford 64.7% 29.8% (+34.9)#80 33.1% (+31.6)#4,437
81. New Post 64.7% 29.8% (+34.9)#81 33.1% (+31.6)#4,440
82. Raymond 64.3% 29.8% (+34.5)#82 33.1% (+31.2)#4,476
83. Centuria 64.3% 29.8% (+34.5)#83 33.1% (+31.2)#4,484
84. Adams 63.8% 29.8% (+34.0)#84 33.1% (+30.7)#4,543
85. Algoma 63.6% 29.8% (+33.8)#85 33.1% (+30.5)#4,566
86. Loyal 63.6% 29.8% (+33.8)#86 33.1% (+30.5)#4,571
87. Cobb 63.6% 29.8% (+33.8)#87 33.1% (+30.5)#4,593
88. Bear Creek 63.6% 29.8% (+33.8)#88 33.1% (+30.5)#4,597
89. New Lisbon 63.0% 29.8% (+33.3)#89 33.1% (+29.9)#4,666
90. Lac Du Flambeau 63.0% 29.8% (+33.2)#90 33.1% (+29.8)#4,678
91. Fox Lake 62.2% 29.8% (+32.4)#91 33.1% (+29.0)#4,804
92. Markesan 61.7% 29.8% (+31.9)#92 33.1% (+28.6)#4,851
93. Newburg 61.5% 29.8% (+31.7)#93 33.1% (+28.4)#4,870
94. Gresham 61.5% 29.8% (+31.7)#94 33.1% (+28.4)#4,883
95. Sextonville 60.0% 29.8% (+30.2)#95 33.1% (+26.9)#5,129
96. Ironton 60.0% 29.8% (+30.2)#96 33.1% (+26.9)#5,144
97. Ripon 59.9% 29.8% (+30.1)#97 33.1% (+26.8)#5,186
98. Denmark 59.2% 29.8% (+29.4)#98 33.1% (+26.0)#5,258
99. Pepin 58.3% 29.8% (+28.5)#99 33.1% (+25.2)#5,381
100. Reserve 58.3% 29.8% (+28.5)#100 33.1% (+25.2)#5,400

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin?
Rib Mountain has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Wisconsin is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.