Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Brush Creek 100.0% 10.6% (+89.4)#1 11.2% (+88.8)#8
2. Caney Ridge 51.3% 10.6% (+40.7)#2 11.2% (+40.1)#178
3. Fallis 48.4% 10.6% (+37.8)#3 11.2% (+37.2)#217
4. Colony 47.7% 10.6% (+37.1)#4 11.2% (+36.5)#231
5. Cave Spring 47.6% 10.6% (+37.0)#5 11.2% (+36.4)#235
6. Old Green 39.1% 10.6% (+28.5)#6 11.2% (+27.9)#370
7. Sentinel 38.6% 10.6% (+28.0)#7 11.2% (+27.4)#385
8. Tullahassee 37.5% 10.6% (+26.9)#8 11.2% (+26.3)#409
9. Reagan 36.4% 10.6% (+25.8)#9 11.2% (+25.1)#454
10. Sand Point 36.0% 10.6% (+25.4)#10 11.2% (+24.8)#464
11. Scipio 35.5% 10.6% (+24.9)#11 11.2% (+24.3)#479
12. Enterprise 33.9% 10.6% (+23.3)#12 11.2% (+22.7)#545
13. Sweetwater 33.3% 10.6% (+22.7)#13 11.2% (+22.1)#561
14. Dwight Mission 33.3% 10.6% (+22.7)#14 11.2% (+22.1)#570
15. Steely Hollow 32.9% 10.6% (+22.3)#15 11.2% (+21.7)#591
16. Mcbride 32.1% 10.6% (+21.5)#16 11.2% (+20.9)#630
17. Titanic 30.0% 10.6% (+19.4)#17 11.2% (+18.8)#752
18. Elmer 30.0% 10.6% (+19.4)#18 11.2% (+18.8)#757
19. Luther 29.7% 10.6% (+19.1)#19 11.2% (+18.5)#774
20. Bee 29.4% 10.6% (+18.8)#20 11.2% (+18.2)#799
21. Mulberry 29.2% 10.6% (+18.6)#21 11.2% (+18.0)#817
22. Leach 29.1% 10.6% (+18.5)#22 11.2% (+17.9)#823
23. Horntown 28.9% 10.6% (+18.3)#23 11.2% (+17.7)#835
24. Tuskahoma 28.6% 10.6% (+18.0)#24 11.2% (+17.4)#863
25. Albany 28.0% 10.6% (+17.4)#25 11.2% (+16.8)#910
26. Bug Tussle 27.8% 10.6% (+17.2)#26 11.2% (+16.6)#924
27. Panola 27.3% 10.6% (+16.7)#27 11.2% (+16.1)#977
28. Hillsdale 27.0% 10.6% (+16.4)#28 11.2% (+15.8)#1,004
29. Grandview 26.5% 10.6% (+15.9)#29 11.2% (+15.3)#1,056
30. Woodlawn Park 26.4% 10.6% (+15.8)#30 11.2% (+15.2)#1,063
31. Dripping Springs 26.1% 10.6% (+15.5)#31 11.2% (+14.9)#1,098
32. Preston 25.4% 10.6% (+14.8)#32 11.2% (+14.2)#1,163
33. Emet 25.0% 10.6% (+14.4)#33 11.2% (+13.8)#1,230
34. Goodwell 24.6% 10.6% (+14.0)#34 11.2% (+13.4)#1,282
35. Sparrowhawk 24.6% 10.6% (+14.0)#35 11.2% (+13.4)#1,293
36. Milfay 24.5% 10.6% (+13.9)#36 11.2% (+13.3)#1,311
37. Strong City 23.8% 10.6% (+13.2)#37 11.2% (+12.6)#1,433
38. Stillwater 23.5% 10.6% (+12.9)#38 11.2% (+12.2)#1,502
39. Cyril 23.3% 10.6% (+12.7)#39 11.2% (+12.1)#1,533
40. Oakwood 22.9% 10.6% (+12.3)#40 11.2% (+11.6)#1,630
41. Oak Hill-Piney 22.6% 10.6% (+12.0)#41 11.2% (+11.4)#1,688
42. Bache 22.2% 10.6% (+11.6)#42 11.2% (+11.0)#1,774
43. Barber 21.9% 10.6% (+11.3)#43 11.2% (+10.7)#1,841
44. Sequoyah 21.9% 10.6% (+11.3)#44 11.2% (+10.7)#1,850
45. Lyons Switch 21.8% 10.6% (+11.2)#45 11.2% (+10.6)#1,864
46. Blair 21.8% 10.6% (+11.2)#46 11.2% (+10.6)#1,875
47. Briartown 21.7% 10.6% (+11.1)#47 11.2% (+10.5)#1,880
48. Langston 21.5% 10.6% (+10.9)#48 11.2% (+10.2)#1,944
49. Fort Gibson 21.1% 10.6% (+10.5)#49 11.2% (+9.92)#2,026
50. Moffett 21.1% 10.6% (+10.4)#50 11.2% (+9.84)#2,051
51. Burlington 21.0% 10.6% (+10.3)#51 11.2% (+9.74)#2,078
52. Twin Oaks 20.7% 10.6% (+10.1)#52 11.2% (+9.50)#2,137
53. Fort Coffee 20.6% 10.6% (+9.98)#53 11.2% (+9.37)#2,173
54. Headrick 20.6% 10.6% (+9.98)#54 11.2% (+9.37)#2,176
55. Nichols Hills 20.2% 10.6% (+9.59)#55 11.2% (+8.99)#2,323
56. Lequire 20.0% 10.6% (+9.40)#56 11.2% (+8.79)#2,403
57. Summit 20.0% 10.6% (+9.40)#57 11.2% (+8.79)#2,410
58. Sasakwa 20.0% 10.6% (+9.40)#58 11.2% (+8.79)#2,415
59. Nicut 19.8% 10.6% (+9.21)#59 11.2% (+8.60)#2,478
60. Brent 19.5% 10.6% (+8.88)#60 11.2% (+8.27)#2,610
61. Mountain View 19.4% 10.6% (+8.77)#61 11.2% (+8.16)#2,649
62. Blackburn 19.4% 10.6% (+8.75)#62 11.2% (+8.14)#2,663
63. Cookson 19.3% 10.6% (+8.67)#63 11.2% (+8.06)#2,692
64. Hough 19.2% 10.6% (+8.63)#64 11.2% (+8.02)#2,711
65. Cumberland 19.0% 10.6% (+8.44)#65 11.2% (+7.83)#2,766
66. Arcadia 19.0% 10.6% (+8.44)#66 11.2% (+7.83)#2,772
67. Roosevelt 19.0% 10.6% (+8.40)#67 11.2% (+7.79)#2,794
68. Deer Creek 18.9% 10.6% (+8.31)#68 11.2% (+7.70)#2,826
69. Gideon 18.9% 10.6% (+8.26)#69 11.2% (+7.65)#2,848
70. Cedar Valley 18.8% 10.6% (+8.18)#70 11.2% (+7.57)#2,887
71. Faxon 18.5% 10.6% (+7.91)#71 11.2% (+7.30)#2,999
72. Tahlequah 18.5% 10.6% (+7.87)#72 11.2% (+7.26)#3,019
73. Nardin 18.5% 10.6% (+7.86)#73 11.2% (+7.25)#3,026
74. Chance 18.4% 10.6% (+7.80)#74 11.2% (+7.19)#3,056
75. Latta 18.4% 10.6% (+7.79)#75 11.2% (+7.18)#3,059
76. Calumet 17.8% 10.6% (+7.17)#76 11.2% (+6.56)#3,360
77. Smithville 17.3% 10.6% (+6.70)#77 11.2% (+6.09)#3,647
78. Morrison 17.3% 10.6% (+6.65)#78 11.2% (+6.04)#3,666
79. Longtown 17.2% 10.6% (+6.56)#79 11.2% (+5.95)#3,715
80. Gregory 17.1% 10.6% (+6.54)#80 11.2% (+5.93)#3,735
81. Carmen 17.1% 10.6% (+6.45)#81 11.2% (+5.84)#3,789
82. Peggs 16.9% 10.6% (+6.28)#82 11.2% (+5.67)#3,873
83. Leedey 16.9% 10.6% (+6.28)#83 11.2% (+5.67)#3,877
84. Snyder 16.8% 10.6% (+6.16)#84 11.2% (+5.55)#3,933
85. Hartshorne 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#85 11.2% (+5.45)#3,982
86. Asher 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#86 11.2% (+5.45)#3,986
87. Eldon 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#87 11.2% (+5.45)#3,991
88. Cloud Creek 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#88 11.2% (+5.45)#4,003
89. Friendship 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#90 11.2% (+5.45)#4,033
90. Avard 16.7% 10.6% (+6.06)#91 11.2% (+5.45)#4,034
91. Arnett 16.3% 10.6% (+5.70)#92 11.2% (+5.09)#4,257
92. Okarche 16.3% 10.6% (+5.68)#93 11.2% (+5.07)#4,276
93. Greasy 16.3% 10.6% (+5.67)#94 11.2% (+5.06)#4,280
94. Beggs 16.1% 10.6% (+5.52)#95 11.2% (+4.91)#4,387
95. Lowrey 16.0% 10.6% (+5.35)#96 11.2% (+4.74)#4,506
96. Helena 15.9% 10.6% (+5.27)#97 11.2% (+4.66)#4,568
97. Fanshawe 15.8% 10.6% (+5.24)#98 11.2% (+4.63)#4,595
98. Norman 15.8% 10.6% (+5.20)#99 11.2% (+4.60)#4,620
99. Sawyer 15.7% 10.6% (+5.11)#100 11.2% (+4.50)#4,703
100. Randlett 15.6% 10.6% (+5.04)#101 11.2% (+4.43)#4,762

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
48.4%
#3
47.7%
#4
39.1%
#5
38.6%
#6
37.5%
#7
33.3%
#8
33.3%
#9
32.9%
#10
30.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma?
Brush Creek has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Oklahoma is 10.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.