Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Emison 100.0% 9.7% (+90.3)#1 11.2% (+88.8)#28
2. Groverton 77.8% 9.7% (+68.1)#2 11.2% (+66.6)#68
3. Burns City 75.6% 9.7% (+65.8)#3 11.2% (+64.3)#74
4. Stone Bluff 63.8% 9.7% (+54.1)#4 11.2% (+52.6)#106
5. Preble 57.1% 9.7% (+47.4)#5 11.2% (+45.9)#135
6. Big Lake 51.7% 9.7% (+42.0)#6 11.2% (+40.5)#170
7. Lewis 51.3% 9.7% (+41.6)#7 11.2% (+40.1)#177
8. New Lebanon 51.2% 9.7% (+41.5)#8 11.2% (+40.0)#179
9. London 50.0% 9.7% (+40.3)#9 11.2% (+38.8)#192
10. Hedrick 49.2% 9.7% (+39.4)#10 11.2% (+37.9)#210
11. Cowan 45.9% 9.7% (+36.2)#11 11.2% (+34.7)#251
12. Elizaville 44.4% 9.7% (+34.7)#12 11.2% (+33.2)#281
13. Buckskin 42.9% 9.7% (+33.1)#13 11.2% (+31.6)#312
14. Indian Village 37.0% 9.7% (+27.3)#14 11.2% (+25.8)#431
15. Graysville 36.8% 9.7% (+27.1)#15 11.2% (+25.6)#442
16. Stendal 36.5% 9.7% (+26.8)#16 11.2% (+25.3)#447
17. Leopold 36.4% 9.7% (+26.6)#17 11.2% (+25.1)#455
18. Metz 36.0% 9.7% (+26.3)#18 11.2% (+24.8)#462
19. East Enterprise 35.7% 9.7% (+26.0)#19 11.2% (+24.5)#470
20. Lake Everett 34.8% 9.7% (+25.1)#20 11.2% (+23.6)#504
21. Duneland Beach 34.7% 9.7% (+25.0)#21 11.2% (+23.5)#509
22. Petroleum 34.4% 9.7% (+24.7)#22 11.2% (+23.2)#528
23. Roseland 34.0% 9.7% (+24.3)#23 11.2% (+22.8)#540
24. Belleville 33.5% 9.7% (+23.7)#24 11.2% (+22.3)#555
25. Boone Grove 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#25 11.2% (+22.1)#571
26. Alton 33.3% 9.7% (+23.6)#26 11.2% (+22.1)#573
27. Notre Dame 33.2% 9.7% (+23.5)#27 11.2% (+22.0)#578
28. Freelandville 32.6% 9.7% (+22.9)#28 11.2% (+21.4)#604
29. Westwood 32.3% 9.7% (+22.6)#29 11.2% (+21.1)#619
30. Union Mills 32.1% 9.7% (+22.4)#30 11.2% (+20.9)#632
31. Keystone 31.6% 9.7% (+21.9)#31 11.2% (+20.4)#656
32. Crows Nest 31.0% 9.7% (+21.3)#32 11.2% (+19.8)#684
33. Chain-O-Lakes 29.9% 9.7% (+20.1)#33 11.2% (+18.7)#765
34. Wooster 28.6% 9.7% (+18.8)#34 11.2% (+17.4)#858
35. Millgrove 27.3% 9.7% (+17.5)#35 11.2% (+16.1)#978
36. Wynnedale 27.0% 9.7% (+17.2)#36 11.2% (+15.7)#1,012
37. Ogden Dunes 26.9% 9.7% (+17.1)#37 11.2% (+15.6)#1,022
38. Lucerne 26.8% 9.7% (+17.0)#38 11.2% (+15.5)#1,031
39. West Lafayette 25.7% 9.7% (+16.0)#39 11.2% (+14.5)#1,132
40. Woodlawn Heights 25.0% 9.7% (+15.3)#40 11.2% (+13.8)#1,223
41. Scipio 24.6% 9.7% (+14.9)#41 11.2% (+13.4)#1,292
42. Burlington 24.2% 9.7% (+14.5)#42 11.2% (+13.0)#1,356
43. Aberdeen 24.0% 9.7% (+14.2)#43 11.2% (+12.7)#1,405
44. Browns Crossing 23.4% 9.7% (+13.7)#44 11.2% (+12.2)#1,516
45. Hartz Lake 23.4% 9.7% (+13.7)#45 11.2% (+12.2)#1,519
46. Spring Hill 23.3% 9.7% (+13.6)#46 11.2% (+12.1)#1,529
47. St Mary Of The Woods 23.2% 9.7% (+13.5)#47 11.2% (+12.0)#1,554
48. Culver 23.0% 9.7% (+13.3)#48 11.2% (+11.8)#1,596
49. Blairsville 22.9% 9.7% (+13.1)#49 11.2% (+11.6)#1,627
50. Rob Roy 22.7% 9.7% (+13.0)#50 11.2% (+11.5)#1,665
51. Bloomington 22.1% 9.7% (+12.4)#51 11.2% (+10.9)#1,800
52. Brimfield 21.7% 9.7% (+12.0)#52 11.2% (+10.5)#1,892
53. Patricksburg 21.0% 9.7% (+11.3)#53 11.2% (+9.77)#2,067
54. Smithville Sanders 20.9% 9.7% (+11.2)#54 11.2% (+9.68)#2,095
55. Grandview Lake 20.5% 9.7% (+10.8)#55 11.2% (+9.31)#2,196
56. Hillsdale 20.4% 9.7% (+10.6)#56 11.2% (+9.16)#2,258
57. Upland 20.0% 9.7% (+10.2)#57 11.2% (+8.75)#2,430
58. Prospect 19.5% 9.7% (+9.76)#58 11.2% (+8.27)#2,609
59. Homecroft 19.5% 9.7% (+9.76)#59 11.2% (+8.27)#2,612
60. Lakes Of The Four Seasons 19.2% 9.7% (+9.43)#60 11.2% (+7.94)#2,736
61. Mooreland 18.9% 9.7% (+9.19)#61 11.2% (+7.70)#2,825
62. Ulen 18.9% 9.7% (+9.14)#62 11.2% (+7.65)#2,850
63. Mellott 18.8% 9.7% (+9.03)#63 11.2% (+7.54)#2,903
64. Lanesville 18.7% 9.7% (+9.01)#64 11.2% (+7.52)#2,912
65. Twelve Mile 18.7% 9.7% (+8.96)#65 11.2% (+7.47)#2,931
66. Elizabeth 18.5% 9.7% (+8.74)#66 11.2% (+7.25)#3,025
67. Chili 18.4% 9.7% (+8.70)#67 11.2% (+7.21)#3,045
68. Poland 18.2% 9.7% (+8.46)#68 11.2% (+6.97)#3,168
69. Landess 18.2% 9.7% (+8.46)#69 11.2% (+6.97)#3,170
70. Alfordsville 18.2% 9.7% (+8.46)#70 11.2% (+6.97)#3,174
71. Cree Lake 17.9% 9.7% (+8.22)#71 11.2% (+6.73)#3,275
72. Battle Ground 17.7% 9.7% (+7.97)#72 11.2% (+6.48)#3,399
73. Deer Creek 17.5% 9.7% (+7.82)#73 11.2% (+6.33)#3,496
74. Hamilton 17.5% 9.7% (+7.78)#74 11.2% (+6.30)#3,520
75. Bass Lake 17.2% 9.7% (+7.52)#75 11.2% (+6.03)#3,673
76. Dover Hill 17.1% 9.7% (+7.35)#76 11.2% (+5.86)#3,781
77. Alford 17.0% 9.7% (+7.30)#77 11.2% (+5.81)#3,804
78. Gwynneville 16.9% 9.7% (+7.22)#78 11.2% (+5.73)#3,835
79. Greencastle 16.9% 9.7% (+7.17)#79 11.2% (+5.68)#3,865
80. New Whiteland 16.7% 9.7% (+6.99)#80 11.2% (+5.50)#3,954
81. Michiana Shores 16.6% 9.7% (+6.85)#81 11.2% (+5.36)#4,088
82. Long Beach 16.5% 9.7% (+6.73)#82 11.2% (+5.24)#4,167
83. New Market 16.3% 9.7% (+6.62)#83 11.2% (+5.13)#4,244
84. Darlington 16.2% 9.7% (+6.47)#84 11.2% (+4.98)#4,348
85. Advance 16.2% 9.7% (+6.43)#85 11.2% (+4.94)#4,366
86. Troy 16.1% 9.7% (+6.36)#86 11.2% (+4.87)#4,421
87. Pittsboro 16.1% 9.7% (+6.34)#87 11.2% (+4.86)#4,429
88. Corydon 15.9% 9.7% (+6.20)#88 11.2% (+4.71)#4,526
89. Spring Grove 15.9% 9.7% (+6.18)#89 11.2% (+4.69)#4,538
90. Roanoke 15.8% 9.7% (+6.11)#90 11.2% (+4.62)#4,599
91. Santa Claus 15.8% 9.7% (+6.03)#91 11.2% (+4.55)#4,666
92. Sharpsville 15.8% 9.7% (+6.03)#92 11.2% (+4.55)#4,667
93. Straughn 15.4% 9.7% (+5.72)#93 11.2% (+4.23)#4,922
94. Snow Lake 15.4% 9.7% (+5.69)#94 11.2% (+4.20)#4,944
95. Winona Lake 15.4% 9.7% (+5.68)#95 11.2% (+4.19)#4,954
96. Valparaiso 15.4% 9.7% (+5.67)#96 11.2% (+4.18)#4,960
97. Benton 15.2% 9.7% (+5.50)#97 11.2% (+4.01)#5,112
98. Spencerville 15.1% 9.7% (+5.37)#98 11.2% (+3.88)#5,241
99. Meridian Hills 15.0% 9.7% (+5.31)#99 11.2% (+3.83)#5,289
100. Oldenburg 15.0% 9.7% (+5.29)#100 11.2% (+3.80)#5,312

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
75.6%
#3
37.0%
#4
35.7%
#5
34.0%
#6
33.3%
#7
33.2%
#8
32.6%
#9
31.0%
#10
27.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana?
Emison has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Indiana is 9.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.