Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Michiana 57.0% 9.7% (+47.3)#1 11.2% (+45.7)#139
2. Levering 37.5% 9.7% (+27.8)#2 11.2% (+26.3)#418
3. Lakeport 35.0% 9.7% (+25.3)#3 11.2% (+23.8)#499
4. Rock 31.5% 9.7% (+21.8)#4 11.2% (+20.2)#664
5. Grosse Pointe Farms 30.2% 9.7% (+20.5)#5 11.2% (+19.0)#741
6. Cedar 30.0% 9.7% (+20.3)#6 11.2% (+18.8)#756
7. Wedgewood 29.6% 9.7% (+19.9)#7 11.2% (+18.4)#786
8. Spring Arbor 28.9% 9.7% (+19.2)#8 11.2% (+17.7)#832
9. Houghton 28.8% 9.7% (+19.2)#9 11.2% (+17.6)#839
10. Bay View 28.3% 9.7% (+18.6)#10 11.2% (+17.1)#881
11. Fulton 27.8% 9.7% (+18.1)#11 11.2% (+16.6)#925
12. Hancock 27.5% 9.7% (+17.9)#12 11.2% (+16.3)#946
13. Ann Arbor 27.2% 9.7% (+17.5)#13 11.2% (+16.0)#984
14. Huntington Woods 26.8% 9.7% (+17.1)#14 11.2% (+15.6)#1,028
15. Paw Paw Lake 26.7% 9.7% (+17.1)#15 11.2% (+15.5)#1,034
16. Ironton 25.6% 9.7% (+16.0)#16 11.2% (+14.4)#1,136
17. Edgemont Park 24.8% 9.7% (+15.1)#17 11.2% (+13.6)#1,261
18. Covington 24.5% 9.7% (+14.8)#18 11.2% (+13.3)#1,310
19. Mears 24.1% 9.7% (+14.4)#19 11.2% (+12.8)#1,387
20. Leland 24.0% 9.7% (+14.3)#20 11.2% (+12.8)#1,404
21. Bruce Crossing 23.1% 9.7% (+13.4)#21 11.2% (+11.9)#1,582
22. Skanee 23.1% 9.7% (+13.4)#22 11.2% (+11.9)#1,589
23. Glen Arbor 23.0% 9.7% (+13.3)#23 11.2% (+11.8)#1,603
24. Okemos 21.8% 9.7% (+12.1)#24 11.2% (+10.6)#1,870
25. East Lansing 21.7% 9.7% (+12.1)#25 11.2% (+10.5)#1,886
26. Barton Hills 21.7% 9.7% (+12.0)#26 11.2% (+10.5)#1,891
27. Haslett 21.4% 9.7% (+11.8)#27 11.2% (+10.2)#1,946
28. Petoskey 21.3% 9.7% (+11.6)#28 11.2% (+10.1)#1,991
29. Village Of Clarkston 21.0% 9.7% (+11.4)#29 11.2% (+9.82)#2,055
30. New Era 20.8% 9.7% (+11.1)#30 11.2% (+9.55)#2,126
31. Maple City 20.7% 9.7% (+11.0)#31 11.2% (+9.44)#2,159
32. Pleasant Ridge 20.5% 9.7% (+10.9)#32 11.2% (+9.33)#2,188
33. Ahmeek 20.5% 9.7% (+10.8)#33 11.2% (+9.24)#2,226
34. Grosse Pointe Park 20.4% 9.7% (+10.7)#34 11.2% (+9.18)#2,247
35. Westwood 20.2% 9.7% (+10.6)#35 11.2% (+9.03)#2,296
36. New Buffalo 19.6% 9.7% (+9.91)#36 11.2% (+8.37)#2,563
37. Bendon 19.6% 9.7% (+9.89)#37 11.2% (+8.35)#2,573
38. Mackinac Island 19.4% 9.7% (+9.71)#38 11.2% (+8.18)#2,639
39. Snover 19.4% 9.7% (+9.68)#39 11.2% (+8.14)#2,659
40. Pentwater 19.2% 9.7% (+9.54)#40 11.2% (+8.00)#2,716
41. Brimley 19.2% 9.7% (+9.50)#41 11.2% (+7.96)#2,729
42. East Grand Rapids 19.1% 9.7% (+9.45)#42 11.2% (+7.91)#2,743
43. Armada 19.0% 9.7% (+9.37)#43 11.2% (+7.83)#2,780
44. Brethren 18.9% 9.7% (+9.26)#44 11.2% (+7.73)#2,813
45. Benzonia 18.9% 9.7% (+9.23)#45 11.2% (+7.69)#2,834
46. Lake Michigan Beach 18.6% 9.7% (+8.97)#46 11.2% (+7.43)#2,940
47. Big Bay 18.5% 9.7% (+8.80)#47 11.2% (+7.26)#3,017
48. Clare 18.4% 9.7% (+8.75)#48 11.2% (+7.21)#3,038
49. Suttons Bay 18.3% 9.7% (+8.67)#49 11.2% (+7.13)#3,089
50. Orchard Lake Village 18.2% 9.7% (+8.57)#50 11.2% (+7.03)#3,134
51. St Ignace 18.2% 9.7% (+8.49)#51 11.2% (+6.95)#3,181
52. Beal City 18.1% 9.7% (+8.40)#52 11.2% (+6.86)#3,220
53. Eureka 18.0% 9.7% (+8.36)#53 11.2% (+6.82)#3,237
54. Hudsonville 18.0% 9.7% (+8.29)#54 11.2% (+6.75)#3,267
55. Beverly Hills 17.9% 9.7% (+8.25)#55 11.2% (+6.71)#3,286
56. Grosse Pointe Woods 17.7% 9.7% (+7.98)#56 11.2% (+6.44)#3,425
57. Leonard 17.6% 9.7% (+7.97)#57 11.2% (+6.43)#3,432
58. Berrien Springs 17.6% 9.7% (+7.90)#58 11.2% (+6.36)#3,472
59. Vandercook Lake 17.5% 9.7% (+7.80)#59 11.2% (+6.26)#3,545
60. Ypsilanti 17.3% 9.7% (+7.65)#60 11.2% (+6.12)#3,628
61. West Ishpeming 17.2% 9.7% (+7.57)#61 11.2% (+6.03)#3,672
62. Grosse Pointe 16.9% 9.7% (+7.23)#62 11.2% (+5.69)#3,852
63. Saline 16.8% 9.7% (+7.09)#63 11.2% (+5.55)#3,936
64. Alma 16.7% 9.7% (+7.03)#64 11.2% (+5.50)#3,956
65. Paris 16.7% 9.7% (+6.99)#65 11.2% (+5.45)#3,994
66. Michigan Center 16.6% 9.7% (+6.91)#66 11.2% (+5.37)#4,072
67. Hillsdale 16.6% 9.7% (+6.90)#67 11.2% (+5.37)#4,079
68. Forest Hills 16.4% 9.7% (+6.77)#68 11.2% (+5.23)#4,174
69. Harrisville 16.4% 9.7% (+6.69)#69 11.2% (+5.15)#4,227
70. Lexington 16.3% 9.7% (+6.62)#70 11.2% (+5.08)#4,268
71. Chelsea 16.3% 9.7% (+6.59)#71 11.2% (+5.05)#4,298
72. East Tawas 16.2% 9.7% (+6.55)#72 11.2% (+5.01)#4,329
73. Laurium 16.2% 9.7% (+6.50)#73 11.2% (+4.96)#4,361
74. Oscoda 15.9% 9.7% (+6.23)#74 11.2% (+4.69)#4,537
75. Birmingham 15.9% 9.7% (+6.19)#75 11.2% (+4.65)#4,574
76. Manchester 15.8% 9.7% (+6.14)#76 11.2% (+4.61)#4,611
77. Berkley 15.7% 9.7% (+6.04)#77 11.2% (+4.50)#4,705
78. Mohawk 15.7% 9.7% (+6.01)#78 11.2% (+4.47)#4,722
79. Mount Pleasant 15.6% 9.7% (+5.94)#79 11.2% (+4.41)#4,782
80. Whitehall 15.5% 9.7% (+5.87)#80 11.2% (+4.33)#4,838
81. Omena 15.4% 9.7% (+5.71)#81 11.2% (+4.17)#4,970
82. Davison 15.3% 9.7% (+5.64)#82 11.2% (+4.11)#5,034
83. Indian River 15.3% 9.7% (+5.63)#83 11.2% (+4.10)#5,042
84. Traverse City 15.3% 9.7% (+5.58)#84 11.2% (+4.04)#5,083
85. Franklin 15.2% 9.7% (+5.50)#85 11.2% (+3.97)#5,159
86. Northport 15.0% 9.7% (+5.36)#86 11.2% (+3.82)#5,299
87. Crystal Downs Country Club 15.0% 9.7% (+5.32)#87 11.2% (+3.79)#5,342
88. Pigeon 14.9% 9.7% (+5.26)#88 11.2% (+3.72)#5,395
89. Fruitport 14.8% 9.7% (+5.14)#89 11.2% (+3.60)#5,509
90. Mcbride 14.8% 9.7% (+5.14)#90 11.2% (+3.60)#5,517
91. Grand Ledge 14.6% 9.7% (+4.96)#91 11.2% (+3.43)#5,696
92. Schoolcraft 14.5% 9.7% (+4.81)#92 11.2% (+3.27)#5,854
93. Gaastra 14.4% 9.7% (+4.75)#93 11.2% (+3.21)#5,927
94. Bridgman 14.4% 9.7% (+4.74)#94 11.2% (+3.20)#5,933
95. Shoreham 14.4% 9.7% (+4.70)#95 11.2% (+3.16)#5,971
96. Manitou Beach Devils Lake 14.4% 9.7% (+4.70)#96 11.2% (+3.16)#5,974
97. Allen 14.3% 9.7% (+4.61)#97 11.2% (+3.07)#6,072
98. Chassell 14.2% 9.7% (+4.57)#98 11.2% (+3.03)#6,130
99. Au Gres 14.0% 9.7% (+4.36)#99 11.2% (+2.83)#6,346
100. Royal Oak 14.0% 9.7% (+4.35)#100 11.2% (+2.82)#6,370

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan are:
#1
57.0%
#2
37.5%
#3
30.2%
#4
30.0%
#5
29.6%
#6
28.9%
#7
28.8%
#8
28.3%
#9
27.5%
#10
27.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan?
Michiana has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan with 57.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Michigan is 9.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.