Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. North Escobares 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#1 11.2% (+88.8)#4
2. Moore 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#2 11.2% (+88.8)#9
3. Sunset Acres 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#3 11.2% (+88.8)#33
4. Santel 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#4 11.2% (+88.8)#45
5. Gutierrez 100.0% 10.5% (+89.5)#5 11.2% (+88.8)#46
6. Sheffield 86.4% 10.5% (+75.9)#6 11.2% (+75.1)#54
7. Box Canyon 84.2% 10.5% (+73.7)#7 11.2% (+73.0)#55
8. Barksdale 75.9% 10.5% (+65.4)#8 11.2% (+64.6)#72
9. Ramos 73.3% 10.5% (+62.8)#9 11.2% (+62.1)#81
10. Prado Verde 64.8% 10.5% (+54.3)#10 11.2% (+53.5)#103
11. Shelbyville 60.2% 10.5% (+49.7)#11 11.2% (+49.0)#114
12. La Paloma Ranchettes 60.0% 10.5% (+49.5)#12 11.2% (+48.8)#117
13. Airport Road Addition 58.5% 10.5% (+48.0)#13 11.2% (+47.3)#123
14. Garceno 57.1% 10.5% (+46.6)#14 11.2% (+45.9)#134
15. Rancho Viejo 56.4% 10.5% (+45.9)#15 11.2% (+45.1)#145
16. Evergreen 56.0% 10.5% (+45.4)#16 11.2% (+44.7)#147
17. Salineno North 52.4% 10.5% (+41.9)#17 11.2% (+41.2)#167
18. Ranchitos Del Norte 51.5% 10.5% (+41.0)#18 11.2% (+40.3)#174
19. Grandfalls 50.8% 10.5% (+40.3)#19 11.2% (+39.6)#182
20. Leona 49.0% 10.5% (+38.5)#20 11.2% (+37.8)#214
21. Chaparrito 47.8% 10.5% (+37.3)#21 11.2% (+36.6)#230
22. Lake View 47.0% 10.5% (+36.5)#22 11.2% (+35.8)#241
23. J F Villareal 45.7% 10.5% (+35.2)#23 11.2% (+34.5)#256
24. Valentine 44.4% 10.5% (+33.9)#24 11.2% (+33.2)#277
25. Richards 43.9% 10.5% (+33.4)#25 11.2% (+32.7)#291
26. Miguel Barrera 43.6% 10.5% (+33.1)#26 11.2% (+32.4)#297
27. San Juan 43.5% 10.5% (+33.0)#27 11.2% (+32.3)#299
28. Tow 42.9% 10.5% (+32.4)#28 11.2% (+31.6)#308
29. Los Ebanos Cdp Starr County 42.0% 10.5% (+31.5)#29 11.2% (+30.8)#327
30. Alamo Beach 39.1% 10.5% (+28.6)#30 11.2% (+27.9)#369
31. Loma Linda 38.8% 10.5% (+28.3)#31 11.2% (+27.6)#377
32. Lasana 38.0% 10.5% (+27.5)#32 11.2% (+26.8)#397
33. Dayton Lakes 37.5% 10.5% (+27.0)#33 11.2% (+26.3)#415
34. Douglassville 37.2% 10.5% (+26.7)#34 11.2% (+26.0)#424
35. Sandia 36.7% 10.5% (+26.1)#35 11.2% (+25.4)#446
36. Spring Branch 36.2% 10.5% (+25.7)#36 11.2% (+25.0)#456
37. Hideaway 36.0% 10.5% (+25.5)#37 11.2% (+24.8)#463
38. Nesbitt 34.6% 10.5% (+24.1)#38 11.2% (+23.4)#515
39. Gail 34.1% 10.5% (+23.6)#39 11.2% (+22.9)#538
40. Butterfield 32.4% 10.5% (+21.9)#40 11.2% (+21.2)#613
41. Loop 32.4% 10.5% (+21.8)#41 11.2% (+21.1)#618
42. Las Quintas Fronterizas 32.0% 10.5% (+21.5)#42 11.2% (+20.8)#635
43. Rochelle 32.0% 10.5% (+21.4)#43 11.2% (+20.7)#639
44. Sylvester 31.6% 10.5% (+21.1)#44 11.2% (+20.4)#657
45. Bluff Dale 31.2% 10.5% (+20.7)#45 11.2% (+20.0)#675
46. Sunset Valley 30.4% 10.5% (+19.9)#46 11.2% (+19.2)#729
47. West Lake Hills 30.0% 10.5% (+19.5)#47 11.2% (+18.8)#750
48. Star Harbor 29.8% 10.5% (+19.3)#48 11.2% (+18.6)#767
49. Kopperl 29.8% 10.5% (+19.3)#49 11.2% (+18.6)#769
50. Riverside 29.6% 10.5% (+19.1)#50 11.2% (+18.4)#789
51. Woodway 28.6% 10.5% (+18.1)#51 11.2% (+17.4)#851
52. South Frydek 28.6% 10.5% (+18.1)#52 11.2% (+17.4)#855
53. Marfa 28.5% 10.5% (+18.0)#53 11.2% (+17.3)#870
54. La Paloma Addition 28.4% 10.5% (+17.9)#54 11.2% (+17.2)#874
55. Boys Ranch 28.2% 10.5% (+17.7)#55 11.2% (+17.0)#891
56. Spring Valley Village 27.7% 10.5% (+17.2)#56 11.2% (+16.5)#936
57. Relampago 27.6% 10.5% (+17.1)#57 11.2% (+16.3)#945
58. San Isidro 27.5% 10.5% (+17.0)#58 11.2% (+16.3)#955
59. Poetry 27.5% 10.5% (+17.0)#59 11.2% (+16.2)#956
60. Union Grove 27.0% 10.5% (+16.5)#60 11.2% (+15.8)#999
61. Guthrie 27.0% 10.5% (+16.5)#61 11.2% (+15.8)#1,008
62. Fronton Ranchettes 26.7% 10.5% (+16.2)#62 11.2% (+15.5)#1,042
63. Westover Hills 26.6% 10.5% (+16.1)#63 11.2% (+15.4)#1,046
64. Holly Lake Ranch 26.4% 10.5% (+15.9)#64 11.2% (+15.2)#1,062
65. Center Point 26.3% 10.5% (+15.8)#65 11.2% (+15.1)#1,071
66. Benavides 26.3% 10.5% (+15.8)#66 11.2% (+15.1)#1,075
67. Wadsworth 26.1% 10.5% (+15.6)#67 11.2% (+14.9)#1,094
68. Lost Creek 25.9% 10.5% (+15.4)#68 11.2% (+14.7)#1,112
69. Beauxart Gardens 25.8% 10.5% (+15.3)#69 11.2% (+14.6)#1,119
70. Hallsville 25.1% 10.5% (+14.6)#70 11.2% (+13.9)#1,194
71. Ropesville 25.0% 10.5% (+14.5)#71 11.2% (+13.8)#1,215
72. Santo 24.9% 10.5% (+14.4)#72 11.2% (+13.7)#1,252
73. Bear Creek 24.7% 10.5% (+14.2)#73 11.2% (+13.5)#1,277
74. Jayton 24.5% 10.5% (+14.0)#74 11.2% (+13.3)#1,312
75. Pattison 24.4% 10.5% (+13.9)#75 11.2% (+13.2)#1,322
76. Ozona 24.2% 10.5% (+13.7)#76 11.2% (+13.0)#1,354
77. Benjamin Perez 24.1% 10.5% (+13.6)#77 11.2% (+12.9)#1,365
78. Tradewinds 24.1% 10.5% (+13.6)#78 11.2% (+12.9)#1,372
79. Tulia 24.0% 10.5% (+13.5)#79 11.2% (+12.8)#1,400
80. Salado 23.9% 10.5% (+13.4)#80 11.2% (+12.7)#1,415
81. Nolanville 23.8% 10.5% (+13.3)#81 11.2% (+12.6)#1,439
82. Falfurrias 23.7% 10.5% (+13.2)#82 11.2% (+12.5)#1,454
83. Imperial 23.5% 10.5% (+13.0)#83 11.2% (+12.3)#1,499
84. University Park 23.4% 10.5% (+12.9)#84 11.2% (+12.2)#1,507
85. New Home 23.4% 10.5% (+12.9)#85 11.2% (+12.2)#1,525
86. Mount Calm 23.3% 10.5% (+12.8)#86 11.2% (+12.1)#1,544
87. Cisco 23.1% 10.5% (+12.6)#87 11.2% (+11.9)#1,564
88. Tynan 23.1% 10.5% (+12.6)#88 11.2% (+11.9)#1,581
89. Southside Place 22.9% 10.5% (+12.4)#89 11.2% (+11.7)#1,618
90. Richland 22.8% 10.5% (+12.3)#90 11.2% (+11.6)#1,635
91. Anderson 22.8% 10.5% (+12.3)#91 11.2% (+11.6)#1,636
92. Tuleta 22.7% 10.5% (+12.2)#92 11.2% (+11.5)#1,663
93. Spade 22.6% 10.5% (+12.1)#93 11.2% (+11.4)#1,689
94. Hilshire Village 22.6% 10.5% (+12.1)#94 11.2% (+11.3)#1,694
95. Eustace 22.5% 10.5% (+12.0)#95 11.2% (+11.3)#1,708
96. Mound 22.5% 10.5% (+12.0)#96 11.2% (+11.3)#1,716
97. Falls City 22.4% 10.5% (+11.9)#97 11.2% (+11.2)#1,735
98. Olmos Park 22.4% 10.5% (+11.9)#98 11.2% (+11.2)#1,739
99. Rice Tracts 21.9% 10.5% (+11.4)#99 11.2% (+10.7)#1,849
100. May 21.7% 10.5% (+11.2)#100 11.2% (+10.5)#1,893

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
84.2%
#7
73.3%
#8
64.8%
#9
60.0%
#10
58.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas?
North Escobares has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Texas is 10.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.