Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois

1.5%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois

City Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oregon 0.13% 3.8% (-3.63)#1 4.5% (-4.33)#11
2. Washington 0.23% 3.8% (-3.53)#2 4.5% (-4.23)#41
3. Columbia 0.24% 3.8% (-3.52)#3 4.5% (-4.22)#45
4. Manteno 0.26% 3.8% (-3.50)#4 4.5% (-4.20)#52
5. Spring Grove 0.27% 3.8% (-3.49)#5 4.5% (-4.19)#56
6. Oswego 0.27% 3.8% (-3.49)#6 4.5% (-4.19)#57
7. Gurnee 0.30% 3.8% (-3.46)#7 4.5% (-4.16)#67
8. O Fallon 0.31% 3.8% (-3.45)#8 4.5% (-4.15)#74
9. Lake Holiday 0.33% 3.8% (-3.43)#9 4.5% (-4.13)#84
10. Morris 0.41% 3.8% (-3.35)#10 4.5% (-4.05)#153
11. Geneva 0.44% 3.8% (-3.32)#11 4.5% (-4.02)#181
12. Plainfield 0.44% 3.8% (-3.32)#12 4.5% (-4.02)#182
13. Yorkville 0.45% 3.8% (-3.32)#13 4.5% (-4.02)#187
14. Wayne 0.47% 3.8% (-3.29)#14 4.5% (-3.99)#215
15. Matteson 0.50% 3.8% (-3.26)#15 4.5% (-3.97)#239
16. Berkeley 0.50% 3.8% (-3.26)#16 4.5% (-3.96)#246
17. Greenfield 0.52% 3.8% (-3.24)#17 4.5% (-3.94)#264
18. Fairview Heights 0.54% 3.8% (-3.22)#18 4.5% (-3.92)#285
19. Hinsdale 0.54% 3.8% (-3.22)#19 4.5% (-3.92)#296
20. Griggsville 0.56% 3.8% (-3.21)#20 4.5% (-3.91)#315
21. Congerville 0.56% 3.8% (-3.20)#21 4.5% (-3.90)#322
22. Warren 0.57% 3.8% (-3.19)#22 4.5% (-3.89)#337
23. Highland Park 0.57% 3.8% (-3.19)#23 4.5% (-3.89)#348
24. Ashkum 0.59% 3.8% (-3.17)#24 4.5% (-3.87)#363
25. Winfield 0.62% 3.8% (-3.14)#25 4.5% (-3.84)#401
26. Crainville 0.65% 3.8% (-3.11)#26 4.5% (-3.81)#443
27. Golf 0.65% 3.8% (-3.11)#27 4.5% (-3.81)#445
28. Kenilworth 0.66% 3.8% (-3.10)#28 4.5% (-3.80)#460
29. Frankfort Square 0.67% 3.8% (-3.09)#29 4.5% (-3.79)#475
30. Mendota 0.67% 3.8% (-3.09)#30 4.5% (-3.79)#481
31. Farmersville 0.68% 3.8% (-3.09)#31 4.5% (-3.79)#488
32. Marquette Heights 0.68% 3.8% (-3.08)#32 4.5% (-3.78)#501
33. The Galena Territory 0.69% 3.8% (-3.08)#33 4.5% (-3.78)#504
34. Robinson 0.69% 3.8% (-3.07)#34 4.5% (-3.78)#505
35. Galatia 0.70% 3.8% (-3.06)#35 4.5% (-3.76)#527
36. Long Grove 0.71% 3.8% (-3.05)#36 4.5% (-3.75)#547
37. Burr Ridge 0.72% 3.8% (-3.04)#37 4.5% (-3.74)#571
38. Winchester 0.74% 3.8% (-3.02)#38 4.5% (-3.72)#605
39. Peotone 0.75% 3.8% (-3.01)#39 4.5% (-3.71)#621
40. Cary 0.75% 3.8% (-3.01)#40 4.5% (-3.71)#622
41. Deer Park 0.76% 3.8% (-3.00)#41 4.5% (-3.70)#640
42. Geneseo 0.76% 3.8% (-3.00)#42 4.5% (-3.70)#641
43. Grantfork 0.76% 3.8% (-3.00)#43 4.5% (-3.70)#655
44. Somonauk 0.77% 3.8% (-2.99)#44 4.5% (-3.69)#674
45. Newark 0.78% 3.8% (-2.99)#45 4.5% (-3.69)#686
46. Batavia 0.79% 3.8% (-2.98)#46 4.5% (-3.68)#713
47. Chadwick 0.79% 3.8% (-2.97)#47 4.5% (-3.67)#721
48. Hudson 0.79% 3.8% (-2.97)#48 4.5% (-3.67)#736
49. Spaulding 0.79% 3.8% (-2.97)#49 4.5% (-3.67)#741
50. Elwood 0.80% 3.8% (-2.97)#50 4.5% (-3.67)#744
51. West Dundee 0.80% 3.8% (-2.96)#51 4.5% (-3.66)#751
52. Hammond 0.80% 3.8% (-2.96)#52 4.5% (-3.66)#755
53. St Rose 0.80% 3.8% (-2.96)#53 4.5% (-3.66)#756
54. Leland 0.81% 3.8% (-2.95)#54 4.5% (-3.65)#780
55. Lisle 0.82% 3.8% (-2.94)#55 4.5% (-3.64)#794
56. Noble 0.83% 3.8% (-2.93)#56 4.5% (-3.64)#815
57. Palos Park 0.83% 3.8% (-2.93)#57 4.5% (-3.63)#825
58. Port Barrington 0.84% 3.8% (-2.93)#58 4.5% (-3.63)#838
59. Riverside 0.84% 3.8% (-2.92)#59 4.5% (-3.62)#852
60. Princeville 0.85% 3.8% (-2.91)#60 4.5% (-3.61)#862
61. Dunlap 0.86% 3.8% (-2.90)#61 4.5% (-3.60)#881
62. Divernon 0.87% 3.8% (-2.90)#62 4.5% (-3.60)#897
63. Glencoe 0.87% 3.8% (-2.89)#63 4.5% (-3.59)#902
64. Flossmoor 0.87% 3.8% (-2.89)#64 4.5% (-3.59)#904
65. Thomasboro 0.89% 3.8% (-2.87)#65 4.5% (-3.57)#931
66. Westchester 0.89% 3.8% (-2.87)#66 4.5% (-3.57)#932
67. Zeigler 0.89% 3.8% (-2.87)#67 4.5% (-3.57)#937
68. Western Springs 0.90% 3.8% (-2.86)#68 4.5% (-3.57)#946
69. Winthrop Harbor 0.90% 3.8% (-2.86)#69 4.5% (-3.56)#956
70. Maroa 0.91% 3.8% (-2.85)#70 4.5% (-3.56)#969
71. Volo 0.91% 3.8% (-2.85)#71 4.5% (-3.55)#974
72. Lake In The Hills 0.91% 3.8% (-2.85)#72 4.5% (-3.55)#981
73. Winnetka 0.91% 3.8% (-2.85)#73 4.5% (-3.55)#992
74. Dieterich 0.94% 3.8% (-2.82)#74 4.5% (-3.52)#1,052
75. Rochelle 0.94% 3.8% (-2.82)#75 4.5% (-3.52)#1,055
76. Chebanse 0.94% 3.8% (-2.82)#76 4.5% (-3.52)#1,065
77. Sidell 0.94% 3.8% (-2.82)#77 4.5% (-3.52)#1,067
78. Northbrook 0.95% 3.8% (-2.81)#78 4.5% (-3.51)#1,081
79. Greenup 0.95% 3.8% (-2.81)#79 4.5% (-3.51)#1,085
80. Lyndon 0.95% 3.8% (-2.81)#80 4.5% (-3.51)#1,089
81. Aviston 0.95% 3.8% (-2.81)#81 4.5% (-3.51)#1,095
82. Damiansville 0.96% 3.8% (-2.80)#82 4.5% (-3.50)#1,107
83. Teutopolis 0.97% 3.8% (-2.79)#83 4.5% (-3.49)#1,125
84. Maple Park 0.97% 3.8% (-2.79)#84 4.5% (-3.49)#1,133
85. Thayer 0.97% 3.8% (-2.79)#85 4.5% (-3.49)#1,138
86. Mount Pulaski 0.98% 3.8% (-2.78)#86 4.5% (-3.48)#1,167
87. Philo 0.98% 3.8% (-2.78)#87 4.5% (-3.48)#1,168
88. Algonquin 0.99% 3.8% (-2.77)#88 4.5% (-3.47)#1,178
89. Tilden 1.0% 3.8% (-2.76)#89 4.5% (-3.46)#1,207
90. New Lenox 1.0% 3.8% (-2.76)#90 4.5% (-3.46)#1,213
91. Mchenry 1.0% 3.8% (-2.75)#91 4.5% (-3.45)#1,225
92. Oak Forest 1.0% 3.8% (-2.74)#92 4.5% (-3.44)#1,269
93. Andover 1.0% 3.8% (-2.73)#93 4.5% (-3.43)#1,285
94. Herscher 1.0% 3.8% (-2.72)#94 4.5% (-3.42)#1,295
95. Villa Park 1.0% 3.8% (-2.72)#95 4.5% (-3.42)#1,296
96. Dunfermline 1.0% 3.8% (-2.72)#96 4.5% (-3.42)#1,308
97. Bannockburn 1.1% 3.8% (-2.70)#97 4.5% (-3.40)#1,341
98. Hecker 1.1% 3.8% (-2.70)#98 4.5% (-3.40)#1,356
99. Carrollton 1.1% 3.8% (-2.69)#99 4.5% (-3.40)#1,364
100. Beckemeyer 1.1% 3.8% (-2.69)#100 4.5% (-3.39)#1,378

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois are:
#1
0.13%
#2
0.23%
#3
0.24%
#4
0.26%
#5
0.27%
#6
0.27%
#7
0.30%
#8
0.31%
#9
0.33%
#10
0.41%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois?
Oregon has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois with 0.13%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the State of Illinois?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Illinois is 3.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.