Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Naplate 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#329
2. Campbell's Island 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#360
3. Buffalo 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#369
4. New Douglas 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#422
5. Bush 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#428
6. Kampsville 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#490
7. Willow Hill 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#493
8. Nason 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#505
9. Kane 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#534
10. Freeman Spur 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#555
11. Serena 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#567
12. Forest City 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#571
13. West Union 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#13 18.1% (+81.9)#582
14. Ophiem 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#14 18.1% (+81.9)#593
15. Alden 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#15 18.1% (+81.9)#623
16. Nilwood 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#16 18.1% (+81.9)#656
17. Old Shawneetown 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#17 18.1% (+81.9)#679
18. Ridott 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#19 18.1% (+81.9)#689
19. Nelson 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#20 18.1% (+81.9)#690
20. Lynnville 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#21 18.1% (+81.9)#699
21. Walnut Hill 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#22 18.1% (+81.9)#717
22. Harding 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#23 18.1% (+81.9)#733
23. Sailor Springs 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#24 18.1% (+81.9)#758
24. Hidalgo 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#25 18.1% (+81.9)#765
25. Golden Gate 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#26 18.1% (+81.9)#782
26. Yale 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#27 18.1% (+81.9)#805
27. Longview 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#28 18.1% (+81.9)#808
28. Garrett 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#29 18.1% (+81.9)#811
29. Eddyville 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#30 18.1% (+81.9)#835
30. New Bedford 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#31 18.1% (+81.9)#871
31. Valley City 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#32 18.1% (+81.9)#887
32. Henderson 94.7% 16.9% (+77.8)#33 18.1% (+76.7)#942
33. Oquawka 91.7% 16.9% (+74.7)#34 18.1% (+73.6)#993
34. Royalton 90.4% 16.9% (+73.5)#35 18.1% (+72.3)#1,019
35. Colp 88.1% 16.9% (+71.2)#36 18.1% (+70.0)#1,060
36. Belle Prairie City 87.5% 16.9% (+70.6)#37 18.1% (+69.4)#1,085
37. Buckley 87.0% 16.9% (+70.0)#38 18.1% (+68.9)#1,103
38. East Carondelet 86.7% 16.9% (+69.7)#39 18.1% (+68.6)#1,112
39. Camden 84.6% 16.9% (+67.7)#40 18.1% (+66.6)#1,169
40. Phoenix 84.3% 16.9% (+67.4)#41 18.1% (+66.3)#1,181
41. Sims 83.3% 16.9% (+66.4)#42 18.1% (+65.3)#1,228
42. Hettick 83.3% 16.9% (+66.4)#43 18.1% (+65.3)#1,231
43. Arrowsmith 82.4% 16.9% (+65.4)#44 18.1% (+64.3)#1,254
44. Iroquois 81.8% 16.9% (+64.9)#45 18.1% (+63.8)#1,271
45. Evansville 80.9% 16.9% (+63.9)#46 18.1% (+62.8)#1,298
46. Bureau Junction 80.8% 16.9% (+63.8)#47 18.1% (+62.7)#1,301
47. San Jose 80.6% 16.9% (+63.7)#48 18.1% (+62.6)#1,307
48. Washington Park 80.6% 16.9% (+63.7)#49 18.1% (+62.5)#1,308
49. Maquon 80.0% 16.9% (+63.1)#50 18.1% (+61.9)#1,350
50. Donnellson 80.0% 16.9% (+63.1)#51 18.1% (+61.9)#1,354
51. Cahokia Heights 79.2% 16.9% (+62.2)#52 18.1% (+61.1)#1,373
52. Kempton 77.8% 16.9% (+60.9)#53 18.1% (+59.7)#1,413
53. Winslow 77.4% 16.9% (+60.5)#54 18.1% (+59.4)#1,427
54. Gorham 75.5% 16.9% (+58.5)#55 18.1% (+57.4)#1,500
55. Cutler 75.0% 16.9% (+58.1)#56 18.1% (+56.9)#1,531
56. Indianola 75.0% 16.9% (+58.1)#57 18.1% (+56.9)#1,542
57. Ferris 75.0% 16.9% (+58.1)#58 18.1% (+56.9)#1,548
58. Venice 74.0% 16.9% (+57.1)#59 18.1% (+56.0)#1,582
59. Waggoner 71.4% 16.9% (+54.5)#60 18.1% (+53.4)#1,714
60. East Cape Girardeau 70.6% 16.9% (+53.7)#61 18.1% (+52.5)#1,751
61. Roberts 69.7% 16.9% (+52.8)#62 18.1% (+51.6)#1,799
62. Thomson 69.2% 16.9% (+52.3)#63 18.1% (+51.2)#1,828
63. Vienna 68.2% 16.9% (+51.3)#64 18.1% (+50.2)#1,885
64. Dalton City 68.0% 16.9% (+51.1)#65 18.1% (+49.9)#1,897
65. Ashley 67.9% 16.9% (+50.9)#66 18.1% (+49.8)#1,905
66. Willisville 67.7% 16.9% (+50.8)#67 18.1% (+49.7)#1,910
67. Lomax 67.7% 16.9% (+50.8)#68 18.1% (+49.7)#1,911
68. Ashmore 67.6% 16.9% (+50.7)#69 18.1% (+49.6)#1,917
69. Taylor Springs 67.6% 16.9% (+50.6)#70 18.1% (+49.5)#1,926
70. Junction City 67.3% 16.9% (+50.4)#71 18.1% (+49.3)#1,941
71. Hoopeston 66.8% 16.9% (+49.9)#72 18.1% (+48.8)#1,959
72. Oak Grove 66.7% 16.9% (+49.7)#73 18.1% (+48.6)#1,997
73. Murphysboro 66.5% 16.9% (+49.6)#74 18.1% (+48.5)#2,037
74. Anna 66.0% 16.9% (+49.0)#75 18.1% (+47.9)#2,054
75. Noble 65.6% 16.9% (+48.7)#76 18.1% (+47.6)#2,071
76. Dongola 65.4% 16.9% (+48.5)#77 18.1% (+47.3)#2,091
77. Karnak 64.7% 16.9% (+47.8)#78 18.1% (+46.6)#2,136
78. Anchor 64.7% 16.9% (+47.8)#79 18.1% (+46.6)#2,142
79. St Elmo 64.0% 16.9% (+47.1)#80 18.1% (+45.9)#2,183
80. Sammons Point 63.2% 16.9% (+46.2)#81 18.1% (+45.1)#2,247
81. Saunemin 62.5% 16.9% (+45.6)#82 18.1% (+44.4)#2,300
82. Wataga 62.3% 16.9% (+45.4)#83 18.1% (+44.2)#2,323
83. Riverton 62.1% 16.9% (+45.1)#84 18.1% (+44.0)#2,332
84. Nauvoo 61.8% 16.9% (+44.8)#85 18.1% (+43.7)#2,357
85. Chesterfield 61.5% 16.9% (+44.6)#86 18.1% (+43.5)#2,388
86. Keyesport 61.1% 16.9% (+44.2)#87 18.1% (+43.0)#2,419
87. Pinckneyville 61.0% 16.9% (+44.1)#88 18.1% (+43.0)#2,424
88. Hillsdale 60.9% 16.9% (+43.9)#89 18.1% (+42.8)#2,442
89. Staunton 60.8% 16.9% (+43.9)#90 18.1% (+42.8)#2,445
90. Mount Erie 60.7% 16.9% (+43.8)#91 18.1% (+42.7)#2,455
91. Golconda 60.6% 16.9% (+43.7)#92 18.1% (+42.5)#2,463
92. Du Quoin 60.6% 16.9% (+43.7)#93 18.1% (+42.5)#2,465
93. Winchester 60.0% 16.9% (+43.1)#94 18.1% (+41.9)#2,494
94. Elliott 60.0% 16.9% (+43.1)#95 18.1% (+41.9)#2,527
95. Bellmont 60.0% 16.9% (+43.1)#96 18.1% (+41.9)#2,531
96. Media 60.0% 16.9% (+43.1)#97 18.1% (+41.9)#2,545
97. Markham 59.8% 16.9% (+42.9)#98 18.1% (+41.8)#2,556
98. Milton 59.1% 16.9% (+42.2)#99 18.1% (+41.0)#2,601
99. Mason 58.5% 16.9% (+41.6)#100 18.1% (+40.5)#2,649
100. Fithian 58.3% 16.9% (+41.4)#101 18.1% (+40.3)#2,667

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois?
Naplate has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of Illinois?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Illinois is 16.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.