Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Lakewood 100.0% 9.3% (+90.7)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#36
2. Bentley 62.5% 9.3% (+53.2)#2 8.4% (+54.1)#94
3. Paloma 55.3% 9.3% (+46.0)#3 8.4% (+46.8)#133
4. Otterville 52.5% 9.3% (+43.2)#4 8.4% (+44.1)#151
5. Lynnville 50.0% 9.3% (+40.7)#5 8.4% (+41.6)#170
6. Elsah 49.8% 9.3% (+40.5)#6 8.4% (+41.3)#186
7. Bloomfield 45.9% 9.3% (+36.7)#7 8.4% (+37.5)#215
8. La Prairie 37.5% 9.3% (+28.2)#8 8.4% (+29.1)#347
9. Chestnut 33.8% 9.3% (+24.5)#9 8.4% (+25.3)#435
10. Ford Heights 33.2% 9.3% (+23.9)#10 8.4% (+24.8)#463
11. Elizabethtown 32.6% 9.3% (+23.3)#11 8.4% (+24.2)#473
12. Laplace 30.9% 9.3% (+21.6)#12 8.4% (+22.4)#541
13. Ridott 30.5% 9.3% (+21.2)#13 8.4% (+22.1)#563
14. Rockport 30.2% 9.3% (+20.9)#14 8.4% (+21.7)#574
15. Panola 30.0% 9.3% (+20.7)#15 8.4% (+21.6)#589
16. Coleta 29.1% 9.3% (+19.8)#16 8.4% (+20.6)#628
17. Willow Lake 29.0% 9.3% (+19.7)#17 8.4% (+20.6)#630
18. Trivoli 27.5% 9.3% (+18.2)#18 8.4% (+19.1)#713
19. Manchester 26.1% 9.3% (+16.8)#19 8.4% (+17.6)#810
20. Coyne Center 25.6% 9.3% (+16.4)#20 8.4% (+17.2)#840
21. Elwin 25.0% 9.3% (+15.7)#21 8.4% (+16.6)#898
22. Prairietown 24.6% 9.3% (+15.3)#22 8.4% (+16.1)#935
23. Bannockburn 24.5% 9.3% (+15.2)#23 8.4% (+16.1)#940
24. Evanston 23.4% 9.3% (+14.2)#24 8.4% (+15.0)#1,061
25. Hoyleton 23.1% 9.3% (+13.9)#25 8.4% (+14.7)#1,086
26. Flossmoor 22.4% 9.3% (+13.1)#26 8.4% (+13.9)#1,175
27. White Heath 21.7% 9.3% (+12.5)#27 8.4% (+13.3)#1,265
28. Iola 21.4% 9.3% (+12.1)#28 8.4% (+13.0)#1,305
29. Royalton 21.4% 9.3% (+12.1)#29 8.4% (+13.0)#1,313
30. Alsey 21.3% 9.3% (+12.0)#30 8.4% (+12.9)#1,326
31. Bluford 20.9% 9.3% (+11.6)#31 8.4% (+12.5)#1,398
32. Chrisman 20.5% 9.3% (+11.2)#32 8.4% (+12.1)#1,462
33. Mapleton 20.1% 9.3% (+10.9)#33 8.4% (+11.7)#1,512
34. Nachusa 20.0% 9.3% (+10.7)#34 8.4% (+11.6)#1,559
35. Cable 20.0% 9.3% (+10.7)#35 8.4% (+11.6)#1,561
36. Little York 19.8% 9.3% (+10.5)#36 8.4% (+11.3)#1,601
37. Camargo 19.8% 9.3% (+10.5)#37 8.4% (+11.3)#1,606
38. Hopedale 19.3% 9.3% (+10.0)#38 8.4% (+10.9)#1,686
39. Claremont 19.2% 9.3% (+9.90)#39 8.4% (+10.7)#1,711
40. Buckley 19.1% 9.3% (+9.79)#40 8.4% (+10.6)#1,742
41. Hidalgo 18.9% 9.3% (+9.64)#41 8.4% (+10.5)#1,780
42. Danforth 18.9% 9.3% (+9.61)#42 8.4% (+10.4)#1,786
43. La Rose 18.9% 9.3% (+9.59)#43 8.4% (+10.4)#1,796
44. Pinckneyville 18.9% 9.3% (+9.58)#44 8.4% (+10.4)#1,797
45. Mill Shoals 18.8% 9.3% (+9.47)#45 8.4% (+10.3)#1,817
46. Ritchie 18.8% 9.3% (+9.47)#46 8.4% (+10.3)#1,818
47. Monmouth 18.5% 9.3% (+9.26)#47 8.4% (+10.1)#1,874
48. Broadwell 18.4% 9.3% (+9.09)#48 8.4% (+9.92)#1,916
49. Ashley 18.3% 9.3% (+9.03)#49 8.4% (+9.87)#1,940
50. Eureka 18.3% 9.3% (+8.98)#50 8.4% (+9.82)#1,957
51. Goreville 18.1% 9.3% (+8.82)#51 8.4% (+9.66)#2,016
52. Carrier Mills 18.1% 9.3% (+8.77)#52 8.4% (+9.61)#2,027
53. Oak Park 17.6% 9.3% (+8.32)#53 8.4% (+9.15)#2,155
54. Ferris 17.5% 9.3% (+8.18)#54 8.4% (+9.02)#2,208
55. Blue Mound 17.4% 9.3% (+8.12)#55 8.4% (+8.96)#2,225
56. Henderson 17.4% 9.3% (+8.11)#56 8.4% (+8.95)#2,234
57. Roberts 17.2% 9.3% (+7.89)#57 8.4% (+8.73)#2,300
58. Sibley 17.1% 9.3% (+7.79)#58 8.4% (+8.63)#2,336
59. Allendale 17.1% 9.3% (+7.77)#59 8.4% (+8.61)#2,347
60. Baileyville 16.9% 9.3% (+7.64)#60 8.4% (+8.48)#2,395
61. Nauvoo 16.8% 9.3% (+7.56)#61 8.4% (+8.40)#2,421
62. Brimfield 16.6% 9.3% (+7.33)#62 8.4% (+8.17)#2,515
63. London Mills 16.5% 9.3% (+7.26)#63 8.4% (+8.10)#2,538
64. Auburn 16.5% 9.3% (+7.19)#64 8.4% (+8.02)#2,569
65. Calumet Park 16.4% 9.3% (+7.10)#65 8.4% (+7.94)#2,602
66. Glenwood 16.4% 9.3% (+7.09)#66 8.4% (+7.93)#2,606
67. Morton 16.4% 9.3% (+7.08)#67 8.4% (+7.92)#2,609
68. Forsyth 16.3% 9.3% (+7.00)#68 8.4% (+7.83)#2,646
69. Cantrall 16.3% 9.3% (+7.00)#69 8.4% (+7.83)#2,650
70. Leonore 16.2% 9.3% (+6.89)#70 8.4% (+7.73)#2,704
71. Westlake 16.1% 9.3% (+6.80)#71 8.4% (+7.64)#2,739
72. Elizabeth 16.0% 9.3% (+6.74)#72 8.4% (+7.57)#2,773
73. Gilson 15.9% 9.3% (+6.66)#73 8.4% (+7.50)#2,818
74. St David 15.9% 9.3% (+6.62)#74 8.4% (+7.46)#2,839
75. Hanna City 15.8% 9.3% (+6.49)#75 8.4% (+7.32)#2,903
76. Chillicothe 15.7% 9.3% (+6.40)#76 8.4% (+7.24)#2,940
77. Dowell 15.6% 9.3% (+6.29)#77 8.4% (+7.13)#2,998
78. Princeville 15.6% 9.3% (+6.28)#78 8.4% (+7.12)#3,004
79. Glencoe 15.5% 9.3% (+6.26)#79 8.4% (+7.10)#3,022
80. Leland Grove 15.5% 9.3% (+6.17)#80 8.4% (+7.01)#3,064
81. Peoria 15.4% 9.3% (+6.16)#81 8.4% (+7.00)#3,069
82. Louisville 15.4% 9.3% (+6.15)#82 8.4% (+6.99)#3,076
83. Kinderhook 15.3% 9.3% (+6.04)#83 8.4% (+6.88)#3,137
84. Abingdon 15.3% 9.3% (+6.01)#84 8.4% (+6.85)#3,153
85. Carterville 15.2% 9.3% (+5.93)#85 8.4% (+6.77)#3,198
86. Charleston 15.2% 9.3% (+5.93)#86 8.4% (+6.77)#3,199
87. Bonfield 15.2% 9.3% (+5.92)#87 8.4% (+6.76)#3,202
88. Quincy 15.1% 9.3% (+5.87)#88 8.4% (+6.71)#3,239
89. Carrollton 15.1% 9.3% (+5.84)#89 8.4% (+6.68)#3,252
90. Olympia Fields 15.1% 9.3% (+5.83)#90 8.4% (+6.67)#3,256
91. East Galesburg 15.1% 9.3% (+5.77)#91 8.4% (+6.61)#3,294
92. Spring Bay 15.0% 9.3% (+5.77)#92 8.4% (+6.60)#3,296
93. Damiansville 15.0% 9.3% (+5.76)#93 8.4% (+6.60)#3,298
94. Alexander 15.0% 9.3% (+5.75)#94 8.4% (+6.59)#3,308
95. Mackinaw 15.0% 9.3% (+5.75)#95 8.4% (+6.59)#3,311
96. Palos Park 15.0% 9.3% (+5.72)#96 8.4% (+6.56)#3,325
97. Vermont 14.9% 9.3% (+5.65)#97 8.4% (+6.49)#3,372
98. Moro 14.9% 9.3% (+5.64)#98 8.4% (+6.47)#3,382
99. Bourbonnais 14.9% 9.3% (+5.58)#99 8.4% (+6.42)#3,414
100. Evergreen Park 14.7% 9.3% (+5.47)#100 8.4% (+6.30)#3,489

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois are:
#1
100.0%
#2
62.5%
#3
52.5%
#4
50.0%
#5
49.8%
#6
37.5%
#7
33.8%
#8
33.2%
#9
32.6%
#10
30.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois?
Lakewood has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of Illinois?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Illinois is 9.3%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.