Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Time 100.0% 9.4% (+90.6)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#202
2. Riggston 71.4% 9.4% (+62.0)#2 10.0% (+61.5)#349
3. Muddy 70.0% 9.4% (+60.6)#3 10.0% (+60.0)#364
4. Chestnut 65.2% 9.4% (+55.8)#4 10.0% (+55.3)#439
5. Rose Hill 57.1% 9.4% (+47.7)#5 10.0% (+47.2)#558
6. Royal Lakes 51.9% 9.4% (+42.5)#6 10.0% (+41.9)#697
7. Illinois 51.4% 9.4% (+42.0)#7 10.0% (+41.4)#715
8. Norris 50.0% 9.4% (+40.6)#8 10.0% (+40.0)#754
9. Waggoner 50.0% 9.4% (+40.6)#9 10.0% (+40.0)#767
10. Wilton Center 50.0% 9.4% (+40.6)#10 10.0% (+40.0)#769
11. Green Valley 48.6% 9.4% (+39.2)#11 10.0% (+38.7)#838
12. Walnut Hill 47.2% 9.4% (+37.8)#12 10.0% (+37.3)#889
13. Ellsworth 45.9% 9.4% (+36.5)#13 10.0% (+36.0)#940
14. Maeystown 45.5% 9.4% (+36.1)#14 10.0% (+35.5)#963
15. Junction 45.5% 9.4% (+36.1)#15 10.0% (+35.5)#964
16. Lowpoint 44.8% 9.4% (+35.4)#16 10.0% (+34.9)#983
17. Bryant 44.0% 9.4% (+34.6)#17 10.0% (+34.0)#1,021
18. Bulpitt 42.3% 9.4% (+32.9)#18 10.0% (+32.4)#1,104
19. Crab Orchard 42.1% 9.4% (+32.7)#19 10.0% (+32.2)#1,117
20. Detroit 40.0% 9.4% (+30.6)#20 10.0% (+30.0)#1,260
21. Macedonia 40.0% 9.4% (+30.6)#21 10.0% (+30.0)#1,262
22. Butler 39.5% 9.4% (+30.1)#22 10.0% (+29.5)#1,280
23. Leonore 39.4% 9.4% (+30.0)#23 10.0% (+29.4)#1,289
24. Camden 39.4% 9.4% (+30.0)#24 10.0% (+29.4)#1,291
25. Mulberry Grove 37.6% 9.4% (+28.2)#25 10.0% (+27.6)#1,401
26. Wheeler 36.4% 9.4% (+27.0)#26 10.0% (+26.4)#1,518
27. Coleta 35.5% 9.4% (+26.1)#27 10.0% (+25.5)#1,600
28. Beecher City 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#28 10.0% (+23.4)#1,766
29. East Brooklyn 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#29 10.0% (+23.4)#1,821
30. Simpson 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#30 10.0% (+23.4)#1,822
31. Florence 33.3% 9.4% (+23.9)#31 10.0% (+23.4)#1,837
32. Alsey 32.3% 9.4% (+22.9)#32 10.0% (+22.3)#1,911
33. Clear Lake 31.7% 9.4% (+22.3)#33 10.0% (+21.8)#1,983
34. Custer Park 31.6% 9.4% (+22.2)#34 10.0% (+21.6)#1,998
35. Niota 30.8% 9.4% (+21.4)#35 10.0% (+20.8)#2,106
36. Cutler 30.6% 9.4% (+21.2)#36 10.0% (+20.7)#2,123
37. Williamsville 30.1% 9.4% (+20.7)#37 10.0% (+20.1)#2,185
38. Aroma Park 30.1% 9.4% (+20.7)#38 10.0% (+20.1)#2,191
39. Bone Gap 30.0% 9.4% (+20.6)#39 10.0% (+20.0)#2,199
40. Williamson 29.8% 9.4% (+20.4)#40 10.0% (+19.8)#2,238
41. Ferris 28.6% 9.4% (+19.2)#41 10.0% (+18.6)#2,445
42. Dix 28.1% 9.4% (+18.7)#42 10.0% (+18.2)#2,522
43. Martinton 28.1% 9.4% (+18.7)#43 10.0% (+18.1)#2,533
44. Holcomb 27.9% 9.4% (+18.5)#44 10.0% (+18.0)#2,561
45. Fairmont City 27.9% 9.4% (+18.5)#45 10.0% (+17.9)#2,562
46. Ford Heights 27.8% 9.4% (+18.4)#46 10.0% (+17.8)#2,574
47. Kinmundy 27.7% 9.4% (+18.3)#47 10.0% (+17.8)#2,600
48. Grand Detour 27.5% 9.4% (+18.1)#48 10.0% (+17.5)#2,644
49. Foosland 27.3% 9.4% (+17.9)#49 10.0% (+17.3)#2,694
50. Beaverville 27.2% 9.4% (+17.8)#50 10.0% (+17.2)#2,704
51. Bardolph 26.8% 9.4% (+17.4)#51 10.0% (+16.8)#2,767
52. Oakwood 25.9% 9.4% (+16.5)#52 10.0% (+16.0)#2,919
53. Verona 25.9% 9.4% (+16.5)#53 10.0% (+16.0)#2,926
54. Hillcrest 25.9% 9.4% (+16.5)#54 10.0% (+16.0)#2,930
55. Wellington 25.9% 9.4% (+16.5)#55 10.0% (+15.9)#2,949
56. Owaneco 25.3% 9.4% (+15.9)#56 10.0% (+15.3)#3,108
57. Neponset 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#57 10.0% (+15.0)#3,160
58. Belknap 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#58 10.0% (+15.0)#3,191
59. Mill Creek 25.0% 9.4% (+15.6)#59 10.0% (+15.0)#3,225
60. Edinburg 24.5% 9.4% (+15.1)#60 10.0% (+14.5)#3,308
61. Mounds 24.4% 9.4% (+15.0)#61 10.0% (+14.4)#3,337
62. Orient 24.4% 9.4% (+15.0)#62 10.0% (+14.4)#3,349
63. Heyworth 24.3% 9.4% (+14.9)#63 10.0% (+14.4)#3,355
64. Hopkins Park 24.3% 9.4% (+14.9)#64 10.0% (+14.4)#3,363
65. Cairo 24.0% 9.4% (+14.6)#65 10.0% (+14.0)#3,457
66. East Carondelet 23.9% 9.4% (+14.5)#66 10.0% (+14.0)#3,470
67. Wenona 23.8% 9.4% (+14.4)#67 10.0% (+13.8)#3,500
68. Millersburg 23.7% 9.4% (+14.3)#68 10.0% (+13.7)#3,528
69. Griggsville 23.7% 9.4% (+14.3)#69 10.0% (+13.7)#3,530
70. Creal Springs 23.6% 9.4% (+14.2)#70 10.0% (+13.7)#3,542
71. Hampshire 23.6% 9.4% (+14.2)#71 10.0% (+13.6)#3,552
72. Ste Marie 23.5% 9.4% (+14.1)#72 10.0% (+13.6)#3,571
73. Carmi 23.4% 9.4% (+14.0)#73 10.0% (+13.5)#3,600
74. Donnellson 23.3% 9.4% (+13.9)#74 10.0% (+13.4)#3,625
75. Rockdale 23.3% 9.4% (+13.9)#75 10.0% (+13.4)#3,630
76. St Peter 23.2% 9.4% (+13.8)#76 10.0% (+13.3)#3,664
77. Keithsburg 23.1% 9.4% (+13.7)#77 10.0% (+13.2)#3,683
78. Longview 23.1% 9.4% (+13.7)#78 10.0% (+13.1)#3,713
79. Fulton 23.0% 9.4% (+13.6)#79 10.0% (+13.1)#3,723
80. Mound City 23.0% 9.4% (+13.6)#80 10.0% (+13.1)#3,728
81. Cowden 22.9% 9.4% (+13.5)#81 10.0% (+12.9)#3,768
82. Redmon 22.9% 9.4% (+13.5)#82 10.0% (+12.9)#3,775
83. Carlinville 22.8% 9.4% (+13.4)#83 10.0% (+12.9)#3,783
84. Arcola 22.8% 9.4% (+13.4)#84 10.0% (+12.8)#3,798
85. Ohio 22.5% 9.4% (+13.1)#85 10.0% (+12.6)#3,861
86. New Canton 22.5% 9.4% (+13.1)#86 10.0% (+12.5)#3,874
87. Christopher 22.5% 9.4% (+13.1)#87 10.0% (+12.5)#3,880
88. Chicago Heights 22.4% 9.4% (+13.0)#88 10.0% (+12.4)#3,903
89. Olympia Fields 22.3% 9.4% (+12.9)#89 10.0% (+12.3)#3,922
90. Golden 22.2% 9.4% (+12.8)#90 10.0% (+12.3)#3,928
91. Watson 22.2% 9.4% (+12.8)#91 10.0% (+12.3)#3,933
92. Sailor Springs 22.2% 9.4% (+12.8)#92 10.0% (+12.3)#3,955
93. Evansville 22.1% 9.4% (+12.7)#93 10.0% (+12.1)#3,997
94. Tamms 22.0% 9.4% (+12.6)#94 10.0% (+12.1)#4,004
95. Versailles 22.0% 9.4% (+12.6)#95 10.0% (+12.1)#4,010
96. Sauget 22.0% 9.4% (+12.6)#96 10.0% (+12.0)#4,024
97. Ina 22.0% 9.4% (+12.6)#97 10.0% (+12.0)#4,029
98. Venice 21.9% 9.4% (+12.5)#98 10.0% (+12.0)#4,048
99. Clay City 21.8% 9.4% (+12.4)#99 10.0% (+11.9)#4,069
100. Kankakee 21.6% 9.4% (+12.2)#100 10.0% (+11.7)#4,117

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois are:
#1
100.0%
#2
70.0%
#3
65.2%
#4
57.1%
#5
51.9%
#6
50.0%
#7
50.0%
#8
48.6%
#9
47.2%
#10
45.9%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois?
Time has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Illinois?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Illinois is 9.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.