Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Scott Afb 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#18
2. Rock Island Arsenal 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#75
3. Alden 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#92
4. Harding 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#113
5. Triumph 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#126
6. Andres 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#167
7. Westervelt 100.0% 33.3% (+66.7)#7 35.2% (+64.8)#176
8. Lane 90.7% 33.3% (+57.4)#8 35.2% (+55.5)#319
9. Janesville 83.3% 33.3% (+50.0)#9 35.2% (+48.1)#392
10. Serena 78.3% 33.3% (+44.9)#10 35.2% (+43.1)#480
11. Rosemont 77.9% 33.3% (+44.5)#11 35.2% (+42.7)#489
12. Carbondale 74.3% 33.3% (+41.0)#12 35.2% (+39.2)#566
13. Oakbrook Terrace 72.4% 33.3% (+39.1)#13 35.2% (+37.2)#619
14. North Chicago 68.3% 33.3% (+35.0)#14 35.2% (+33.1)#789
15. Urbana 67.2% 33.3% (+33.8)#15 35.2% (+32.0)#838
16. Custer Park 65.2% 33.3% (+31.9)#16 35.2% (+30.0)#936
17. Muddy 62.5% 33.3% (+29.2)#17 35.2% (+27.3)#1,153
18. Golden Gate 62.1% 33.3% (+28.7)#18 35.2% (+26.9)#1,182
19. Ford Heights 62.0% 33.3% (+28.7)#19 35.2% (+26.9)#1,183
20. Old Mill Creek 61.8% 33.3% (+28.5)#20 35.2% (+26.6)#1,200
21. Cambria 58.2% 33.3% (+24.9)#21 35.2% (+23.0)#1,564
22. Dekalb 57.9% 33.3% (+24.6)#22 35.2% (+22.7)#1,600
23. Cave In Rock 56.7% 33.3% (+23.4)#23 35.2% (+21.5)#1,763
24. De Soto 56.2% 33.3% (+22.8)#24 35.2% (+21.0)#1,848
25. Cahokia Heights 55.6% 33.3% (+22.3)#25 35.2% (+20.4)#1,923
26. Mound City 55.6% 33.3% (+22.3)#26 35.2% (+20.4)#1,925
27. Champaign 54.6% 33.3% (+21.3)#27 35.2% (+19.4)#2,088
28. Macomb 54.6% 33.3% (+21.3)#28 35.2% (+19.4)#2,092
29. Chicago 54.4% 33.3% (+21.1)#29 35.2% (+19.2)#2,123
30. Sun River Terrace 53.8% 33.3% (+20.5)#30 35.2% (+18.7)#2,208
31. Rockdale 53.3% 33.3% (+20.0)#31 35.2% (+18.1)#2,317
32. Cameron 53.2% 33.3% (+19.9)#32 35.2% (+18.1)#2,330
33. Adair 53.0% 33.3% (+19.7)#33 35.2% (+17.8)#2,376
34. Calumet Park 53.0% 33.3% (+19.7)#34 35.2% (+17.8)#2,385
35. Venice 52.9% 33.3% (+19.6)#35 35.2% (+17.7)#2,405
36. Charleston 52.6% 33.3% (+19.3)#36 35.2% (+17.5)#2,446
37. Murphysboro 52.3% 33.3% (+19.0)#37 35.2% (+17.1)#2,527
38. Blue Island 51.3% 33.3% (+18.0)#38 35.2% (+16.2)#2,742
39. Waukegan 51.1% 33.3% (+17.8)#39 35.2% (+15.9)#2,807
40. Kankakee 51.1% 33.3% (+17.8)#40 35.2% (+15.9)#2,818
41. Riverdale 50.8% 33.3% (+17.4)#41 35.2% (+15.6)#2,904
42. Rochelle 50.6% 33.3% (+17.2)#42 35.2% (+15.4)#2,952
43. Harvey 50.3% 33.3% (+17.0)#43 35.2% (+15.2)#3,005
44. Scottville 50.0% 33.3% (+16.7)#44 35.2% (+14.8)#3,118
45. Eddyville 50.0% 33.3% (+16.7)#45 35.2% (+14.8)#3,122
46. Highwood 49.7% 33.3% (+16.4)#46 35.2% (+14.5)#3,195
47. Richton Park 49.5% 33.3% (+16.2)#47 35.2% (+14.3)#3,254
48. Elizabethtown 48.0% 33.3% (+14.7)#48 35.2% (+12.9)#3,666
49. Mount Sterling 47.9% 33.3% (+14.6)#49 35.2% (+12.7)#3,710
50. Rantoul 47.8% 33.3% (+14.5)#50 35.2% (+12.6)#3,747
51. Westmont 47.7% 33.3% (+14.4)#51 35.2% (+12.5)#3,777
52. Madison 47.7% 33.3% (+14.3)#52 35.2% (+12.5)#3,789
53. Hurst 47.7% 33.3% (+14.3)#53 35.2% (+12.5)#3,790
54. East St Louis 47.6% 33.3% (+14.3)#54 35.2% (+12.5)#3,800
55. Greenville 47.5% 33.3% (+14.2)#55 35.2% (+12.3)#3,843
56. Dix 47.3% 33.3% (+14.0)#56 35.2% (+12.1)#3,909
57. Waggoner 47.3% 33.3% (+14.0)#57 35.2% (+12.1)#3,913
58. Justice 47.2% 33.3% (+13.9)#58 35.2% (+12.0)#3,944
59. Sauget 47.1% 33.3% (+13.7)#59 35.2% (+11.9)#4,003
60. Bensenville 46.9% 33.3% (+13.6)#60 35.2% (+11.8)#4,040
61. Golconda 46.8% 33.3% (+13.4)#61 35.2% (+11.6)#4,095
62. Richmond 46.7% 33.3% (+13.4)#62 35.2% (+11.5)#4,112
63. Edgington 45.9% 33.3% (+12.6)#63 35.2% (+10.8)#4,365
64. Rockford 45.9% 33.3% (+12.6)#64 35.2% (+10.7)#4,382
65. Mount Vernon 45.9% 33.3% (+12.5)#65 35.2% (+10.7)#4,387
66. Stone Park 45.8% 33.3% (+12.4)#66 35.2% (+10.6)#4,415
67. Park City 45.7% 33.3% (+12.4)#67 35.2% (+10.6)#4,428
68. Ridgewood 45.7% 33.3% (+12.3)#68 35.2% (+10.5)#4,455
69. Carbon Cliff 45.5% 33.3% (+12.2)#69 35.2% (+10.3)#4,494
70. Joppa 45.5% 33.3% (+12.1)#70 35.2% (+10.3)#4,515
71. Cicero 45.4% 33.3% (+12.1)#71 35.2% (+10.2)#4,545
72. West Dundee 45.0% 33.3% (+11.7)#72 35.2% (+9.82)#4,682
73. Mattoon 45.0% 33.3% (+11.7)#73 35.2% (+9.82)#4,683
74. Melrose Park 44.9% 33.3% (+11.6)#74 35.2% (+9.74)#4,711
75. Forest Park 44.8% 33.3% (+11.5)#75 35.2% (+9.63)#4,757
76. Savanna 44.7% 33.3% (+11.4)#76 35.2% (+9.55)#4,784
77. Royal Lakes 44.6% 33.3% (+11.2)#77 35.2% (+9.37)#4,852
78. Normal 44.2% 33.3% (+10.9)#78 35.2% (+9.02)#4,988
79. Zion 44.1% 33.3% (+10.8)#79 35.2% (+8.90)#5,020
80. Evanston 44.1% 33.3% (+10.8)#80 35.2% (+8.89)#5,022
81. Marley 44.0% 33.3% (+10.7)#81 35.2% (+8.82)#5,055
82. Danville 44.0% 33.3% (+10.7)#82 35.2% (+8.80)#5,058
83. Topeka 43.8% 33.3% (+10.4)#83 35.2% (+8.57)#5,156
84. Peoria 43.7% 33.3% (+10.4)#84 35.2% (+8.54)#5,166
85. Sauk Village 43.7% 33.3% (+10.4)#85 35.2% (+8.52)#5,173
86. Preston Heights 43.7% 33.3% (+10.4)#86 35.2% (+8.52)#5,176
87. Brooklyn 43.6% 33.3% (+10.3)#87 35.2% (+8.44)#5,214
88. Silvis 43.3% 33.3% (+9.98)#88 35.2% (+8.12)#5,338
89. Lisle 43.3% 33.3% (+9.96)#89 35.2% (+8.10)#5,346
90. Freeport 43.1% 33.3% (+9.79)#90 35.2% (+7.93)#5,409
91. Winslow 42.9% 33.3% (+9.53)#91 35.2% (+7.67)#5,515
92. Schiller Park 42.8% 33.3% (+9.52)#92 35.2% (+7.66)#5,539
93. Alton 42.7% 33.3% (+9.33)#93 35.2% (+7.47)#5,611
94. Savoy 42.6% 33.3% (+9.27)#94 35.2% (+7.41)#5,632
95. Shawneetown 42.6% 33.3% (+9.25)#95 35.2% (+7.39)#5,648
96. Summit 42.4% 33.3% (+9.12)#96 35.2% (+7.26)#5,695
97. Harvard 42.4% 33.3% (+9.11)#97 35.2% (+7.25)#5,701
98. Liverpool 42.3% 33.3% (+8.98)#98 35.2% (+7.12)#5,755
99. Morris 42.1% 33.3% (+8.79)#99 35.2% (+6.94)#5,836
100. Chicago Ridge 42.1% 33.3% (+8.76)#100 35.2% (+6.90)#5,858

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
77.9%
#5
74.3%
#6
72.4%
#7
68.3%
#8
67.2%
#9
62.5%
#10
62.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois?
Scott AFB has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Illinois?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois is 33.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.