Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois

City Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1. Holiday Shores 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#1 62.5% (+37.5)#33
2. Venetian Village 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#2 62.5% (+37.5)#46
3. Marquette Heights 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#3 62.5% (+37.5)#47
4. Fox Lake Hills 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#4 62.5% (+37.5)#60
5. Hudson 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#5 62.5% (+37.5)#68
6. Heritage Lake 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#6 62.5% (+37.5)#111
7. Lake Camelot 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#7 62.5% (+37.5)#116
8. Timberlane 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#8 62.5% (+37.5)#130
9. Forest Lake 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#9 62.5% (+37.5)#147
10. Tower Lakes 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#10 62.5% (+37.5)#158
11. Big Rock 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#11 62.5% (+37.5)#171
12. Willow Lake 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#12 62.5% (+37.5)#279
13. Lake Petersburg 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#13 62.5% (+37.5)#320
14. Owaneco 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#14 62.5% (+37.5)#323
15. Lost Nation 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#15 62.5% (+37.5)#331
16. Oak Run 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#16 62.5% (+37.5)#358
17. Elsah 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#17 62.5% (+37.5)#384
18. Mettawa 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#18 62.5% (+37.5)#399
19. Argyle 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#19 62.5% (+37.5)#425
20. Williamsfield 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#20 62.5% (+37.5)#440
21. Lakewood Shores 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#21 62.5% (+37.5)#446
22. Custer Park 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#22 62.5% (+37.5)#553
23. Trivoli 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#23 62.5% (+37.5)#565
24. Campbell's Island 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#24 62.5% (+37.5)#588
25. Plum Valley 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#25 62.5% (+37.5)#601
26. East Lynn 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#26 62.5% (+37.5)#609
27. Chemung 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#27 62.5% (+37.5)#623
28. Ridgefield 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#28 62.5% (+37.5)#631
29. Sparland 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#29 62.5% (+37.5)#666
30. Kings 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#30 62.5% (+37.5)#690
31. Langleyville 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#31 62.5% (+37.5)#698
32. Prairietown 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#32 62.5% (+37.5)#705
33. Cameron 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#33 62.5% (+37.5)#712
34. Virgil 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#34 62.5% (+37.5)#766
35. Kempton 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#35 62.5% (+37.5)#841
36. Seaton 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#36 62.5% (+37.5)#856
37. Alexander 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#37 62.5% (+37.5)#859
38. Victoria 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#38 62.5% (+37.5)#933
39. Ivesdale 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#39 62.5% (+37.5)#972
40. Buckingham 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#40 62.5% (+37.5)#984
41. Wellington 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#41 62.5% (+37.5)#1,006
42. Mossville 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#42 62.5% (+37.5)#1,040
43. Smithville 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#43 62.5% (+37.5)#1,073
44. Burtons Bridge 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#44 62.5% (+37.5)#1,082
45. Serena 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#45 62.5% (+37.5)#1,094
46. Lawrence 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#46 62.5% (+37.5)#1,115
47. Penfield 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#47 62.5% (+37.5)#1,129
48. Plattville 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#48 62.5% (+37.5)#1,138
49. Ophiem 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#49 62.5% (+37.5)#1,157
50. Whiteash 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#50 62.5% (+37.5)#1,164
51. Hooppole 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#51 62.5% (+37.5)#1,168
52. White Heath 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#52 62.5% (+37.5)#1,262
53. Cleveland 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#53 62.5% (+37.5)#1,265
54. Alden 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#54 62.5% (+37.5)#1,273
55. Holcomb 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#55 62.5% (+37.5)#1,276
56. Olivet 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#56 62.5% (+37.5)#1,312
57. Ferris 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#57 62.5% (+37.5)#1,323
58. Wilton Center 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#58 62.5% (+37.5)#1,331
59. Beason 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#59 62.5% (+37.5)#1,338
60. Lowpoint 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#60 62.5% (+37.5)#1,347
61. Ritchie 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#61 62.5% (+37.5)#1,361
62. Preemption 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#62 62.5% (+37.5)#1,370
63. Laplace 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#63 62.5% (+37.5)#1,384
64. Wedron 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#64 62.5% (+37.5)#1,405
65. Nachusa 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#65 62.5% (+37.5)#1,445
66. Taylor Ridge 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#66 62.5% (+37.5)#1,491
67. Trilla 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#67 62.5% (+37.5)#1,515
68. Paloma 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#68 62.5% (+37.5)#1,530
69. Old Mill Creek 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#69 62.5% (+37.5)#1,566
70. Gilson 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#70 62.5% (+37.5)#1,579
71. Osco 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#71 62.5% (+37.5)#1,593
72. Eagle Lake 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#72 62.5% (+37.5)#1,617
73. Galt 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#73 62.5% (+37.5)#1,631
74. Burton 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#75 62.5% (+37.5)#1,661
75. Liverpool 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#76 62.5% (+37.5)#1,662
76. La Rose 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#77 62.5% (+37.5)#1,679
77. Cable 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#78 62.5% (+37.5)#1,722
78. Bloomfield 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#79 62.5% (+37.5)#1,777
79. Rockport 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#80 62.5% (+37.5)#1,888
80. Ellisville 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#81 62.5% (+37.5)#1,896
81. Triumph 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#82 62.5% (+37.5)#1,908
82. Basco 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#83 62.5% (+37.5)#1,909
83. Adeline 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#84 62.5% (+37.5)#1,931
84. Sciota 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#85 62.5% (+37.5)#2,013
85. Beverly 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#86 62.5% (+37.5)#2,056
86. Kinsman 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#87 62.5% (+37.5)#2,076
87. Elwin 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#88 62.5% (+37.5)#2,122
88. Shirley 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#89 62.5% (+37.5)#2,148
89. Millersburg 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#90 62.5% (+37.5)#2,149
90. Union Hill 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#91 62.5% (+37.5)#2,178
91. Lorenzo 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#92 62.5% (+37.5)#2,179
92. Joslin 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#93 62.5% (+37.5)#2,198
93. Annapolis 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#94 62.5% (+37.5)#2,227
94. East Brooklyn 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#95 62.5% (+37.5)#2,242
95. Irwin 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#96 62.5% (+37.5)#2,346
96. Cornland 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#97 62.5% (+37.5)#2,362
97. Muddy 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#98 62.5% (+37.5)#2,368
98. Lake 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#99 62.5% (+37.5)#2,473
99. Adams 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#100 62.5% (+37.5)#2,474
100. Illinois 100.0% 59.6% (+40.4)#101 62.5% (+37.5)#2,514

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois?
Holiday Shores has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the State of Illinois?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Illinois is 59.6%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.