Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Louisiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Fort Polk South 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#4
2. New Orleans Station 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#27
3. Fort Polk North 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#38
4. Creola 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#81
5. Dorseyville 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#108
6. Gloster 100.0% 32.8% (+67.2)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#145
7. Elmwood 85.2% 32.8% (+52.3)#7 35.2% (+50.0)#370
8. Rio 82.4% 32.8% (+49.5)#8 35.2% (+47.2)#404
9. Bayou Goula 80.0% 32.8% (+47.2)#9 35.2% (+44.8)#444
10. Joyce 74.1% 32.8% (+41.2)#10 35.2% (+38.9)#571
11. South Mansfield 73.0% 32.8% (+40.1)#11 35.2% (+37.8)#599
12. Rayville 72.2% 32.8% (+39.4)#12 35.2% (+37.0)#625
13. Dixie Inn 72.1% 32.8% (+39.2)#13 35.2% (+36.9)#633
14. Natalbany 72.0% 32.8% (+39.2)#14 35.2% (+36.8)#634
15. Starks 70.9% 32.8% (+38.0)#15 35.2% (+35.7)#675
16. Campti 69.7% 32.8% (+36.9)#16 35.2% (+34.5)#725
17. Grand Coteau 68.6% 32.8% (+35.8)#17 35.2% (+33.4)#781
18. Midway 68.6% 32.8% (+35.7)#18 35.2% (+33.4)#785
19. Clarence 67.4% 32.8% (+34.6)#19 35.2% (+32.2)#823
20. Richwood 67.1% 32.8% (+34.3)#20 35.2% (+31.9)#841
21. Ruston 65.9% 32.8% (+33.0)#21 35.2% (+30.7)#905
22. White Castle 65.0% 32.8% (+32.1)#22 35.2% (+29.8)#953
23. Bonita 63.7% 32.8% (+30.9)#23 35.2% (+28.5)#1,042
24. Grambling 63.0% 32.8% (+30.1)#24 35.2% (+27.8)#1,102
25. Chataignier 62.5% 32.8% (+29.7)#25 35.2% (+27.3)#1,150
26. Chatham 62.4% 32.8% (+29.6)#26 35.2% (+27.2)#1,160
27. Jonesboro 61.8% 32.8% (+28.9)#27 35.2% (+26.6)#1,203
28. Ville Platte 61.7% 32.8% (+28.9)#28 35.2% (+26.5)#1,209
29. Oil City 61.6% 32.8% (+28.7)#29 35.2% (+26.4)#1,226
30. Pioneer 61.4% 32.8% (+28.6)#30 35.2% (+26.2)#1,241
31. Lydia 61.4% 32.8% (+28.6)#31 35.2% (+26.2)#1,242
32. Gardere 58.3% 32.8% (+25.5)#32 35.2% (+23.1)#1,555
33. Robeline 58.1% 32.8% (+25.3)#33 35.2% (+23.0)#1,570
34. Napoleonville 58.0% 32.8% (+25.2)#34 35.2% (+22.8)#1,586
35. Many 58.0% 32.8% (+25.2)#35 35.2% (+22.8)#1,588
36. Washington 57.9% 32.8% (+25.1)#36 35.2% (+22.8)#1,597
37. West Monroe 57.8% 32.8% (+25.0)#37 35.2% (+22.7)#1,612
38. Homer 57.3% 32.8% (+24.5)#38 35.2% (+22.2)#1,685
39. Leesville 57.3% 32.8% (+24.4)#39 35.2% (+22.1)#1,693
40. Natchitoches 57.3% 32.8% (+24.4)#40 35.2% (+22.1)#1,696
41. Greensburg 57.2% 32.8% (+24.3)#41 35.2% (+22.0)#1,710
42. Banks Springs 56.9% 32.8% (+24.1)#42 35.2% (+21.7)#1,734
43. Mansura 56.2% 32.8% (+23.4)#43 35.2% (+21.0)#1,839
44. Springhill 55.8% 32.8% (+23.0)#44 35.2% (+20.6)#1,890
45. Boyce 55.6% 32.8% (+22.8)#45 35.2% (+20.5)#1,917
46. North Hodge 55.6% 32.8% (+22.7)#46 35.2% (+20.4)#1,933
47. Winnfield 55.5% 32.8% (+22.7)#47 35.2% (+20.3)#1,950
48. Monroe 55.4% 32.8% (+22.6)#48 35.2% (+20.2)#1,961
49. Dodson 55.1% 32.8% (+22.3)#49 35.2% (+19.9)#2,017
50. Mer Rouge 54.2% 32.8% (+21.3)#50 35.2% (+19.0)#2,156
51. Coushatta 54.2% 32.8% (+21.3)#51 35.2% (+19.0)#2,159
52. Terrytown 53.6% 32.8% (+20.8)#52 35.2% (+18.4)#2,245
53. Tallulah 53.6% 32.8% (+20.8)#53 35.2% (+18.4)#2,251
54. Grayson 53.6% 32.8% (+20.8)#54 35.2% (+18.4)#2,252
55. Westwego 53.0% 32.8% (+20.2)#55 35.2% (+17.9)#2,372
56. Start 52.3% 32.8% (+19.4)#56 35.2% (+17.1)#2,538
57. Opelousas 52.2% 32.8% (+19.4)#57 35.2% (+17.1)#2,539
58. Baton Rouge 52.1% 32.8% (+19.3)#58 35.2% (+16.9)#2,570
59. Lacassine 52.0% 32.8% (+19.2)#59 35.2% (+16.8)#2,592
60. New Llano 52.0% 32.8% (+19.1)#60 35.2% (+16.8)#2,599
61. St Francisville 51.8% 32.8% (+18.9)#61 35.2% (+16.6)#2,636
62. Amite City 51.6% 32.8% (+18.7)#62 35.2% (+16.4)#2,683
63. Vinton 51.4% 32.8% (+18.6)#63 35.2% (+16.2)#2,727
64. Crowley 51.3% 32.8% (+18.5)#64 35.2% (+16.1)#2,746
65. Lake Providence 51.2% 32.8% (+18.4)#65 35.2% (+16.0)#2,774
66. Palmetto 51.1% 32.8% (+18.3)#66 35.2% (+16.0)#2,800
67. Hammond 51.0% 32.8% (+18.2)#67 35.2% (+15.8)#2,841
68. Baldwin 50.9% 32.8% (+18.0)#68 35.2% (+15.7)#2,876
69. Pollock 50.8% 32.8% (+18.0)#69 35.2% (+15.6)#2,898
70. New Orleans 50.7% 32.8% (+17.9)#70 35.2% (+15.5)#2,914
71. Gretna 50.4% 32.8% (+17.6)#71 35.2% (+15.2)#2,993
72. Logansport 50.1% 32.8% (+17.2)#72 35.2% (+14.9)#3,064
73. Bogalusa 50.0% 32.8% (+17.1)#73 35.2% (+14.8)#3,155
74. Mamou 49.4% 32.8% (+16.6)#74 35.2% (+14.2)#3,268
75. Bienville 49.4% 32.8% (+16.5)#75 35.2% (+14.2)#3,287
76. Eunice 49.3% 32.8% (+16.4)#76 35.2% (+14.1)#3,307
77. Farmerville 49.2% 32.8% (+16.3)#77 35.2% (+14.0)#3,330
78. Sterlington 49.1% 32.8% (+16.2)#78 35.2% (+13.9)#3,357
79. New Iberia 49.0% 32.8% (+16.1)#79 35.2% (+13.8)#3,380
80. Varnado 49.0% 32.8% (+16.1)#80 35.2% (+13.8)#3,391
81. Junction City 48.4% 32.8% (+15.5)#81 35.2% (+13.2)#3,566
82. Cullen 47.8% 32.8% (+15.0)#82 35.2% (+12.6)#3,742
83. Donaldsonville 47.8% 32.8% (+14.9)#83 35.2% (+12.6)#3,749
84. Florien 47.8% 32.8% (+14.9)#84 35.2% (+12.6)#3,755
85. Minden 47.7% 32.8% (+14.9)#85 35.2% (+12.5)#3,772
86. Delta 47.6% 32.8% (+14.8)#86 35.2% (+12.4)#3,811
87. Delhi 47.6% 32.8% (+14.7)#87 35.2% (+12.4)#3,828
88. St Martinville 47.4% 32.8% (+14.5)#88 35.2% (+12.2)#3,881
89. Winnsboro 47.3% 32.8% (+14.4)#89 35.2% (+12.1)#3,925
90. Powhatan 47.1% 32.8% (+14.2)#90 35.2% (+11.9)#4,005
91. Bernice 46.9% 32.8% (+14.0)#91 35.2% (+11.7)#4,073
92. Franklinton 46.8% 32.8% (+13.9)#92 35.2% (+11.6)#4,099
93. Pineville 46.6% 32.8% (+13.7)#93 35.2% (+11.4)#4,160
94. Jefferson 46.6% 32.8% (+13.7)#94 35.2% (+11.4)#4,161
95. Bastrop 46.6% 32.8% (+13.7)#95 35.2% (+11.4)#4,164
96. Hessmer 46.4% 32.8% (+13.6)#96 35.2% (+11.2)#4,193
97. Harvey 46.4% 32.8% (+13.6)#97 35.2% (+11.2)#4,206
98. Port Barre 46.3% 32.8% (+13.5)#98 35.2% (+11.2)#4,220
99. Shreveport 46.2% 32.8% (+13.4)#99 35.2% (+11.0)#4,265
100. Abbeville 46.2% 32.8% (+13.3)#100 35.2% (+11.0)#4,284

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
85.2%
#6
80.0%
#7
74.1%
#8
73.0%
#9
72.2%
#10
72.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana?
Fort Polk South has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Louisiana?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Louisiana is 32.8%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.