Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arkansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. College Station 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#85
2. Uniontown 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#129
3. Alpine 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#140
4. Pencil Bluff 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#172
5. Scott 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#188
6. Sherrill 98.4% 33.8% (+64.7)#6 35.2% (+63.3)#266
7. Reader 77.3% 33.8% (+43.5)#7 35.2% (+42.1)#501
8. Lake View 70.6% 33.8% (+36.8)#8 35.2% (+35.4)#682
9. Hermitage 66.5% 33.8% (+32.7)#9 35.2% (+31.3)#881
10. Colt 66.2% 33.8% (+32.4)#10 35.2% (+31.0)#894
11. Sunset 65.4% 33.8% (+31.6)#11 35.2% (+30.2)#927
12. Forrest City 64.2% 33.8% (+30.4)#12 35.2% (+29.0)#1,014
13. Little Flock 63.4% 33.8% (+29.7)#13 35.2% (+28.3)#1,068
14. Prescott 63.0% 33.8% (+29.2)#14 35.2% (+27.8)#1,099
15. Ozark 61.9% 33.8% (+28.1)#15 35.2% (+26.7)#1,197
16. Wilburn 61.6% 33.8% (+27.9)#16 35.2% (+26.5)#1,219
17. Holly Grove 60.7% 33.8% (+26.9)#17 35.2% (+25.5)#1,305
18. Antoine 60.3% 33.8% (+26.5)#18 35.2% (+25.1)#1,336
19. Fayetteville 59.8% 33.8% (+26.0)#19 35.2% (+24.6)#1,396
20. Sulphur Rock 59.5% 33.8% (+25.7)#20 35.2% (+24.3)#1,433
21. Wabbaseka 59.3% 33.8% (+25.5)#21 35.2% (+24.1)#1,456
22. Arkadelphia 58.9% 33.8% (+25.2)#22 35.2% (+23.7)#1,489
23. Marianna 58.4% 33.8% (+24.6)#23 35.2% (+23.2)#1,541
24. Payneway 57.8% 33.8% (+24.1)#24 35.2% (+22.6)#1,614
25. Earle 57.7% 33.8% (+23.9)#25 35.2% (+22.5)#1,633
26. Fox 57.6% 33.8% (+23.9)#26 35.2% (+22.5)#1,645
27. Garland 57.4% 33.8% (+23.6)#27 35.2% (+22.2)#1,676
28. Salado 57.3% 33.8% (+23.5)#28 35.2% (+22.1)#1,690
29. Marmaduke 56.4% 33.8% (+22.6)#29 35.2% (+21.2)#1,812
30. Hatfield 56.2% 33.8% (+22.5)#30 35.2% (+21.1)#1,832
31. Conway 56.0% 33.8% (+22.3)#31 35.2% (+20.9)#1,861
32. Bay 55.8% 33.8% (+22.0)#32 35.2% (+20.6)#1,899
33. Kensett 55.4% 33.8% (+21.6)#33 35.2% (+20.2)#1,967
34. Ola 55.3% 33.8% (+21.5)#34 35.2% (+20.1)#1,977
35. West Memphis 55.3% 33.8% (+21.5)#35 35.2% (+20.1)#1,984
36. Reyno 54.5% 33.8% (+20.7)#36 35.2% (+19.3)#2,114
37. Deer 54.4% 33.8% (+20.6)#37 35.2% (+19.2)#2,126
38. Midland 54.0% 33.8% (+20.2)#38 35.2% (+18.8)#2,181
39. Lockesburg 53.7% 33.8% (+19.9)#39 35.2% (+18.5)#2,232
40. Flippin 53.6% 33.8% (+19.8)#40 35.2% (+18.4)#2,246
41. Osceola 53.6% 33.8% (+19.8)#41 35.2% (+18.4)#2,254
42. Mount Vernon 53.4% 33.8% (+19.6)#42 35.2% (+18.2)#2,285
43. Helena West Helena 53.3% 33.8% (+19.5)#43 35.2% (+18.1)#2,322
44. De Queen 53.2% 33.8% (+19.4)#44 35.2% (+18.0)#2,338
45. Edmondson 53.2% 33.8% (+19.4)#45 35.2% (+18.0)#2,342
46. Leslie 53.1% 33.8% (+19.3)#46 35.2% (+17.9)#2,365
47. Morrilton 53.1% 33.8% (+19.3)#47 35.2% (+17.9)#2,367
48. Gum Springs 53.1% 33.8% (+19.3)#48 35.2% (+17.9)#2,370
49. Mcalmont 52.8% 33.8% (+19.0)#49 35.2% (+17.6)#2,425
50. Alma 52.5% 33.8% (+18.7)#50 35.2% (+17.3)#2,475
51. North Little Rock 52.4% 33.8% (+18.6)#51 35.2% (+17.2)#2,498
52. Oden 52.0% 33.8% (+18.2)#52 35.2% (+16.8)#2,591
53. Piney 51.8% 33.8% (+18.0)#53 35.2% (+16.6)#2,627
54. Clarksville 51.7% 33.8% (+17.9)#54 35.2% (+16.5)#2,664
55. Russell 51.6% 33.8% (+17.8)#55 35.2% (+16.4)#2,678
56. Booneville 51.6% 33.8% (+17.8)#56 35.2% (+16.4)#2,682
57. Jacksonville 51.4% 33.8% (+17.6)#57 35.2% (+16.2)#2,721
58. Rivervale 51.2% 33.8% (+17.4)#58 35.2% (+16.0)#2,790
59. Warren 51.1% 33.8% (+17.3)#59 35.2% (+15.9)#2,823
60. Hackett 51.0% 33.8% (+17.2)#60 35.2% (+15.8)#2,858
61. Adona 50.9% 33.8% (+17.2)#61 35.2% (+15.8)#2,865
62. Hughes 50.8% 33.8% (+17.1)#62 35.2% (+15.6)#2,891
63. Marshall 50.8% 33.8% (+17.0)#63 35.2% (+15.6)#2,897
64. Cotton Plant 50.7% 33.8% (+16.9)#64 35.2% (+15.5)#2,921
65. Monticello 50.6% 33.8% (+16.8)#65 35.2% (+15.4)#2,942
66. Grady 50.6% 33.8% (+16.8)#66 35.2% (+15.4)#2,947
67. Johnson 50.2% 33.8% (+16.4)#67 35.2% (+15.0)#3,043
68. Cash 50.0% 33.8% (+16.2)#68 35.2% (+14.8)#3,094
69. Searcy 49.4% 33.8% (+15.7)#69 35.2% (+14.2)#3,270
70. Jasper 49.3% 33.8% (+15.6)#70 35.2% (+14.2)#3,289
71. Brookland 49.3% 33.8% (+15.5)#71 35.2% (+14.1)#3,299
72. Blytheville 49.0% 33.8% (+15.2)#72 35.2% (+13.8)#3,389
73. Danville 48.9% 33.8% (+15.1)#73 35.2% (+13.7)#3,416
74. Newport 48.8% 33.8% (+15.0)#74 35.2% (+13.6)#3,446
75. Elaine 48.7% 33.8% (+15.0)#75 35.2% (+13.5)#3,465
76. Fort Smith 48.6% 33.8% (+14.8)#76 35.2% (+13.4)#3,491
77. Pearcy 48.6% 33.8% (+14.8)#77 35.2% (+13.4)#3,494
78. Bellefonte 48.6% 33.8% (+14.8)#78 35.2% (+13.4)#3,496
79. Ash Flat 48.1% 33.8% (+14.4)#79 35.2% (+13.0)#3,638
80. Springdale 47.9% 33.8% (+14.2)#80 35.2% (+12.8)#3,697
81. Cave City 47.8% 33.8% (+14.1)#81 35.2% (+12.7)#3,727
82. Bentonville 47.8% 33.8% (+14.1)#82 35.2% (+12.7)#3,731
83. Trumann 47.8% 33.8% (+14.0)#83 35.2% (+12.6)#3,761
84. Decatur 47.8% 33.8% (+14.0)#84 35.2% (+12.6)#3,762
85. Marvell 47.7% 33.8% (+13.9)#85 35.2% (+12.5)#3,797
86. Hensley 47.6% 33.8% (+13.8)#86 35.2% (+12.4)#3,814
87. Huntsville 47.4% 33.8% (+13.6)#87 35.2% (+12.2)#3,876
88. Turrell 47.4% 33.8% (+13.6)#88 35.2% (+12.2)#3,890
89. Batesville 47.2% 33.8% (+13.4)#89 35.2% (+12.0)#3,954
90. Magnolia 47.1% 33.8% (+13.4)#90 35.2% (+12.0)#3,975
91. Lexa 47.1% 33.8% (+13.3)#91 35.2% (+11.9)#4,004
92. Joiner 47.0% 33.8% (+13.2)#92 35.2% (+11.8)#4,027
93. Cove 47.0% 33.8% (+13.2)#93 35.2% (+11.8)#4,034
94. Hope 46.8% 33.8% (+13.0)#94 35.2% (+11.6)#4,094
95. Pine Bluff 46.6% 33.8% (+12.8)#95 35.2% (+11.4)#4,149
96. Bradford 46.6% 33.8% (+12.8)#96 35.2% (+11.4)#4,168
97. Mountain View 46.3% 33.8% (+12.6)#97 35.2% (+11.1)#4,224
98. East Camden 46.3% 33.8% (+12.5)#98 35.2% (+11.1)#4,232
99. Jonesboro 46.0% 33.8% (+12.3)#99 35.2% (+10.9)#4,326
100. Bald Knob 46.0% 33.8% (+12.3)#100 35.2% (+10.9)#4,327

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
98.4%
#4
77.3%
#5
70.6%
#6
66.5%
#7
66.2%
#8
65.4%
#9
64.2%
#10
63.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas?
College Station has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Arkansas?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Arkansas is 33.8%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.