Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Keshena 75.6% 32.3% (+43.3)#1 35.2% (+40.4)#532
2. West Milwaukee 71.4% 32.3% (+39.1)#2 35.2% (+36.2)#656
3. Whitewater 70.5% 32.3% (+38.2)#3 35.2% (+35.3)#691
4. Little Round Lake 70.3% 32.3% (+38.0)#4 35.2% (+35.1)#697
5. Birch Hill 69.7% 32.3% (+37.4)#5 35.2% (+34.6)#724
6. Sand Pillow 68.2% 32.3% (+35.9)#6 35.2% (+33.0)#795
7. Ceex Haci 63.6% 32.3% (+31.3)#7 35.2% (+28.5)#1,053
8. Big Foot Prairie 63.2% 32.3% (+30.8)#8 35.2% (+28.0)#1,088
9. Conrath 63.2% 32.3% (+30.8)#9 35.2% (+28.0)#1,089
10. Menomonie 61.3% 32.3% (+29.0)#10 35.2% (+26.1)#1,251
11. Nichols 60.8% 32.3% (+28.5)#11 35.2% (+25.6)#1,297
12. Platteville 60.5% 32.3% (+28.2)#12 35.2% (+25.3)#1,319
13. Boulder Junction 59.1% 32.3% (+26.8)#13 35.2% (+23.9)#1,471
14. Butler 59.0% 32.3% (+26.7)#14 35.2% (+23.8)#1,482
15. Milwaukee 58.8% 32.3% (+26.5)#15 35.2% (+23.7)#1,498
16. Diaperville 58.8% 32.3% (+26.5)#16 35.2% (+23.6)#1,502
17. Edmund 58.8% 32.3% (+26.4)#17 35.2% (+23.6)#1,509
18. Mole Lake 57.1% 32.3% (+24.8)#18 35.2% (+22.0)#1,713
19. Wausaukee 56.4% 32.3% (+24.1)#19 35.2% (+21.2)#1,811
20. Webster 56.0% 32.3% (+23.7)#20 35.2% (+20.9)#1,864
21. New Odanah 55.9% 32.3% (+23.6)#21 35.2% (+20.7)#1,879
22. Adams 55.5% 32.3% (+23.2)#22 35.2% (+20.3)#1,954
23. Drummond 55.3% 32.3% (+23.0)#23 35.2% (+20.1)#1,983
24. Sister Bay 55.1% 32.3% (+22.8)#24 35.2% (+19.9)#2,018
25. Wild Rose 54.1% 32.3% (+21.8)#25 35.2% (+18.9)#2,170
26. Colfax 54.0% 32.3% (+21.7)#26 35.2% (+18.8)#2,177
27. La Crosse 53.7% 32.3% (+21.4)#27 35.2% (+18.5)#2,233
28. West Baraboo 53.6% 32.3% (+21.3)#28 35.2% (+18.4)#2,249
29. Sullivan 53.1% 32.3% (+20.8)#29 35.2% (+17.9)#2,366
30. Madison 53.0% 32.3% (+20.7)#30 35.2% (+17.8)#2,386
31. Harrisville 52.5% 32.3% (+20.2)#31 35.2% (+17.3)#2,479
32. Phillips 52.2% 32.3% (+19.9)#32 35.2% (+17.0)#2,546
33. Shorewood 52.1% 32.3% (+19.8)#33 35.2% (+16.9)#2,574
34. Fitchburg 51.9% 32.3% (+19.6)#34 35.2% (+16.8)#2,603
35. Middleton 51.7% 32.3% (+19.4)#35 35.2% (+16.5)#2,653
36. Zoar 51.1% 32.3% (+18.8)#36 35.2% (+15.9)#2,810
37. Steuben 51.0% 32.3% (+18.7)#37 35.2% (+15.8)#2,840
38. Lac Du Flambeau 51.0% 32.3% (+18.7)#38 35.2% (+15.8)#2,849
39. Westfield 51.0% 32.3% (+18.7)#39 35.2% (+15.8)#2,854
40. Elk Mound 50.5% 32.3% (+18.2)#40 35.2% (+15.3)#2,962
41. Burlington 50.4% 32.3% (+18.1)#41 35.2% (+15.2)#2,995
42. Eagle River 50.2% 32.3% (+17.9)#42 35.2% (+15.0)#3,040
43. Coleman 50.1% 32.3% (+17.8)#43 35.2% (+15.0)#3,052
44. St Francis 49.7% 32.3% (+17.4)#44 35.2% (+14.5)#3,202
45. Schofield 49.6% 32.3% (+17.3)#45 35.2% (+14.4)#3,219
46. Lomira 49.6% 32.3% (+17.2)#46 35.2% (+14.4)#3,231
47. Chippewa Falls 48.9% 32.3% (+16.5)#47 35.2% (+13.7)#3,420
48. New London 48.8% 32.3% (+16.5)#48 35.2% (+13.7)#3,423
49. Independence 48.3% 32.3% (+15.9)#49 35.2% (+13.1)#3,599
50. Lake Geneva 48.1% 32.3% (+15.8)#50 35.2% (+13.0)#3,633
51. Stevens Point 48.1% 32.3% (+15.8)#51 35.2% (+12.9)#3,645
52. Hayward 48.1% 32.3% (+15.8)#52 35.2% (+12.9)#3,649
53. Reserve 48.1% 32.3% (+15.8)#53 35.2% (+12.9)#3,658
54. Shorewood Hills 47.7% 32.3% (+15.3)#54 35.2% (+12.5)#3,794
55. West Allis 47.2% 32.3% (+14.9)#55 35.2% (+12.0)#3,934
56. Saukville 47.2% 32.3% (+14.9)#56 35.2% (+12.0)#3,963
57. Tomah 46.6% 32.3% (+14.3)#57 35.2% (+11.5)#4,138
58. Stanley 46.6% 32.3% (+14.3)#58 35.2% (+11.4)#4,143
59. Osceola 46.3% 32.3% (+14.0)#59 35.2% (+11.2)#4,218
60. Lake Delton 46.3% 32.3% (+14.0)#60 35.2% (+11.1)#4,227
61. Knapp 46.3% 32.3% (+14.0)#61 35.2% (+11.1)#4,235
62. Beaver Dam 46.1% 32.3% (+13.8)#62 35.2% (+10.9)#4,303
63. Minong 46.1% 32.3% (+13.8)#63 35.2% (+10.9)#4,306
64. Warrens 46.1% 32.3% (+13.8)#64 35.2% (+10.9)#4,307
65. Winter 45.9% 32.3% (+13.6)#65 35.2% (+10.8)#4,366
66. Portage 45.7% 32.3% (+13.4)#66 35.2% (+10.6)#4,426
67. Somerset 45.7% 32.3% (+13.4)#67 35.2% (+10.5)#4,438
68. Wisconsin Rapids 45.6% 32.3% (+13.3)#68 35.2% (+10.4)#4,468
69. Rice Lake 45.3% 32.3% (+13.0)#69 35.2% (+10.1)#4,593
70. Wittenberg 45.2% 32.3% (+12.9)#70 35.2% (+9.99)#4,624
71. Fox Lake 45.2% 32.3% (+12.9)#71 35.2% (+9.99)#4,626
72. Ladysmith 45.0% 32.3% (+12.6)#72 35.2% (+9.77)#4,701
73. Cameron 44.9% 32.3% (+12.5)#73 35.2% (+9.67)#4,741
74. Oconto Falls 44.8% 32.3% (+12.5)#74 35.2% (+9.61)#4,762
75. Hales Corners 44.7% 32.3% (+12.4)#75 35.2% (+9.55)#4,777
76. Clayton 44.6% 32.3% (+12.3)#76 35.2% (+9.40)#4,842
77. Oshkosh 44.5% 32.3% (+12.2)#77 35.2% (+9.36)#4,854
78. Arcadia 44.4% 32.3% (+12.0)#78 35.2% (+9.17)#4,930
79. Medford 44.3% 32.3% (+12.0)#79 35.2% (+9.16)#4,934
80. Greenfield 44.3% 32.3% (+12.0)#80 35.2% (+9.16)#4,935
81. Black River Falls 44.3% 32.3% (+12.0)#81 35.2% (+9.09)#4,964
82. Monona 43.9% 32.3% (+11.6)#82 35.2% (+8.75)#5,083
83. Green Bay 43.8% 32.3% (+11.5)#83 35.2% (+8.66)#5,113
84. Elkhorn 43.8% 32.3% (+11.4)#84 35.2% (+8.57)#5,151
85. Eau Claire 43.5% 32.3% (+11.2)#85 35.2% (+8.35)#5,265
86. St Croix Falls 43.5% 32.3% (+11.2)#86 35.2% (+8.29)#5,283
87. Elcho 43.3% 32.3% (+11.0)#87 35.2% (+8.15)#5,327
88. Spooner 43.2% 32.3% (+10.9)#88 35.2% (+8.04)#5,370
89. Wautoma 43.2% 32.3% (+10.9)#89 35.2% (+7.99)#5,389
90. River Falls 43.0% 32.3% (+10.7)#90 35.2% (+7.86)#5,445
91. Union Grove 43.0% 32.3% (+10.7)#91 35.2% (+7.85)#5,451
92. Butternut 43.0% 32.3% (+10.7)#92 35.2% (+7.80)#5,466
93. Galesville 42.9% 32.3% (+10.6)#93 35.2% (+7.74)#5,493
94. Fond Du Lac 42.7% 32.3% (+10.4)#94 35.2% (+7.49)#5,598
95. Altoona 42.6% 32.3% (+10.3)#95 35.2% (+7.41)#5,640
96. Ashwaubenon 42.6% 32.3% (+10.3)#96 35.2% (+7.41)#5,642
97. Mauston 42.5% 32.3% (+10.2)#97 35.2% (+7.31)#5,673
98. Waupaca 42.5% 32.3% (+10.1)#98 35.2% (+7.28)#5,684
99. Walworth 42.4% 32.3% (+10.1)#99 35.2% (+7.23)#5,713
100. Bluffview 42.3% 32.3% (+10.0)#100 35.2% (+7.17)#5,732

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin?
Keshena has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin with 75.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Wisconsin is 32.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.