Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Tamora 100.0% 33.5% (+66.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#209
2. Kramer 100.0% 33.5% (+66.5)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#212
3. Offutt Afb 99.4% 33.5% (+66.0)#3 35.2% (+64.3)#241
4. Boys Town 91.7% 33.5% (+58.2)#4 35.2% (+56.5)#315
5. Santee 82.4% 33.5% (+49.0)#5 35.2% (+47.2)#403
6. Macy 79.1% 33.5% (+45.6)#6 35.2% (+43.9)#465
7. Winnebago 70.2% 33.5% (+36.8)#7 35.2% (+35.0)#698
8. Johnstown 70.0% 33.5% (+36.5)#8 35.2% (+34.8)#707
9. Lemoyne 57.9% 33.5% (+24.4)#9 35.2% (+22.7)#1,607
10. Loretto 55.9% 33.5% (+22.4)#10 35.2% (+20.7)#1,881
11. Strang 55.6% 33.5% (+22.1)#11 35.2% (+20.4)#1,946
12. Lisco 54.5% 33.5% (+21.1)#12 35.2% (+19.4)#2,110
13. Mullen 54.3% 33.5% (+20.8)#13 35.2% (+19.1)#2,143
14. Heartwell 51.1% 33.5% (+17.7)#14 35.2% (+15.9)#2,811
15. Malcolm 47.1% 33.5% (+13.7)#15 35.2% (+12.0)#3,972
16. Curtis 46.3% 33.5% (+12.8)#16 35.2% (+11.1)#4,237
17. Scottsbluff 45.9% 33.5% (+12.4)#17 35.2% (+10.7)#4,383
18. Valentine 45.8% 33.5% (+12.3)#18 35.2% (+10.6)#4,414
19. La Vista 45.1% 33.5% (+11.7)#19 35.2% (+9.96)#4,638
20. Terrytown 44.5% 33.5% (+11.0)#20 35.2% (+9.29)#4,867
21. Steele City 44.4% 33.5% (+11.0)#21 35.2% (+9.26)#4,894
22. Sidney 43.9% 33.5% (+10.5)#22 35.2% (+8.75)#5,084
23. Tecumseh 43.9% 33.5% (+10.5)#23 35.2% (+8.75)#5,085
24. Keystone 43.8% 33.5% (+10.3)#24 35.2% (+8.57)#5,157
25. Lincoln 43.7% 33.5% (+10.2)#25 35.2% (+8.49)#5,195
26. Rogers 43.3% 33.5% (+9.88)#26 35.2% (+8.15)#5,329
27. Ralston 43.2% 33.5% (+9.73)#27 35.2% (+8.00)#5,384
28. Fort Calhoun 42.9% 33.5% (+9.40)#28 35.2% (+7.67)#5,508
29. South Sioux City 42.7% 33.5% (+9.29)#29 35.2% (+7.56)#5,574
30. Sumner 42.7% 33.5% (+9.20)#30 35.2% (+7.47)#5,609
31. Coleridge 42.6% 33.5% (+9.13)#31 35.2% (+7.40)#5,644
32. Lexington 42.5% 33.5% (+9.05)#32 35.2% (+7.32)#5,669
33. Cairo 42.3% 33.5% (+8.82)#33 35.2% (+7.09)#5,769
34. Ansley 42.3% 33.5% (+8.81)#34 35.2% (+7.08)#5,775
35. Omaha 42.1% 33.5% (+8.65)#35 35.2% (+6.92)#5,841
36. Rushville 42.1% 33.5% (+8.60)#36 35.2% (+6.87)#5,875
37. Martinsburg 41.9% 33.5% (+8.48)#37 35.2% (+6.75)#5,915
38. Grand Island 41.4% 33.5% (+7.93)#38 35.2% (+6.20)#6,156
39. Reynolds 41.4% 33.5% (+7.93)#39 35.2% (+6.20)#6,160
40. Wayne 41.2% 33.5% (+7.70)#40 35.2% (+5.97)#6,247
41. Minatare 40.6% 33.5% (+7.14)#41 35.2% (+5.41)#6,495
42. Thedford 40.5% 33.5% (+7.04)#42 35.2% (+5.31)#6,558
43. Fairbury 40.4% 33.5% (+6.92)#43 35.2% (+5.19)#6,611
44. Chadron 40.3% 33.5% (+6.83)#44 35.2% (+5.10)#6,656
45. Lorton 40.0% 33.5% (+6.55)#45 35.2% (+4.82)#6,800
46. North Platte 39.7% 33.5% (+6.28)#46 35.2% (+4.55)#6,930
47. Fremont 39.7% 33.5% (+6.28)#47 35.2% (+4.55)#6,931
48. Broken Bow 39.7% 33.5% (+6.22)#48 35.2% (+4.49)#6,958
49. Herman 39.6% 33.5% (+6.13)#49 35.2% (+4.40)#7,005
50. Kearney 39.5% 33.5% (+6.00)#50 35.2% (+4.27)#7,070
51. Smithfield 39.4% 33.5% (+5.94)#51 35.2% (+4.21)#7,095
52. Inglewood 39.1% 33.5% (+5.62)#52 35.2% (+3.89)#7,239
53. Ravenna 38.8% 33.5% (+5.35)#53 35.2% (+3.62)#7,367
54. Auburn 38.7% 33.5% (+5.29)#54 35.2% (+3.56)#7,391
55. Clinton 38.7% 33.5% (+5.26)#55 35.2% (+3.53)#7,410
56. Peru 38.5% 33.5% (+5.01)#56 35.2% (+3.28)#7,500
57. Seward 38.5% 33.5% (+5.00)#57 35.2% (+3.27)#7,515
58. Maywood 37.8% 33.5% (+4.36)#58 35.2% (+2.63)#7,842
59. Norfolk 37.7% 33.5% (+4.25)#59 35.2% (+2.52)#7,888
60. Loup City 37.6% 33.5% (+4.19)#60 35.2% (+2.46)#7,926
61. Beatrice 37.6% 33.5% (+4.16)#61 35.2% (+2.43)#7,942
62. Gilead 37.5% 33.5% (+4.05)#62 35.2% (+2.32)#8,023
63. Wakefield 37.2% 33.5% (+3.78)#63 35.2% (+2.05)#8,159
64. Wauneta 37.0% 33.5% (+3.58)#64 35.2% (+1.85)#8,257
65. Cozad 36.9% 33.5% (+3.49)#65 35.2% (+1.76)#8,298
66. Wisner 36.9% 33.5% (+3.44)#66 35.2% (+1.71)#8,321
67. Bellevue 36.6% 33.5% (+3.16)#67 35.2% (+1.43)#8,485
68. Elba 36.6% 33.5% (+3.13)#68 35.2% (+1.40)#8,502
69. Wilber 36.6% 33.5% (+3.12)#69 35.2% (+1.39)#8,511
70. Gresham 36.5% 33.5% (+3.04)#70 35.2% (+1.31)#8,559
71. Hastings 36.4% 33.5% (+2.95)#71 35.2% (+1.22)#8,607
72. O Neill 36.2% 33.5% (+2.77)#72 35.2% (+1.04)#8,707
73. Memphis 36.1% 33.5% (+2.66)#73 35.2% (+0.927)#8,778
74. Milford 35.8% 33.5% (+2.37)#74 35.2% (+0.641)#8,939
75. Wilcox 35.6% 33.5% (+2.15)#75 35.2% (+0.422)#9,052
76. La Platte 35.6% 33.5% (+2.10)#76 35.2% (+0.372)#9,083
77. Stella 35.3% 33.5% (+1.84)#77 35.2% (+0.111)#9,222
78. Dwight 35.2% 33.5% (+1.70)#78 35.2% (-0.027)#9,303
79. Central City 35.1% 33.5% (+1.63)#79 35.2% (-0.100)#9,347
80. Laurel 34.6% 33.5% (+1.14)#80 35.2% (-0.586)#9,615
81. Holdrege 34.4% 33.5% (+0.902)#81 35.2% (-0.828)#9,736
82. Morrill 34.3% 33.5% (+0.825)#82 35.2% (-0.905)#9,778
83. Humboldt 34.3% 33.5% (+0.803)#83 35.2% (-0.927)#9,787
84. Plattsmouth 34.2% 33.5% (+0.727)#84 35.2% (-1.00)#9,829
85. Trenton 34.1% 33.5% (+0.678)#85 35.2% (-1.05)#9,859
86. Kimball 34.1% 33.5% (+0.659)#86 35.2% (-1.07)#9,869
87. Arthur 34.0% 33.5% (+0.508)#87 35.2% (-1.22)#9,957
88. Crete 33.9% 33.5% (+0.419)#88 35.2% (-1.31)#10,005
89. Walthill 33.8% 33.5% (+0.377)#89 35.2% (-1.35)#10,032
90. Mccook 33.8% 33.5% (+0.321)#90 35.2% (-1.41)#10,065
91. Beemer 33.7% 33.5% (+0.223)#91 35.2% (-1.51)#10,105
92. Rosalie 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#92 35.2% (-1.85)#10,292
93. Hyannis 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#93 35.2% (-1.85)#10,310
94. Ohiowa 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#94 35.2% (-1.85)#10,311
95. Inavale 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#95 35.2% (-1.85)#10,333
96. Crookston 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#96 35.2% (-1.85)#10,344
97. Cowles 33.3% 33.5% (-0.120)#97 35.2% (-1.85)#10,356
98. Pilger 33.1% 33.5% (-0.403)#98 35.2% (-2.13)#10,506
99. Wahoo 32.7% 33.5% (-0.751)#99 35.2% (-2.48)#10,713
100. Lyman 32.4% 33.5% (-1.06)#100 35.2% (-2.79)#10,889

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska are:
#1
100.0%
#2
99.4%
#3
91.7%
#4
82.4%
#5
79.1%
#6
70.2%
#7
70.0%
#8
57.9%
#9
55.9%
#10
55.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Tamora has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.