Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Grand Forks Afb 100.0% 36.8% (+63.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#37
2. Heil 100.0% 36.8% (+63.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#226
3. Minot Afb 99.7% 36.8% (+62.9)#3 35.2% (+64.5)#239
4. Green Acres 89.3% 36.8% (+52.4)#4 35.2% (+54.1)#337
5. Mylo 87.5% 36.8% (+50.7)#5 35.2% (+52.3)#351
6. Ross 87.2% 36.8% (+50.4)#6 35.2% (+52.0)#353
7. Mandaree 85.8% 36.8% (+49.0)#7 35.2% (+50.6)#362
8. Hansboro 85.7% 36.8% (+48.9)#8 35.2% (+50.5)#363
9. Four Bears Village 80.6% 36.8% (+43.8)#9 35.2% (+45.5)#431
10. Porcupine 80.0% 36.8% (+43.2)#10 35.2% (+44.8)#446
11. Wolford 80.0% 36.8% (+43.2)#11 35.2% (+44.8)#447
12. Manning 77.3% 36.8% (+40.5)#12 35.2% (+42.1)#502
13. Medora 67.6% 36.8% (+30.8)#13 35.2% (+32.5)#813
14. New Town 66.0% 36.8% (+29.2)#14 35.2% (+30.8)#900
15. Dunseith 59.8% 36.8% (+23.0)#15 35.2% (+24.6)#1,398
16. Watford City 59.5% 36.8% (+22.7)#16 35.2% (+24.3)#1,431
17. Englevale 58.8% 36.8% (+22.0)#17 35.2% (+23.6)#1,503
18. York 57.1% 36.8% (+20.3)#18 35.2% (+22.0)#1,719
19. Dunn Center 56.7% 36.8% (+19.9)#19 35.2% (+21.5)#1,761
20. Belcourt 56.7% 36.8% (+19.8)#20 35.2% (+21.5)#1,772
21. Cannon Ball 55.9% 36.8% (+19.1)#21 35.2% (+20.7)#1,878
22. Fargo 55.8% 36.8% (+19.0)#22 35.2% (+20.7)#1,886
23. Mayville 55.3% 36.8% (+18.5)#23 35.2% (+20.1)#1,982
24. East Dunseith 55.1% 36.8% (+18.3)#24 35.2% (+19.9)#2,016
25. Williston 54.4% 36.8% (+17.6)#25 35.2% (+19.3)#2,118
26. Grand Forks 54.4% 36.8% (+17.6)#26 35.2% (+19.3)#2,119
27. Newburg 52.6% 36.8% (+15.8)#27 35.2% (+17.4)#2,454
28. Woodworth 51.6% 36.8% (+14.8)#28 35.2% (+16.4)#2,671
29. Devils Lake 51.6% 36.8% (+14.8)#29 35.2% (+16.4)#2,676
30. Wahpeton 51.0% 36.8% (+14.1)#30 35.2% (+15.8)#2,859
31. Palermo 50.8% 36.8% (+14.0)#31 35.2% (+15.6)#2,894
32. Parshall 50.6% 36.8% (+13.8)#32 35.2% (+15.4)#2,949
33. Ayr 50.0% 36.8% (+13.2)#33 35.2% (+14.8)#3,142
34. Cavalier 49.0% 36.8% (+12.2)#34 35.2% (+13.8)#3,377
35. Fort Totten 49.0% 36.8% (+12.1)#35 35.2% (+13.8)#3,388
36. Tolley 46.2% 36.8% (+9.34)#36 35.2% (+11.0)#4,282
37. Gwinner 45.8% 36.8% (+8.93)#37 35.2% (+10.6)#4,425
38. Aneta 45.5% 36.8% (+8.64)#38 35.2% (+10.3)#4,519
39. Rolla 45.2% 36.8% (+8.43)#39 35.2% (+10.1)#4,601
40. Crosby 44.7% 36.8% (+7.91)#40 35.2% (+9.54)#4,787
41. Jamestown 44.2% 36.8% (+7.34)#41 35.2% (+8.98)#5,006
42. Esmond 44.1% 36.8% (+7.30)#42 35.2% (+8.93)#5,014
43. Minot 43.4% 36.8% (+6.58)#43 35.2% (+8.21)#5,314
44. Emerado 43.0% 36.8% (+6.19)#44 35.2% (+7.82)#5,458
45. Rolette 42.9% 36.8% (+6.13)#45 35.2% (+7.77)#5,483
46. White Shield 42.9% 36.8% (+6.04)#46 35.2% (+7.67)#5,518
47. New Rockford 42.2% 36.8% (+5.42)#47 35.2% (+7.06)#5,787
48. Ellendale 42.2% 36.8% (+5.38)#48 35.2% (+7.02)#5,801
49. Lakota 42.0% 36.8% (+5.17)#49 35.2% (+6.80)#5,898
50. Dickinson 42.0% 36.8% (+5.16)#50 35.2% (+6.79)#5,901
51. New England 41.8% 36.8% (+4.98)#51 35.2% (+6.61)#5,976
52. Tioga 41.7% 36.8% (+4.90)#52 35.2% (+6.53)#6,010
53. Clifford 41.7% 36.8% (+4.85)#53 35.2% (+6.48)#6,034
54. Lisbon 41.2% 36.8% (+4.37)#54 35.2% (+6.00)#6,229
55. Ambrose 41.2% 36.8% (+4.36)#55 35.2% (+5.99)#6,240
56. Harvey 40.6% 36.8% (+3.80)#56 35.2% (+5.43)#6,479
57. Edmore 40.6% 36.8% (+3.79)#57 35.2% (+5.43)#6,483
58. Casselton 40.3% 36.8% (+3.52)#58 35.2% (+5.15)#6,633
59. Hampden 40.0% 36.8% (+3.18)#59 35.2% (+4.82)#6,804
60. Killdeer 39.2% 36.8% (+2.38)#60 35.2% (+4.01)#7,181
61. Ray 39.1% 36.8% (+2.29)#61 35.2% (+3.92)#7,222
62. Stanley 38.8% 36.8% (+1.95)#62 35.2% (+3.58)#7,383
63. Hettinger 38.1% 36.8% (+1.29)#63 35.2% (+2.92)#7,684
64. Ryder 37.3% 36.8% (+0.439)#64 35.2% (+2.07)#8,151
65. Trenton 37.2% 36.8% (+0.340)#65 35.2% (+1.97)#8,192
66. Pekin 37.0% 36.8% (+0.221)#66 35.2% (+1.85)#8,263
67. Hazelton 36.8% 36.8% (-0.023)#67 35.2% (+1.61)#8,386
68. Walhalla 36.5% 36.8% (-0.270)#68 35.2% (+1.36)#8,531
69. Shell Valley 36.5% 36.8% (-0.317)#69 35.2% (+1.31)#8,557
70. Portal 36.5% 36.8% (-0.329)#70 35.2% (+1.30)#8,565
71. Mcclusky 36.4% 36.8% (-0.452)#71 35.2% (+1.18)#8,628
72. Valley City 36.1% 36.8% (-0.719)#72 35.2% (+0.914)#8,785
73. Lankin 36.1% 36.8% (-0.750)#73 35.2% (+0.882)#8,805
74. Bottineau 35.4% 36.8% (-1.41)#74 35.2% (+0.220)#9,157
75. Tuttle 35.3% 36.8% (-1.52)#75 35.2% (+0.111)#9,229
76. Souris 35.1% 36.8% (-1.68)#76 35.2% (-0.048)#9,320
77. Cando 34.8% 36.8% (-1.98)#77 35.2% (-0.348)#9,467
78. Goodrich 34.7% 36.8% (-2.12)#78 35.2% (-0.490)#9,564
79. Maddock 34.6% 36.8% (-2.18)#79 35.2% (-0.549)#9,589
80. Grafton 34.6% 36.8% (-2.21)#80 35.2% (-0.575)#9,608
81. Bismarck 34.6% 36.8% (-2.26)#81 35.2% (-0.627)#9,635
82. West Fargo 34.2% 36.8% (-2.60)#82 35.2% (-0.965)#9,800
83. Kenmare 33.4% 36.8% (-3.42)#83 35.2% (-1.78)#10,235
84. Mountain 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#84 35.2% (-1.85)#10,317
85. Grace City 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#85 35.2% (-1.85)#10,335
86. Elliott 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#86 35.2% (-1.85)#10,339
87. Leith 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#87 35.2% (-1.85)#10,340
88. Cathay 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#88 35.2% (-1.85)#10,345
89. Hannah 33.3% 36.8% (-3.48)#89 35.2% (-1.85)#10,352
90. Plaza 32.9% 36.8% (-3.87)#90 35.2% (-2.24)#10,584
91. St John 32.9% 36.8% (-3.90)#91 35.2% (-2.27)#10,605
92. Washburn 32.7% 36.8% (-4.13)#92 35.2% (-2.50)#10,728
93. Hope 32.6% 36.8% (-4.26)#93 35.2% (-2.63)#10,801
94. Beach 32.5% 36.8% (-4.29)#94 35.2% (-2.66)#10,820
95. Minnewaukan 32.5% 36.8% (-4.32)#95 35.2% (-2.68)#10,839
96. Warwick 32.1% 36.8% (-4.67)#96 35.2% (-3.04)#11,062
97. Tappen 32.1% 36.8% (-4.74)#97 35.2% (-3.11)#11,093
98. Mandan 32.0% 36.8% (-4.78)#98 35.2% (-3.15)#11,124
99. Lansford 32.0% 36.8% (-4.82)#99 35.2% (-3.18)#11,140
100. Wimbledon 32.0% 36.8% (-4.82)#100 35.2% (-3.18)#11,143

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
99.7%
#4
89.3%
#5
87.5%
#6
87.2%
#7
85.8%
#8
85.7%
#9
80.6%
#10
80.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota?
Grand Forks AFB has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Dakota is 36.8%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.