Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Montreat 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#72
2. Hassell 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#178
3. Fontana Dam 100.0% 33.8% (+66.2)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#211
4. Cullowhee 90.7% 33.8% (+56.9)#4 35.2% (+55.5)#321
5. Spring Lake 77.9% 33.8% (+44.1)#5 35.2% (+42.7)#488
6. Norman 77.5% 33.8% (+43.7)#6 35.2% (+42.3)#495
7. Boone 77.1% 33.8% (+43.3)#7 35.2% (+41.9)#508
8. Brunswick 72.3% 33.8% (+38.5)#8 35.2% (+37.1)#622
9. Pembroke 71.6% 33.8% (+37.8)#9 35.2% (+36.4)#645
10. Rosman 69.2% 33.8% (+35.4)#10 35.2% (+34.0)#747
11. South Weldon 68.8% 33.8% (+35.0)#11 35.2% (+33.6)#770
12. Delway 68.8% 33.8% (+35.0)#12 35.2% (+33.6)#775
13. Greenville 67.1% 33.8% (+33.3)#13 35.2% (+31.9)#840
14. Belvoir 67.0% 33.8% (+33.3)#14 35.2% (+31.9)#847
15. Robbinsville 66.7% 33.8% (+32.9)#15 35.2% (+31.5)#863
16. Buies Creek 66.5% 33.8% (+32.7)#16 35.2% (+31.3)#882
17. Warsaw 65.2% 33.8% (+31.4)#17 35.2% (+30.0)#940
18. Spring Hope 64.7% 33.8% (+30.9)#18 35.2% (+29.5)#975
19. Jacksonville 64.5% 33.8% (+30.7)#19 35.2% (+29.3)#990
20. Oak City 63.8% 33.8% (+30.0)#20 35.2% (+28.6)#1,034
21. Yanceyville 63.4% 33.8% (+29.6)#21 35.2% (+28.2)#1,072
22. Evergreen 63.4% 33.8% (+29.6)#22 35.2% (+28.2)#1,074
23. Henderson 63.0% 33.8% (+29.2)#23 35.2% (+27.8)#1,100
24. Enfield 62.2% 33.8% (+28.4)#24 35.2% (+27.0)#1,173
25. Grifton 61.6% 33.8% (+27.8)#25 35.2% (+26.4)#1,222
26. Goldsboro 60.9% 33.8% (+27.1)#26 35.2% (+25.7)#1,290
27. Lowgap 60.8% 33.8% (+27.0)#27 35.2% (+25.6)#1,298
28. Sunbury 60.8% 33.8% (+27.0)#28 35.2% (+25.6)#1,300
29. Lexington 60.2% 33.8% (+26.4)#29 35.2% (+25.1)#1,337
30. Sylva 60.0% 33.8% (+26.2)#30 35.2% (+24.8)#1,363
31. Chocowinity 59.8% 33.8% (+26.0)#31 35.2% (+24.6)#1,394
32. Ahoskie 59.7% 33.8% (+25.9)#32 35.2% (+24.5)#1,409
33. Hayesville 59.6% 33.8% (+25.8)#33 35.2% (+24.4)#1,419
34. Delco 59.3% 33.8% (+25.5)#34 35.2% (+24.1)#1,457
35. Troy 58.9% 33.8% (+25.1)#35 35.2% (+23.8)#1,487
36. Kinston 58.9% 33.8% (+25.1)#36 35.2% (+23.8)#1,488
37. Lincolnton 58.6% 33.8% (+24.8)#37 35.2% (+23.4)#1,527
38. Plymouth 58.2% 33.8% (+24.4)#38 35.2% (+23.0)#1,559
39. Robbins 58.2% 33.8% (+24.4)#39 35.2% (+23.0)#1,561
40. Ramseur 58.1% 33.8% (+24.3)#40 35.2% (+23.0)#1,572
41. Louisburg 58.0% 33.8% (+24.2)#41 35.2% (+22.8)#1,591
42. Bladenboro 57.9% 33.8% (+24.1)#42 35.2% (+22.8)#1,598
43. Gibson 57.9% 33.8% (+24.1)#43 35.2% (+22.7)#1,603
44. Brookford 57.9% 33.8% (+24.1)#44 35.2% (+22.7)#1,605
45. Havelock 57.8% 33.8% (+24.0)#45 35.2% (+22.6)#1,624
46. Murphy 57.7% 33.8% (+23.9)#46 35.2% (+22.5)#1,635
47. Graingers 57.7% 33.8% (+23.9)#47 35.2% (+22.5)#1,640
48. Edenton 57.6% 33.8% (+23.9)#48 35.2% (+22.5)#1,644
49. Columbia 57.5% 33.8% (+23.7)#49 35.2% (+22.3)#1,662
50. Northchase 57.4% 33.8% (+23.6)#50 35.2% (+22.2)#1,673
51. Polkton 57.2% 33.8% (+23.4)#51 35.2% (+22.1)#1,698
52. Elizabeth City 57.2% 33.8% (+23.4)#52 35.2% (+22.0)#1,709
53. Carrboro 56.5% 33.8% (+22.7)#53 35.2% (+21.3)#1,790
54. Selma 56.4% 33.8% (+22.6)#54 35.2% (+21.2)#1,801
55. North Wilkesboro 56.4% 33.8% (+22.6)#55 35.2% (+21.2)#1,806
56. Old Hundred 56.4% 33.8% (+22.6)#56 35.2% (+21.2)#1,809
57. Maxton 56.3% 33.8% (+22.5)#57 35.2% (+21.1)#1,825
58. Carolina Meadows 55.9% 33.8% (+22.1)#58 35.2% (+20.7)#1,885
59. Princeton 55.7% 33.8% (+21.9)#59 35.2% (+20.5)#1,905
60. Scotland Neck 55.7% 33.8% (+21.9)#60 35.2% (+20.5)#1,911
61. Keener 55.5% 33.8% (+21.7)#61 35.2% (+20.3)#1,959
62. Camden 55.4% 33.8% (+21.6)#62 35.2% (+20.2)#1,963
63. Conetoe 55.3% 33.8% (+21.6)#63 35.2% (+20.2)#1,975
64. Forest City 55.3% 33.8% (+21.5)#64 35.2% (+20.1)#1,986
65. Spindale 54.6% 33.8% (+20.9)#65 35.2% (+19.5)#2,084
66. Fayetteville 54.6% 33.8% (+20.8)#66 35.2% (+19.4)#2,101
67. Laurinburg 54.3% 33.8% (+20.5)#67 35.2% (+19.1)#2,141
68. Wilmington 54.1% 33.8% (+20.3)#68 35.2% (+18.9)#2,174
69. Potters Hill 53.9% 33.8% (+20.1)#69 35.2% (+18.7)#2,198
70. Aurora 53.9% 33.8% (+20.1)#70 35.2% (+18.7)#2,202
71. Franklinville 53.8% 33.8% (+20.1)#71 35.2% (+18.7)#2,207
72. Dillsboro 53.8% 33.8% (+20.1)#72 35.2% (+18.7)#2,210
73. Snow Hill 53.7% 33.8% (+19.9)#73 35.2% (+18.5)#2,228
74. Jonesville 53.5% 33.8% (+19.7)#74 35.2% (+18.3)#2,269
75. Hookerton 53.3% 33.8% (+19.5)#75 35.2% (+18.1)#2,323
76. Lumberton 53.2% 33.8% (+19.4)#76 35.2% (+18.0)#2,335
77. Biscoe 53.2% 33.8% (+19.4)#77 35.2% (+18.0)#2,346
78. Beaufort 52.9% 33.8% (+19.1)#78 35.2% (+17.7)#2,403
79. Clinton 52.8% 33.8% (+19.1)#79 35.2% (+17.7)#2,414
80. Dobson 52.7% 33.8% (+18.9)#80 35.2% (+17.5)#2,435
81. Whiteville 52.7% 33.8% (+18.9)#81 35.2% (+17.5)#2,436
82. Pineville 52.5% 33.8% (+18.7)#82 35.2% (+17.3)#2,472
83. Bonnetsville 52.5% 33.8% (+18.7)#83 35.2% (+17.3)#2,478
84. Hendersonville 52.5% 33.8% (+18.7)#84 35.2% (+17.3)#2,486
85. Yadkinville 52.4% 33.8% (+18.6)#85 35.2% (+17.2)#2,504
86. East Laurinburg 52.4% 33.8% (+18.6)#86 35.2% (+17.2)#2,507
87. Benson 52.4% 33.8% (+18.6)#87 35.2% (+17.2)#2,514
88. Jefferson 52.3% 33.8% (+18.5)#88 35.2% (+17.1)#2,537
89. Fairmont 52.2% 33.8% (+18.4)#89 35.2% (+17.0)#2,554
90. Star 52.2% 33.8% (+18.4)#90 35.2% (+17.0)#2,555
91. Creswell 52.1% 33.8% (+18.3)#91 35.2% (+16.9)#2,571
92. Asheboro 51.8% 33.8% (+18.0)#92 35.2% (+16.6)#2,624
93. Sharpsburg 51.7% 33.8% (+17.9)#93 35.2% (+16.6)#2,644
94. Morehead City 51.7% 33.8% (+17.9)#94 35.2% (+16.5)#2,652
95. Maury 51.6% 33.8% (+17.8)#95 35.2% (+16.4)#2,670
96. Roper 51.5% 33.8% (+17.7)#96 35.2% (+16.3)#2,699
97. Woodland 51.3% 33.8% (+17.5)#97 35.2% (+16.1)#2,748
98. Bessemer City 51.0% 33.8% (+17.2)#98 35.2% (+15.8)#2,838
99. Smithfield 50.9% 33.8% (+17.1)#99 35.2% (+15.7)#2,872
100. Youngsville 50.9% 33.8% (+17.1)#100 35.2% (+15.7)#2,882

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
90.7%
#5
77.9%
#6
77.5%
#7
77.1%
#8
72.3%
#9
71.6%
#10
69.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina?
Montreat has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in North Carolina is 33.8%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.