Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Fort Bliss 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#2
2. Lackland Afb 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#5
3. Laughlin Afb 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#43
4. Randolph Afb 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#55
5. Del Sol 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#5 35.2% (+64.8)#79
6. Garciasville 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#6 35.2% (+64.8)#87
7. Airport Heights 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#7 35.2% (+64.8)#99
8. El Castillo 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#8 35.2% (+64.8)#102
9. Boys Ranch 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#9 35.2% (+64.8)#105
10. Los Altos 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#10 35.2% (+64.8)#133
11. Tierra Grande 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#11 35.2% (+64.8)#148
12. Lopeno 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#12 35.2% (+64.8)#159
13. Los Veteranos I 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#13 35.2% (+64.8)#171
14. Oakhurst 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#14 35.2% (+64.8)#191
15. Clay 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#15 35.2% (+64.8)#195
16. Los Ybanez 100.0% 37.6% (+62.4)#16 35.2% (+64.8)#219
17. Fort Hood 99.3% 37.6% (+61.7)#17 35.2% (+64.1)#244
18. Chaparrito 85.0% 37.6% (+47.4)#18 35.2% (+49.8)#371
19. Sarita 84.2% 37.6% (+46.6)#19 35.2% (+49.0)#377
20. Webster 83.7% 37.6% (+46.1)#20 35.2% (+48.5)#386
21. Quintana 82.8% 37.6% (+45.2)#21 35.2% (+47.6)#398
22. Addison 82.7% 37.6% (+45.1)#22 35.2% (+47.5)#399
23. Prairie View 82.1% 37.6% (+44.5)#23 35.2% (+46.9)#409
24. Evergreen 81.5% 37.6% (+43.9)#24 35.2% (+46.3)#417
25. Balcones Heights 81.4% 37.6% (+43.8)#25 35.2% (+46.2)#418
26. Sandy Hollow Escondidas 81.1% 37.6% (+43.5)#26 35.2% (+45.9)#421
27. Mcleod 79.3% 37.6% (+41.7)#27 35.2% (+44.1)#463
28. Chula Vista Cdp Cameron County 78.0% 37.6% (+40.4)#28 35.2% (+42.9)#483
29. La Puerta 76.0% 37.6% (+38.4)#29 35.2% (+40.9)#523
30. Barrera 75.8% 37.6% (+38.2)#30 35.2% (+40.6)#527
31. Shelbyville 75.7% 37.6% (+38.1)#31 35.2% (+40.5)#529
32. Fronton Ranchettes 73.1% 37.6% (+35.5)#32 35.2% (+38.0)#595
33. Hempstead 73.0% 37.6% (+35.4)#33 35.2% (+37.9)#598
34. Utopia 72.2% 37.6% (+34.6)#34 35.2% (+37.0)#626
35. Wells Branch 71.9% 37.6% (+34.3)#35 35.2% (+36.7)#640
36. Radar Base 71.4% 37.6% (+33.8)#36 35.2% (+36.2)#653
37. Farnsworth 71.4% 37.6% (+33.8)#37 35.2% (+36.2)#655
38. Waller 71.2% 37.6% (+33.6)#38 35.2% (+36.0)#665
39. San Marcos 71.1% 37.6% (+33.5)#39 35.2% (+35.9)#667
40. Solis 70.4% 37.6% (+32.8)#40 35.2% (+35.2)#692
41. Mobile City 70.3% 37.6% (+32.7)#41 35.2% (+35.2)#695
42. La Esperanza 68.8% 37.6% (+31.1)#42 35.2% (+33.6)#772
43. Sun Valley 68.8% 37.6% (+31.1)#43 35.2% (+33.6)#773
44. Knollwood 67.9% 37.6% (+30.3)#44 35.2% (+32.7)#802
45. Garwood 67.9% 37.6% (+30.3)#45 35.2% (+32.7)#803
46. Driscoll 66.7% 37.6% (+29.1)#46 35.2% (+31.5)#862
47. Amargosa 65.3% 37.6% (+27.7)#47 35.2% (+30.1)#929
48. Opdyke West 64.9% 37.6% (+27.3)#48 35.2% (+29.7)#955
49. Study Butte 64.6% 37.6% (+27.0)#49 35.2% (+29.4)#980
50. College Station 63.7% 37.6% (+26.1)#50 35.2% (+28.5)#1,041
51. Huntsville 63.5% 37.6% (+25.9)#51 35.2% (+28.3)#1,066
52. Humble 63.3% 37.6% (+25.7)#52 35.2% (+28.1)#1,080
53. Nacogdoches 63.1% 37.6% (+25.5)#53 35.2% (+27.9)#1,093
54. Laguna Heights 62.9% 37.6% (+25.3)#54 35.2% (+27.7)#1,115
55. Irving 62.8% 37.6% (+25.2)#55 35.2% (+27.7)#1,118
56. Lockett 62.5% 37.6% (+24.9)#56 35.2% (+27.3)#1,149
57. Olmito 61.7% 37.6% (+24.1)#57 35.2% (+26.5)#1,213
58. Seven Oaks 61.7% 37.6% (+24.1)#58 35.2% (+26.5)#1,215
59. Bledsoe 61.5% 37.6% (+23.9)#59 35.2% (+26.4)#1,232
60. Euless 60.5% 37.6% (+22.9)#60 35.2% (+25.3)#1,318
61. Alto 60.4% 37.6% (+22.8)#61 35.2% (+25.3)#1,324
62. Commerce 60.4% 37.6% (+22.8)#62 35.2% (+25.2)#1,327
63. Hudson 59.9% 37.6% (+22.3)#63 35.2% (+24.8)#1,384
64. Cactus 59.2% 37.6% (+21.6)#64 35.2% (+24.0)#1,462
65. Kaufman 59.2% 37.6% (+21.6)#65 35.2% (+24.0)#1,465
66. Ramos 58.3% 37.6% (+20.7)#66 35.2% (+23.1)#1,550
67. Las Palmas Ii 58.2% 37.6% (+20.6)#67 35.2% (+23.0)#1,563
68. Dallas 58.1% 37.6% (+20.5)#68 35.2% (+22.9)#1,582
69. Houston 58.0% 37.6% (+20.4)#69 35.2% (+22.9)#1,583
70. Rochelle 57.9% 37.6% (+20.3)#70 35.2% (+22.8)#1,594
71. Big Sandy 57.9% 37.6% (+20.3)#71 35.2% (+22.7)#1,601
72. Sadler 57.6% 37.6% (+20.0)#72 35.2% (+22.4)#1,651
73. Huntington 57.5% 37.6% (+19.9)#73 35.2% (+22.3)#1,663
74. Forsan 56.9% 37.6% (+19.3)#74 35.2% (+21.7)#1,735
75. Realitos 56.8% 37.6% (+19.2)#75 35.2% (+21.6)#1,743
76. San Augustine 56.5% 37.6% (+18.9)#76 35.2% (+21.3)#1,788
77. Corrigan 56.5% 37.6% (+18.9)#77 35.2% (+21.3)#1,791
78. Myrtle Springs 56.5% 37.6% (+18.9)#78 35.2% (+21.3)#1,796
79. Runge 56.4% 37.6% (+18.8)#79 35.2% (+21.2)#1,808
80. Guthrie 56.2% 37.6% (+18.6)#80 35.2% (+21.1)#1,833
81. Perrin 55.7% 37.6% (+18.1)#81 35.2% (+20.6)#1,902
82. Mabank 55.7% 37.6% (+18.1)#82 35.2% (+20.5)#1,904
83. Austin 55.6% 37.6% (+18.0)#83 35.2% (+20.4)#1,928
84. Ranchitos East 55.6% 37.6% (+18.0)#84 35.2% (+20.4)#1,936
85. May 55.2% 37.6% (+17.6)#85 35.2% (+20.0)#1,992
86. Lacy Lakeview 55.2% 37.6% (+17.6)#86 35.2% (+20.0)#1,999
87. Emory 54.9% 37.6% (+17.3)#87 35.2% (+19.7)#2,051
88. Wharton 54.8% 37.6% (+17.2)#88 35.2% (+19.6)#2,066
89. Lewisville 54.8% 37.6% (+17.2)#89 35.2% (+19.6)#2,071
90. Sansom Park 54.3% 37.6% (+16.6)#90 35.2% (+19.1)#2,148
91. Stafford 54.2% 37.6% (+16.6)#91 35.2% (+19.0)#2,151
92. Stephenville 54.1% 37.6% (+16.5)#92 35.2% (+18.9)#2,168
93. Ector 53.9% 37.6% (+16.3)#93 35.2% (+18.8)#2,190
94. Spring Branch 53.9% 37.6% (+16.3)#94 35.2% (+18.7)#2,192
95. Killeen 53.7% 37.6% (+16.1)#95 35.2% (+18.6)#2,225
96. Galveston 53.7% 37.6% (+16.1)#96 35.2% (+18.5)#2,236
97. Kingsville 53.5% 37.6% (+15.9)#97 35.2% (+18.3)#2,267
98. Seco Mines 53.5% 37.6% (+15.9)#98 35.2% (+18.3)#2,268
99. Crockett 53.5% 37.6% (+15.9)#99 35.2% (+18.3)#2,272
100. Westworth Village 53.4% 37.6% (+15.8)#100 35.2% (+18.2)#2,294

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas?
Fort Bliss has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.