Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Green Acres 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#13
2. Four Bears Village 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#58
3. Jessie 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#158
4. Mylo 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#209
5. Ypsilanti 100.0% 9.1% (+90.9)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#212
6. Ardoch 80.0% 9.1% (+70.9)#6 10.0% (+70.0)#278
7. Sarles 80.0% 9.1% (+70.9)#7 10.0% (+70.0)#279
8. Ambrose 75.0% 9.1% (+65.9)#8 10.0% (+65.0)#317
9. Haynes 69.2% 9.1% (+60.1)#9 10.0% (+59.3)#378
10. Mchenry 66.7% 9.1% (+57.6)#10 10.0% (+56.7)#416
11. Pillsbury 66.7% 9.1% (+57.6)#11 10.0% (+56.7)#420
12. Luverne 60.0% 9.1% (+50.9)#12 10.0% (+50.0)#513
13. Grace City 55.6% 9.1% (+46.4)#13 10.0% (+45.6)#605
14. Arnegard 55.0% 9.1% (+45.9)#14 10.0% (+45.0)#613
15. Mandaree 50.0% 9.1% (+40.9)#15 10.0% (+40.0)#738
16. Makoti 50.0% 9.1% (+40.9)#16 10.0% (+40.0)#784
17. Hansboro 50.0% 9.1% (+40.9)#17 10.0% (+40.0)#804
18. East Fairview 47.4% 9.1% (+38.3)#18 10.0% (+37.5)#878
19. Kathryn 46.7% 9.1% (+37.6)#19 10.0% (+36.7)#913
20. Pisek 45.9% 9.1% (+36.8)#20 10.0% (+36.0)#941
21. De Lamere 43.8% 9.1% (+34.6)#21 10.0% (+33.8)#1,041
22. Fort Totten 41.2% 9.1% (+32.1)#22 10.0% (+31.2)#1,170
23. Fingal 40.0% 9.1% (+30.9)#23 10.0% (+30.0)#1,242
24. Dawson 38.5% 9.1% (+29.3)#24 10.0% (+28.5)#1,358
25. Esmond 38.2% 9.1% (+29.1)#25 10.0% (+28.3)#1,366
26. Tappen 37.5% 9.1% (+28.4)#26 10.0% (+27.5)#1,411
27. Cannon Ball 36.8% 9.1% (+27.7)#27 10.0% (+26.9)#1,469
28. Edmore 36.7% 9.1% (+27.6)#28 10.0% (+26.8)#1,484
29. Aneta 35.3% 9.1% (+26.2)#29 10.0% (+25.3)#1,620
30. Tuttle 34.6% 9.1% (+25.5)#30 10.0% (+24.7)#1,668
31. East Dunseith 33.3% 9.1% (+24.2)#31 10.0% (+23.4)#1,764
32. Deering 33.3% 9.1% (+24.2)#32 10.0% (+23.4)#1,807
33. Barney 33.3% 9.1% (+24.2)#33 10.0% (+23.4)#1,823
34. Inkster 33.3% 9.1% (+24.2)#34 10.0% (+23.4)#1,834
35. Willow City 32.4% 9.1% (+23.2)#35 10.0% (+22.4)#1,902
36. Hague 30.0% 9.1% (+20.9)#36 10.0% (+20.0)#2,205
37. Bathgate 29.4% 9.1% (+20.3)#37 10.0% (+19.5)#2,300
38. Center 28.6% 9.1% (+19.5)#38 10.0% (+18.6)#2,426
39. Halliday 27.9% 9.1% (+18.8)#39 10.0% (+18.0)#2,560
40. Parshall 27.3% 9.1% (+18.2)#40 10.0% (+17.3)#2,672
41. Rocklake 27.3% 9.1% (+18.2)#41 10.0% (+17.3)#2,686
42. Bisbee 26.7% 9.1% (+17.6)#42 10.0% (+16.7)#2,789
43. Carson 26.5% 9.1% (+17.4)#43 10.0% (+16.5)#2,827
44. Hunter 26.1% 9.1% (+17.0)#44 10.0% (+16.1)#2,906
45. Walhalla 25.7% 9.1% (+16.6)#45 10.0% (+15.7)#2,984
46. Belfield 25.3% 9.1% (+16.2)#46 10.0% (+15.4)#3,086
47. Mooreton 25.0% 9.1% (+15.9)#47 10.0% (+15.0)#3,189
48. Pettibone 25.0% 9.1% (+15.9)#48 10.0% (+15.0)#3,218
49. Antler 25.0% 9.1% (+15.9)#49 10.0% (+15.0)#3,236
50. Wishek 24.8% 9.1% (+15.7)#50 10.0% (+14.8)#3,260
51. Watford City 24.0% 9.1% (+14.9)#51 10.0% (+14.1)#3,436
52. Pick City 23.8% 9.1% (+14.7)#52 10.0% (+13.9)#3,496
53. Jud 23.5% 9.1% (+14.4)#53 10.0% (+13.6)#3,578
54. Binford 23.4% 9.1% (+14.3)#54 10.0% (+13.5)#3,608
55. Medina 23.1% 9.1% (+14.0)#55 10.0% (+13.1)#3,703
56. Marmarth 23.1% 9.1% (+14.0)#56 10.0% (+13.1)#3,711
57. Newburg 23.1% 9.1% (+14.0)#57 10.0% (+13.1)#3,715
58. Loma 23.1% 9.1% (+14.0)#58 10.0% (+13.1)#3,719
59. Pembina 22.9% 9.1% (+13.8)#59 10.0% (+12.9)#3,762
60. Jamestown 22.8% 9.1% (+13.7)#60 10.0% (+12.9)#3,782
61. Menoken 22.2% 9.1% (+13.1)#61 10.0% (+12.3)#3,966
62. Mott 22.0% 9.1% (+12.9)#62 10.0% (+12.1)#4,008
63. Anamoose 21.6% 9.1% (+12.5)#63 10.0% (+11.6)#4,137
64. Hope 21.3% 9.1% (+12.2)#64 10.0% (+11.4)#4,228
65. Maddock 21.1% 9.1% (+12.0)#65 10.0% (+11.2)#4,285
66. Sanborn 20.7% 9.1% (+11.6)#66 10.0% (+10.7)#4,457
67. Drake 20.6% 9.1% (+11.5)#67 10.0% (+10.7)#4,475
68. Finley 20.6% 9.1% (+11.5)#68 10.0% (+10.7)#4,479
69. Flasher 20.4% 9.1% (+11.3)#69 10.0% (+10.4)#4,573
70. Sheyenne 20.3% 9.1% (+11.2)#70 10.0% (+10.3)#4,615
71. Solen 20.0% 9.1% (+10.9)#71 10.0% (+10.0)#4,777
72. Hampden 20.0% 9.1% (+10.9)#72 10.0% (+10.0)#4,792
73. Linton 19.9% 9.1% (+10.8)#73 10.0% (+9.98)#4,809
74. Belcourt 19.2% 9.1% (+10.1)#74 10.0% (+9.28)#5,099
75. Mcclusky 18.9% 9.1% (+9.75)#75 10.0% (+8.92)#5,261
76. Ashley 18.2% 9.1% (+9.11)#76 10.0% (+8.27)#5,544
77. Buffalo 18.2% 9.1% (+9.07)#77 10.0% (+8.23)#5,583
78. Gascoyne 18.2% 9.1% (+9.07)#78 10.0% (+8.23)#5,598
79. Trenton 17.9% 9.1% (+8.83)#79 10.0% (+8.00)#5,686
80. Elgin 17.5% 9.1% (+8.35)#80 10.0% (+7.52)#5,952
81. Osnabrock 17.1% 9.1% (+8.03)#81 10.0% (+7.19)#6,150
82. Reeder 17.1% 9.1% (+7.96)#82 10.0% (+7.12)#6,186
83. Carrington 17.0% 9.1% (+7.92)#83 10.0% (+7.08)#6,199
84. Valley City 16.9% 9.1% (+7.75)#84 10.0% (+6.91)#6,303
85. Cando 16.8% 9.1% (+7.73)#85 10.0% (+6.90)#6,312
86. Regan 16.7% 9.1% (+7.55)#86 10.0% (+6.71)#6,447
87. Lehr 16.7% 9.1% (+7.55)#87 10.0% (+6.71)#6,454
88. Hankinson 16.1% 9.1% (+6.99)#88 10.0% (+6.16)#6,768
89. Casselton 15.9% 9.1% (+6.78)#89 10.0% (+5.94)#6,910
90. Langdon 15.9% 9.1% (+6.77)#90 10.0% (+5.94)#6,912
91. Michigan City 15.7% 9.1% (+6.57)#91 10.0% (+5.73)#7,033
92. Driscoll 15.6% 9.1% (+6.51)#92 10.0% (+5.67)#7,082
93. New Town 15.4% 9.1% (+6.27)#93 10.0% (+5.43)#7,216
94. Bottineau 15.4% 9.1% (+6.27)#94 10.0% (+5.43)#7,217
95. New Salem 15.4% 9.1% (+6.27)#95 10.0% (+5.43)#7,223
96. Emerado 15.0% 9.1% (+5.88)#96 10.0% (+5.05)#7,498
97. Ray 14.7% 9.1% (+5.63)#97 10.0% (+4.79)#7,680
98. Regent 14.7% 9.1% (+5.59)#98 10.0% (+4.75)#7,704
99. Fessenden 14.7% 9.1% (+5.55)#99 10.0% (+4.71)#7,733
100. Crary 14.3% 9.1% (+5.17)#100 10.0% (+4.33)#8,050

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
80.0%
#7
80.0%
#8
75.0%
#9
69.2%
#10
66.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota?
Green Acres has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in North Dakota is 9.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.