Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hartz Lake 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#55
2. Bippus 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#117
3. Penntown 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#130
4. Paris Crossing 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#197
5. Eckerty 81.0% 8.1% (+72.8)#5 10.0% (+71.0)#272
6. Celestine 80.5% 8.1% (+72.3)#6 10.0% (+70.5)#273
7. Andersonville 73.2% 8.1% (+65.0)#7 10.0% (+63.2)#337
8. St Mary Of The Woods 71.5% 8.1% (+63.3)#8 10.0% (+61.5)#344
9. Groverton 70.3% 8.1% (+62.1)#9 10.0% (+60.3)#360
10. Notre Dame 66.3% 8.1% (+58.2)#10 10.0% (+56.4)#425
11. Butlerville 59.7% 8.1% (+51.6)#11 10.0% (+49.8)#519
12. Cass 58.3% 8.1% (+50.2)#12 10.0% (+48.4)#540
13. Freetown 57.1% 8.1% (+49.0)#13 10.0% (+47.2)#553
14. Dubois 56.2% 8.1% (+48.1)#14 10.0% (+46.3)#584
15. Paxton 53.7% 8.1% (+45.6)#15 10.0% (+43.8)#648
16. Holiday Woods 52.6% 8.1% (+44.5)#16 10.0% (+42.7)#675
17. Americus 50.9% 8.1% (+42.7)#17 10.0% (+40.9)#728
18. New Middletown 50.0% 8.1% (+41.9)#18 10.0% (+40.0)#790
19. Mauckport 50.0% 8.1% (+41.9)#19 10.0% (+40.0)#796
20. River Forest 50.0% 8.1% (+41.9)#20 10.0% (+40.0)#807
21. Oldenburg 45.4% 8.1% (+37.3)#21 10.0% (+35.5)#967
22. Forest 44.3% 8.1% (+36.1)#22 10.0% (+34.3)#1,011
23. Lake Village 44.0% 8.1% (+35.8)#23 10.0% (+34.0)#1,022
24. Willow Branch 43.8% 8.1% (+35.6)#24 10.0% (+33.8)#1,037
25. Adams 42.3% 8.1% (+34.2)#25 10.0% (+32.4)#1,105
26. Alton 40.0% 8.1% (+31.9)#26 10.0% (+30.0)#1,264
27. Memphis 39.5% 8.1% (+31.3)#27 10.0% (+29.5)#1,279
28. Tennyson 39.3% 8.1% (+31.1)#28 10.0% (+29.3)#1,297
29. Thayer 38.7% 8.1% (+30.6)#29 10.0% (+28.8)#1,333
30. Nyona Lake 38.6% 8.1% (+30.4)#30 10.0% (+28.6)#1,342
31. Attica 37.9% 8.1% (+29.8)#31 10.0% (+28.0)#1,383
32. Cree Lake 37.5% 8.1% (+29.4)#32 10.0% (+27.5)#1,413
33. Stinesville 36.8% 8.1% (+28.7)#33 10.0% (+26.9)#1,472
34. Bowling Green 36.6% 8.1% (+28.5)#34 10.0% (+26.7)#1,495
35. Eugene 36.4% 8.1% (+28.2)#35 10.0% (+26.4)#1,516
36. Amity 35.7% 8.1% (+27.6)#36 10.0% (+25.8)#1,574
37. Newbern 35.7% 8.1% (+27.6)#37 10.0% (+25.8)#1,578
38. Gilmer Park 35.2% 8.1% (+27.0)#38 10.0% (+25.2)#1,624
39. Laconia 33.3% 8.1% (+25.2)#39 10.0% (+23.4)#1,819
40. St. Wendel 32.9% 8.1% (+24.7)#40 10.0% (+22.9)#1,856
41. Knox 32.6% 8.1% (+24.4)#41 10.0% (+22.6)#1,882
42. New Pekin 31.7% 8.1% (+23.5)#42 10.0% (+21.7)#1,988
43. Sims 31.0% 8.1% (+22.8)#43 10.0% (+21.0)#2,080
44. Culver 29.7% 8.1% (+21.5)#44 10.0% (+19.7)#2,262
45. Miami 29.6% 8.1% (+21.5)#45 10.0% (+19.7)#2,269
46. Boston 29.4% 8.1% (+21.3)#46 10.0% (+19.5)#2,296
47. Wadesville 29.1% 8.1% (+20.9)#47 10.0% (+19.1)#2,337
48. Rockfield 28.9% 8.1% (+20.8)#48 10.0% (+19.0)#2,363
49. Paoli 28.9% 8.1% (+20.7)#49 10.0% (+18.9)#2,378
50. Manilla 28.8% 8.1% (+20.7)#50 10.0% (+18.9)#2,386
51. Trafalgar 28.1% 8.1% (+19.9)#51 10.0% (+18.1)#2,532
52. Charlestown 27.8% 8.1% (+19.6)#52 10.0% (+17.8)#2,596
53. Scottsburg 27.5% 8.1% (+19.3)#53 10.0% (+17.5)#2,648
54. Saugany Lake 27.0% 8.1% (+18.8)#54 10.0% (+17.0)#2,737
55. Borden 26.8% 8.1% (+18.6)#55 10.0% (+16.8)#2,766
56. Merom 26.7% 8.1% (+18.5)#56 10.0% (+16.7)#2,782
57. Canaan 26.5% 8.1% (+18.3)#57 10.0% (+16.5)#2,830
58. Richland 26.3% 8.1% (+18.2)#58 10.0% (+16.4)#2,854
59. Carthage 26.2% 8.1% (+18.1)#59 10.0% (+16.3)#2,881
60. Cicero 25.8% 8.1% (+17.6)#60 10.0% (+15.8)#2,971
61. Russellville 25.5% 8.1% (+17.4)#61 10.0% (+15.6)#3,029
62. Shoals 25.1% 8.1% (+17.0)#62 10.0% (+15.2)#3,126
63. New Goshen 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#63 10.0% (+15.0)#3,154
64. Modoc 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#64 10.0% (+15.0)#3,177
65. Yeoman 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#65 10.0% (+15.0)#3,185
66. Salamonia 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#66 10.0% (+15.0)#3,187
67. Grantsburg 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#67 10.0% (+15.0)#3,190
68. Bethany 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#68 10.0% (+15.0)#3,227
69. Henryville 24.9% 8.1% (+16.7)#69 10.0% (+14.9)#3,244
70. Winamac 23.6% 8.1% (+15.4)#70 10.0% (+13.6)#3,553
71. New Chicago 23.5% 8.1% (+15.4)#71 10.0% (+13.6)#3,561
72. Chain-O-Lakes 23.5% 8.1% (+15.4)#72 10.0% (+13.6)#3,567
73. Laketon 23.5% 8.1% (+15.4)#73 10.0% (+13.6)#3,570
74. Napoleon 23.4% 8.1% (+15.3)#74 10.0% (+13.5)#3,596
75. Royerton 23.3% 8.1% (+15.1)#75 10.0% (+13.3)#3,652
76. Lynn 22.2% 8.1% (+14.1)#76 10.0% (+12.3)#3,926
77. Ashley 22.1% 8.1% (+14.0)#77 10.0% (+12.2)#3,990
78. Newport 22.0% 8.1% (+13.9)#78 10.0% (+12.1)#4,011
79. Francesville 21.9% 8.1% (+13.8)#79 10.0% (+12.0)#4,040
80. Summitville 21.8% 8.1% (+13.6)#80 10.0% (+11.8)#4,080
81. Shelby 21.3% 8.1% (+13.1)#81 10.0% (+11.3)#4,236
82. Hobbs 21.3% 8.1% (+13.1)#82 10.0% (+11.3)#4,237
83. Enchanted Hills 21.2% 8.1% (+13.1)#83 10.0% (+11.3)#4,244
84. Bicknell 21.2% 8.1% (+13.1)#84 10.0% (+11.3)#4,246
85. Wheatland 21.2% 8.1% (+13.0)#85 10.0% (+11.2)#4,273
86. Greendale 21.1% 8.1% (+12.9)#86 10.0% (+11.1)#4,301
87. Saratoga 21.1% 8.1% (+12.9)#87 10.0% (+11.1)#4,314
88. Milan 21.0% 8.1% (+12.8)#88 10.0% (+11.0)#4,335
89. English 20.8% 8.1% (+12.7)#89 10.0% (+10.9)#4,386
90. Griffin 20.8% 8.1% (+12.7)#90 10.0% (+10.9)#4,400
91. Lakeville 20.8% 8.1% (+12.6)#91 10.0% (+10.8)#4,425
92. Laurel 20.7% 8.1% (+12.5)#92 10.0% (+10.7)#4,445
93. Greensburg 20.4% 8.1% (+12.2)#93 10.0% (+10.4)#4,563
94. Seymour 20.3% 8.1% (+12.2)#94 10.0% (+10.4)#4,591
95. Shelburn 20.2% 8.1% (+12.1)#95 10.0% (+10.3)#4,623
96. Monroe City 19.8% 8.1% (+11.6)#96 10.0% (+9.84)#4,862
97. Petersburg 19.8% 8.1% (+11.6)#97 10.0% (+9.82)#4,872
98. Town Of Pines 19.8% 8.1% (+11.6)#98 10.0% (+9.80)#4,882
99. Holton 19.6% 8.1% (+11.5)#99 10.0% (+9.66)#4,937
100. Shorewood Forest 19.6% 8.1% (+11.4)#100 10.0% (+9.60)#4,954

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana are:
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana?
St Mary of the Woods has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana with 71.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Indiana is 8.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.