Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hardwood Acres 100.0% 9.0% (+91.0)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#19
2. Elm Hall 65.5% 9.0% (+56.5)#2 10.0% (+55.5)#434
3. Bingham Farms 48.5% 9.0% (+39.5)#3 10.0% (+38.5)#843
4. Maple City 48.4% 9.0% (+39.4)#4 10.0% (+38.4)#846
5. Watersmeet 44.4% 9.0% (+35.5)#5 10.0% (+34.5)#1,000
6. Highland Park 44.2% 9.0% (+35.2)#6 10.0% (+34.2)#1,013
7. Benton Harbor 43.6% 9.0% (+34.6)#7 10.0% (+33.6)#1,047
8. Whittemore 40.2% 9.0% (+31.3)#8 10.0% (+30.3)#1,226
9. Middleville 39.9% 9.0% (+31.0)#9 10.0% (+30.0)#1,265
10. Mears 37.3% 9.0% (+28.4)#10 10.0% (+27.4)#1,436
11. Mount Morris 36.6% 9.0% (+27.6)#11 10.0% (+26.6)#1,499
12. Kingston 36.4% 9.0% (+27.4)#12 10.0% (+26.4)#1,509
13. Farwell 35.1% 9.0% (+26.2)#13 10.0% (+25.2)#1,630
14. Gobles 34.2% 9.0% (+25.2)#14 10.0% (+24.2)#1,704
15. Clarksville 33.3% 9.0% (+24.4)#15 10.0% (+23.4)#1,771
16. Cambria 33.3% 9.0% (+24.4)#16 10.0% (+23.4)#1,787
17. Interlochen 33.1% 9.0% (+24.1)#17 10.0% (+23.2)#1,846
18. Hurontown 32.4% 9.0% (+23.5)#18 10.0% (+22.5)#1,894
19. Wellston 32.1% 9.0% (+23.1)#19 10.0% (+22.1)#1,929
20. Millburg 31.7% 9.0% (+22.8)#20 10.0% (+21.8)#1,978
21. Baldwin 31.2% 9.0% (+22.2)#21 10.0% (+21.2)#2,051
22. Brown City 30.9% 9.0% (+21.9)#22 10.0% (+21.0)#2,082
23. Memphis 30.7% 9.0% (+21.7)#23 10.0% (+20.7)#2,113
24. Harrietta 30.6% 9.0% (+21.6)#24 10.0% (+20.6)#2,132
25. Evart 30.1% 9.0% (+21.2)#25 10.0% (+20.2)#2,181
26. River Rouge 29.2% 9.0% (+20.3)#26 10.0% (+19.3)#2,317
27. Mesick 28.4% 9.0% (+19.4)#27 10.0% (+18.4)#2,488
28. Lawrence 28.2% 9.0% (+19.2)#28 10.0% (+18.3)#2,505
29. Barnes Lake 27.9% 9.0% (+19.0)#29 10.0% (+18.0)#2,552
30. Manistique 27.6% 9.0% (+18.7)#30 10.0% (+17.7)#2,618
31. Luther 27.5% 9.0% (+18.5)#31 10.0% (+17.5)#2,653
32. Painesdale 27.3% 9.0% (+18.3)#32 10.0% (+17.3)#2,679
33. Mcbain 27.2% 9.0% (+18.2)#33 10.0% (+17.2)#2,701
34. Quinnesec 26.4% 9.0% (+17.4)#34 10.0% (+16.4)#2,846
35. Applegate 26.3% 9.0% (+17.4)#35 10.0% (+16.4)#2,858
36. Tower 25.8% 9.0% (+16.8)#36 10.0% (+15.9)#2,960
37. Beulah 25.3% 9.0% (+16.3)#37 10.0% (+15.3)#3,096
38. Buena Vista 25.1% 9.0% (+16.2)#38 10.0% (+15.2)#3,120
39. Hartford 25.0% 9.0% (+16.0)#39 10.0% (+15.0)#3,138
40. Fairgrove 25.0% 9.0% (+16.0)#40 10.0% (+15.0)#3,157
41. Powers 25.0% 9.0% (+16.0)#41 10.0% (+15.0)#3,164
42. Imlay City 24.5% 9.0% (+15.5)#42 10.0% (+14.6)#3,302
43. Grayling 24.3% 9.0% (+15.3)#43 10.0% (+14.3)#3,376
44. Hamtramck 24.2% 9.0% (+15.2)#44 10.0% (+14.2)#3,403
45. Grant 24.1% 9.0% (+15.2)#45 10.0% (+14.2)#3,408
46. Chesaning 23.5% 9.0% (+14.5)#46 10.0% (+13.5)#3,588
47. Davison 23.4% 9.0% (+14.5)#47 10.0% (+13.5)#3,597
48. Port Hope 23.3% 9.0% (+14.3)#48 10.0% (+13.3)#3,651
49. Reed City 23.2% 9.0% (+14.3)#49 10.0% (+13.3)#3,658
50. Hart 22.9% 9.0% (+14.0)#50 10.0% (+13.0)#3,747
51. Kaleva 22.6% 9.0% (+13.6)#51 10.0% (+12.6)#3,842
52. Morrice 22.4% 9.0% (+13.5)#52 10.0% (+12.5)#3,884
53. Melvindale 22.4% 9.0% (+13.5)#53 10.0% (+12.5)#3,889
54. Camden 22.2% 9.0% (+13.3)#54 10.0% (+12.3)#3,930
55. Falmouth 22.2% 9.0% (+13.3)#55 10.0% (+12.3)#3,943
56. Greenland 22.2% 9.0% (+13.3)#56 10.0% (+12.3)#3,952
57. Fair Plain 22.2% 9.0% (+13.2)#57 10.0% (+12.2)#3,976
58. Watervliet 21.8% 9.0% (+12.9)#58 10.0% (+11.9)#4,063
59. Crystal 21.7% 9.0% (+12.7)#59 10.0% (+11.7)#4,114
60. Morley 21.6% 9.0% (+12.6)#60 10.0% (+11.6)#4,133
61. Deckerville 21.6% 9.0% (+12.6)#61 10.0% (+11.6)#4,144
62. Forestville 21.4% 9.0% (+12.5)#62 10.0% (+11.5)#4,190
63. White Pigeon 21.3% 9.0% (+12.3)#63 10.0% (+11.3)#4,241
64. Muskegon Heights 21.1% 9.0% (+12.2)#64 10.0% (+11.2)#4,286
65. Caro 21.1% 9.0% (+12.1)#65 10.0% (+11.1)#4,291
66. Manton 21.0% 9.0% (+12.0)#66 10.0% (+11.0)#4,332
67. Detroit 20.6% 9.0% (+11.7)#67 10.0% (+10.7)#4,476
68. Chatham 20.6% 9.0% (+11.6)#68 10.0% (+10.6)#4,495
69. Bangor 20.5% 9.0% (+11.5)#69 10.0% (+10.5)#4,523
70. Harrison 20.5% 9.0% (+11.5)#70 10.0% (+10.5)#4,533
71. Beechwood 20.4% 9.0% (+11.5)#71 10.0% (+10.5)#4,544
72. Lake Orion 20.4% 9.0% (+11.4)#72 10.0% (+10.4)#4,584
73. Belding 20.3% 9.0% (+11.3)#73 10.0% (+10.3)#4,603
74. Paw Paw 20.2% 9.0% (+11.3)#74 10.0% (+10.3)#4,622
75. Rose City 20.0% 9.0% (+11.0)#75 10.0% (+10.0)#4,716
76. Lincoln 20.0% 9.0% (+11.0)#76 10.0% (+10.0)#4,739
77. Laurium 19.9% 9.0% (+11.0)#77 10.0% (+9.99)#4,806
78. Lake Linden 19.9% 9.0% (+10.9)#78 10.0% (+9.90)#4,837
79. Fennville 19.7% 9.0% (+10.7)#79 10.0% (+9.76)#4,899
80. Litchfield 19.7% 9.0% (+10.7)#80 10.0% (+9.74)#4,907
81. Inkster 19.6% 9.0% (+10.6)#81 10.0% (+9.63)#4,949
82. Stanton 19.4% 9.0% (+10.5)#82 10.0% (+9.48)#5,023
83. Beecher 19.3% 9.0% (+10.3)#83 10.0% (+9.34)#5,085
84. Rapid River 19.2% 9.0% (+10.3)#84 10.0% (+9.28)#5,109
85. Grawn 19.0% 9.0% (+10.0)#85 10.0% (+9.05)#5,216
86. Decatur 18.8% 9.0% (+9.85)#86 10.0% (+8.86)#5,279
87. Harrisville 18.8% 9.0% (+9.82)#87 10.0% (+8.83)#5,289
88. Baraga 18.8% 9.0% (+9.81)#88 10.0% (+8.82)#5,293
89. Kinde 18.8% 9.0% (+9.79)#89 10.0% (+8.80)#5,306
90. Lawton 18.7% 9.0% (+9.75)#90 10.0% (+8.76)#5,329
91. Bessemer 18.7% 9.0% (+9.72)#91 10.0% (+8.74)#5,333
92. Charlevoix 18.6% 9.0% (+9.66)#92 10.0% (+8.67)#5,353
93. Ypsilanti 18.6% 9.0% (+9.62)#93 10.0% (+8.63)#5,374
94. Tustin 18.5% 9.0% (+9.56)#94 10.0% (+8.57)#5,412
95. Ionia 18.4% 9.0% (+9.48)#95 10.0% (+8.49)#5,449
96. Hesperia 18.4% 9.0% (+9.47)#96 10.0% (+8.48)#5,453
97. Dorr 18.1% 9.0% (+9.18)#97 10.0% (+8.19)#5,604
98. Edmore 18.0% 9.0% (+9.02)#98 10.0% (+8.03)#5,667
99. Ovid 18.0% 9.0% (+9.00)#99 10.0% (+8.01)#5,678
100. Eau Claire 17.9% 9.0% (+8.99)#100 10.0% (+8.00)#5,685

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan are:
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan?
Hardwood Acres has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Michigan is 9.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.