Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#116
2. Paac Ciinak 93.3% 8.1% (+85.2)#2 10.0% (+83.4)#225
3. Odanah 87.5% 8.1% (+79.4)#3 10.0% (+77.5)#239
4. Edmund 56.5% 8.1% (+48.4)#4 10.0% (+46.6)#575
5. Florence 55.6% 8.1% (+47.4)#5 10.0% (+45.6)#599
6. Tilleda 55.6% 8.1% (+47.4)#6 10.0% (+45.6)#603
7. Jump River 54.5% 8.1% (+46.4)#7 10.0% (+44.6)#627
8. Dekorra 50.0% 8.1% (+41.9)#8 10.0% (+40.0)#777
9. Gratiot 46.2% 8.1% (+38.0)#9 10.0% (+36.2)#931
10. Mount Hope 45.8% 8.1% (+37.7)#10 10.0% (+35.9)#943
11. Adams 41.0% 8.1% (+32.9)#11 10.0% (+31.1)#1,186
12. Knowlton 40.9% 8.1% (+32.8)#12 10.0% (+31.0)#1,192
13. Big Falls 40.6% 8.1% (+32.5)#13 10.0% (+30.7)#1,207
14. Gotham 37.9% 8.1% (+29.8)#14 10.0% (+28.0)#1,381
15. King 37.4% 8.1% (+29.3)#15 10.0% (+27.5)#1,426
16. Jim Falls 36.8% 8.1% (+28.7)#16 10.0% (+26.9)#1,475
17. Little Round Lake 35.4% 8.1% (+27.2)#17 10.0% (+25.4)#1,610
18. St Joseph 34.9% 8.1% (+26.7)#18 10.0% (+24.9)#1,647
19. Boyceville 34.4% 8.1% (+26.3)#19 10.0% (+24.5)#1,681
20. Highland 33.7% 8.1% (+25.5)#20 10.0% (+23.7)#1,732
21. Aniwa 30.4% 8.1% (+22.3)#21 10.0% (+20.5)#2,145
22. Markesan 30.3% 8.1% (+22.2)#22 10.0% (+20.4)#2,159
23. West Milwaukee 30.1% 8.1% (+22.0)#23 10.0% (+20.2)#2,178
24. Elmwood 29.8% 8.1% (+21.6)#24 10.0% (+19.8)#2,239
25. New London 29.5% 8.1% (+21.4)#25 10.0% (+19.6)#2,280
26. Lac Du Flambeau 29.2% 8.1% (+21.0)#26 10.0% (+19.2)#2,326
27. Mondovi 29.0% 8.1% (+20.9)#27 10.0% (+19.0)#2,356
28. South Wayne 28.6% 8.1% (+20.4)#28 10.0% (+18.6)#2,431
29. Franks Field 28.6% 8.1% (+20.4)#29 10.0% (+18.6)#2,451
30. Wabeno 27.7% 8.1% (+19.6)#30 10.0% (+17.8)#2,603
31. Haugen 27.4% 8.1% (+19.3)#31 10.0% (+17.5)#2,657
32. Friendship 27.4% 8.1% (+19.2)#32 10.0% (+17.4)#2,661
33. Mason 27.3% 8.1% (+19.1)#33 10.0% (+17.3)#2,689
34. Ingram 26.7% 8.1% (+18.5)#34 10.0% (+16.7)#2,790
35. Webster 26.3% 8.1% (+18.1)#35 10.0% (+16.3)#2,870
36. Linden 26.3% 8.1% (+18.1)#36 10.0% (+16.3)#2,874
37. Ashland 25.6% 8.1% (+17.5)#37 10.0% (+15.6)#3,011
38. Middle Village 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#38 10.0% (+15.0)#3,186
39. Glen Flora 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#39 10.0% (+15.0)#3,208
40. Saxon 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#40 10.0% (+15.0)#3,219
41. Mauston 24.9% 8.1% (+16.7)#41 10.0% (+14.9)#3,241
42. Brillion 24.8% 8.1% (+16.7)#42 10.0% (+14.9)#3,255
43. Pigeon Falls 24.6% 8.1% (+16.4)#43 10.0% (+14.6)#3,287
44. Mount Calvary 24.5% 8.1% (+16.3)#44 10.0% (+14.5)#3,319
45. Bangor 24.4% 8.1% (+16.3)#45 10.0% (+14.5)#3,324
46. Bagley 24.2% 8.1% (+16.1)#46 10.0% (+14.3)#3,382
47. Readstown 24.2% 8.1% (+16.0)#47 10.0% (+14.2)#3,401
48. Stanley 23.8% 8.1% (+15.7)#48 10.0% (+13.9)#3,484
49. Hillsboro 23.3% 8.1% (+15.2)#49 10.0% (+13.4)#3,632
50. Waterloo 23.3% 8.1% (+15.2)#50 10.0% (+13.3)#3,633
51. Montfort 23.3% 8.1% (+15.1)#51 10.0% (+13.3)#3,636
52. La Farge 23.2% 8.1% (+15.1)#52 10.0% (+13.3)#3,660
53. Waubeka 23.2% 8.1% (+15.1)#53 10.0% (+13.3)#3,661
54. Mole Lake 23.2% 8.1% (+15.0)#54 10.0% (+13.2)#3,672
55. Lake Lorraine 23.1% 8.1% (+14.9)#55 10.0% (+13.1)#3,702
56. Diamond Bluff 22.9% 8.1% (+14.7)#56 10.0% (+12.9)#3,774
57. Dallas 22.7% 8.1% (+14.6)#57 10.0% (+12.8)#3,804
58. Woodman 22.2% 8.1% (+14.1)#58 10.0% (+12.3)#3,945
59. Townsend 22.2% 8.1% (+14.1)#59 10.0% (+12.3)#3,957
60. Conrath 22.2% 8.1% (+14.1)#60 10.0% (+12.3)#3,962
61. Springbrook 22.2% 8.1% (+14.1)#61 10.0% (+12.3)#3,964
62. Lime Ridge 21.9% 8.1% (+13.7)#62 10.0% (+11.9)#4,059
63. Pine River 21.6% 8.1% (+13.5)#63 10.0% (+11.7)#4,125
64. Pittsville 21.5% 8.1% (+13.3)#64 10.0% (+11.5)#4,165
65. Cornell 21.3% 8.1% (+13.2)#65 10.0% (+11.4)#4,224
66. Fairwater 21.2% 8.1% (+13.0)#66 10.0% (+11.2)#4,277
67. Muscoda 21.1% 8.1% (+12.9)#67 10.0% (+11.1)#4,304
68. New Auburn 20.9% 8.1% (+12.8)#68 10.0% (+10.9)#4,361
69. Bruce 20.5% 8.1% (+12.3)#69 10.0% (+10.5)#4,540
70. Ontario 20.3% 8.1% (+12.2)#70 10.0% (+10.3)#4,602
71. Plum City 20.2% 8.1% (+12.1)#71 10.0% (+10.3)#4,624
72. Fox Lake 20.2% 8.1% (+12.0)#72 10.0% (+10.2)#4,642
73. Mission 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#73 10.0% (+10.0)#4,726
74. Eureka 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#74 10.0% (+10.0)#4,731
75. Lewis 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#75 10.0% (+10.0)#4,755
76. Alto 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#76 10.0% (+10.0)#4,766
77. Trego 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#77 10.0% (+10.0)#4,770
78. Chelsea 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#78 10.0% (+10.0)#4,774
79. Viroqua 19.9% 8.1% (+11.8)#79 10.0% (+9.98)#4,808
80. Minong 19.8% 8.1% (+11.7)#80 10.0% (+9.85)#4,859
81. Packwaukee 19.6% 8.1% (+11.5)#81 10.0% (+9.67)#4,934
82. Princeton 19.5% 8.1% (+11.3)#82 10.0% (+9.51)#5,004
83. Sheldon 19.4% 8.1% (+11.3)#83 10.0% (+9.49)#5,015
84. Merrill 19.4% 8.1% (+11.2)#84 10.0% (+9.41)#5,051
85. Weyauwega 19.3% 8.1% (+11.2)#85 10.0% (+9.37)#5,074
86. Delavan 19.3% 8.1% (+11.2)#86 10.0% (+9.35)#5,079
87. Friesland 19.0% 8.1% (+10.9)#87 10.0% (+9.10)#5,197
88. Ferryville 19.0% 8.1% (+10.9)#88 10.0% (+9.10)#5,201
89. Newald 19.0% 8.1% (+10.9)#89 10.0% (+9.10)#5,206
90. Hayward 19.0% 8.1% (+10.9)#90 10.0% (+9.05)#5,215
91. Marion 18.9% 8.1% (+10.7)#91 10.0% (+8.91)#5,266
92. Butler 18.7% 8.1% (+10.5)#92 10.0% (+8.72)#5,337
93. Westfield 18.6% 8.1% (+10.5)#93 10.0% (+8.65)#5,363
94. Chilton 18.6% 8.1% (+10.4)#94 10.0% (+8.61)#5,387
95. North Fond Du Lac 18.4% 8.1% (+10.3)#95 10.0% (+8.48)#5,454
96. Gilman 18.3% 8.1% (+10.1)#96 10.0% (+8.32)#5,527
97. New Richmond 18.2% 8.1% (+10.1)#97 10.0% (+8.29)#5,535
98. Kendall 18.2% 8.1% (+10.0)#98 10.0% (+8.23)#5,570
99. Westboro 18.2% 8.1% (+10.0)#99 10.0% (+8.23)#5,576
100. Knapp 17.9% 8.1% (+9.81)#100 10.0% (+8.00)#5,687

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin are:
#1
87.5%
#2
56.5%
#3
55.6%
#4
55.6%
#5
54.5%
#6
46.2%
#7
45.8%
#8
41.0%
#9
40.9%
#10
40.6%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin?
Odanah has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin with 87.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Wisconsin is 8.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.