Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Redwater 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#25
2. Harperville 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#43
3. Winterville 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#111
4. Alligator 78.9% 13.4% (+65.5)#4 10.0% (+69.0)#288
5. Falcon 73.5% 13.4% (+60.1)#5 10.0% (+63.6)#332
6. Doddsville 69.2% 13.4% (+55.8)#6 10.0% (+59.3)#376
7. Glendora 66.7% 13.4% (+53.2)#7 10.0% (+56.7)#410
8. Goodman 66.4% 13.4% (+52.9)#8 10.0% (+56.4)#424
9. Beaumont 63.7% 13.4% (+50.3)#9 10.0% (+53.8)#453
10. Fernwood 60.0% 13.4% (+46.6)#10 10.0% (+50.0)#509
11. Darling 59.5% 13.4% (+46.0)#11 10.0% (+49.5)#522
12. Nellieburg 55.9% 13.4% (+42.5)#12 10.0% (+45.9)#592
13. Mccool 54.5% 13.4% (+41.1)#13 10.0% (+44.6)#626
14. North Carrollton 54.3% 13.4% (+40.9)#14 10.0% (+44.3)#633
15. Roxie 53.7% 13.4% (+40.3)#15 10.0% (+43.8)#646
16. Winstonville 52.2% 13.4% (+38.7)#16 10.0% (+42.2)#688
17. North Tunica 51.6% 13.4% (+38.1)#17 10.0% (+41.6)#706
18. Foxworth 50.8% 13.4% (+37.4)#18 10.0% (+40.9)#729
19. Elliott 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#19 10.0% (+40.0)#741
20. Coahoma 50.0% 13.4% (+36.6)#20 10.0% (+40.0)#758
21. Mendenhall 48.6% 13.4% (+35.2)#21 10.0% (+38.7)#836
22. Dennis 47.6% 13.4% (+34.2)#22 10.0% (+37.7)#873
23. Mayersville 47.4% 13.4% (+33.9)#23 10.0% (+37.4)#883
24. Sidon 46.7% 13.4% (+33.2)#24 10.0% (+36.7)#910
25. Stewart 45.8% 13.4% (+32.4)#25 10.0% (+35.9)#944
26. Pickens 45.7% 13.4% (+32.3)#26 10.0% (+35.8)#946
27. Morgantown 45.7% 13.4% (+32.3)#27 10.0% (+35.8)#947
28. Kokomo 45.2% 13.4% (+31.8)#28 10.0% (+35.3)#973
29. Crowder 45.0% 13.4% (+31.5)#29 10.0% (+35.0)#980
30. Sunflower 44.9% 13.4% (+31.5)#30 10.0% (+35.0)#981
31. Biggersville 43.8% 13.4% (+30.3)#31 10.0% (+33.8)#1,036
32. Bassfield 43.5% 13.4% (+30.0)#32 10.0% (+33.5)#1,051
33. Eden 41.2% 13.4% (+27.7)#33 10.0% (+31.2)#1,173
34. Port Gibson 39.8% 13.4% (+26.4)#34 10.0% (+29.8)#1,273
35. Osyka 39.4% 13.4% (+26.0)#35 10.0% (+29.5)#1,287
36. Derma 39.3% 13.4% (+25.9)#36 10.0% (+29.4)#1,295
37. Metcalfe 38.9% 13.4% (+25.5)#37 10.0% (+28.9)#1,321
38. Paris 37.2% 13.4% (+23.8)#38 10.0% (+27.2)#1,440
39. Crawford 37.1% 13.4% (+23.6)#39 10.0% (+27.1)#1,449
40. Itta Bena 36.8% 13.4% (+23.4)#40 10.0% (+26.8)#1,481
41. Arcola 36.2% 13.4% (+22.7)#41 10.0% (+26.2)#1,532
42. Brookhaven 35.9% 13.4% (+22.5)#42 10.0% (+26.0)#1,550
43. Monticello 35.7% 13.4% (+22.3)#43 10.0% (+25.8)#1,569
44. Tchula 35.6% 13.4% (+22.2)#44 10.0% (+25.7)#1,586
45. Indianola 35.5% 13.4% (+22.0)#45 10.0% (+25.5)#1,603
46. Scooba 35.2% 13.4% (+21.8)#46 10.0% (+25.2)#1,622
47. Flora 34.2% 13.4% (+20.8)#47 10.0% (+24.3)#1,697
48. Shaw 33.6% 13.4% (+20.2)#48 10.0% (+23.7)#1,735
49. Collinsville 33.4% 13.4% (+20.0)#49 10.0% (+23.5)#1,746
50. Morgan City 33.3% 13.4% (+19.9)#50 10.0% (+23.4)#1,788
51. Benoit 32.2% 13.4% (+18.8)#51 10.0% (+22.3)#1,915
52. Collins 32.1% 13.4% (+18.7)#52 10.0% (+22.2)#1,927
53. New Augusta 31.7% 13.4% (+18.3)#53 10.0% (+21.8)#1,980
54. Mclain 31.4% 13.4% (+17.9)#54 10.0% (+21.4)#2,030
55. Edwards 31.2% 13.4% (+17.8)#55 10.0% (+21.3)#2,042
56. Crosby 31.2% 13.4% (+17.8)#56 10.0% (+21.3)#2,044
57. Aberdeen 31.1% 13.4% (+17.6)#57 10.0% (+21.1)#2,065
58. Walnut 30.8% 13.4% (+17.3)#58 10.0% (+20.8)#2,095
59. Kilmichael 30.7% 13.4% (+17.3)#59 10.0% (+20.8)#2,109
60. Lambert 30.4% 13.4% (+16.9)#60 10.0% (+20.4)#2,152
61. Fayette 30.1% 13.4% (+16.6)#61 10.0% (+20.1)#2,190
62. Bond 30.0% 13.4% (+16.6)#62 10.0% (+20.0)#2,197
63. Okolona 29.9% 13.4% (+16.5)#63 10.0% (+20.0)#2,217
64. Centreville 29.8% 13.4% (+16.4)#64 10.0% (+19.9)#2,229
65. Magee 29.6% 13.4% (+16.2)#65 10.0% (+19.7)#2,274
66. Ellisville 28.6% 13.4% (+15.2)#66 10.0% (+18.7)#2,416
67. Shuqualak 27.6% 13.4% (+14.2)#67 10.0% (+17.6)#2,628
68. Potts Camp 27.6% 13.4% (+14.2)#68 10.0% (+17.6)#2,629
69. Waynesboro 27.5% 13.4% (+14.1)#69 10.0% (+17.5)#2,640
70. Houston 27.2% 13.4% (+13.7)#70 10.0% (+17.2)#2,703
71. Pelahatchie 27.1% 13.4% (+13.6)#71 10.0% (+17.1)#2,722
72. Gunnison 26.9% 13.4% (+13.4)#72 10.0% (+16.9)#2,752
73. Hamilton 26.5% 13.4% (+13.0)#73 10.0% (+16.5)#2,828
74. Shannon 26.5% 13.4% (+13.0)#74 10.0% (+16.5)#2,831
75. Union 26.3% 13.4% (+12.9)#75 10.0% (+16.4)#2,850
76. Mound Bayou 26.3% 13.4% (+12.9)#76 10.0% (+16.4)#2,852
77. Toomsuba 25.8% 13.4% (+12.4)#77 10.0% (+15.9)#2,953
78. Yazoo City 25.4% 13.4% (+12.0)#78 10.0% (+15.4)#3,071
79. Gluckstadt 25.3% 13.4% (+11.9)#79 10.0% (+15.4)#3,085
80. Bovina 25.3% 13.4% (+11.9)#80 10.0% (+15.3)#3,094
81. Mccomb 25.0% 13.4% (+11.6)#81 10.0% (+15.1)#3,136
82. Bruce 25.0% 13.4% (+11.6)#82 10.0% (+15.0)#3,139
83. Ethel 25.0% 13.4% (+11.6)#83 10.0% (+15.0)#3,163
84. Hermanville 24.5% 13.4% (+11.1)#84 10.0% (+14.5)#3,309
85. Chunky 24.5% 13.4% (+11.1)#85 10.0% (+14.5)#3,310
86. Renova 23.9% 13.4% (+10.5)#86 10.0% (+13.9)#3,472
87. Tunica 23.6% 13.4% (+10.1)#87 10.0% (+13.6)#3,555
88. Gloster 23.6% 13.4% (+10.1)#88 10.0% (+13.6)#3,556
89. De Soto 23.3% 13.4% (+9.82)#89 10.0% (+13.3)#3,650
90. Coldwater 23.2% 13.4% (+9.77)#90 10.0% (+13.3)#3,667
91. Helena 23.2% 13.4% (+9.72)#91 10.0% (+13.2)#3,676
92. Glendale 23.1% 13.4% (+9.64)#92 10.0% (+13.1)#3,695
93. Tunica Resorts 22.9% 13.4% (+9.46)#93 10.0% (+12.9)#3,757
94. D Lo 22.6% 13.4% (+9.15)#94 10.0% (+12.6)#3,841
95. Friars Point 22.5% 13.4% (+9.09)#95 10.0% (+12.6)#3,866
96. Weir 22.4% 13.4% (+8.98)#96 10.0% (+12.5)#3,892
97. Winona 22.2% 13.4% (+8.72)#97 10.0% (+12.2)#3,978
98. Cruger 21.8% 13.4% (+8.40)#98 10.0% (+11.9)#4,065
99. Kosciusko 21.8% 13.4% (+8.32)#99 10.0% (+11.8)#4,083
100. Leland 21.5% 13.4% (+8.02)#100 10.0% (+11.5)#4,170

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi are:
#1
100.0%
#2
78.9%
#3
73.5%
#4
69.2%
#5
66.7%
#6
66.4%
#7
63.7%
#8
59.5%
#9
55.9%
#10
54.5%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi?
Redwater has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Mississippi is 13.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.