Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Cash 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#32
2. Lobeco 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#73
3. Cross Anchor 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#191
4. Coosawhatchie 100.0% 10.3% (+89.7)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#211
5. Fingerville 79.8% 10.3% (+69.5)#5 10.0% (+69.8)#280
6. Olympia 78.7% 10.3% (+68.4)#6 10.0% (+68.8)#289
7. Little Rock 78.2% 10.3% (+67.9)#7 10.0% (+68.2)#290
8. Blenheim 62.5% 10.3% (+52.2)#8 10.0% (+52.5)#472
9. Dovesville 61.5% 10.3% (+51.2)#9 10.0% (+51.6)#480
10. Cowpens 57.4% 10.3% (+47.1)#10 10.0% (+47.5)#547
11. Centenary 56.2% 10.3% (+45.9)#11 10.0% (+46.3)#583
12. Antreville 54.5% 10.3% (+44.2)#12 10.0% (+44.5)#630
13. East Gaffney 53.8% 10.3% (+43.5)#13 10.0% (+43.9)#645
14. Clio 51.5% 10.3% (+41.2)#14 10.0% (+41.5)#710
15. Sharon 48.4% 10.3% (+38.1)#15 10.0% (+38.4)#844
16. East Sumter 47.0% 10.3% (+36.7)#16 10.0% (+37.0)#898
17. Great Falls 46.4% 10.3% (+36.1)#17 10.0% (+36.5)#920
18. Timmonsville 46.3% 10.3% (+36.0)#18 10.0% (+36.4)#923
19. Jenkinsville 45.5% 10.3% (+35.2)#19 10.0% (+35.5)#965
20. Arthurtown 43.9% 10.3% (+33.6)#20 10.0% (+34.0)#1,026
21. Zion 42.4% 10.3% (+32.1)#21 10.0% (+32.4)#1,101
22. Adams Run 42.3% 10.3% (+32.0)#22 10.0% (+32.3)#1,108
23. Lake View 40.7% 10.3% (+30.4)#23 10.0% (+30.8)#1,200
24. Converse 40.0% 10.3% (+29.7)#24 10.0% (+30.0)#1,237
25. Southern Shops 39.7% 10.3% (+29.4)#25 10.0% (+29.8)#1,274
26. Greeleyville 39.1% 10.3% (+28.8)#26 10.0% (+29.1)#1,309
27. Lynchburg 39.0% 10.3% (+28.7)#27 10.0% (+29.0)#1,317
28. Riverview 38.6% 10.3% (+28.3)#28 10.0% (+28.6)#1,343
29. Ridgeway 38.2% 10.3% (+27.9)#29 10.0% (+28.3)#1,368
30. Wallace 38.0% 10.3% (+27.7)#30 10.0% (+28.1)#1,378
31. Bennettsville 37.8% 10.3% (+27.5)#31 10.0% (+27.8)#1,391
32. Grover 37.5% 10.3% (+27.2)#32 10.0% (+27.5)#1,409
33. Marion 37.5% 10.3% (+27.2)#33 10.0% (+27.5)#1,425
34. Lincolnville 37.4% 10.3% (+27.1)#34 10.0% (+27.4)#1,430
35. Eureka Mill 36.9% 10.3% (+26.6)#35 10.0% (+26.9)#1,468
36. Winnsboro Mills 36.7% 10.3% (+26.4)#36 10.0% (+26.8)#1,485
37. Monetta 36.6% 10.3% (+26.3)#37 10.0% (+26.6)#1,498
38. Allendale 35.3% 10.3% (+25.0)#38 10.0% (+25.3)#1,615
39. Dale 34.7% 10.3% (+24.4)#39 10.0% (+24.8)#1,655
40. Denmark 34.4% 10.3% (+24.1)#40 10.0% (+24.5)#1,684
41. Sellers 34.2% 10.3% (+23.9)#41 10.0% (+24.3)#1,702
42. Enoree 33.8% 10.3% (+23.5)#42 10.0% (+23.8)#1,725
43. South Union 33.3% 10.3% (+23.0)#43 10.0% (+23.4)#1,768
44. Cordova 33.3% 10.3% (+23.0)#44 10.0% (+23.4)#1,784
45. Laurel Bay 33.0% 10.3% (+22.7)#45 10.0% (+23.1)#1,849
46. Awendaw 32.8% 10.3% (+22.5)#46 10.0% (+22.8)#1,862
47. White Knoll 32.7% 10.3% (+22.4)#47 10.0% (+22.7)#1,869
48. Richburg 31.5% 10.3% (+21.1)#48 10.0% (+21.5)#2,021
49. Olanta 31.4% 10.3% (+21.1)#49 10.0% (+21.4)#2,028
50. Johnsonville 31.1% 10.3% (+20.8)#50 10.0% (+21.2)#2,057
51. Starr 30.8% 10.3% (+20.5)#51 10.0% (+20.8)#2,099
52. Duncan 30.7% 10.3% (+20.4)#52 10.0% (+20.7)#2,118
53. Watts Mills 30.6% 10.3% (+20.3)#53 10.0% (+20.6)#2,127
54. Wellford 30.0% 10.3% (+19.7)#54 10.0% (+20.0)#2,193
55. Peak 30.0% 10.3% (+19.7)#55 10.0% (+20.0)#2,207
56. Society Hill 29.7% 10.3% (+19.4)#56 10.0% (+19.8)#2,248
57. Patrick 29.5% 10.3% (+19.2)#57 10.0% (+19.6)#2,276
58. Clarks Hill 29.5% 10.3% (+19.2)#58 10.0% (+19.6)#2,279
59. Blacksburg 29.2% 10.3% (+18.9)#59 10.0% (+19.3)#2,324
60. Saxon 28.9% 10.3% (+18.5)#60 10.0% (+18.9)#2,382
61. Lakewood 28.2% 10.3% (+17.9)#61 10.0% (+18.3)#2,504
62. Joanna 28.1% 10.3% (+17.8)#62 10.0% (+18.1)#2,531
63. Mccoll 28.0% 10.3% (+17.7)#63 10.0% (+18.0)#2,550
64. Latta 27.8% 10.3% (+17.5)#64 10.0% (+17.9)#2,569
65. Hartsville 27.8% 10.3% (+17.5)#65 10.0% (+17.9)#2,571
66. Holly Hill 27.2% 10.3% (+16.9)#66 10.0% (+17.2)#2,706
67. York 26.8% 10.3% (+16.5)#67 10.0% (+16.8)#2,761
68. Homewood 26.7% 10.3% (+16.4)#68 10.0% (+16.8)#2,775
69. Neeses 26.5% 10.3% (+16.2)#69 10.0% (+16.6)#2,816
70. Promised Land 26.5% 10.3% (+16.2)#70 10.0% (+16.6)#2,821
71. Wilkinson Heights 26.4% 10.3% (+16.1)#71 10.0% (+16.5)#2,835
72. Whitney 26.4% 10.3% (+16.1)#72 10.0% (+16.5)#2,842
73. Varnville 26.3% 10.3% (+16.0)#73 10.0% (+16.4)#2,849
74. Ridgeland 26.3% 10.3% (+16.0)#74 10.0% (+16.3)#2,869
75. Ware Shoals 26.1% 10.3% (+15.8)#75 10.0% (+16.2)#2,899
76. Ruby 25.6% 10.3% (+15.3)#76 10.0% (+15.7)#2,994
77. Finklea 25.6% 10.3% (+15.3)#77 10.0% (+15.7)#3,003
78. Coward 25.6% 10.3% (+15.3)#78 10.0% (+15.6)#3,009
79. Gifford 25.6% 10.3% (+15.3)#79 10.0% (+15.6)#3,017
80. Johnston 25.4% 10.3% (+15.1)#80 10.0% (+15.4)#3,080
81. Graniteville 25.1% 10.3% (+14.8)#81 10.0% (+15.2)#3,123
82. Meggett 25.1% 10.3% (+14.8)#82 10.0% (+15.2)#3,124
83. Iva 25.0% 10.3% (+14.7)#83 10.0% (+15.0)#3,142
84. Barnwell 25.0% 10.3% (+14.7)#84 10.0% (+15.0)#3,237
85. North 24.9% 10.3% (+14.6)#85 10.0% (+14.9)#3,249
86. Warrenville 24.8% 10.3% (+14.5)#86 10.0% (+14.9)#3,252
87. Branchville 24.7% 10.3% (+14.4)#87 10.0% (+14.8)#3,266
88. Yemassee 24.0% 10.3% (+13.7)#88 10.0% (+14.1)#3,440
89. Parker 23.9% 10.3% (+13.6)#89 10.0% (+14.0)#3,464
90. Sans Souci 23.8% 10.3% (+13.5)#90 10.0% (+13.9)#3,486
91. Orangeburg 23.6% 10.3% (+13.3)#91 10.0% (+13.6)#3,551
92. St George 23.6% 10.3% (+13.3)#92 10.0% (+13.6)#3,558
93. Woodford 23.5% 10.3% (+13.2)#93 10.0% (+13.6)#3,577
94. Utica 23.4% 10.3% (+13.1)#94 10.0% (+13.4)#3,611
95. Estill 23.3% 10.3% (+13.0)#95 10.0% (+13.3)#3,638
96. Hemingway 22.9% 10.3% (+12.6)#96 10.0% (+12.9)#3,769
97. Wagener 22.6% 10.3% (+12.3)#97 10.0% (+12.7)#3,828
98. Lake City 22.6% 10.3% (+12.3)#98 10.0% (+12.6)#3,836
99. Alcolu 22.4% 10.3% (+12.1)#99 10.0% (+12.5)#3,893
100. Russellville 22.1% 10.3% (+11.8)#100 10.0% (+12.2)#3,983

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
79.8%
#3
62.5%
#4
57.4%
#5
54.5%
#6
53.8%
#7
51.5%
#8
48.4%
#9
47.0%
#10
46.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina?
Cross Anchor has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in South Carolina is 10.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.