Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Swink 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 10.0% (+90.0)#166
2. Badger Lee 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#2 10.0% (+90.0)#170
3. Twin Lakes 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#3 10.0% (+90.0)#179
4. Ixl 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#4 10.0% (+90.0)#186
5. Rosedale 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#5 10.0% (+90.0)#187
6. Lake Ellsworth Addition 89.7% 9.5% (+80.1)#6 10.0% (+79.7)#232
7. Slick 80.3% 9.5% (+70.8)#7 10.0% (+70.4)#274
8. Bradley 79.2% 9.5% (+69.7)#8 10.0% (+69.3)#285
9. Byars 76.8% 9.5% (+67.3)#9 10.0% (+66.9)#299
10. New Alluwe 72.7% 9.5% (+63.2)#10 10.0% (+62.8)#339
11. Jefferson 72.7% 9.5% (+63.2)#11 10.0% (+62.8)#340
12. Pumpkin Hollow 65.5% 9.5% (+56.0)#12 10.0% (+55.6)#432
13. Dustin 65.2% 9.5% (+55.7)#13 10.0% (+55.2)#441
14. Albion 63.6% 9.5% (+54.1)#14 10.0% (+53.7)#456
15. Mcbride 61.8% 9.5% (+52.2)#15 10.0% (+51.8)#479
16. Proctor 61.1% 9.5% (+51.6)#16 10.0% (+51.2)#487
17. Warwick 60.0% 9.5% (+50.5)#17 10.0% (+50.0)#506
18. Sportmans Shores 60.0% 9.5% (+50.5)#18 10.0% (+50.0)#508
19. Moyers 58.3% 9.5% (+48.8)#19 10.0% (+48.4)#538
20. New Woodville 57.1% 9.5% (+47.6)#20 10.0% (+47.2)#561
21. Grand Lake Towne 56.6% 9.5% (+47.1)#21 10.0% (+46.7)#568
22. Mccurtain 54.5% 9.5% (+44.9)#22 10.0% (+44.5)#629
23. White Water 54.2% 9.5% (+44.6)#23 10.0% (+44.2)#637
24. Piney 53.8% 9.5% (+44.3)#24 10.0% (+43.9)#644
25. Keys 53.0% 9.5% (+43.5)#25 10.0% (+43.1)#665
26. Summit 52.8% 9.5% (+43.3)#26 10.0% (+42.8)#671
27. Hanson 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#27 10.0% (+40.0)#765
28. Hanna 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#28 10.0% (+40.0)#786
29. Depew 48.7% 9.5% (+39.2)#29 10.0% (+38.8)#834
30. Sparrowhawk 46.9% 9.5% (+37.4)#30 10.0% (+37.0)#900
31. Gerty 46.7% 9.5% (+37.1)#31 10.0% (+36.7)#914
32. Cowlington 45.0% 9.5% (+35.5)#32 10.0% (+35.0)#978
33. Pocasset 43.8% 9.5% (+34.2)#33 10.0% (+33.8)#1,033
34. Johnson Prairie 43.8% 9.5% (+34.2)#34 10.0% (+33.8)#1,034
35. Bromide 42.9% 9.5% (+33.3)#35 10.0% (+32.9)#1,084
36. Nicut 42.7% 9.5% (+33.2)#36 10.0% (+32.7)#1,091
37. Bennington 42.2% 9.5% (+32.7)#37 10.0% (+32.3)#1,110
38. Ringling 41.9% 9.5% (+32.4)#38 10.0% (+31.9)#1,131
39. Dennis 41.5% 9.5% (+32.0)#39 10.0% (+31.6)#1,151
40. Coleman 41.2% 9.5% (+31.7)#40 10.0% (+31.2)#1,171
41. Oaks 41.2% 9.5% (+31.7)#41 10.0% (+31.2)#1,172
42. Fitzhugh 41.1% 9.5% (+31.6)#42 10.0% (+31.2)#1,179
43. Bache 40.7% 9.5% (+31.2)#43 10.0% (+30.8)#1,199
44. Pensacola 40.0% 9.5% (+30.5)#44 10.0% (+30.0)#1,246
45. Moffett 40.0% 9.5% (+30.5)#45 10.0% (+30.0)#1,254
46. Webb City 40.0% 9.5% (+30.5)#46 10.0% (+30.0)#1,258
47. Foyil 39.7% 9.5% (+30.1)#47 10.0% (+29.7)#1,276
48. Cottonwood 39.1% 9.5% (+29.6)#48 10.0% (+29.2)#1,304
49. Tushka 38.6% 9.5% (+29.1)#49 10.0% (+28.7)#1,339
50. Billings 38.5% 9.5% (+28.9)#50 10.0% (+28.5)#1,349
51. Bluejacket 38.2% 9.5% (+28.7)#51 10.0% (+28.3)#1,363
52. Lexington 38.2% 9.5% (+28.7)#52 10.0% (+28.3)#1,367
53. Allen 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#53 10.0% (+27.5)#1,406
54. Lima 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#54 10.0% (+27.5)#1,418
55. Hitchita 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#55 10.0% (+27.5)#1,420
56. Centrahoma 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#56 10.0% (+27.5)#1,421
57. Rock Island 36.8% 9.5% (+27.3)#57 10.0% (+26.9)#1,478
58. Haworth 36.6% 9.5% (+27.1)#58 10.0% (+26.6)#1,497
59. Caney Ridge 36.4% 9.5% (+26.8)#59 10.0% (+26.4)#1,519
60. Talihina 36.1% 9.5% (+26.5)#60 10.0% (+26.1)#1,539
61. Cameron 36.0% 9.5% (+26.5)#61 10.0% (+26.0)#1,544
62. Medford 35.9% 9.5% (+26.4)#62 10.0% (+25.9)#1,551
63. Bell 35.8% 9.5% (+26.3)#63 10.0% (+25.9)#1,563
64. Taloga 35.6% 9.5% (+26.1)#64 10.0% (+25.6)#1,591
65. Howe 34.3% 9.5% (+24.7)#65 10.0% (+24.3)#1,694
66. Peggs 33.6% 9.5% (+24.1)#66 10.0% (+23.6)#1,739
67. Kansas 33.6% 9.5% (+24.0)#67 10.0% (+23.6)#1,741
68. Waukomis 33.5% 9.5% (+24.0)#68 10.0% (+23.6)#1,744
69. Ringwood 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#69 10.0% (+23.4)#1,759
70. Eakly 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#70 10.0% (+23.4)#1,763
71. Titanic 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#71 10.0% (+23.4)#1,767
72. Dixon 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#72 10.0% (+23.4)#1,790
73. Tatums 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#73 10.0% (+23.4)#1,794
74. Le Flore 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#74 10.0% (+23.4)#1,796
75. Lawrence Creek 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#75 10.0% (+23.4)#1,805
76. Terlton 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#76 10.0% (+23.4)#1,826
77. Clearview 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#77 10.0% (+23.4)#1,827
78. Bunch 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#78 10.0% (+23.4)#1,831
79. Fallis 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#79 10.0% (+23.4)#1,832
80. Amorita 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#80 10.0% (+23.4)#1,835
81. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 32.9% 9.5% (+23.4)#81 10.0% (+22.9)#1,854
82. Goodwell 31.6% 9.5% (+22.1)#82 10.0% (+21.6)#1,996
83. Crowder 31.4% 9.5% (+21.9)#83 10.0% (+21.5)#2,026
84. Briggs 31.2% 9.5% (+21.7)#84 10.0% (+21.3)#2,041
85. Lebanon 31.2% 9.5% (+21.7)#85 10.0% (+21.3)#2,045
86. Boswell 31.2% 9.5% (+21.6)#86 10.0% (+21.2)#2,052
87. Hugo 30.7% 9.5% (+21.2)#87 10.0% (+20.8)#2,108
88. Calvin 30.4% 9.5% (+20.9)#88 10.0% (+20.5)#2,144
89. Monroe 30.4% 9.5% (+20.9)#89 10.0% (+20.5)#2,146
90. Antlers 30.3% 9.5% (+20.8)#90 10.0% (+20.4)#2,161
91. Washington 30.2% 9.5% (+20.7)#91 10.0% (+20.3)#2,171
92. Bridgeport 30.0% 9.5% (+20.5)#92 10.0% (+20.0)#2,203
93. Sparks 30.0% 9.5% (+20.5)#93 10.0% (+20.0)#2,204
94. Boynton 29.7% 9.5% (+20.2)#94 10.0% (+19.8)#2,252
95. Taft 29.6% 9.5% (+20.1)#95 10.0% (+19.7)#2,273
96. Delaware 29.5% 9.5% (+20.0)#96 10.0% (+19.6)#2,282
97. Wilburton 29.5% 9.5% (+19.9)#97 10.0% (+19.5)#2,287
98. Winchester 29.3% 9.5% (+19.8)#98 10.0% (+19.3)#2,311
99. Idabel 28.9% 9.5% (+19.4)#99 10.0% (+18.9)#2,374
100. Cartwright 28.6% 9.5% (+19.0)#100 10.0% (+18.6)#2,423

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
80.3%
#6
79.2%
#7
76.8%
#8
72.7%
#9
72.7%
#10
65.2%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma?
Swink has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.