Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Idaho
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho

City Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1. Huetter 71.4% 8.1% (+63.3)#1 10.0% (+61.5)#346
2. Butte City 54.3% 8.1% (+46.2)#2 10.0% (+44.4)#631
3. Malta 54.3% 8.1% (+46.2)#3 10.0% (+44.3)#634
4. Donnelly 53.3% 8.1% (+45.2)#4 10.0% (+43.4)#657
5. Hamer 45.5% 8.1% (+37.3)#5 10.0% (+35.5)#966
6. Moyie Springs 43.9% 8.1% (+35.8)#6 10.0% (+34.0)#1,024
7. Kendrick 38.8% 8.1% (+30.6)#7 10.0% (+28.8)#1,332
8. Winchester 35.9% 8.1% (+27.8)#8 10.0% (+25.9)#1,556
9. Silverton 32.7% 8.1% (+24.5)#9 10.0% (+22.7)#1,872
10. Sweetwater 30.0% 8.1% (+21.9)#10 10.0% (+20.0)#2,200
11. Council 28.8% 8.1% (+20.7)#11 10.0% (+18.8)#2,398
12. Oldtown 28.6% 8.1% (+20.5)#12 10.0% (+18.6)#2,427
13. Acequia 28.6% 8.1% (+20.5)#13 10.0% (+18.6)#2,441
14. Glenns Ferry 27.7% 8.1% (+19.6)#14 10.0% (+17.8)#2,598
15. Rupert 27.3% 8.1% (+19.2)#15 10.0% (+17.4)#2,662
16. Athol 27.3% 8.1% (+19.2)#16 10.0% (+17.3)#2,676
17. Oxford 27.3% 8.1% (+19.2)#17 10.0% (+17.3)#2,693
18. Midvale 26.8% 8.1% (+18.6)#18 10.0% (+16.8)#2,771
19. Parker 25.5% 8.1% (+17.4)#19 10.0% (+15.6)#3,027
20. Castleford 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#20 10.0% (+15.0)#3,179
21. Roberts 24.0% 8.1% (+15.9)#21 10.0% (+14.0)#3,446
22. Bovill 23.4% 8.1% (+15.3)#22 10.0% (+13.5)#3,607
23. Victor 23.2% 8.1% (+15.1)#23 10.0% (+13.2)#3,668
24. De Smet 23.1% 8.1% (+15.0)#24 10.0% (+13.1)#3,709
25. Culdesac 21.7% 8.1% (+13.6)#25 10.0% (+11.7)#4,106
26. Crouch 21.4% 8.1% (+13.3)#26 10.0% (+11.5)#4,185
27. Mccall 20.9% 8.1% (+12.8)#27 10.0% (+10.9)#4,365
28. Arco 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#28 10.0% (+10.0)#4,709
29. Garden Valley 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#29 10.0% (+10.0)#4,719
30. Tensed 20.0% 8.1% (+11.9)#30 10.0% (+10.0)#4,779
31. Richfield 19.7% 8.1% (+11.6)#31 10.0% (+9.77)#4,896
32. Shoshone 19.2% 8.1% (+11.1)#32 10.0% (+9.26)#5,124
33. Weippe 19.1% 8.1% (+11.0)#33 10.0% (+9.18)#5,157
34. St Anthony 19.1% 8.1% (+11.0)#34 10.0% (+9.13)#5,179
35. Tetonia 18.8% 8.1% (+10.6)#35 10.0% (+8.80)#5,307
36. Franklin 18.5% 8.1% (+10.4)#36 10.0% (+8.57)#5,408
37. Wendell 18.0% 8.1% (+9.90)#37 10.0% (+8.06)#5,656
38. Kuna 17.9% 8.1% (+9.82)#38 10.0% (+7.98)#5,699
39. Hailey 17.7% 8.1% (+9.60)#39 10.0% (+7.76)#5,810
40. Hagerman 17.5% 8.1% (+9.42)#40 10.0% (+7.58)#5,917
41. Troy 17.3% 8.1% (+9.22)#41 10.0% (+7.38)#6,032
42. Lapwai 17.3% 8.1% (+9.15)#42 10.0% (+7.31)#6,065
43. Kellogg 17.0% 8.1% (+8.92)#43 10.0% (+7.08)#6,205
44. Cascade 16.9% 8.1% (+8.83)#44 10.0% (+6.99)#6,257
45. Ponderay 16.8% 8.1% (+8.73)#45 10.0% (+6.89)#6,313
46. Stites 16.7% 8.1% (+8.56)#46 10.0% (+6.71)#6,429
47. Kamiah 16.4% 8.1% (+8.32)#47 10.0% (+6.48)#6,582
48. Weiser 15.8% 8.1% (+7.68)#48 10.0% (+5.84)#6,955
49. Osburn 15.7% 8.1% (+7.58)#49 10.0% (+5.74)#7,025
50. Hauser 15.5% 8.1% (+7.34)#50 10.0% (+5.50)#7,179
51. Downey 14.9% 8.1% (+6.80)#51 10.0% (+4.96)#7,564
52. Burley 14.8% 8.1% (+6.73)#52 10.0% (+4.89)#7,615
53. Notus 14.7% 8.1% (+6.59)#53 10.0% (+4.75)#7,696
54. Riggins 14.4% 8.1% (+6.28)#54 10.0% (+4.44)#7,918
55. Plummer 14.3% 8.1% (+6.17)#55 10.0% (+4.33)#7,993
56. Horseshoe Bend 14.3% 8.1% (+6.17)#56 10.0% (+4.33)#7,997
57. St Maries 14.2% 8.1% (+6.05)#57 10.0% (+4.21)#8,134
58. Bancroft 14.0% 8.1% (+5.92)#58 10.0% (+4.08)#8,236
59. Homedale 13.9% 8.1% (+5.76)#59 10.0% (+3.92)#8,374
60. Fort Hall 13.7% 8.1% (+5.59)#60 10.0% (+3.75)#8,529
61. Ferdinand 13.6% 8.1% (+5.52)#61 10.0% (+3.68)#8,606
62. Cottonwood 13.5% 8.1% (+5.35)#62 10.0% (+3.51)#8,738
63. Moreland 13.3% 8.1% (+5.19)#63 10.0% (+3.35)#8,906
64. Montpelier 13.1% 8.1% (+4.97)#64 10.0% (+3.13)#9,101
65. Salmon 13.0% 8.1% (+4.88)#65 10.0% (+3.04)#9,183
66. Sandpoint 12.9% 8.1% (+4.82)#66 10.0% (+2.98)#9,230
67. Georgetown 12.7% 8.1% (+4.55)#67 10.0% (+2.71)#9,494
68. Buhl 12.6% 8.1% (+4.44)#68 10.0% (+2.60)#9,583
69. Worley 12.5% 8.1% (+4.39)#69 10.0% (+2.55)#9,644
70. White Bird 12.5% 8.1% (+4.39)#70 10.0% (+2.55)#9,677
71. Pocatello 12.3% 8.1% (+4.23)#71 10.0% (+2.39)#9,807
72. Hope 12.2% 8.1% (+4.13)#72 10.0% (+2.29)#9,898
73. Emmett 12.0% 8.1% (+3.94)#73 10.0% (+2.10)#10,101
74. Murtaugh 11.8% 8.1% (+3.65)#74 10.0% (+1.81)#10,408
75. Wallace 11.7% 8.1% (+3.56)#75 10.0% (+1.72)#10,520
76. Peck 11.7% 8.1% (+3.56)#76 10.0% (+1.71)#10,532
77. Grangeville 11.6% 8.1% (+3.49)#77 10.0% (+1.65)#10,587
78. Ashton 11.5% 8.1% (+3.43)#78 10.0% (+1.59)#10,641
79. Hazelton 11.3% 8.1% (+3.21)#79 10.0% (+1.37)#10,860
80. Melba 11.3% 8.1% (+3.21)#80 10.0% (+1.37)#10,867
81. Hansen 11.3% 8.1% (+3.19)#81 10.0% (+1.35)#10,889
82. Irwin 11.3% 8.1% (+3.14)#82 10.0% (+1.30)#10,957
83. Bonners Ferry 11.0% 8.1% (+2.88)#83 10.0% (+1.04)#11,244
84. Inkom 10.7% 8.1% (+2.57)#84 10.0% (+0.728)#11,623
85. Blanchard 10.6% 8.1% (+2.48)#85 10.0% (+0.637)#11,724
86. Filer 10.5% 8.1% (+2.38)#86 10.0% (+0.545)#11,834
87. Swan Valley 10.4% 8.1% (+2.31)#87 10.0% (+0.465)#11,948
88. Iona 10.4% 8.1% (+2.28)#88 10.0% (+0.444)#11,972
89. Twin Falls 10.3% 8.1% (+2.19)#89 10.0% (+0.348)#12,085
90. Juliaetta 10.2% 8.1% (+2.11)#90 10.0% (+0.267)#12,187
91. Island Park 10.1% 8.1% (+2.03)#91 10.0% (+0.193)#12,293
92. Caldwell 10.1% 8.1% (+1.97)#92 10.0% (+0.130)#12,355
93. Gooding 10.0% 8.1% (+1.93)#93 10.0% (+0.093)#12,390
94. Fruitland 10.0% 8.1% (+1.89)#94 10.0% (+0.048)#12,421
95. New Plymouth 10.0% 8.1% (+1.89)#95 10.0% (+0.048)#12,431
96. Pierce 9.9% 8.1% (+1.82)#96 10.0% (-0.018)#12,581
97. Rockford Bay 9.7% 8.1% (+1.57)#97 10.0% (-0.274)#12,925
98. Preston 9.6% 8.1% (+1.54)#98 10.0% (-0.304)#12,966
99. Garden City 9.6% 8.1% (+1.44)#99 10.0% (-0.397)#13,095
100. Kooskia 9.5% 8.1% (+1.43)#100 10.0% (-0.408)#13,106

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho are:
#1
71.4%
#2
54.3%
#3
54.3%
#4
53.3%
#5
45.5%
#6
43.9%
#7
38.8%
#8
35.9%
#9
30.0%
#10
28.8%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho?
Huetter has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho with 71.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the State of Idaho?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Idaho is 8.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.