Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Lotsee66.7%4.1%(+62.6)#14.3%(+62.4)#18
2.Utica36.7%4.1%(+32.6)#24.3%(+32.4)#89
3.Loyal35.5%4.1%(+31.4)#34.3%(+31.2)#100
4.Lawtonka Acres34.2%4.1%(+30.1)#44.3%(+29.9)#108
5.Gowen33.3%4.1%(+29.2)#54.3%(+29.0)#115
6.Elohim33.3%4.1%(+29.2)#64.3%(+29.0)#121
7.Lake Aluma29.6%4.1%(+25.5)#74.3%(+25.3)#159
8.Deer Lick27.5%4.1%(+23.4)#84.3%(+23.2)#184
9.Paradise Hill26.7%4.1%(+22.6)#94.3%(+22.4)#196
10.Honey Hill23.9%4.1%(+19.8)#104.3%(+19.6)#247
11.Sparrowhawk22.9%4.1%(+18.8)#114.3%(+18.6)#271
12.Terlton22.2%4.1%(+18.1)#124.3%(+17.9)#292
13.Bug Tussle20.8%4.1%(+16.7)#134.3%(+16.5)#329
14.Sportmans Shores20.8%4.1%(+16.7)#144.3%(+16.5)#330
15.Chester20.0%4.1%(+15.9)#154.3%(+15.7)#368
16.Narcissa16.7%4.1%(+12.6)#164.3%(+12.4)#548
17.Pettit15.7%4.1%(+11.6)#174.3%(+11.4)#630
18.Bearden15.5%4.1%(+11.4)#184.3%(+11.2)#640
19.New Eucha15.2%4.1%(+11.1)#194.3%(+10.9)#669
20.Byng15.1%4.1%(+11.0)#204.3%(+10.8)#674
21.Wann14.9%4.1%(+10.8)#214.3%(+10.6)#702
22.Nichols Hills14.7%4.1%(+10.6)#224.3%(+10.4)#719
23.Headrick14.7%4.1%(+10.6)#234.3%(+10.4)#721
24.Carter14.6%4.1%(+10.5)#244.3%(+10.3)#733
25.Leon14.3%4.1%(+10.2)#254.3%(+10.00)#776
26.Keys14.2%4.1%(+10.1)#264.3%(+9.90)#787
27.Remy14.1%4.1%(+10.0)#274.3%(+9.81)#804
28.Simms11.9%4.1%(+7.77)#284.3%(+7.58)#1,221
29.Cole11.8%4.1%(+7.71)#294.3%(+7.52)#1,237
30.Shattuck11.8%4.1%(+7.70)#304.3%(+7.51)#1,241
31.Brent11.8%4.1%(+7.67)#314.3%(+7.48)#1,243
32.Woodlawn Park11.3%4.1%(+7.22)#324.3%(+7.03)#1,371
33.Sunray11.2%4.1%(+7.13)#334.3%(+6.94)#1,397
34.Peckham11.1%4.1%(+7.02)#344.3%(+6.83)#1,431
35.Nashoba10.5%4.1%(+6.43)#354.3%(+6.24)#1,601
36.Silo10.4%4.1%(+6.33)#364.3%(+6.14)#1,631
37.Devol9.9%4.1%(+5.76)#374.3%(+5.57)#1,849
38.Park Hill9.7%4.1%(+5.57)#384.3%(+5.38)#1,931
39.Medicine Park9.6%4.1%(+5.54)#394.3%(+5.35)#1,941
40.Teresita9.6%4.1%(+5.52)#404.3%(+5.33)#1,952
41.Orlando9.6%4.1%(+5.52)#414.3%(+5.33)#1,955
42.Keota9.5%4.1%(+5.37)#424.3%(+5.18)#2,025
43.Cedar Valley9.4%4.1%(+5.30)#434.3%(+5.11)#2,065
44.Dennis8.9%4.1%(+4.76)#444.3%(+4.57)#2,375
45.Briartown8.7%4.1%(+4.60)#454.3%(+4.41)#2,488
46.Lone Wolf8.6%4.1%(+4.50)#464.3%(+4.31)#2,539
47.Hooker8.5%4.1%(+4.37)#474.3%(+4.18)#2,632
48.Chewey8.0%4.1%(+3.95)#484.3%(+3.76)#2,940
49.Erick8.0%4.1%(+3.87)#494.3%(+3.68)#3,008
50.Mallard Bay7.9%4.1%(+3.84)#504.3%(+3.65)#3,032
51.Cimarron City7.9%4.1%(+3.84)#514.3%(+3.65)#3,034
52.Newcastle7.9%4.1%(+3.84)#524.3%(+3.65)#3,039
53.Hennessey7.9%4.1%(+3.80)#534.3%(+3.61)#3,064
54.Breckenridge7.8%4.1%(+3.72)#544.3%(+3.53)#3,146
55.Long7.7%4.1%(+3.60)#554.3%(+3.41)#3,245
56.Elgin7.6%4.1%(+3.55)#564.3%(+3.36)#3,303
57.Flint Creek7.6%4.1%(+3.55)#574.3%(+3.36)#3,305
58.Ripley7.5%4.1%(+3.45)#584.3%(+3.26)#3,388
59.Tenkiller7.5%4.1%(+3.38)#594.3%(+3.19)#3,458
60.Strang7.4%4.1%(+3.31)#604.3%(+3.12)#3,528
61.East Duke7.3%4.1%(+3.18)#614.3%(+2.99)#3,648
62.Piedmont7.2%4.1%(+3.13)#624.3%(+2.94)#3,704
63.Jenks7.2%4.1%(+3.12)#634.3%(+2.93)#3,707
64.Hallett7.1%4.1%(+3.05)#644.3%(+2.86)#3,808
65.Zeb7.0%4.1%(+2.91)#654.3%(+2.72)#3,953
66.Taylor Ferry7.0%4.1%(+2.89)#664.3%(+2.70)#3,975
67.Tuttle6.9%4.1%(+2.77)#674.3%(+2.58)#4,125
68.Greenfield6.8%4.1%(+2.72)#684.3%(+2.53)#4,192
69.Edmond6.6%4.1%(+2.53)#694.3%(+2.34)#4,443
70.Bixby6.6%4.1%(+2.51)#704.3%(+2.32)#4,476
71.Okay6.6%4.1%(+2.50)#714.3%(+2.31)#4,488
72.Arapaho6.5%4.1%(+2.38)#724.3%(+2.19)#4,642
73.Granite6.5%4.1%(+2.37)#734.3%(+2.18)#4,661
74.Cumberland6.3%4.1%(+2.25)#744.3%(+2.06)#4,806
75.Gore6.3%4.1%(+2.19)#754.3%(+2.00)#4,905
76.Whitefield6.3%4.1%(+2.19)#764.3%(+2.00)#4,908
77.Weleetka6.3%4.1%(+2.17)#774.3%(+1.98)#4,925
78.Milfay6.1%4.1%(+2.03)#784.3%(+1.84)#5,187
79.Oaks6.1%4.1%(+1.96)#794.3%(+1.77)#5,273
80.Smith Village6.1%4.1%(+1.96)#804.3%(+1.77)#5,279
81.Quinton6.0%4.1%(+1.93)#814.3%(+1.74)#5,331
82.Canton6.0%4.1%(+1.90)#824.3%(+1.71)#5,378
83.Blanchard6.0%4.1%(+1.89)#834.3%(+1.70)#5,407
84.Geary5.9%4.1%(+1.84)#844.3%(+1.65)#5,478
85.Calumet5.9%4.1%(+1.83)#854.3%(+1.64)#5,496
86.Texanna5.8%4.1%(+1.71)#864.3%(+1.52)#5,697
87.Johnson5.8%4.1%(+1.70)#874.3%(+1.51)#5,713
88.Pocasset5.8%4.1%(+1.70)#884.3%(+1.51)#5,714
89.Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County5.7%4.1%(+1.65)#894.3%(+1.46)#5,806
90.Gregory5.7%4.1%(+1.62)#904.3%(+1.43)#5,850
91.Osage5.7%4.1%(+1.62)#914.3%(+1.43)#5,858
92.Union City5.6%4.1%(+1.52)#924.3%(+1.33)#6,041
93.Dickson5.6%4.1%(+1.50)#934.3%(+1.31)#6,075
94.Washington5.6%4.1%(+1.50)#944.3%(+1.31)#6,083
95.Garvin5.6%4.1%(+1.46)#954.3%(+1.27)#6,174
96.Grayson5.6%4.1%(+1.46)#964.3%(+1.27)#6,175
97.Hillsdale5.4%4.1%(+1.31)#974.3%(+1.12)#6,458
98.South Coffeyville5.4%4.1%(+1.28)#984.3%(+1.09)#6,512
99.Indiahoma5.3%4.1%(+1.21)#994.3%(+1.02)#6,677
100.Choctaw5.3%4.1%(+1.19)#1004.3%(+0.999)#6,714

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma are:
#1
66.7%
#2
35.5%
#3
33.3%
#4
29.6%
#5
27.5%
#6
26.7%
#7
22.2%
#8
20.0%
#9
16.7%
#10
15.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma?
Lotsee has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma with 66.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.