Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Mcroberts 57.4% 4.8% (+52.6)#1 4.3% (+53.1)#26
2. Cawood 32.4% 4.8% (+27.6)#2 4.3% (+28.1)#127
3. Jeff 31.9% 4.8% (+27.1)#3 4.3% (+27.6)#136
4. Spottsville 30.4% 4.8% (+25.5)#4 4.3% (+26.1)#152
5. Cleaton 28.3% 4.8% (+23.5)#5 4.3% (+24.0)#177
6. Mockingbird Valley 27.6% 4.8% (+22.7)#6 4.3% (+23.3)#182
7. Hazard 25.7% 4.8% (+20.8)#7 4.3% (+21.4)#210
8. Mount Olivet 24.5% 4.8% (+19.6)#8 4.3% (+20.2)#229
9. Glenview 24.4% 4.8% (+19.5)#9 4.3% (+20.1)#231
10. Marrowbone 22.0% 4.8% (+17.2)#10 4.3% (+17.7)#296
11. Maryhill Estates 21.5% 4.8% (+16.7)#11 4.3% (+17.2)#308
12. Knottsville 21.1% 4.8% (+16.3)#12 4.3% (+16.8)#319
13. Seneca Gardens 19.2% 4.8% (+14.3)#13 4.3% (+14.9)#406
14. Symsonia 18.7% 4.8% (+13.9)#14 4.3% (+14.4)#431
15. Fairview 18.5% 4.8% (+13.7)#15 4.3% (+14.2)#448
16. Murray Hill 18.0% 4.8% (+13.2)#16 4.3% (+13.8)#468
17. Virgie 17.7% 4.8% (+12.9)#17 4.3% (+13.4)#482
18. Norbourne Estates 17.5% 4.8% (+12.7)#18 4.3% (+13.2)#489
19. Strathmoor Manor 16.9% 4.8% (+12.1)#19 4.3% (+12.6)#525
20. Northfield 16.4% 4.8% (+11.6)#20 4.3% (+12.1)#563
21. Pryorsburg 16.3% 4.8% (+11.4)#21 4.3% (+12.0)#580
22. Manitou 16.2% 4.8% (+11.4)#22 4.3% (+11.9)#587
23. Raceland 15.4% 4.8% (+10.6)#23 4.3% (+11.1)#644
24. Rosine 15.1% 4.8% (+10.3)#24 4.3% (+10.8)#678
25. Whitesburg 14.9% 4.8% (+10.1)#25 4.3% (+10.6)#699
26. Thornhill 14.9% 4.8% (+10.1)#26 4.3% (+10.6)#700
27. Farmington 14.9% 4.8% (+10.1)#27 4.3% (+10.6)#701
28. Belfry 14.7% 4.8% (+9.83)#28 4.3% (+10.4)#727
29. South Williamson 14.4% 4.8% (+9.59)#29 4.3% (+10.1)#761
30. Rabbit Hash 14.1% 4.8% (+9.28)#30 4.3% (+9.83)#801
31. Hodgenville 13.7% 4.8% (+8.87)#31 4.3% (+9.43)#858
32. Strathmoor Village 13.3% 4.8% (+8.49)#32 4.3% (+9.05)#924
33. Audubon Park 13.3% 4.8% (+8.44)#33 4.3% (+9.00)#934
34. St Mary 13.2% 4.8% (+8.32)#34 4.3% (+8.87)#947
35. Anchorage 12.8% 4.8% (+7.95)#35 4.3% (+8.50)#1,020
36. Greenville 12.4% 4.8% (+7.54)#36 4.3% (+8.10)#1,105
37. Bellewood 12.2% 4.8% (+7.35)#37 4.3% (+7.91)#1,137
38. Norwood 12.2% 4.8% (+7.34)#38 4.3% (+7.90)#1,144
39. Prospect 11.8% 4.8% (+6.97)#39 4.3% (+7.53)#1,235
40. Kingsley 11.8% 4.8% (+6.92)#40 4.3% (+7.48)#1,244
41. Cambridge 11.7% 4.8% (+6.87)#41 4.3% (+7.43)#1,266
42. Windy Hills 11.6% 4.8% (+6.75)#42 4.3% (+7.30)#1,291
43. Druid Hills 11.6% 4.8% (+6.72)#43 4.3% (+7.27)#1,300
44. Broeck Pointe 11.5% 4.8% (+6.61)#44 4.3% (+7.16)#1,336
45. Brownsboro Farm 11.4% 4.8% (+6.58)#45 4.3% (+7.13)#1,347
46. Mortons Gap 11.3% 4.8% (+6.47)#46 4.3% (+7.03)#1,373
47. Bancroft 11.3% 4.8% (+6.43)#47 4.3% (+6.98)#1,385
48. Bellefonte 11.2% 4.8% (+6.38)#48 4.3% (+6.93)#1,399
49. Cecilia 11.2% 4.8% (+6.34)#49 4.3% (+6.90)#1,406
50. Spring Valley 11.1% 4.8% (+6.30)#50 4.3% (+6.85)#1,414
51. Pikeville 11.1% 4.8% (+6.22)#51 4.3% (+6.78)#1,443
52. Mayking 10.9% 4.8% (+6.03)#52 4.3% (+6.58)#1,492
53. Barbourville 10.7% 4.8% (+5.88)#53 4.3% (+6.44)#1,531
54. Brownsboro Village 10.7% 4.8% (+5.87)#54 4.3% (+6.43)#1,534
55. Plano 10.6% 4.8% (+5.75)#55 4.3% (+6.31)#1,574
56. St Matthews 10.4% 4.8% (+5.59)#56 4.3% (+6.14)#1,630
57. Alexandria 10.4% 4.8% (+5.51)#57 4.3% (+6.07)#1,658
58. Hurstbourne 10.2% 4.8% (+5.40)#58 4.3% (+5.95)#1,706
59. Bloomfield 10.2% 4.8% (+5.35)#59 4.3% (+5.91)#1,720
60. Jenkins 10.2% 4.8% (+5.32)#60 4.3% (+5.87)#1,732
61. Belleview 10.0% 4.8% (+5.16)#61 4.3% (+5.71)#1,788
62. Elkhorn City 9.9% 4.8% (+5.10)#62 4.3% (+5.65)#1,815
63. South Shore 9.9% 4.8% (+5.07)#63 4.3% (+5.63)#1,826
64. Elk Creek 9.9% 4.8% (+5.04)#64 4.3% (+5.60)#1,842
65. Ten Broeck 9.7% 4.8% (+4.84)#65 4.3% (+5.39)#1,926
66. Upton 9.6% 4.8% (+4.73)#66 4.3% (+5.28)#1,978
67. Hills And Dales 9.5% 4.8% (+4.68)#67 4.3% (+5.24)#2,001
68. Harlan 9.4% 4.8% (+4.56)#68 4.3% (+5.12)#2,059
69. Old Brownsboro Place 9.2% 4.8% (+4.41)#69 4.3% (+4.96)#2,136
70. Paintsville 9.2% 4.8% (+4.37)#70 4.3% (+4.92)#2,159
71. Sebree 9.2% 4.8% (+4.34)#71 4.3% (+4.89)#2,174
72. Fairfield 9.1% 4.8% (+4.25)#72 4.3% (+4.80)#2,228
73. Graymoor Devondale 9.1% 4.8% (+4.24)#73 4.3% (+4.79)#2,248
74. Simpsonville 9.1% 4.8% (+4.22)#74 4.3% (+4.78)#2,253
75. Sacramento 9.0% 4.8% (+4.18)#75 4.3% (+4.74)#2,274
76. Manor Creek 8.9% 4.8% (+4.08)#76 4.3% (+4.63)#2,335
77. Summersville 8.9% 4.8% (+4.06)#77 4.3% (+4.62)#2,347
78. Indian Hills 8.9% 4.8% (+4.04)#78 4.3% (+4.60)#2,365
79. Russell 8.8% 4.8% (+3.99)#79 4.3% (+4.54)#2,394
80. Beechmont 8.8% 4.8% (+3.92)#80 4.3% (+4.47)#2,432
81. Sycamore 8.7% 4.8% (+3.91)#81 4.3% (+4.46)#2,443
82. Union 8.7% 4.8% (+3.91)#82 4.3% (+4.46)#2,444
83. Watterson Park 8.7% 4.8% (+3.90)#83 4.3% (+4.46)#2,451
84. Wurtland 8.7% 4.8% (+3.87)#84 4.3% (+4.42)#2,473
85. Coal Run Village 8.7% 4.8% (+3.83)#85 4.3% (+4.38)#2,506
86. Morganfield 8.5% 4.8% (+3.66)#86 4.3% (+4.21)#2,603
87. Irvine 8.5% 4.8% (+3.64)#87 4.3% (+4.19)#2,618
88. Coldstream 8.5% 4.8% (+3.61)#88 4.3% (+4.17)#2,637
89. Woodland Hills 8.4% 4.8% (+3.59)#89 4.3% (+4.14)#2,655
90. Douglass Hills 8.4% 4.8% (+3.53)#90 4.3% (+4.09)#2,688
91. Glenview Hills 8.2% 4.8% (+3.40)#91 4.3% (+3.96)#2,773
92. Clarkson 8.1% 4.8% (+3.30)#92 4.3% (+3.86)#2,862
93. Madisonville 8.1% 4.8% (+3.21)#93 4.3% (+3.77)#2,932
94. Central City 7.9% 4.8% (+3.09)#94 4.3% (+3.65)#3,036
95. Smithland 7.8% 4.8% (+2.99)#95 4.3% (+3.54)#3,126
96. Richlawn 7.7% 4.8% (+2.89)#96 4.3% (+3.44)#3,215
97. Newport 7.7% 4.8% (+2.88)#97 4.3% (+3.44)#3,219
98. Hanson 7.7% 4.8% (+2.87)#98 4.3% (+3.43)#3,225
99. Liberty 7.7% 4.8% (+2.83)#99 4.3% (+3.38)#3,281
100. Jamestown 7.6% 4.8% (+2.80)#100 4.3% (+3.35)#3,318

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky are:
#1
57.4%
#2
32.4%
#3
31.9%
#4
30.4%
#5
28.3%
#6
27.6%
#7
25.7%
#8
24.5%
#9
24.4%
#10
22.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky?
McRoberts has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky with 57.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Kentucky is 4.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.