Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Edgewater42.1%4.7%(+37.4)#14.3%(+37.8)#68
2.Memphis36.4%4.7%(+31.7)#24.3%(+32.1)#90
3.Beatrice31.6%4.7%(+26.9)#34.3%(+27.3)#143
4.Natural Bridge26.7%4.7%(+22.0)#44.3%(+22.4)#197
5.Toxey25.8%4.7%(+21.1)#54.3%(+21.5)#209
6.Bellamy18.5%4.7%(+13.9)#64.3%(+14.2)#449
7.Myrtlewood17.7%4.7%(+13.1)#74.3%(+13.5)#478
8.Uriah17.6%4.7%(+12.9)#84.3%(+13.3)#485
9.Hobson16.8%4.7%(+12.2)#94.3%(+12.6)#534
10.Fairhope16.6%4.7%(+11.9)#104.3%(+12.3)#555
11.Magnolia Springs16.5%4.7%(+11.8)#114.3%(+12.2)#556
12.Ray16.1%4.7%(+11.4)#124.3%(+11.8)#601
13.Stockton16.0%4.7%(+11.3)#134.3%(+11.7)#606
14.Point Clear15.9%4.7%(+11.2)#144.3%(+11.6)#613
15.Stapleton15.2%4.7%(+10.5)#154.3%(+10.9)#671
16.Mountain Brook14.4%4.7%(+9.78)#164.3%(+10.2)#759
17.Blue Ridge13.1%4.7%(+8.41)#174.3%(+8.79)#960
18.Homewood12.8%4.7%(+8.10)#184.3%(+8.47)#1,025
19.Vestavia Hills12.5%4.7%(+7.85)#194.3%(+8.23)#1,066
20.Lake View12.5%4.7%(+7.82)#204.3%(+8.19)#1,092
21.Riverview12.2%4.7%(+7.58)#214.3%(+7.96)#1,130
22.Glencoe12.1%4.7%(+7.48)#224.3%(+7.86)#1,154
23.Talladega Springs12.0%4.7%(+7.34)#234.3%(+7.71)#1,182
24.Fort Rucker11.9%4.7%(+7.25)#244.3%(+7.63)#1,207
25.Gardendale11.9%4.7%(+7.22)#254.3%(+7.60)#1,218
26.Sweet Water11.7%4.7%(+6.99)#264.3%(+7.36)#1,273
27.Lookout Mountain11.6%4.7%(+6.95)#274.3%(+7.33)#1,280
28.Carolina11.6%4.7%(+6.91)#284.3%(+7.28)#1,298
29.Fayette11.4%4.7%(+6.76)#294.3%(+7.14)#1,345
30.Redland11.4%4.7%(+6.72)#304.3%(+7.10)#1,354
31.New Hope10.8%4.7%(+6.13)#314.3%(+6.51)#1,508
32.Highland Lakes10.3%4.7%(+5.65)#324.3%(+6.03)#1,676
33.Hollins10.3%4.7%(+5.63)#334.3%(+6.01)#1,680
34.Waverly10.3%4.7%(+5.59)#344.3%(+5.97)#1,702
35.Avon10.0%4.7%(+5.29)#354.3%(+5.66)#1,814
36.Oneonta9.9%4.7%(+5.24)#364.3%(+5.62)#1,834
37.Trussville9.8%4.7%(+5.18)#374.3%(+5.56)#1,855
38.Deatsville9.8%4.7%(+5.18)#384.3%(+5.56)#1,858
39.Sterrett9.8%4.7%(+5.12)#394.3%(+5.50)#1,880
40.Alexandria9.6%4.7%(+4.91)#404.3%(+5.29)#1,975
41.Rock Mills9.4%4.7%(+4.71)#414.3%(+5.09)#2,070
42.Haleyville9.4%4.7%(+4.69)#424.3%(+5.07)#2,082
43.Thomaston9.3%4.7%(+4.64)#434.3%(+5.02)#2,109
44.Indian Springs Village8.9%4.7%(+4.27)#444.3%(+4.65)#2,323
45.Brilliant8.9%4.7%(+4.20)#454.3%(+4.58)#2,373
46.Kimberly8.7%4.7%(+4.07)#464.3%(+4.45)#2,459
47.Silverhill8.6%4.7%(+3.95)#474.3%(+4.33)#2,529
48.Flomaton8.6%4.7%(+3.94)#484.3%(+4.32)#2,533
49.Daviston8.5%4.7%(+3.85)#494.3%(+4.22)#2,595
50.Moores Mill8.4%4.7%(+3.70)#504.3%(+4.08)#2,695
51.Boaz8.3%4.7%(+3.68)#514.3%(+4.06)#2,703
52.Guin8.3%4.7%(+3.59)#524.3%(+3.97)#2,764
53.Glen Allen8.2%4.7%(+3.53)#534.3%(+3.91)#2,807
54.Coats Bend8.1%4.7%(+3.47)#544.3%(+3.85)#2,871
55.Owens Cross Roads8.1%4.7%(+3.47)#554.3%(+3.85)#2,873
56.Chelsea8.1%4.7%(+3.46)#564.3%(+3.84)#2,883
57.Satsuma8.1%4.7%(+3.42)#574.3%(+3.80)#2,908
58.La Fayette8.1%4.7%(+3.41)#584.3%(+3.79)#2,920
59.Waterloo8.0%4.7%(+3.34)#594.3%(+3.71)#2,981
60.Morris8.0%4.7%(+3.30)#604.3%(+3.68)#3,001
61.Crossville7.8%4.7%(+3.17)#614.3%(+3.54)#3,123
62.Sylvan Springs7.7%4.7%(+3.08)#624.3%(+3.46)#3,200
63.Priceville7.7%4.7%(+3.03)#634.3%(+3.41)#3,238
64.Sardis City7.7%4.7%(+3.02)#644.3%(+3.40)#3,267
65.Guntersville7.7%4.7%(+3.00)#654.3%(+3.38)#3,286
66.Loxley7.7%4.7%(+3.00)#664.3%(+3.38)#3,289
67.Detroit7.6%4.7%(+2.95)#674.3%(+3.32)#3,335
68.Langston7.5%4.7%(+2.86)#684.3%(+3.24)#3,411
69.Northport7.5%4.7%(+2.83)#694.3%(+3.21)#3,440
70.Hayden7.5%4.7%(+2.82)#704.3%(+3.20)#3,450
71.Springville7.4%4.7%(+2.70)#714.3%(+3.07)#3,570
72.Meadowbrook7.3%4.7%(+2.64)#724.3%(+3.02)#3,622
73.Forestdale7.2%4.7%(+2.56)#734.3%(+2.93)#3,712
74.Childersburg7.2%4.7%(+2.55)#744.3%(+2.93)#3,717
75.Hoover7.1%4.7%(+2.48)#754.3%(+2.86)#3,812
76.Jasper7.1%4.7%(+2.46)#764.3%(+2.84)#3,838
77.Spanish Fort7.1%4.7%(+2.42)#774.3%(+2.79)#3,875
78.Thorsby7.0%4.7%(+2.36)#784.3%(+2.74)#3,940
79.Leroy7.0%4.7%(+2.33)#794.3%(+2.71)#3,969
80.Mccalla7.0%4.7%(+2.32)#804.3%(+2.69)#3,990
81.Minor7.0%4.7%(+2.30)#814.3%(+2.68)#4,014
82.Hillsboro6.9%4.7%(+2.26)#824.3%(+2.64)#4,043
83.Gurley6.9%4.7%(+2.26)#834.3%(+2.64)#4,049
84.Muscle Shoals6.9%4.7%(+2.21)#844.3%(+2.59)#4,118
85.Irondale6.9%4.7%(+2.19)#854.3%(+2.57)#4,137
86.Dora6.8%4.7%(+2.18)#864.3%(+2.56)#4,152
87.Creola6.8%4.7%(+2.14)#874.3%(+2.52)#4,206
88.Trafford6.8%4.7%(+2.12)#884.3%(+2.49)#4,228
89.Gordonville6.7%4.7%(+2.06)#894.3%(+2.44)#4,306
90.Rehobeth6.7%4.7%(+2.05)#904.3%(+2.43)#4,321
91.West Jefferson6.7%4.7%(+2.00)#914.3%(+2.38)#4,383
92.White Plains6.6%4.7%(+1.98)#924.3%(+2.36)#4,428
93.Highland Lake6.6%4.7%(+1.96)#934.3%(+2.34)#4,447
94.Heath6.6%4.7%(+1.93)#944.3%(+2.31)#4,491
95.Oakman6.6%4.7%(+1.89)#954.3%(+2.27)#4,537
96.Daphne6.6%4.7%(+1.89)#964.3%(+2.26)#4,547
97.Eva6.5%4.7%(+1.88)#974.3%(+2.25)#4,561
98.Eldridge6.5%4.7%(+1.79)#984.3%(+2.17)#4,683
99.Winfield6.4%4.7%(+1.76)#994.3%(+2.14)#4,713
100.Andalusia6.4%4.7%(+1.76)#1004.3%(+2.13)#4,714

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama are:
#1
42.1%
#2
36.4%
#3
31.6%
#4
26.7%
#5
25.8%
#6
18.5%
#7
17.7%
#8
17.6%
#9
16.8%
#10
16.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama?
Edgewater has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama with 42.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Alabama is 4.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.