Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Milroy 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#250
2. Lewis 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#275
3. Hanna 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#296
4. Servia 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#371
5. Amity 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#417
6. Lake Holiday Hideaway 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#426
7. New Point 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#427
8. Freetown 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#503
9. Losantville 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#510
10. Kingsbury 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#536
11. Marion 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#565
12. Cedar Grove 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#13 18.1% (+81.9)#568
13. Burnett 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#14 18.1% (+81.9)#576
14. Jonesville 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#15 18.1% (+81.9)#584
15. Adams 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#16 18.1% (+81.9)#592
16. Alford 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#17 18.1% (+81.9)#598
17. Decker 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#18 18.1% (+81.9)#621
18. Deer Creek 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#19 18.1% (+81.9)#629
19. Otisco 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#20 18.1% (+81.9)#729
20. Hobbs 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#21 18.1% (+81.9)#779
21. Florence 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#22 18.1% (+81.9)#810
22. Pleasantville 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#23 18.1% (+81.9)#816
23. Laconia 100.0% 18.4% (+81.6)#24 18.1% (+81.9)#845
24. Kewanna 90.5% 18.4% (+72.1)#25 18.1% (+72.4)#1,016
25. Switz City 87.5% 18.4% (+69.1)#26 18.1% (+69.4)#1,079
26. Shoals 86.7% 18.4% (+68.2)#27 18.1% (+68.6)#1,107
27. Kempton 85.7% 18.4% (+67.3)#28 18.1% (+67.7)#1,140
28. English 83.8% 18.4% (+65.4)#29 18.1% (+65.7)#1,196
29. Kingman 81.2% 18.4% (+62.8)#30 18.1% (+63.2)#1,288
30. Alamo 80.0% 18.4% (+61.6)#31 18.1% (+61.9)#1,359
31. Russellville 77.3% 18.4% (+58.8)#32 18.1% (+59.2)#1,433
32. Ambia 76.9% 18.4% (+58.5)#33 18.1% (+58.9)#1,454
33. Otwell 76.3% 18.4% (+57.8)#34 18.1% (+58.2)#1,477
34. La Paz 75.0% 18.4% (+56.6)#35 18.1% (+56.9)#1,522
35. Bloomingdale 73.9% 18.4% (+55.5)#36 18.1% (+55.9)#1,588
36. Seelyville 73.3% 18.4% (+54.9)#37 18.1% (+55.3)#1,619
37. Orestes 73.3% 18.4% (+54.9)#38 18.1% (+55.3)#1,622
38. Laurel 71.6% 18.4% (+53.2)#39 18.1% (+53.5)#1,689
39. Tennyson 70.0% 18.4% (+51.6)#40 18.1% (+51.9)#1,788
40. Winamac 69.5% 18.4% (+51.0)#41 18.1% (+51.4)#1,813
41. Peru 67.6% 18.4% (+49.1)#42 18.1% (+49.5)#1,923
42. Hymera 67.4% 18.4% (+49.0)#43 18.1% (+49.4)#1,930
43. Loogootee 67.4% 18.4% (+48.9)#44 18.1% (+49.3)#1,938
44. Amboy 66.7% 18.4% (+48.2)#45 18.1% (+48.6)#1,994
45. Poneto 66.7% 18.4% (+48.2)#46 18.1% (+48.6)#2,020
46. Monroe City 65.6% 18.4% (+47.2)#47 18.1% (+47.5)#2,074
47. Scott 65.0% 18.4% (+46.6)#48 18.1% (+46.9)#2,118
48. La Fontaine 64.8% 18.4% (+46.4)#49 18.1% (+46.7)#2,129
49. Hudson 64.2% 18.4% (+45.7)#50 18.1% (+46.1)#2,175
50. Royal Center 63.6% 18.4% (+45.2)#51 18.1% (+45.6)#2,202
51. Rockville 62.0% 18.4% (+43.6)#52 18.1% (+44.0)#2,338
52. Bremen 61.0% 18.4% (+42.6)#53 18.1% (+42.9)#2,429
53. Montezuma 60.0% 18.4% (+41.6)#54 18.1% (+41.9)#2,499
54. Lyons 60.0% 18.4% (+41.6)#55 18.1% (+41.9)#2,502
55. Newberry 60.0% 18.4% (+41.6)#56 18.1% (+41.9)#2,540
56. Waynetown 58.5% 18.4% (+40.1)#57 18.1% (+40.4)#2,651
57. Roseland 58.3% 18.4% (+39.9)#58 18.1% (+40.3)#2,665
58. Scottsburg 58.3% 18.4% (+39.9)#59 18.1% (+40.2)#2,675
59. Barbee 57.1% 18.4% (+38.7)#60 18.1% (+39.1)#2,752
60. Walton 56.8% 18.4% (+38.3)#61 18.1% (+38.7)#2,793
61. Salt Creek Commons 56.4% 18.4% (+37.9)#62 18.1% (+38.3)#2,830
62. Boswell 55.7% 18.4% (+37.3)#63 18.1% (+37.6)#2,894
63. Pierceton 54.2% 18.4% (+35.7)#64 18.1% (+36.1)#3,022
64. Dillsboro 52.7% 18.4% (+34.3)#65 18.1% (+34.6)#3,172
65. Liberty Mills 52.5% 18.4% (+34.1)#66 18.1% (+34.4)#3,186
66. Pine Village 52.4% 18.4% (+34.0)#67 18.1% (+34.3)#3,197
67. Rising Sun 52.3% 18.4% (+33.9)#68 18.1% (+34.3)#3,205
68. Gary 52.1% 18.4% (+33.6)#69 18.1% (+34.0)#3,228
69. Lawrenceburg 51.7% 18.4% (+33.3)#70 18.1% (+33.6)#3,263
70. Windfall City 51.6% 18.4% (+33.2)#71 18.1% (+33.6)#3,272
71. Bainbridge 51.3% 18.4% (+32.9)#72 18.1% (+33.2)#3,308
72. Attica 51.0% 18.4% (+32.6)#73 18.1% (+32.9)#3,326
73. Rosedale 50.0% 18.4% (+31.6)#74 18.1% (+31.9)#3,442
74. Elizabethtown 50.0% 18.4% (+31.6)#75 18.1% (+31.9)#3,495
75. Napoleon 50.0% 18.4% (+31.6)#76 18.1% (+31.9)#3,504
76. Merom 50.0% 18.4% (+31.6)#77 18.1% (+31.9)#3,534
77. Blountsville 50.0% 18.4% (+31.6)#78 18.1% (+31.9)#3,560
78. South Whitley 49.3% 18.4% (+30.9)#79 18.1% (+31.3)#3,617
79. Williamsburg 49.1% 18.4% (+30.7)#80 18.1% (+31.0)#3,637
80. Batesville 48.2% 18.4% (+29.8)#81 18.1% (+30.2)#3,722
81. Roachdale 47.9% 18.4% (+29.5)#82 18.1% (+29.9)#3,763
82. Middletown 47.5% 18.4% (+29.1)#83 18.1% (+29.5)#3,807
83. East Chicago 47.3% 18.4% (+28.8)#84 18.1% (+29.2)#3,838
84. Union City 46.7% 18.4% (+28.2)#85 18.1% (+28.6)#3,912
85. Clinton 46.6% 18.4% (+28.1)#86 18.1% (+28.5)#3,937
86. Clay City 46.4% 18.4% (+28.0)#87 18.1% (+28.4)#3,952
87. Kentland 46.0% 18.4% (+27.6)#88 18.1% (+27.9)#4,021
88. Aurora 45.8% 18.4% (+27.4)#89 18.1% (+27.8)#4,039
89. Homer 45.2% 18.4% (+26.7)#90 18.1% (+27.1)#4,123
90. Winslow 45.0% 18.4% (+26.6)#91 18.1% (+26.9)#4,138
91. Staunton 44.8% 18.4% (+26.4)#92 18.1% (+26.8)#4,167
92. Richmond 44.7% 18.4% (+26.2)#93 18.1% (+26.6)#4,191
93. Farmersburg 43.8% 18.4% (+25.3)#94 18.1% (+25.7)#4,317
94. Kennard 43.8% 18.4% (+25.3)#95 18.1% (+25.7)#4,322
95. Millersburg 43.1% 18.4% (+24.7)#96 18.1% (+25.0)#4,419
96. Paragon 42.9% 18.4% (+24.4)#97 18.1% (+24.8)#4,455
97. Connersville 42.5% 18.4% (+24.1)#98 18.1% (+24.5)#4,515
98. Lake Station 41.8% 18.4% (+23.4)#99 18.1% (+23.8)#4,607
99. Prince S Lakes 41.7% 18.4% (+23.2)#100 18.1% (+23.6)#4,630
100. Leavenworth 41.7% 18.4% (+23.2)#101 18.1% (+23.6)#4,638

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana?
Milroy has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Indiana is 18.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.