Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Walker 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#183
2. Ponemah 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#198
3. Orr 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#374
4. Wahkon 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#480
5. Hayward 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#550
6. Borup 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#652
7. Perley 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#716
8. Dundee 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#802
9. Beltrami 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#812
10. Walters 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#824
11. New Trier 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#826
12. Kenneth 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#836
13. Essig 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#13 18.1% (+81.9)#850
14. Laporte 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#14 18.1% (+81.9)#854
15. Nashua 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#15 18.1% (+81.9)#861
16. South End 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#16 18.1% (+81.9)#885
17. Halma 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#17 18.1% (+81.9)#888
18. Correll 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#18 18.1% (+81.9)#909
19. Redby 94.3% 11.3% (+83.0)#19 18.1% (+76.2)#948
20. Granada 88.2% 11.3% (+76.9)#20 18.1% (+70.2)#1,057
21. Warba 88.2% 11.3% (+76.9)#21 18.1% (+70.2)#1,058
22. Ball Club 87.9% 11.3% (+76.5)#22 18.1% (+69.8)#1,067
23. Dent 87.5% 11.3% (+76.2)#23 18.1% (+69.4)#1,081
24. Marietta 87.5% 11.3% (+76.2)#24 18.1% (+69.4)#1,083
25. Lengby 87.5% 11.3% (+76.2)#25 18.1% (+69.4)#1,086
26. Squaw Lake 85.7% 11.3% (+74.4)#26 18.1% (+67.7)#1,147
27. Richville 85.7% 11.3% (+74.4)#27 18.1% (+67.7)#1,149
28. Wilton 83.3% 11.3% (+72.0)#28 18.1% (+65.3)#1,223
29. White Earth 82.9% 11.3% (+71.6)#29 18.1% (+64.8)#1,240
30. Wendell 82.4% 11.3% (+71.0)#30 18.1% (+64.3)#1,255
31. Remer 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#31 18.1% (+61.9)#1,334
32. Ebro 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#32 18.1% (+61.9)#1,357
33. Lake Lillian 77.8% 11.3% (+66.4)#33 18.1% (+59.7)#1,416
34. Sunburg 77.8% 11.3% (+66.4)#34 18.1% (+59.7)#1,418
35. Brooten 76.9% 11.3% (+65.6)#35 18.1% (+58.9)#1,451
36. Ulen 76.2% 11.3% (+64.9)#36 18.1% (+58.1)#1,479
37. Jasper 75.0% 11.3% (+63.7)#37 18.1% (+56.9)#1,521
38. Naytahwaush 75.0% 11.3% (+63.7)#38 18.1% (+56.9)#1,523
39. Chandler 75.0% 11.3% (+63.7)#39 18.1% (+56.9)#1,527
40. Keewatin 73.6% 11.3% (+62.2)#40 18.1% (+55.5)#1,611
41. Ashby 71.4% 11.3% (+60.1)#41 18.1% (+53.4)#1,701
42. Kelliher 71.4% 11.3% (+60.1)#42 18.1% (+53.4)#1,703
43. Hazel Run 71.4% 11.3% (+60.1)#43 18.1% (+53.4)#1,716
44. Mahnomen 68.8% 11.3% (+57.4)#44 18.1% (+50.7)#1,861
45. Lucan 66.7% 11.3% (+55.3)#45 18.1% (+48.6)#2,014
46. South Haven 66.7% 11.3% (+55.3)#46 18.1% (+48.6)#2,015
47. Lastrup 66.7% 11.3% (+55.3)#47 18.1% (+48.6)#2,027
48. Nielsville 66.7% 11.3% (+55.3)#48 18.1% (+48.6)#2,028
49. Villard 64.7% 11.3% (+53.4)#49 18.1% (+46.6)#2,141
50. Landfall 64.0% 11.3% (+52.7)#50 18.1% (+45.9)#2,185
51. Eveleth 62.6% 11.3% (+51.3)#51 18.1% (+44.6)#2,283
52. Riverland 62.2% 11.3% (+50.8)#52 18.1% (+44.1)#2,330
53. Crosby 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#53 18.1% (+41.9)#2,491
54. Backus 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#54 18.1% (+41.9)#2,522
55. Pine Bend 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#55 18.1% (+41.9)#2,552
56. Calumet 59.3% 11.3% (+47.9)#56 18.1% (+41.2)#2,588
57. Sacred Heart 58.5% 11.3% (+47.2)#57 18.1% (+40.5)#2,647
58. Pine River 55.6% 11.3% (+44.2)#58 18.1% (+37.5)#2,905
59. Badger 55.6% 11.3% (+44.2)#59 18.1% (+37.5)#2,914
60. Delavan 55.6% 11.3% (+44.2)#60 18.1% (+37.5)#2,926
61. Bird Island 54.5% 11.3% (+43.2)#61 18.1% (+36.5)#3,001
62. Belview 54.5% 11.3% (+43.2)#62 18.1% (+36.5)#3,005
63. Milaca 54.4% 11.3% (+43.1)#63 18.1% (+36.3)#3,014
64. Twin Lakes 53.8% 11.3% (+42.5)#64 18.1% (+35.8)#3,053
65. Jeffers 53.3% 11.3% (+42.0)#65 18.1% (+35.3)#3,110
66. Frazee 53.0% 11.3% (+41.7)#66 18.1% (+35.0)#3,136
67. St James 52.8% 11.3% (+41.5)#67 18.1% (+34.7)#3,164
68. Rushmore 52.4% 11.3% (+41.0)#68 18.1% (+34.3)#3,196
69. Geneva 52.2% 11.3% (+40.8)#69 18.1% (+34.1)#3,221
70. St Joseph 52.0% 11.3% (+40.6)#70 18.1% (+33.9)#3,235
71. Holland 51.7% 11.3% (+40.4)#71 18.1% (+33.7)#3,259
72. Cosmos 51.6% 11.3% (+40.3)#72 18.1% (+33.6)#3,275
73. Marble 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#73 18.1% (+31.9)#3,438
74. Brownton 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#74 18.1% (+31.9)#3,450
75. Lynd 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#75 18.1% (+31.9)#3,454
76. Pine Point 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#76 18.1% (+31.9)#3,499
77. Williams 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#77 18.1% (+31.9)#3,509
78. Bellechester 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#78 18.1% (+31.9)#3,525
79. Waltham 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#79 18.1% (+31.9)#3,530
80. Leonidas 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#80 18.1% (+31.9)#3,572
81. Manchester 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#81 18.1% (+31.9)#3,575
82. Blackduck 48.1% 11.3% (+36.8)#82 18.1% (+30.1)#3,738
83. Warroad 48.1% 11.3% (+36.7)#83 18.1% (+30.0)#3,742
84. Elmore 47.2% 11.3% (+35.9)#84 18.1% (+29.2)#3,844
85. Virginia 46.8% 11.3% (+35.4)#85 18.1% (+28.7)#3,904
86. Soudan 46.7% 11.3% (+35.3)#86 18.1% (+28.6)#3,925
87. Emmons 46.2% 11.3% (+34.8)#87 18.1% (+28.1)#4,000
88. Foxhome 45.5% 11.3% (+34.1)#88 18.1% (+27.4)#4,099
89. La Prairie 45.0% 11.3% (+33.7)#89 18.1% (+26.9)#4,139
90. Cass Lake 44.8% 11.3% (+33.5)#90 18.1% (+26.8)#4,165
91. Walnut Grove 44.7% 11.3% (+33.4)#91 18.1% (+26.7)#4,179
92. Red Lake 44.4% 11.3% (+33.1)#92 18.1% (+26.4)#4,210
93. Millerville 44.4% 11.3% (+33.1)#93 18.1% (+26.4)#4,243
94. Willmar 44.2% 11.3% (+32.8)#94 18.1% (+26.1)#4,272
95. Jackson 43.9% 11.3% (+32.5)#95 18.1% (+25.8)#4,304
96. Carlton 43.8% 11.3% (+32.4)#96 18.1% (+25.7)#4,318
97. Freeborn 43.8% 11.3% (+32.4)#97 18.1% (+25.7)#4,332
98. Iona 43.8% 11.3% (+32.4)#98 18.1% (+25.7)#4,334
99. Verndale 42.9% 11.3% (+31.5)#99 18.1% (+24.8)#4,458
100. Currie 42.9% 11.3% (+31.5)#100 18.1% (+24.8)#4,477

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota?
Walker has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Minnesota is 11.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.