Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Four Bears Village 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#498
2. Litchville 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#654
3. Fort Yates 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#667
4. Noonan 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#674
5. Ruthville 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#675
6. Warwick 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#763
7. Reeder 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#798
8. Pekin 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#830
9. Nome 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#864
10. Jud 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#872
11. Hansboro 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#904
12. Drake 93.8% 13.1% (+80.6)#13 18.1% (+75.7)#954
13. Cannon Ball 92.8% 13.1% (+79.7)#14 18.1% (+74.7)#970
14. Upham 92.3% 13.1% (+79.2)#15 18.1% (+74.2)#983
15. Mandaree 87.3% 13.1% (+74.2)#16 18.1% (+69.3)#1,090
16. East Dunseith 79.6% 13.1% (+66.5)#17 18.1% (+61.5)#1,362
17. Bowdon 69.2% 13.1% (+56.1)#18 18.1% (+51.2)#1,836
18. Maddock 62.5% 13.1% (+49.4)#19 18.1% (+44.4)#2,304
19. Bowman 60.5% 13.1% (+47.4)#20 18.1% (+42.5)#2,468
20. Golden Valley 60.0% 13.1% (+46.9)#21 18.1% (+41.9)#2,533
21. Mcville 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#22 18.1% (+39.1)#2,765
22. Lisbon 56.5% 13.1% (+43.4)#23 18.1% (+38.4)#2,825
23. Green Acres 56.0% 13.1% (+42.9)#24 18.1% (+37.9)#2,862
24. Belcourt 54.9% 13.1% (+41.8)#25 18.1% (+36.8)#2,975
25. Shell Valley 54.6% 13.1% (+41.5)#26 18.1% (+36.6)#2,994
26. Dunn Center 52.8% 13.1% (+39.7)#27 18.1% (+34.8)#3,161
27. Ashley 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#28 18.1% (+31.9)#3,439
28. Esmond 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#29 18.1% (+31.9)#3,562
29. Rolla 48.0% 13.1% (+34.9)#30 18.1% (+29.9)#3,756
30. Minto 47.1% 13.1% (+34.0)#31 18.1% (+29.0)#3,866
31. Glen Ullin 44.9% 13.1% (+31.8)#32 18.1% (+26.8)#4,161
32. Parshall 43.9% 13.1% (+30.8)#33 18.1% (+25.9)#4,301
33. Regent 41.7% 13.1% (+28.6)#34 18.1% (+23.6)#4,640
34. Lidgerwood 40.0% 13.1% (+26.9)#35 18.1% (+21.9)#4,868
35. Montpelier 40.0% 13.1% (+26.9)#36 18.1% (+21.9)#4,922
36. Medina 38.5% 13.1% (+25.4)#37 18.1% (+20.4)#5,157
37. Edgeley 37.1% 13.1% (+24.0)#38 18.1% (+19.0)#5,381
38. Harvey 33.7% 13.1% (+20.6)#39 18.1% (+15.6)#6,002
39. Fingal 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#40 18.1% (+15.3)#6,172
40. Garrison 32.5% 13.1% (+19.4)#41 18.1% (+14.4)#6,302
41. Cando 31.1% 13.1% (+18.0)#42 18.1% (+13.1)#6,556
42. Halliday 31.0% 13.1% (+17.9)#43 18.1% (+13.0)#6,585
43. Underwood 30.0% 13.1% (+16.9)#44 18.1% (+11.9)#6,798
44. Elgin 29.7% 13.1% (+16.6)#45 18.1% (+11.7)#6,888
45. Gackle 29.6% 13.1% (+16.5)#46 18.1% (+11.6)#6,910
46. Rolette 29.2% 13.1% (+16.1)#47 18.1% (+11.1)#7,006
47. Mayville 28.3% 13.1% (+15.2)#48 18.1% (+10.2)#7,244
48. Fort Totten 27.8% 13.1% (+14.7)#49 18.1% (+9.76)#7,350
49. Walhalla 26.7% 13.1% (+13.6)#50 18.1% (+8.60)#7,645
50. Mohall 26.7% 13.1% (+13.6)#51 18.1% (+8.60)#7,650
51. Hope 25.9% 13.1% (+12.8)#52 18.1% (+7.86)#7,823
52. Bottineau 25.5% 13.1% (+12.4)#53 18.1% (+7.43)#7,924
53. Lakota 25.0% 13.1% (+11.9)#54 18.1% (+6.94)#8,050
54. Powers Lake 25.0% 13.1% (+11.9)#55 18.1% (+6.94)#8,089
55. Sanborn 25.0% 13.1% (+11.9)#56 18.1% (+6.94)#8,115
56. Neche 24.1% 13.1% (+11.0)#57 18.1% (+6.08)#8,308
57. Walcott 23.8% 13.1% (+10.7)#58 18.1% (+5.75)#8,404
58. Finley 23.8% 13.1% (+10.7)#59 18.1% (+5.75)#8,405
59. Plaza 23.1% 13.1% (+9.98)#60 18.1% (+5.01)#8,633
60. Trenton 22.0% 13.1% (+8.85)#61 18.1% (+3.89)#8,944
61. Towner 21.2% 13.1% (+8.11)#62 18.1% (+3.15)#9,205
62. Granville 21.1% 13.1% (+7.95)#63 18.1% (+2.99)#9,261
63. Ray 20.7% 13.1% (+7.59)#64 18.1% (+2.63)#9,352
64. Wyndmere 20.7% 13.1% (+7.59)#65 18.1% (+2.63)#9,354
65. Belfield 20.4% 13.1% (+7.31)#66 18.1% (+2.35)#9,443
66. Emerado 20.0% 13.1% (+6.90)#67 18.1% (+1.94)#9,567
67. Taylor 20.0% 13.1% (+6.90)#68 18.1% (+1.94)#9,596
68. Valley City 19.9% 13.1% (+6.84)#69 18.1% (+1.88)#9,613
69. Tioga 19.5% 13.1% (+6.43)#70 18.1% (+1.46)#9,719
70. Gladstone 19.4% 13.1% (+6.25)#71 18.1% (+1.29)#9,793
71. Hoople 18.6% 13.1% (+5.50)#72 18.1% (+0.542)#10,018
72. Fargo 18.3% 13.1% (+5.19)#73 18.1% (+0.228)#10,113
73. Tappen 18.2% 13.1% (+5.08)#74 18.1% (+0.119)#10,171
74. Rugby 18.0% 13.1% (+4.92)#75 18.1% (-0.045)#10,209
75. Wishek 17.8% 13.1% (+4.68)#76 18.1% (-0.285)#10,291
76. Mooreton 17.6% 13.1% (+4.55)#77 18.1% (-0.416)#10,353
77. Grand Forks Afb 17.3% 13.1% (+4.19)#78 18.1% (-0.775)#10,465
78. Beach 17.0% 13.1% (+3.90)#79 18.1% (-1.06)#10,543
79. Havana 16.7% 13.1% (+3.57)#80 18.1% (-1.40)#10,701
80. Fessenden 16.2% 13.1% (+3.11)#81 18.1% (-1.85)#10,828
81. Watford City 16.2% 13.1% (+3.07)#82 18.1% (-1.90)#10,844
82. Wahpeton 16.0% 13.1% (+2.89)#83 18.1% (-2.07)#10,908
83. Bismarck 15.7% 13.1% (+2.56)#84 18.1% (-2.40)#11,003
84. Drayton 15.4% 13.1% (+2.28)#85 18.1% (-2.68)#11,091
85. Mandan 15.2% 13.1% (+2.09)#86 18.1% (-2.87)#11,176
86. Devils Lake 15.1% 13.1% (+2.03)#87 18.1% (-2.93)#11,195
87. Grand Forks 14.6% 13.1% (+1.52)#88 18.1% (-3.44)#11,376
88. Williston 14.6% 13.1% (+1.48)#89 18.1% (-3.48)#11,383
89. Page 14.3% 13.1% (+1.18)#90 18.1% (-3.78)#11,524
90. Almont 13.8% 13.1% (+0.692)#91 18.1% (-4.27)#11,704
91. New Town 13.2% 13.1% (+0.106)#92 18.1% (-4.86)#11,918
92. Washburn 13.2% 13.1% (+0.106)#93 18.1% (-4.86)#11,919
93. Minot 12.7% 13.1% (-0.451)#94 18.1% (-5.41)#12,122
94. St John 12.5% 13.1% (-0.601)#95 18.1% (-5.56)#12,224
95. Dunseith 11.7% 13.1% (-1.43)#96 18.1% (-6.40)#12,502
96. Hazen 11.0% 13.1% (-2.12)#97 18.1% (-7.08)#12,795
97. Enderlin 10.4% 13.1% (-2.65)#98 18.1% (-7.62)#13,004
98. Kensal 10.2% 13.1% (-2.90)#99 18.1% (-7.86)#13,095
99. Abercrombie 10.0% 13.1% (-3.10)#100 18.1% (-8.06)#13,201
100. Horace 9.6% 13.1% (-3.50)#101 18.1% (-8.47)#13,323

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota?
Four Bears Village has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Dakota is 13.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.