Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Millburg 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#327
2. Shaftsburg 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#359
3. Empire 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#375
4. New Troy 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#393
5. Oden 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#436
6. Tower 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#441
7. Henderson 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#465
8. Paris 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#475
9. Winn 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#486
10. Marenisco 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#502
11. Burlington 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#523
12. Naubinway 100.0% 20.1% (+79.9)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#819
13. Dowagiac 91.5% 20.1% (+71.4)#13 18.1% (+73.5)#997
14. Akron 90.0% 20.1% (+69.9)#14 18.1% (+71.9)#1,028
15. Calumet 87.0% 20.1% (+66.9)#15 18.1% (+69.0)#1,098
16. Benton Heights 87.0% 20.1% (+66.9)#16 18.1% (+68.9)#1,101
17. Montgomery 84.6% 20.1% (+64.5)#17 18.1% (+66.6)#1,166
18. Bendon 83.7% 20.1% (+63.6)#18 18.1% (+65.7)#1,199
19. Lexington 83.3% 20.1% (+63.2)#19 18.1% (+65.3)#1,208
20. Camden 83.3% 20.1% (+63.2)#20 18.1% (+65.3)#1,210
21. Reading 78.8% 20.1% (+58.7)#21 18.1% (+60.8)#1,378
22. Melvin 76.9% 20.1% (+56.8)#22 18.1% (+58.9)#1,455
23. Lakes Of The North 75.0% 20.1% (+54.9)#23 18.1% (+56.9)#1,514
24. Turner 75.0% 20.1% (+54.9)#24 18.1% (+56.9)#1,555
25. Gobles 72.7% 20.1% (+52.6)#25 18.1% (+54.7)#1,645
26. Owendale 72.7% 20.1% (+52.6)#26 18.1% (+54.7)#1,648
27. Amasa 69.2% 20.1% (+49.1)#27 18.1% (+51.2)#1,835
28. Detroit Beach 69.1% 20.1% (+49.0)#28 18.1% (+51.0)#1,844
29. River Rouge 67.8% 20.1% (+47.6)#29 18.1% (+49.7)#1,908
30. Wolverine 66.7% 20.1% (+46.5)#30 18.1% (+48.6)#2,013
31. Skidway Lake 65.3% 20.1% (+45.2)#31 18.1% (+47.2)#2,094
32. Springfield 64.9% 20.1% (+44.8)#32 18.1% (+46.8)#2,125
33. Rose City 64.3% 20.1% (+44.2)#33 18.1% (+46.2)#2,164
34. Copper City 63.6% 20.1% (+43.5)#34 18.1% (+45.6)#2,216
35. Montrose 63.0% 20.1% (+42.9)#35 18.1% (+44.9)#2,256
36. Daggett 62.5% 20.1% (+42.4)#36 18.1% (+44.4)#2,312
37. Onaway 62.0% 20.1% (+41.9)#37 18.1% (+43.9)#2,341
38. Harrison 62.0% 20.1% (+41.9)#38 18.1% (+43.9)#2,343
39. Brownlee Park 61.1% 20.1% (+41.0)#39 18.1% (+43.0)#2,412
40. Paw Paw Lake 61.1% 20.1% (+40.9)#40 18.1% (+43.0)#2,423
41. Mount Morris 61.0% 20.1% (+40.8)#41 18.1% (+42.9)#2,430
42. Imlay City 60.9% 20.1% (+40.8)#42 18.1% (+42.9)#2,434
43. Iron River 60.5% 20.1% (+40.4)#43 18.1% (+42.5)#2,470
44. Hancock 59.7% 20.1% (+39.6)#44 18.1% (+41.7)#2,560
45. Benton Harbor 58.9% 20.1% (+38.8)#45 18.1% (+40.9)#2,606
46. Kincheloe 58.8% 20.1% (+38.7)#46 18.1% (+40.7)#2,626
47. Tustin 57.7% 20.1% (+37.6)#47 18.1% (+39.6)#2,713
48. Mayville 57.3% 20.1% (+37.2)#48 18.1% (+39.3)#2,741
49. Pentwater 57.1% 20.1% (+37.0)#49 18.1% (+39.1)#2,754
50. Mesick 57.1% 20.1% (+37.0)#50 18.1% (+39.1)#2,762
51. Pierson 57.1% 20.1% (+37.0)#51 18.1% (+39.1)#2,775
52. White Pigeon 56.8% 20.1% (+36.7)#52 18.1% (+38.8)#2,789
53. Laingsburg 56.5% 20.1% (+36.4)#53 18.1% (+38.5)#2,814
54. Charlevoix 56.3% 20.1% (+36.2)#54 18.1% (+38.3)#2,832
55. Perry 56.3% 20.1% (+36.2)#55 18.1% (+38.2)#2,834
56. Michigamme 56.2% 20.1% (+36.1)#56 18.1% (+38.2)#2,843
57. Harrisville 55.9% 20.1% (+35.8)#57 18.1% (+37.8)#2,879
58. St Helen 55.5% 20.1% (+35.4)#58 18.1% (+37.4)#2,934
59. Coleman 54.9% 20.1% (+34.8)#59 18.1% (+36.8)#2,976
60. Manistique 54.5% 20.1% (+34.3)#60 18.1% (+36.4)#3,010
61. Wakefield 54.0% 20.1% (+33.9)#61 18.1% (+36.0)#3,032
62. Saginaw 53.5% 20.1% (+33.3)#62 18.1% (+35.4)#3,090
63. Hillman 53.3% 20.1% (+33.2)#63 18.1% (+35.3)#3,102
64. Springport 52.8% 20.1% (+32.7)#64 18.1% (+34.8)#3,160
65. Inkster 52.8% 20.1% (+32.7)#65 18.1% (+34.7)#3,163
66. Cassopolis 52.7% 20.1% (+32.6)#66 18.1% (+34.6)#3,171
67. West Branch 52.3% 20.1% (+32.2)#67 18.1% (+34.3)#3,203
68. Flint 51.7% 20.1% (+31.6)#68 18.1% (+33.7)#3,261
69. Crystal 51.6% 20.1% (+31.5)#69 18.1% (+33.6)#3,270
70. Evart 50.5% 20.1% (+30.3)#70 18.1% (+32.4)#3,370
71. Flat Rock 50.3% 20.1% (+30.2)#71 18.1% (+32.3)#3,380
72. Hamtramck 50.1% 20.1% (+30.0)#72 18.1% (+32.1)#3,392
73. Olivet 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#73 18.1% (+31.9)#3,410
74. Parma 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#74 18.1% (+31.9)#3,435
75. Morley 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#75 18.1% (+31.9)#3,437
76. Brethren 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#76 18.1% (+31.9)#3,477
77. Rapid River 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#77 18.1% (+31.9)#3,496
78. Fountain 50.0% 20.1% (+29.9)#78 18.1% (+31.9)#3,523
79. Cedar Springs 49.7% 20.1% (+29.6)#79 18.1% (+31.6)#3,589
80. Niles 49.2% 20.1% (+29.1)#80 18.1% (+31.2)#3,625
81. South Haven 48.9% 20.1% (+28.8)#81 18.1% (+30.8)#3,653
82. Lake Linden 48.8% 20.1% (+28.7)#82 18.1% (+30.8)#3,662
83. Breckenridge 48.7% 20.1% (+28.6)#83 18.1% (+30.7)#3,672
84. Bay City 48.6% 20.1% (+28.5)#84 18.1% (+30.5)#3,685
85. Laurium 48.6% 20.1% (+28.5)#85 18.1% (+30.5)#3,687
86. Ontonagon 48.4% 20.1% (+28.3)#86 18.1% (+30.3)#3,707
87. Pittsford 48.4% 20.1% (+28.3)#87 18.1% (+30.3)#3,710
88. Lakeview 48.3% 20.1% (+28.2)#88 18.1% (+30.3)#3,712
89. Wayne 48.1% 20.1% (+28.0)#89 18.1% (+30.1)#3,739
90. Howard City 48.0% 20.1% (+27.8)#90 18.1% (+29.9)#3,758
91. Bessemer 47.8% 20.1% (+27.7)#91 18.1% (+29.8)#3,775
92. Allen 47.6% 20.1% (+27.5)#92 18.1% (+29.6)#3,797
93. Alma 47.1% 20.1% (+27.0)#93 18.1% (+29.1)#3,855
94. Beecher 46.9% 20.1% (+26.7)#94 18.1% (+28.8)#3,892
95. Detroit 46.7% 20.1% (+26.6)#95 18.1% (+28.7)#3,907
96. Mohawk 46.7% 20.1% (+26.5)#96 18.1% (+28.6)#3,927
97. Walkerville 46.2% 20.1% (+26.0)#97 18.1% (+28.1)#4,007
98. Zilwaukee 46.0% 20.1% (+25.9)#98 18.1% (+28.0)#4,015
99. Edmore 46.0% 20.1% (+25.9)#99 18.1% (+27.9)#4,022
100. Ithaca 45.9% 20.1% (+25.8)#100 18.1% (+27.9)#4,030

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
91.5%
#8
90.0%
#9
87.0%
#10
87.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan?
Empire has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Michigan is 20.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.