Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hot Springs 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#12
2. Porcupine 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#161
3. Antelope 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#239
4. Manderson White Horse Creek 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#261
5. Parmelee 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#346
6. Wounded Knee 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#384
7. Long Hollow 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#396
8. Hermosa 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#398
9. Little Eagle 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#405
10. Enemy Swim 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#447
11. Soldier Creek 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#467
12. Wakpala 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#520
13. South Shore 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#13 18.1% (+81.9)#539
14. Oelrichs 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#14 18.1% (+81.9)#559
15. Horse Creek 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#15 18.1% (+81.9)#566
16. Tulare 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#16 18.1% (+81.9)#590
17. Corn Creek 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#17 18.1% (+81.9)#606
18. Swift Bird 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#18 18.1% (+81.9)#610
19. Kenel 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#19 18.1% (+81.9)#614
20. Spring Creek 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#20 18.1% (+81.9)#639
21. Norris 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#21 18.1% (+81.9)#651
22. Peever Flats 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#22 18.1% (+81.9)#742
23. Belvidere 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#23 18.1% (+81.9)#768
24. Vale 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#24 18.1% (+81.9)#774
25. Ravinia 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#25 18.1% (+81.9)#851
26. Ideal 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#26 18.1% (+81.9)#865
27. Onaka 100.0% 17.4% (+82.6)#27 18.1% (+81.9)#906
28. Bullhead 92.5% 17.4% (+75.1)#28 18.1% (+74.4)#975
29. Bridger 84.6% 17.4% (+67.2)#29 18.1% (+66.6)#1,170
30. Hecla 84.2% 17.4% (+66.8)#30 18.1% (+66.1)#1,184
31. Eureka 83.9% 17.4% (+66.4)#31 18.1% (+65.8)#1,193
32. Brandt 83.3% 17.4% (+65.9)#32 18.1% (+65.3)#1,232
33. Naples 81.8% 17.4% (+64.4)#33 18.1% (+63.8)#1,276
34. St Francis 76.5% 17.4% (+59.0)#34 18.1% (+58.4)#1,467
35. Rosebud 76.3% 17.4% (+58.9)#35 18.1% (+58.3)#1,471
36. Clark Colony 75.0% 17.4% (+57.6)#36 18.1% (+56.9)#1,557
37. La Plant 73.7% 17.4% (+56.2)#37 18.1% (+55.6)#1,605
38. Mission 72.0% 17.4% (+54.5)#38 18.1% (+53.9)#1,675
39. Wessington 70.0% 17.4% (+52.6)#39 18.1% (+51.9)#1,787
40. Strandburg 70.0% 17.4% (+52.6)#40 18.1% (+51.9)#1,789
41. Johnson Siding 67.7% 17.4% (+50.3)#41 18.1% (+49.7)#1,909
42. Fort Thompson 67.5% 17.4% (+50.0)#42 18.1% (+49.4)#1,928
43. Alpena 66.7% 17.4% (+49.2)#43 18.1% (+48.6)#1,990
44. Edgemont 66.0% 17.4% (+48.5)#44 18.1% (+47.9)#2,055
45. Pine Ridge 64.7% 17.4% (+47.2)#45 18.1% (+46.6)#2,145
46. Wanblee 64.2% 17.4% (+46.7)#46 18.1% (+46.1)#2,174
47. Murdo 63.5% 17.4% (+46.1)#47 18.1% (+45.5)#2,225
48. Bridgewater 62.5% 17.4% (+45.1)#48 18.1% (+44.4)#2,302
49. Peever 59.4% 17.4% (+41.9)#49 18.1% (+41.3)#2,580
50. North Eagle Butte 59.1% 17.4% (+41.7)#50 18.1% (+41.1)#2,594
51. Delmont 59.1% 17.4% (+41.6)#51 18.1% (+41.0)#2,602
52. Hudson 58.3% 17.4% (+40.9)#52 18.1% (+40.3)#2,668
53. Burke 56.2% 17.4% (+38.8)#53 18.1% (+38.2)#2,838
54. Elkton 55.8% 17.4% (+38.3)#54 18.1% (+37.7)#2,885
55. West Brule 55.2% 17.4% (+37.7)#55 18.1% (+37.1)#2,959
56. Eagle Butte 51.9% 17.4% (+34.4)#56 18.1% (+33.8)#3,247
57. Big Stone City 51.6% 17.4% (+34.2)#57 18.1% (+33.6)#3,271
58. Dupree 50.0% 17.4% (+32.6)#58 18.1% (+31.9)#3,466
59. Letcher 50.0% 17.4% (+32.6)#59 18.1% (+31.9)#3,548
60. Geddes 50.0% 17.4% (+32.6)#60 18.1% (+31.9)#3,553
61. Utica 50.0% 17.4% (+32.6)#61 18.1% (+31.9)#3,568
62. Ortley 50.0% 17.4% (+32.6)#62 18.1% (+31.9)#3,573
63. Avon 48.7% 17.4% (+31.3)#63 18.1% (+30.7)#3,673
64. White River 47.1% 17.4% (+29.6)#64 18.1% (+29.0)#3,863
65. Bryant 45.4% 17.4% (+27.9)#65 18.1% (+27.3)#4,106
66. Lemmon 44.7% 17.4% (+27.3)#66 18.1% (+26.7)#4,178
67. Sisseton 44.3% 17.4% (+26.9)#67 18.1% (+26.3)#4,249
68. Custer 43.2% 17.4% (+25.7)#68 18.1% (+25.1)#4,406
69. Flandreau 42.5% 17.4% (+25.1)#69 18.1% (+24.5)#4,514
70. Winner 41.7% 17.4% (+24.2)#70 18.1% (+23.6)#4,625
71. Lower Brule 40.9% 17.4% (+23.5)#71 18.1% (+22.8)#4,734
72. Stratford 40.0% 17.4% (+22.6)#72 18.1% (+21.9)#4,925
73. Rapid Valley 39.5% 17.4% (+22.1)#73 18.1% (+21.5)#4,980
74. Platte 38.9% 17.4% (+21.5)#74 18.1% (+20.9)#5,074
75. Lead 38.0% 17.4% (+20.6)#75 18.1% (+20.0)#5,218
76. Springfield 37.7% 17.4% (+20.3)#76 18.1% (+19.7)#5,266
77. Summit 36.4% 17.4% (+18.9)#77 18.1% (+18.3)#5,514
78. Pickstown 35.7% 17.4% (+18.3)#78 18.1% (+17.7)#5,637
79. Freeman 35.2% 17.4% (+17.7)#79 18.1% (+17.1)#5,748
80. Allen 34.9% 17.4% (+17.4)#80 18.1% (+16.8)#5,799
81. Colton 34.0% 17.4% (+16.6)#81 18.1% (+16.0)#5,946
82. Wolsey 33.3% 17.4% (+15.9)#82 18.1% (+15.3)#6,081
83. Irene 33.3% 17.4% (+15.9)#83 18.1% (+15.3)#6,102
84. Henry 33.3% 17.4% (+15.9)#84 18.1% (+15.3)#6,147
85. Central City 33.3% 17.4% (+15.9)#85 18.1% (+15.3)#6,174
86. Martin 33.0% 17.4% (+15.5)#86 18.1% (+14.9)#6,226
87. Veblen 32.6% 17.4% (+15.1)#87 18.1% (+14.5)#6,296
88. Colome 32.4% 17.4% (+15.0)#88 18.1% (+14.4)#6,317
89. Vermillion 31.4% 17.4% (+14.0)#89 18.1% (+13.4)#6,491
90. Armour 31.1% 17.4% (+13.7)#90 18.1% (+13.1)#6,559
91. Midland 30.8% 17.4% (+13.3)#91 18.1% (+12.7)#6,647
92. Rosholt 30.0% 17.4% (+12.6)#92 18.1% (+11.9)#6,811
93. Gettysburg 29.9% 17.4% (+12.4)#93 18.1% (+11.8)#6,854
94. Mitchell 29.6% 17.4% (+12.2)#94 18.1% (+11.6)#6,899
95. Madison 27.9% 17.4% (+10.4)#95 18.1% (+9.80)#7,338
96. Green Valley 26.7% 17.4% (+9.23)#96 18.1% (+8.60)#7,641
97. Mclaughlin 26.6% 17.4% (+9.12)#97 18.1% (+8.50)#7,682
98. Oglala 26.0% 17.4% (+8.57)#98 18.1% (+7.95)#7,799
99. Monroe 25.0% 17.4% (+7.56)#99 18.1% (+6.94)#8,097
100. Kennebec 23.8% 17.4% (+6.37)#100 18.1% (+5.75)#8,401

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota?
Hot Springs has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Dakota is 17.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.