Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Davis City 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#1 18.1% (+81.9)#551
2. Osterdock 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#2 18.1% (+81.9)#655
3. Linn Grove 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#3 18.1% (+81.9)#676
4. Castalia 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#4 18.1% (+81.9)#686
5. Baldwin 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#5 18.1% (+81.9)#692
6. Centralia 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#6 18.1% (+81.9)#707
7. Brayton 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#7 18.1% (+81.9)#750
8. Randalia 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#8 18.1% (+81.9)#838
9. Grant 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#9 18.1% (+81.9)#841
10. Morley 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#10 18.1% (+81.9)#866
11. Coburg 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#11 18.1% (+81.9)#878
12. Cotter 100.0% 14.3% (+85.7)#12 18.1% (+81.9)#907
13. Marquette 95.0% 14.3% (+80.7)#13 18.1% (+76.9)#940
14. Kiron 90.9% 14.3% (+76.6)#14 18.1% (+72.8)#1,007
15. Ireton 87.5% 14.3% (+73.2)#15 18.1% (+69.4)#1,077
16. Soldier 85.7% 14.3% (+71.4)#16 18.1% (+67.7)#1,144
17. Goodell 83.3% 14.3% (+69.0)#17 18.1% (+65.3)#1,229
18. Derby 81.8% 14.3% (+67.5)#18 18.1% (+63.8)#1,273
19. Casey 80.0% 14.3% (+65.7)#19 18.1% (+61.9)#1,331
20. Melvin 80.0% 14.3% (+65.7)#20 18.1% (+61.9)#1,338
21. Zwingle 77.8% 14.3% (+63.5)#21 18.1% (+59.7)#1,419
22. Allerton 76.2% 14.3% (+61.9)#22 18.1% (+58.1)#1,480
23. Blakesburg 75.0% 14.3% (+60.7)#23 18.1% (+56.9)#1,535
24. Bagley 75.0% 14.3% (+60.7)#24 18.1% (+56.9)#1,536
25. Delaware 75.0% 14.3% (+60.7)#26 18.1% (+56.9)#1,552
26. Bradgate 75.0% 14.3% (+60.7)#27 18.1% (+56.9)#1,553
27. Meservey 74.1% 14.3% (+59.8)#28 18.1% (+56.0)#1,579
28. Humeston 72.7% 14.3% (+58.4)#29 18.1% (+54.7)#1,646
29. Rake 71.4% 14.3% (+57.1)#30 18.1% (+53.4)#1,710
30. Okoboji 70.8% 14.3% (+56.5)#31 18.1% (+52.8)#1,740
31. Lorimor 69.0% 14.3% (+54.7)#32 18.1% (+50.9)#1,847
32. Maysville 68.0% 14.3% (+53.7)#33 18.1% (+49.9)#1,899
33. Lake Mills 67.3% 14.3% (+53.0)#34 18.1% (+49.2)#1,944
34. Malcom 66.7% 14.3% (+52.4)#35 18.1% (+48.6)#2,009
35. Rembrandt 66.7% 14.3% (+52.4)#36 18.1% (+48.6)#2,016
36. Turin 66.7% 14.3% (+52.4)#37 18.1% (+48.6)#2,024
37. St Anthony 66.7% 14.3% (+52.4)#38 18.1% (+48.6)#2,029
38. Churdan 65.0% 14.3% (+50.7)#39 18.1% (+46.9)#2,114
39. Prairieburg 64.3% 14.3% (+50.0)#40 18.1% (+46.2)#2,170
40. Hampton 62.6% 14.3% (+48.3)#41 18.1% (+44.6)#2,284
41. Farmersburg 62.5% 14.3% (+48.2)#42 18.1% (+44.4)#2,303
42. Decatur City 61.5% 14.3% (+47.2)#43 18.1% (+43.5)#2,390
43. Emmetsburg 59.8% 14.3% (+45.5)#44 18.1% (+41.7)#2,557
44. Wyoming 59.1% 14.3% (+44.8)#45 18.1% (+41.0)#2,597
45. Milton 59.1% 14.3% (+44.8)#46 18.1% (+41.0)#2,598
46. Victor 58.7% 14.3% (+44.4)#47 18.1% (+40.6)#2,634
47. Elma 57.1% 14.3% (+42.8)#48 18.1% (+39.1)#2,759
48. Ladora 57.1% 14.3% (+42.8)#49 18.1% (+39.1)#2,768
49. Beaverdale 56.8% 14.3% (+42.5)#50 18.1% (+38.8)#2,791
50. Thor 56.5% 14.3% (+42.2)#51 18.1% (+38.5)#2,820
51. Linden 56.2% 14.3% (+42.0)#52 18.1% (+38.2)#2,844
52. What Cheer 56.0% 14.3% (+41.7)#53 18.1% (+37.9)#2,863
53. Postville 55.8% 14.3% (+41.5)#54 18.1% (+37.7)#2,889
54. Lockridge 55.6% 14.3% (+41.3)#55 18.1% (+37.5)#2,913
55. Clarion 53.8% 14.3% (+39.5)#56 18.1% (+35.8)#3,044
56. Grand River 53.8% 14.3% (+39.5)#57 18.1% (+35.8)#3,054
57. Greeley 53.6% 14.3% (+39.3)#58 18.1% (+35.5)#3,080
58. New Hartford 53.3% 14.3% (+39.0)#59 18.1% (+35.3)#3,101
59. Villisca 51.4% 14.3% (+37.1)#60 18.1% (+33.3)#3,297
60. Hazleton 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#61 18.1% (+31.9)#3,434
61. Union 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#62 18.1% (+31.9)#3,474
62. Kirkville 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#63 18.1% (+31.9)#3,507
63. Harris 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#64 18.1% (+31.9)#3,529
64. Hillsboro 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#65 18.1% (+31.9)#3,549
65. Superior 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#66 18.1% (+31.9)#3,551
66. St Marys 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#67 18.1% (+31.9)#3,555
67. Nodaway 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#68 18.1% (+31.9)#3,571
68. Galt 50.0% 14.3% (+35.7)#69 18.1% (+31.9)#3,574
69. Panora 49.6% 14.3% (+35.3)#70 18.1% (+31.5)#3,603
70. Story City 49.4% 14.3% (+35.1)#71 18.1% (+31.3)#3,612
71. Brooklyn 48.3% 14.3% (+34.0)#72 18.1% (+30.2)#3,716
72. Clermont 47.6% 14.3% (+33.3)#73 18.1% (+29.6)#3,792
73. Rippey 47.4% 14.3% (+33.1)#74 18.1% (+29.3)#3,825
74. Oakville 47.1% 14.3% (+32.8)#75 18.1% (+29.0)#3,873
75. Kimballton 46.7% 14.3% (+32.4)#76 18.1% (+28.6)#3,926
76. Evansdale 46.3% 14.3% (+32.0)#77 18.1% (+28.2)#3,974
77. Farnhamville 46.2% 14.3% (+31.9)#78 18.1% (+28.1)#3,995
78. Dow City 46.2% 14.3% (+31.9)#79 18.1% (+28.1)#3,997
79. South English 46.2% 14.3% (+31.9)#80 18.1% (+28.1)#4,003
80. Atlantic 45.8% 14.3% (+31.5)#81 18.1% (+27.8)#4,038
81. Boyden 45.7% 14.3% (+31.4)#82 18.1% (+27.6)#4,062
82. Burt 44.7% 14.3% (+30.4)#83 18.1% (+26.7)#4,182
83. Hedrick 44.4% 14.3% (+30.1)#84 18.1% (+26.4)#4,215
84. Silver City 44.4% 14.3% (+30.1)#85 18.1% (+26.4)#4,223
85. Geneva 44.4% 14.3% (+30.1)#86 18.1% (+26.4)#4,240
86. Wahpeton 43.8% 14.3% (+29.5)#87 18.1% (+25.7)#4,327
87. Cushing 43.8% 14.3% (+29.5)#88 18.1% (+25.7)#4,333
88. Battle Creek 42.9% 14.3% (+28.6)#89 18.1% (+24.8)#4,449
89. Farragut 42.9% 14.3% (+28.6)#90 18.1% (+24.8)#4,467
90. Red Oak 42.4% 14.3% (+28.1)#91 18.1% (+24.3)#4,530
91. Royal 42.2% 14.3% (+27.9)#92 18.1% (+24.1)#4,561
92. Schaller 41.5% 14.3% (+27.2)#93 18.1% (+23.4)#4,651
93. Carter Lake 40.7% 14.3% (+26.4)#94 18.1% (+22.6)#4,763
94. Sibley 40.4% 14.3% (+26.1)#95 18.1% (+22.3)#4,813
95. Fort Madison 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#96 18.1% (+22.0)#4,844
96. Dallas Center 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#97 18.1% (+21.9)#4,851
97. Agency 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#98 18.1% (+21.9)#4,879
98. Irwin 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#99 18.1% (+21.9)#4,888
99. Hancock 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#100 18.1% (+21.9)#4,898
100. Searsboro 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#101 18.1% (+21.9)#4,919

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa?
Davis City has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in Iowa is 14.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.