Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Houlton 61.1% 9.6% (+51.5)#1 5.5% (+55.6)#112
2. Gotham 42.7% 9.6% (+33.1)#2 5.5% (+37.2)#301
3. Holcombe 35.1% 9.6% (+25.5)#3 5.5% (+29.7)#498
4. Wausaukee 33.9% 9.6% (+24.2)#4 5.5% (+28.4)#545
5. Rubicon 33.8% 9.6% (+24.1)#5 5.5% (+28.3)#550
6. Kellnersville 33.3% 9.6% (+23.7)#6 5.5% (+27.9)#566
7. Glen Flora 33.3% 9.6% (+23.7)#7 5.5% (+27.9)#573
8. Nichols 33.1% 9.6% (+23.5)#8 5.5% (+27.6)#593
9. Phillips 32.9% 9.6% (+23.2)#9 5.5% (+27.4)#601
10. Caroline 32.8% 9.6% (+23.2)#10 5.5% (+27.3)#603
11. Conrath 32.7% 9.6% (+23.1)#11 5.5% (+27.2)#611
12. Burnett 32.6% 9.6% (+23.0)#12 5.5% (+27.1)#615
13. Edmund 31.4% 9.6% (+21.8)#13 5.5% (+26.0)#682
14. Neosho 30.7% 9.6% (+21.1)#14 5.5% (+25.2)#728
15. Van Dyne 30.1% 9.6% (+20.4)#15 5.5% (+24.6)#760
16. Downsville 29.9% 9.6% (+20.2)#16 5.5% (+24.4)#776
17. Manawa 29.8% 9.6% (+20.2)#17 5.5% (+24.4)#779
18. Lohrville 29.6% 9.6% (+19.9)#18 5.5% (+24.1)#795
19. Osceola 29.2% 9.6% (+19.5)#19 5.5% (+23.7)#830
20. Bear Creek 28.6% 9.6% (+18.9)#20 5.5% (+23.1)#871
21. Centuria 28.5% 9.6% (+18.8)#21 5.5% (+23.0)#891
22. Hawkins 28.4% 9.6% (+18.7)#22 5.5% (+22.9)#900
23. Abbotsford 27.9% 9.6% (+18.2)#23 5.5% (+22.4)#940
24. Princeton 27.9% 9.6% (+18.2)#24 5.5% (+22.4)#942
25. Shopiere 27.7% 9.6% (+18.0)#25 5.5% (+22.2)#961
26. Humbird 26.8% 9.6% (+17.1)#26 5.5% (+21.3)#1,052
27. Browntown 26.7% 9.6% (+17.1)#27 5.5% (+21.3)#1,054
28. Leopolis 26.7% 9.6% (+17.0)#28 5.5% (+21.2)#1,065
29. Curtiss 26.5% 9.6% (+16.9)#29 5.5% (+21.1)#1,073
30. Arcadia 26.5% 9.6% (+16.8)#30 5.5% (+21.0)#1,079
31. Brothertown 26.4% 9.6% (+16.8)#31 5.5% (+20.9)#1,088
32. Oconto Falls 26.2% 9.6% (+16.5)#32 5.5% (+20.7)#1,111
33. Siren 25.8% 9.6% (+16.2)#33 5.5% (+20.3)#1,161
34. Cataract 25.7% 9.6% (+16.1)#34 5.5% (+20.3)#1,169
35. Clyman 25.7% 9.6% (+16.0)#35 5.5% (+20.2)#1,175
36. Waukau 25.5% 9.6% (+15.9)#36 5.5% (+20.0)#1,194
37. Kennan 25.5% 9.6% (+15.8)#37 5.5% (+20.0)#1,201
38. Necedah 25.4% 9.6% (+15.8)#38 5.5% (+20.0)#1,205
39. Theresa 25.2% 9.6% (+15.6)#39 5.5% (+19.8)#1,231
40. Reeseville 25.1% 9.6% (+15.4)#40 5.5% (+19.6)#1,245
41. Trego 25.0% 9.6% (+15.4)#41 5.5% (+19.5)#1,274
42. Plainfield 24.9% 9.6% (+15.3)#42 5.5% (+19.5)#1,287
43. Alma Center 24.7% 9.6% (+15.1)#43 5.5% (+19.3)#1,313
44. Peshtigo 24.5% 9.6% (+14.8)#44 5.5% (+19.0)#1,355
45. Lena 23.8% 9.6% (+14.1)#45 5.5% (+18.3)#1,456
46. Rock Springs 23.7% 9.6% (+14.1)#46 5.5% (+18.2)#1,468
47. Marion 23.7% 9.6% (+14.1)#47 5.5% (+18.2)#1,470
48. Juda 23.6% 9.6% (+13.9)#48 5.5% (+18.1)#1,491
49. Taylor 23.4% 9.6% (+13.7)#49 5.5% (+17.9)#1,523
50. Horicon 23.3% 9.6% (+13.7)#50 5.5% (+17.9)#1,524
51. Union Center 22.8% 9.6% (+13.1)#51 5.5% (+17.3)#1,631
52. Cazenovia 22.4% 9.6% (+12.8)#52 5.5% (+16.9)#1,688
53. Bloomington 22.4% 9.6% (+12.8)#53 5.5% (+16.9)#1,692
54. Kiel 22.4% 9.6% (+12.7)#54 5.5% (+16.9)#1,698
55. Ridgeland 22.2% 9.6% (+12.6)#55 5.5% (+16.8)#1,722
56. Lynxville 22.2% 9.6% (+12.6)#56 5.5% (+16.8)#1,728
57. Elderon 22.2% 9.6% (+12.6)#57 5.5% (+16.8)#1,733
58. Marinette 22.0% 9.6% (+12.4)#58 5.5% (+16.6)#1,765
59. Lebanon 21.9% 9.6% (+12.2)#59 5.5% (+16.4)#1,797
60. Grand View 21.9% 9.6% (+12.2)#60 5.5% (+16.4)#1,798
61. Clear Lake 21.9% 9.6% (+12.2)#61 5.5% (+16.4)#1,800
62. Grantsburg 21.7% 9.6% (+12.1)#62 5.5% (+16.3)#1,820
63. Goodman 21.7% 9.6% (+12.0)#63 5.5% (+16.2)#1,838
64. Boaz 21.7% 9.6% (+12.0)#64 5.5% (+16.2)#1,840
65. Boyd 21.6% 9.6% (+12.0)#65 5.5% (+16.2)#1,846
66. Eastman 21.6% 9.6% (+12.0)#66 5.5% (+16.2)#1,851
67. Cadott 21.6% 9.6% (+12.0)#67 5.5% (+16.1)#1,856
68. Clintonville 21.6% 9.6% (+12.0)#68 5.5% (+16.1)#1,860
69. Dorchester 21.5% 9.6% (+11.8)#69 5.5% (+16.0)#1,884
70. Eland 21.3% 9.6% (+11.7)#70 5.5% (+15.9)#1,918
71. Woodville 21.2% 9.6% (+11.6)#71 5.5% (+15.8)#1,939
72. New Auburn 21.1% 9.6% (+11.5)#72 5.5% (+15.7)#1,964
73. New Lisbon 21.1% 9.6% (+11.4)#73 5.5% (+15.6)#1,981
74. Weyauwega 21.0% 9.6% (+11.4)#74 5.5% (+15.6)#1,997
75. Amery 21.0% 9.6% (+11.4)#75 5.5% (+15.6)#1,999
76. Brillion 20.9% 9.6% (+11.3)#76 5.5% (+15.5)#2,014
77. Waupun 20.9% 9.6% (+11.2)#77 5.5% (+15.4)#2,032
78. New London 20.8% 9.6% (+11.2)#78 5.5% (+15.4)#2,044
79. Wiota 20.7% 9.6% (+11.1)#79 5.5% (+15.2)#2,084
80. Webster 20.6% 9.6% (+11.0)#80 5.5% (+15.2)#2,097
81. Rio 20.6% 9.6% (+10.9)#81 5.5% (+15.1)#2,115
82. Rome 20.5% 9.6% (+10.9)#82 5.5% (+15.1)#2,123
83. Forestville 20.4% 9.6% (+10.8)#83 5.5% (+15.0)#2,151
84. South Wayne 20.4% 9.6% (+10.7)#84 5.5% (+14.9)#2,170
85. Iron Belt 20.3% 9.6% (+10.6)#85 5.5% (+14.8)#2,194
86. Ogdensburg 20.2% 9.6% (+10.6)#86 5.5% (+14.7)#2,207
87. Hixton 20.2% 9.6% (+10.5)#87 5.5% (+14.7)#2,218
88. Lake Ivanhoe 20.1% 9.6% (+10.4)#88 5.5% (+14.6)#2,236
89. Cornell 20.0% 9.6% (+10.4)#89 5.5% (+14.5)#2,240
90. Ontario 20.0% 9.6% (+10.4)#90 5.5% (+14.5)#2,247
91. Chaseburg 20.0% 9.6% (+10.4)#91 5.5% (+14.5)#2,249
92. Edgar 20.0% 9.6% (+10.3)#92 5.5% (+14.5)#2,280
93. Rib Lake 19.9% 9.6% (+10.3)#93 5.5% (+14.5)#2,285
94. Mattoon 19.9% 9.6% (+10.3)#94 5.5% (+14.4)#2,293
95. Prentice 19.9% 9.6% (+10.3)#95 5.5% (+14.4)#2,294
96. Knapp 19.8% 9.6% (+10.2)#96 5.5% (+14.4)#2,310
97. Trempealeau 19.7% 9.6% (+10.1)#97 5.5% (+14.3)#2,341
98. Omro 19.7% 9.6% (+10.0)#98 5.5% (+14.2)#2,359
99. Fairwater 19.7% 9.6% (+10.0)#99 5.5% (+14.2)#2,363
100. Colby 19.6% 9.6% (+9.98)#100 5.5% (+14.1)#2,373

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin are:
#1
61.1%
#2
42.7%
#3
35.1%
#4
33.9%
#5
33.3%
#6
33.3%
#7
33.1%
#8
32.9%
#9
32.8%
#10
32.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin?
Houlton has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin with 61.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Wisconsin is 9.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.