Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Gilbertsville 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#4
2. Lowes 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#6
3. Freeburn 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#3 5.5% (+94.5)#8
4. Arjay 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#4 5.5% (+94.5)#13
5. New Hope 100.0% 8.9% (+91.1)#5 5.5% (+94.5)#33
6. Big Clifty 68.7% 8.9% (+59.7)#6 5.5% (+63.2)#81
7. Gracey 59.3% 8.9% (+50.3)#7 5.5% (+53.8)#127
8. Woodbury 44.4% 8.9% (+35.5)#8 5.5% (+39.0)#273
9. Allensville 42.5% 8.9% (+33.5)#9 5.5% (+37.0)#305
10. Fountain Run 42.4% 8.9% (+33.5)#10 5.5% (+37.0)#306
11. Sardis 40.9% 8.9% (+32.0)#11 5.5% (+35.4)#337
12. Chaplin 36.7% 8.9% (+27.8)#12 5.5% (+31.3)#448
13. Annville 35.2% 8.9% (+26.3)#13 5.5% (+29.8)#492
14. Water Valley 35.2% 8.9% (+26.2)#14 5.5% (+29.7)#494
15. Stanley 35.1% 8.9% (+26.2)#15 5.5% (+29.7)#497
16. Mays Lick 35.0% 8.9% (+26.1)#16 5.5% (+29.5)#504
17. Buckhorn 33.3% 8.9% (+24.4)#17 5.5% (+27.9)#578
18. Hardinsburg 32.3% 8.9% (+23.4)#18 5.5% (+26.9)#627
19. North Corbin 32.1% 8.9% (+23.2)#19 5.5% (+26.7)#636
20. Blandville 32.1% 8.9% (+23.2)#20 5.5% (+26.7)#639
21. Providence 31.6% 8.9% (+22.7)#21 5.5% (+26.2)#665
22. Bonnieville 30.6% 8.9% (+21.6)#22 5.5% (+25.1)#733
23. Poplar Hills 29.5% 8.9% (+20.6)#23 5.5% (+24.1)#797
24. Elkton 28.8% 8.9% (+19.8)#24 5.5% (+23.3)#860
25. Magnolia 28.7% 8.9% (+19.8)#25 5.5% (+23.3)#862
26. Flemingsburg 28.3% 8.9% (+19.4)#26 5.5% (+22.8)#909
27. Bradfordsville 28.0% 8.9% (+19.1)#27 5.5% (+22.5)#931
28. Raywick 27.9% 8.9% (+18.9)#28 5.5% (+22.4)#943
29. Wheatcroft 27.6% 8.9% (+18.6)#29 5.5% (+22.1)#969
30. Salem 26.7% 8.9% (+17.7)#30 5.5% (+21.2)#1,060
31. Columbus 26.7% 8.9% (+17.7)#31 5.5% (+21.2)#1,062
32. Rosine 26.4% 8.9% (+17.5)#32 5.5% (+20.9)#1,089
33. Pine Knot 25.8% 8.9% (+16.9)#33 5.5% (+20.4)#1,154
34. Prestonville 25.6% 8.9% (+16.6)#34 5.5% (+20.1)#1,185
35. Farmington 25.5% 8.9% (+16.6)#35 5.5% (+20.1)#1,192
36. Millersburg 25.5% 8.9% (+16.5)#36 5.5% (+20.0)#1,196
37. Rockholds 25.3% 8.9% (+16.4)#37 5.5% (+19.8)#1,220
38. Benham 25.3% 8.9% (+16.3)#38 5.5% (+19.8)#1,225
39. Clay City 25.1% 8.9% (+16.1)#39 5.5% (+19.6)#1,246
40. Beech Grove 25.0% 8.9% (+16.1)#40 5.5% (+19.5)#1,258
41. St Mary 25.0% 8.9% (+16.1)#41 5.5% (+19.5)#1,260
42. Fulton 24.9% 8.9% (+16.0)#42 5.5% (+19.4)#1,291
43. Ezel 24.1% 8.9% (+15.1)#43 5.5% (+18.6)#1,409
44. Edmonton 24.0% 8.9% (+15.1)#44 5.5% (+18.6)#1,411
45. Woodburn 23.9% 8.9% (+14.9)#45 5.5% (+18.4)#1,441
46. Cloverport 23.7% 8.9% (+14.8)#46 5.5% (+18.2)#1,471
47. Cayce 23.3% 8.9% (+14.4)#47 5.5% (+17.9)#1,529
48. Fredonia 23.3% 8.9% (+14.3)#48 5.5% (+17.8)#1,544
49. Germantown 23.0% 8.9% (+14.0)#49 5.5% (+17.5)#1,597
50. Lebanon Junction 22.4% 8.9% (+13.4)#50 5.5% (+16.9)#1,697
51. Gratz 21.9% 8.9% (+12.9)#51 5.5% (+16.4)#1,799
52. Oneida 21.8% 8.9% (+12.9)#52 5.5% (+16.3)#1,813
53. Corinth 21.7% 8.9% (+12.8)#53 5.5% (+16.3)#1,825
54. New Haven 21.7% 8.9% (+12.7)#54 5.5% (+16.2)#1,835
55. Pleasureville 21.4% 8.9% (+12.5)#55 5.5% (+16.0)#1,890
56. Hickman 21.4% 8.9% (+12.4)#56 5.5% (+15.9)#1,909
57. Gamaliel 21.1% 8.9% (+12.1)#57 5.5% (+15.6)#1,980
58. Pryorsburg 20.9% 8.9% (+12.0)#58 5.5% (+15.5)#2,020
59. Monterey 20.9% 8.9% (+12.0)#59 5.5% (+15.5)#2,021
60. Cleaton 20.8% 8.9% (+11.8)#60 5.5% (+15.3)#2,068
61. Artemus 20.7% 8.9% (+11.8)#61 5.5% (+15.2)#2,078
62. Lebanon 20.7% 8.9% (+11.7)#62 5.5% (+15.2)#2,087
63. Cerulean 20.6% 8.9% (+11.7)#63 5.5% (+15.1)#2,104
64. Slaughters 20.5% 8.9% (+11.6)#64 5.5% (+15.0)#2,129
65. Pleasant Ridge 20.4% 8.9% (+11.5)#65 5.5% (+14.9)#2,154
66. Jeffersonville 20.4% 8.9% (+11.4)#66 5.5% (+14.9)#2,174
67. Lewisport 20.4% 8.9% (+11.4)#67 5.5% (+14.9)#2,176
68. Moseleyville 20.2% 8.9% (+11.3)#68 5.5% (+14.8)#2,198
69. Centertown 20.0% 8.9% (+11.1)#69 5.5% (+14.5)#2,245
70. Mchenry 19.9% 8.9% (+10.9)#70 5.5% (+14.4)#2,300
71. Burkesville 19.4% 8.9% (+10.5)#71 5.5% (+13.9)#2,444
72. Dixon 19.3% 8.9% (+10.4)#72 5.5% (+13.8)#2,460
73. North Middletown 19.2% 8.9% (+10.3)#73 5.5% (+13.7)#2,488
74. Lewisburg 18.8% 8.9% (+9.84)#74 5.5% (+13.3)#2,638
75. Auburn 18.6% 8.9% (+9.70)#75 5.5% (+13.2)#2,685
76. Loretto 18.5% 8.9% (+9.61)#76 5.5% (+13.1)#2,721
77. Fairview 18.5% 8.9% (+9.58)#77 5.5% (+13.0)#2,730
78. Burnside 18.4% 8.9% (+9.46)#78 5.5% (+12.9)#2,770
79. Louisa 18.2% 8.9% (+9.30)#79 5.5% (+12.8)#2,833
80. West Point 18.2% 8.9% (+9.24)#80 5.5% (+12.7)#2,852
81. Sacramento 18.0% 8.9% (+9.11)#81 5.5% (+12.6)#2,920
82. Princeton 18.0% 8.9% (+9.10)#82 5.5% (+12.6)#2,924
83. Crofton 18.0% 8.9% (+9.02)#83 5.5% (+12.5)#2,957
84. Hawesville 17.9% 8.9% (+8.99)#84 5.5% (+12.5)#2,974
85. Franklin 17.9% 8.9% (+8.96)#85 5.5% (+12.4)#2,986
86. Mount Vernon 17.9% 8.9% (+8.95)#86 5.5% (+12.4)#2,994
87. Carlisle 17.6% 8.9% (+8.66)#87 5.5% (+12.1)#3,088
88. Brodhead 17.6% 8.9% (+8.65)#88 5.5% (+12.1)#3,092
89. Georgetown 17.6% 8.9% (+8.61)#89 5.5% (+12.1)#3,104
90. Cynthiana 17.4% 8.9% (+8.44)#90 5.5% (+11.9)#3,183
91. Irvington 17.3% 8.9% (+8.33)#91 5.5% (+11.8)#3,225
92. Sharpsburg 17.2% 8.9% (+8.28)#92 5.5% (+11.8)#3,254
93. Lancaster 17.1% 8.9% (+8.15)#93 5.5% (+11.6)#3,325
94. Horse Cave 17.1% 8.9% (+8.14)#94 5.5% (+11.6)#3,329
95. Cave City 17.0% 8.9% (+8.06)#95 5.5% (+11.5)#3,359
96. Tompkinsville 16.9% 8.9% (+7.99)#96 5.5% (+11.5)#3,387
97. West Buechel 16.7% 8.9% (+7.76)#97 5.5% (+11.2)#3,486
98. Harrodsburg 16.7% 8.9% (+7.73)#98 5.5% (+11.2)#3,546
99. Cannonsburg 16.6% 8.9% (+7.63)#99 5.5% (+11.1)#3,579
100. Beechmont 16.4% 8.9% (+7.49)#100 5.5% (+11.0)#3,648

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
68.7%
#7
59.3%
#8
44.4%
#9
42.5%
#10
42.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky?
Gilbertsville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Kentucky is 8.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.