Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Spink Colony 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#26
2. Shannon Colony 100.0% 6.4% (+93.6)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#35
3. Marvin 60.0% 6.4% (+53.6)#3 5.5% (+54.5)#121
4. Winfred 56.5% 6.4% (+50.2)#4 5.5% (+51.1)#147
5. Mission Hill 51.7% 6.4% (+45.3)#5 5.5% (+46.2)#184
6. Altamont 50.0% 6.4% (+43.6)#6 5.5% (+44.5)#204
7. Glendale Colony 42.5% 6.4% (+36.1)#7 5.5% (+37.0)#303
8. Revillo 41.0% 6.4% (+34.6)#8 5.5% (+35.5)#336
9. Canova 39.3% 6.4% (+32.9)#9 5.5% (+33.8)#377
10. Wallace 35.7% 6.4% (+29.4)#10 5.5% (+30.2)#476
11. Utica 35.5% 6.4% (+29.1)#11 5.5% (+30.0)#484
12. Burbank 34.4% 6.4% (+28.0)#12 5.5% (+28.9)#521
13. Yale 32.8% 6.4% (+26.4)#13 5.5% (+27.3)#606
14. Crook 32.1% 6.4% (+25.7)#14 5.5% (+26.6)#643
15. Boulder Canyon 31.3% 6.4% (+24.9)#15 5.5% (+25.8)#689
16. Naples 30.8% 6.4% (+24.4)#16 5.5% (+25.3)#725
17. Roslyn 30.6% 6.4% (+24.2)#17 5.5% (+25.1)#734
18. Oldham 30.5% 6.4% (+24.1)#18 5.5% (+25.0)#738
19. Peever 30.0% 6.4% (+23.6)#19 5.5% (+24.5)#761
20. Gayville 30.0% 6.4% (+23.6)#20 5.5% (+24.5)#770
21. Rowena 28.6% 6.4% (+22.2)#21 5.5% (+23.1)#876
22. Brentford 26.8% 6.4% (+20.5)#22 5.5% (+21.4)#1,049
23. Bath Corner 26.7% 6.4% (+20.3)#23 5.5% (+21.2)#1,064
24. Sinai 26.5% 6.4% (+20.1)#24 5.5% (+21.0)#1,078
25. Brant Lake South 25.9% 6.4% (+19.6)#25 5.5% (+20.5)#1,142
26. Colome 25.7% 6.4% (+19.4)#26 5.5% (+20.3)#1,168
27. Wentworth 25.0% 6.4% (+18.6)#27 5.5% (+19.5)#1,261
28. Running Water 24.0% 6.4% (+17.6)#28 5.5% (+18.5)#1,422
29. Bushnell 23.3% 6.4% (+17.0)#29 5.5% (+17.9)#1,530
30. Millerdale Colony 23.2% 6.4% (+16.9)#30 5.5% (+17.7)#1,558
31. Springfield 23.2% 6.4% (+16.8)#31 5.5% (+17.7)#1,560
32. Florence 22.8% 6.4% (+16.5)#32 5.5% (+17.4)#1,625
33. Astoria 22.2% 6.4% (+15.9)#33 5.5% (+16.8)#1,727
34. Clark Colony 22.2% 6.4% (+15.9)#35 5.5% (+16.8)#1,739
35. Farmer 22.2% 6.4% (+15.9)#36 5.5% (+16.8)#1,740
36. Alcester 22.1% 6.4% (+15.7)#37 5.5% (+16.6)#1,754
37. Britton 21.7% 6.4% (+15.3)#38 5.5% (+16.2)#1,832
38. Allen 21.4% 6.4% (+15.0)#39 5.5% (+15.9)#1,908
39. Westport 20.6% 6.4% (+14.2)#40 5.5% (+15.1)#2,114
40. Bristol 20.0% 6.4% (+13.6)#41 5.5% (+14.5)#2,250
41. Bradley 20.0% 6.4% (+13.6)#42 5.5% (+14.5)#2,265
42. Goodwin 20.0% 6.4% (+13.6)#43 5.5% (+14.5)#2,266
43. Volin 19.8% 6.4% (+13.4)#44 5.5% (+14.3)#2,321
44. Henry 18.8% 6.4% (+12.4)#45 5.5% (+13.3)#2,645
45. Richland 18.8% 6.4% (+12.4)#46 5.5% (+13.3)#2,650
46. Corona 18.8% 6.4% (+12.4)#47 5.5% (+13.3)#2,656
47. Brandt 18.3% 6.4% (+12.0)#48 5.5% (+12.9)#2,793
48. Pierpont 18.1% 6.4% (+11.7)#49 5.5% (+12.6)#2,916
49. Yankton 17.9% 6.4% (+11.5)#50 5.5% (+12.4)#2,997
50. Fairburn 17.6% 6.4% (+11.3)#51 5.5% (+12.2)#3,072
51. Hudson 17.5% 6.4% (+11.2)#52 5.5% (+12.1)#3,118
52. Spring Creek Colony 17.1% 6.4% (+10.7)#53 5.5% (+11.6)#3,316
53. Plankinton 17.1% 6.4% (+10.7)#54 5.5% (+11.6)#3,327
54. Mansfield 17.1% 6.4% (+10.7)#55 5.5% (+11.6)#3,336
55. Lesterville 16.9% 6.4% (+10.5)#56 5.5% (+11.4)#3,409
56. Alpena 16.5% 6.4% (+10.1)#57 5.5% (+11.0)#3,614
57. Hosmer 16.1% 6.4% (+9.77)#58 5.5% (+10.7)#3,796
58. Howard 16.1% 6.4% (+9.76)#59 5.5% (+10.7)#3,805
59. La Plant 15.9% 6.4% (+9.55)#60 5.5% (+10.4)#3,906
60. Elkton 15.9% 6.4% (+9.54)#61 5.5% (+10.4)#3,920
61. Huron 15.9% 6.4% (+9.49)#62 5.5% (+10.4)#3,948
62. Twin Brooks 15.8% 6.4% (+9.43)#63 5.5% (+10.3)#3,988
63. Agency Village 15.4% 6.4% (+9.09)#64 5.5% (+9.98)#4,129
64. Canton 15.2% 6.4% (+8.81)#65 5.5% (+9.70)#4,299
65. Letcher 15.1% 6.4% (+8.76)#66 5.5% (+9.65)#4,329
66. Stickney 15.0% 6.4% (+8.59)#67 5.5% (+9.48)#4,440
67. Leola 14.9% 6.4% (+8.56)#68 5.5% (+9.46)#4,458
68. Groton 14.9% 6.4% (+8.50)#69 5.5% (+9.39)#4,499
69. Tabor 14.8% 6.4% (+8.47)#70 5.5% (+9.36)#4,516
70. Cavour 14.8% 6.4% (+8.45)#71 5.5% (+9.35)#4,525
71. Colonial Pine Hills 14.7% 6.4% (+8.37)#72 5.5% (+9.26)#4,590
72. Lake Preston 14.6% 6.4% (+8.26)#73 5.5% (+9.16)#4,657
73. Davis 14.0% 6.4% (+7.59)#74 5.5% (+8.48)#5,037
74. White 13.9% 6.4% (+7.54)#75 5.5% (+8.43)#5,076
75. Hermosa 13.8% 6.4% (+7.47)#76 5.5% (+8.36)#5,121
76. Marty 13.8% 6.4% (+7.43)#77 5.5% (+8.32)#5,138
77. Wessington Springs 13.8% 6.4% (+7.42)#78 5.5% (+8.31)#5,144
78. Agar 13.5% 6.4% (+7.10)#79 5.5% (+7.99)#5,402
79. Hayti 13.4% 6.4% (+7.06)#80 5.5% (+7.95)#5,432
80. Lane 13.3% 6.4% (+6.97)#81 5.5% (+7.86)#5,515
81. Estelline 13.0% 6.4% (+6.64)#82 5.5% (+7.53)#5,775
82. Toronto 12.9% 6.4% (+6.59)#83 5.5% (+7.48)#5,801
83. Quinn 12.9% 6.4% (+6.54)#84 5.5% (+7.43)#5,856
84. Wasta 12.9% 6.4% (+6.54)#85 5.5% (+7.43)#5,859
85. Morningside 12.5% 6.4% (+6.14)#86 5.5% (+7.03)#6,193
86. Castlewood 12.1% 6.4% (+5.69)#87 5.5% (+6.59)#6,571
87. Hurley 11.9% 6.4% (+5.54)#88 5.5% (+6.44)#6,725
88. Lennox 11.8% 6.4% (+5.44)#89 5.5% (+6.33)#6,824
89. Oelrichs 11.8% 6.4% (+5.40)#90 5.5% (+6.30)#6,861
90. New Effington 11.8% 6.4% (+5.40)#91 5.5% (+6.30)#6,862
91. De Smet 11.7% 6.4% (+5.34)#92 5.5% (+6.23)#6,941
92. Kadoka 11.6% 6.4% (+5.28)#93 5.5% (+6.18)#6,992
93. Arlington 11.5% 6.4% (+5.14)#94 5.5% (+6.03)#7,127
94. Langford 11.4% 6.4% (+5.03)#95 5.5% (+5.92)#7,236
95. Colman 11.3% 6.4% (+4.94)#96 5.5% (+5.83)#7,323
96. Worthing 11.2% 6.4% (+4.84)#97 5.5% (+5.73)#7,436
97. Jefferson 11.1% 6.4% (+4.75)#98 5.5% (+5.64)#7,503
98. Watertown 11.0% 6.4% (+4.65)#99 5.5% (+5.54)#7,645
99. Tulare 11.0% 6.4% (+4.61)#100 5.5% (+5.51)#7,681
100. Big Stone City 10.9% 6.4% (+4.53)#101 5.5% (+5.42)#7,768

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota are:
#1
60.0%
#2
56.5%
#3
51.7%
#4
50.0%
#5
41.0%
#6
39.3%
#7
35.7%
#8
35.5%
#9
32.8%
#10
30.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota?
Marvin has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota with 60.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in South Dakota is 6.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.