Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Chillicothe 70.0% 8.3% (+61.7)#1 5.5% (+64.5)#78
2. Harris 66.9% 8.3% (+58.7)#2 5.5% (+61.5)#86
3. Yarmouth 64.8% 8.3% (+56.5)#3 5.5% (+59.3)#92
4. Montpelier 62.2% 8.3% (+53.9)#4 5.5% (+56.7)#107
5. Delphos 60.0% 8.3% (+51.7)#5 5.5% (+54.5)#119
6. Miller 56.0% 8.3% (+47.7)#6 5.5% (+50.5)#149
7. Elkport 50.0% 8.3% (+41.7)#7 5.5% (+44.5)#208
8. Shannon City 47.9% 8.3% (+39.7)#8 5.5% (+42.4)#228
9. Hamilton 46.9% 8.3% (+38.6)#9 5.5% (+41.4)#244
10. New Haven 46.7% 8.3% (+38.4)#10 5.5% (+41.2)#248
11. Moscow 46.4% 8.3% (+38.1)#11 5.5% (+40.9)#250
12. Braddyville 41.8% 8.3% (+33.6)#12 5.5% (+36.4)#321
13. Kingston 40.0% 8.3% (+31.7)#13 5.5% (+34.5)#357
14. Turin 39.8% 8.3% (+31.5)#14 5.5% (+34.3)#366
15. Northboro 39.0% 8.3% (+30.7)#15 5.5% (+33.5)#385
16. Rodman 38.5% 8.3% (+30.2)#16 5.5% (+33.0)#401
17. Royal 37.9% 8.3% (+29.6)#17 5.5% (+32.4)#421
18. Chatsworth 37.8% 8.3% (+29.6)#18 5.5% (+32.4)#423
19. Thornburg 37.5% 8.3% (+29.2)#19 5.5% (+32.0)#429
20. Webster 37.1% 8.3% (+28.8)#20 5.5% (+31.6)#438
21. Malcom 36.4% 8.3% (+28.1)#21 5.5% (+30.9)#456
22. Gillett Grove 35.3% 8.3% (+27.0)#22 5.5% (+29.8)#490
23. Storm Lake 34.6% 8.3% (+26.3)#23 5.5% (+29.1)#515
24. Promise City 34.5% 8.3% (+26.2)#24 5.5% (+29.0)#517
25. Swaledale 34.0% 8.3% (+25.7)#25 5.5% (+28.5)#541
26. Columbus City 33.6% 8.3% (+25.3)#26 5.5% (+28.1)#558
27. Arthur 33.3% 8.3% (+25.1)#27 5.5% (+27.9)#565
28. Center Junction 32.5% 8.3% (+24.2)#28 5.5% (+27.0)#619
29. Van Wert 32.2% 8.3% (+23.9)#29 5.5% (+26.7)#634
30. Duncan 32.1% 8.3% (+23.9)#30 5.5% (+26.7)#640
31. Thurman 31.6% 8.3% (+23.4)#31 5.5% (+26.2)#664
32. Bradgate 31.6% 8.3% (+23.3)#32 5.5% (+26.1)#671
33. Leland 31.5% 8.3% (+23.2)#33 5.5% (+26.0)#676
34. Chelsea 31.1% 8.3% (+22.8)#34 5.5% (+25.6)#703
35. Spragueville 30.8% 8.3% (+22.5)#35 5.5% (+25.3)#722
36. Zwingle 30.4% 8.3% (+22.2)#36 5.5% (+25.0)#741
37. Brunsville 29.0% 8.3% (+20.7)#37 5.5% (+23.5)#841
38. Hardy 28.6% 8.3% (+20.3)#38 5.5% (+23.1)#883
39. Stockport 28.4% 8.3% (+20.1)#39 5.5% (+22.9)#895
40. California Junction 28.3% 8.3% (+20.0)#40 5.5% (+22.8)#913
41. Woden 28.0% 8.3% (+19.8)#41 5.5% (+22.6)#930
42. Delaware 27.8% 8.3% (+19.6)#42 5.5% (+22.4)#945
43. Columbus Junction 27.5% 8.3% (+19.3)#43 5.5% (+22.1)#974
44. Montour 27.0% 8.3% (+18.8)#44 5.5% (+21.6)#1,028
45. Craig 26.8% 8.3% (+18.6)#45 5.5% (+21.4)#1,048
46. Randolph 26.7% 8.3% (+18.4)#46 5.5% (+21.2)#1,061
47. Albion 26.5% 8.3% (+18.3)#47 5.5% (+21.1)#1,076
48. Ferguson 26.3% 8.3% (+18.1)#48 5.5% (+20.8)#1,100
49. Beaverdale 26.2% 8.3% (+17.9)#49 5.5% (+20.7)#1,109
50. Ionia 26.1% 8.3% (+17.8)#50 5.5% (+20.6)#1,127
51. Fontanelle 25.8% 8.3% (+17.6)#51 5.5% (+20.3)#1,156
52. Fredericksburg 25.6% 8.3% (+17.3)#52 5.5% (+20.1)#1,184
53. Drakesville 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#53 5.5% (+19.5)#1,264
54. Plano 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#54 5.5% (+19.5)#1,275
55. Cotter 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#55 5.5% (+19.5)#1,282
56. Yetter 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#56 5.5% (+19.5)#1,284
57. Hepburn 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#57 5.5% (+19.5)#1,285
58. Titonka 24.9% 8.3% (+16.6)#58 5.5% (+19.4)#1,292
59. Clarinda 24.8% 8.3% (+16.5)#59 5.5% (+19.3)#1,309
60. Goodell 24.7% 8.3% (+16.5)#60 5.5% (+19.3)#1,315
61. Vincent 24.7% 8.3% (+16.4)#61 5.5% (+19.2)#1,327
62. Stanley 24.3% 8.3% (+16.1)#62 5.5% (+18.9)#1,373
63. Randalia 24.1% 8.3% (+15.9)#63 5.5% (+18.7)#1,396
64. Marysville 24.0% 8.3% (+15.7)#64 5.5% (+18.5)#1,423
65. Maloy 23.7% 8.3% (+15.4)#65 5.5% (+18.2)#1,478
66. Bonaparte 23.6% 8.3% (+15.4)#66 5.5% (+18.2)#1,485
67. Hospers 23.6% 8.3% (+15.3)#67 5.5% (+18.1)#1,488
68. Crystal Lake 23.5% 8.3% (+15.3)#68 5.5% (+18.1)#1,498
69. Brandon 23.3% 8.3% (+15.1)#69 5.5% (+17.8)#1,536
70. Elberon 23.1% 8.3% (+14.8)#70 5.5% (+17.6)#1,580
71. Little Rock 22.9% 8.3% (+14.7)#71 5.5% (+17.5)#1,599
72. Denison 22.9% 8.3% (+14.6)#72 5.5% (+17.4)#1,610
73. Vail 22.7% 8.3% (+14.4)#73 5.5% (+17.2)#1,641
74. Kiron 22.6% 8.3% (+14.3)#74 5.5% (+17.1)#1,661
75. Belle Plaine 22.5% 8.3% (+14.3)#75 5.5% (+17.1)#1,672
76. Searsboro 22.4% 8.3% (+14.1)#76 5.5% (+16.9)#1,695
77. Sabula 22.3% 8.3% (+14.0)#77 5.5% (+16.8)#1,713
78. Sherrill 22.1% 8.3% (+13.9)#78 5.5% (+16.7)#1,751
79. Woodburn 21.7% 8.3% (+13.4)#79 5.5% (+16.2)#1,839
80. Rembrandt 21.6% 8.3% (+13.4)#80 5.5% (+16.2)#1,844
81. Hartwick 21.6% 8.3% (+13.3)#81 5.5% (+16.1)#1,869
82. Middletown 21.6% 8.3% (+13.3)#82 5.5% (+16.1)#1,872
83. Marble Rock 21.5% 8.3% (+13.3)#83 5.5% (+16.1)#1,877
84. Baldwin 21.4% 8.3% (+13.2)#84 5.5% (+16.0)#1,895
85. Udell 21.4% 8.3% (+13.2)#85 5.5% (+16.0)#1,900
86. Hamburg 21.3% 8.3% (+13.0)#86 5.5% (+15.8)#1,924
87. Oelwein 21.2% 8.3% (+13.0)#87 5.5% (+15.7)#1,940
88. Irvington 21.2% 8.3% (+13.0)#88 5.5% (+15.7)#1,950
89. Mystic 21.2% 8.3% (+12.9)#89 5.5% (+15.7)#1,957
90. Barnes City 21.2% 8.3% (+12.9)#90 5.5% (+15.7)#1,963
91. Bedford 21.1% 8.3% (+12.8)#91 5.5% (+15.6)#1,983
92. Clio 21.1% 8.3% (+12.8)#92 5.5% (+15.6)#1,993
93. Rockwell 20.9% 8.3% (+12.7)#93 5.5% (+15.5)#2,015
94. Janesville 20.9% 8.3% (+12.7)#94 5.5% (+15.4)#2,025
95. Albert City 20.9% 8.3% (+12.6)#95 5.5% (+15.4)#2,026
96. Alvord 20.9% 8.3% (+12.6)#96 5.5% (+15.4)#2,039
97. Hopkinton 20.8% 8.3% (+12.6)#97 5.5% (+15.4)#2,057
98. Westgate 20.6% 8.3% (+12.3)#98 5.5% (+15.1)#2,110
99. Lucas 20.5% 8.3% (+12.2)#99 5.5% (+15.0)#2,146
100. Jesup 20.4% 8.3% (+12.2)#100 5.5% (+14.9)#2,155

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa are:
#1
70.0%
#2
66.9%
#3
60.0%
#4
56.0%
#5
50.0%
#6
47.9%
#7
46.9%
#8
46.7%
#9
41.8%
#10
39.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa?
Chillicothe has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa with 70.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Iowa is 8.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.