Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Boon 43.5% 8.9% (+34.6)#1 5.5% (+38.0)#286
2. Scotts 42.9% 8.9% (+34.0)#2 5.5% (+37.4)#293
3. Hickory Corners 37.6% 8.9% (+28.8)#3 5.5% (+32.2)#424
4. Twining 35.6% 8.9% (+26.8)#4 5.5% (+30.1)#479
5. Burr Oak 35.1% 8.9% (+26.3)#5 5.5% (+29.7)#499
6. Barnes Lake 34.5% 8.9% (+25.6)#6 5.5% (+29.0)#516
7. Burlington 33.3% 8.9% (+24.5)#7 5.5% (+27.9)#567
8. Minden City 32.3% 8.9% (+23.4)#8 5.5% (+26.8)#630
9. Bronson 32.1% 8.9% (+23.2)#9 5.5% (+26.6)#641
10. Wolf Lake 31.9% 8.9% (+23.0)#10 5.5% (+26.4)#648
11. Melvin 31.6% 8.9% (+22.7)#11 5.5% (+26.1)#668
12. Oden 31.4% 8.9% (+22.6)#12 5.5% (+26.0)#680
13. Hastings 31.2% 8.9% (+22.4)#13 5.5% (+25.8)#695
14. Stanwood 30.3% 8.9% (+21.4)#14 5.5% (+24.8)#749
15. Clifford 30.2% 8.9% (+21.3)#15 5.5% (+24.7)#756
16. Martin 29.5% 8.9% (+20.6)#16 5.5% (+24.0)#798
17. Waldron 29.2% 8.9% (+20.4)#17 5.5% (+23.8)#822
18. Lyons 29.1% 8.9% (+20.2)#18 5.5% (+23.6)#832
19. Free Soil 28.6% 8.9% (+19.7)#19 5.5% (+23.1)#877
20. Nessen City 28.6% 8.9% (+19.7)#20 5.5% (+23.1)#879
21. Oakley 28.3% 8.9% (+19.5)#21 5.5% (+22.9)#904
22. Marcellus 27.5% 8.9% (+18.7)#22 5.5% (+22.0)#975
23. Daggett 27.3% 8.9% (+18.4)#23 5.5% (+21.8)#1,002
24. Tower 27.2% 8.9% (+18.3)#24 5.5% (+21.7)#1,010
25. Sturgis 27.1% 8.9% (+18.3)#25 5.5% (+21.7)#1,019
26. Howard City 27.1% 8.9% (+18.2)#26 5.5% (+21.6)#1,024
27. Litchfield 26.9% 8.9% (+18.1)#27 5.5% (+21.5)#1,032
28. Bruce Crossing 26.9% 8.9% (+18.1)#28 5.5% (+21.5)#1,035
29. New Troy 26.9% 8.9% (+18.0)#29 5.5% (+21.4)#1,040
30. Morley 26.4% 8.9% (+17.5)#30 5.5% (+20.9)#1,092
31. Pelkie 26.3% 8.9% (+17.5)#31 5.5% (+20.8)#1,101
32. Newaygo 26.2% 8.9% (+17.4)#32 5.5% (+20.8)#1,107
33. East Jordan 26.1% 8.9% (+17.2)#33 5.5% (+20.6)#1,118
34. Detroit Beach 25.7% 8.9% (+16.9)#34 5.5% (+20.3)#1,170
35. Farwell 25.5% 8.9% (+16.7)#35 5.5% (+20.1)#1,193
36. Burt 25.4% 8.9% (+16.5)#36 5.5% (+19.9)#1,213
37. Carson City 24.9% 8.9% (+16.0)#37 5.5% (+19.4)#1,297
38. Mendon 24.6% 8.9% (+15.7)#38 5.5% (+19.1)#1,340
39. Stephenson 24.5% 8.9% (+15.6)#39 5.5% (+19.0)#1,351
40. Port Hope 24.4% 8.9% (+15.5)#40 5.5% (+18.9)#1,366
41. Three Rivers 24.2% 8.9% (+15.3)#41 5.5% (+18.7)#1,389
42. White Pigeon 24.1% 8.9% (+15.3)#42 5.5% (+18.7)#1,397
43. Central Lake 24.1% 8.9% (+15.3)#43 5.5% (+18.7)#1,398
44. Homer 24.1% 8.9% (+15.3)#44 5.5% (+18.6)#1,399
45. Hudson 24.1% 8.9% (+15.2)#45 5.5% (+18.6)#1,408
46. Hubbardston 24.0% 8.9% (+15.1)#46 5.5% (+18.5)#1,428
47. Quincy 23.8% 8.9% (+15.0)#47 5.5% (+18.4)#1,445
48. Falmouth 23.8% 8.9% (+14.9)#48 5.5% (+18.3)#1,460
49. Otsego 23.6% 8.9% (+14.7)#49 5.5% (+18.1)#1,490
50. Gagetown 23.5% 8.9% (+14.7)#50 5.5% (+18.1)#1,495
51. Manton 23.3% 8.9% (+14.4)#51 5.5% (+17.8)#1,546
52. Morenci 23.1% 8.9% (+14.2)#52 5.5% (+17.6)#1,575
53. Nashville 22.9% 8.9% (+14.1)#53 5.5% (+17.5)#1,604
54. Vandalia 22.7% 8.9% (+13.9)#54 5.5% (+17.3)#1,635
55. Muskegon Heights 22.6% 8.9% (+13.8)#55 5.5% (+17.2)#1,651
56. Eagle 22.6% 8.9% (+13.7)#56 5.5% (+17.1)#1,662
57. Pittsford 22.4% 8.9% (+13.5)#57 5.5% (+16.9)#1,701
58. Chatham 22.2% 8.9% (+13.4)#58 5.5% (+16.8)#1,732
59. Copper Harbor 22.2% 8.9% (+13.4)#59 5.5% (+16.8)#1,734
60. Kinde 22.2% 8.9% (+13.3)#60 5.5% (+16.7)#1,750
61. Cass City 21.9% 8.9% (+13.1)#61 5.5% (+16.4)#1,788
62. Centreville 21.8% 8.9% (+13.0)#62 5.5% (+16.4)#1,803
63. Twin Lake 21.8% 8.9% (+12.9)#63 5.5% (+16.3)#1,818
64. Bay Port 21.6% 8.9% (+12.8)#64 5.5% (+16.1)#1,858
65. Bancroft 21.6% 8.9% (+12.7)#65 5.5% (+16.1)#1,859
66. Woodland 21.4% 8.9% (+12.5)#66 5.5% (+15.9)#1,903
67. Luther 21.3% 8.9% (+12.4)#67 5.5% (+15.8)#1,927
68. Lakes Of The North 21.2% 8.9% (+12.3)#68 5.5% (+15.7)#1,954
69. Roosevelt Park 21.2% 8.9% (+12.3)#69 5.5% (+15.7)#1,960
70. Dodgeville 21.1% 8.9% (+12.3)#70 5.5% (+15.7)#1,965
71. Buchanan 21.1% 8.9% (+12.2)#71 5.5% (+15.6)#1,977
72. Allegan 21.1% 8.9% (+12.2)#72 5.5% (+15.6)#1,982
73. Deerfield 21.1% 8.9% (+12.2)#73 5.5% (+15.6)#1,985
74. Sand Lake 21.0% 8.9% (+12.2)#74 5.5% (+15.6)#2,000
75. Otter Lake 20.9% 8.9% (+12.0)#75 5.5% (+15.4)#2,028
76. Ovid 20.9% 8.9% (+12.0)#76 5.5% (+15.4)#2,031
77. Mayville 20.9% 8.9% (+12.0)#77 5.5% (+15.4)#2,036
78. Omer 20.8% 8.9% (+12.0)#78 5.5% (+15.4)#2,049
79. Bear Lake 20.8% 8.9% (+11.9)#79 5.5% (+15.3)#2,067
80. Hersey 20.6% 8.9% (+11.7)#80 5.5% (+15.1)#2,116
81. Montague 20.5% 8.9% (+11.7)#81 5.5% (+15.1)#2,121
82. Carsonville 20.5% 8.9% (+11.6)#82 5.5% (+15.0)#2,142
83. Covington 20.4% 8.9% (+11.5)#83 5.5% (+14.9)#2,158
84. Galien 20.4% 8.9% (+11.5)#84 5.5% (+14.9)#2,163
85. Mattawan 20.4% 8.9% (+11.5)#85 5.5% (+14.9)#2,172
86. Coleman 20.1% 8.9% (+11.3)#86 5.5% (+14.7)#2,220
87. Ubly 20.0% 8.9% (+11.1)#87 5.5% (+14.5)#2,243
88. Leland 19.8% 8.9% (+11.0)#88 5.5% (+14.4)#2,314
89. Custer 19.7% 8.9% (+10.9)#89 5.5% (+14.3)#2,339
90. Dowling 19.7% 8.9% (+10.8)#90 5.5% (+14.2)#2,346
91. Beecher 19.7% 8.9% (+10.8)#91 5.5% (+14.2)#2,347
92. Barryton 19.7% 8.9% (+10.8)#92 5.5% (+14.2)#2,348
93. Elm Hall 19.7% 8.9% (+10.8)#93 5.5% (+14.2)#2,356
94. Cadillac 19.6% 8.9% (+10.7)#94 5.5% (+14.1)#2,396
95. Athens 19.4% 8.9% (+10.5)#95 5.5% (+13.9)#2,442
96. White Cloud 19.4% 8.9% (+10.5)#96 5.5% (+13.9)#2,449
97. Three Lakes 19.2% 8.9% (+10.3)#97 5.5% (+13.7)#2,491
98. Menominee 19.1% 8.9% (+10.3)#98 5.5% (+13.7)#2,509
99. Owendale 19.1% 8.9% (+10.3)#99 5.5% (+13.7)#2,512
100. Plainwell 19.1% 8.9% (+10.2)#100 5.5% (+13.6)#2,519

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan are:
#1
43.5%
#2
37.6%
#3
35.6%
#4
35.1%
#5
33.3%
#6
32.3%
#7
32.1%
#8
31.9%
#9
31.6%
#10
31.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan?
Boon has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan with 43.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Michigan is 8.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.