Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Louise 56.7% 8.3% (+48.4)#1 5.5% (+51.2)#145
2. Sidon 44.7% 8.3% (+36.4)#2 5.5% (+39.2)#270
3. Wheeler 42.5% 8.3% (+34.2)#3 5.5% (+37.0)#304
4. Calhoun City 39.5% 8.3% (+31.2)#4 5.5% (+34.0)#373
5. Oakland 38.9% 8.3% (+30.7)#5 5.5% (+33.5)#386
6. Edwards 38.5% 8.3% (+30.3)#6 5.5% (+33.1)#398
7. Weir 36.2% 8.3% (+28.0)#7 5.5% (+30.7)#461
8. Lauderdale 35.8% 8.3% (+27.5)#8 5.5% (+30.3)#470
9. Heidelberg 35.7% 8.3% (+27.5)#9 5.5% (+30.3)#472
10. Pachuta 34.4% 8.3% (+26.2)#10 5.5% (+29.0)#519
11. Redwater 33.7% 8.3% (+25.4)#11 5.5% (+28.2)#554
12. Coffeeville 33.6% 8.3% (+25.4)#12 5.5% (+28.2)#555
13. Golden 33.0% 8.3% (+24.8)#13 5.5% (+27.6)#594
14. Ecru 33.0% 8.3% (+24.8)#14 5.5% (+27.6)#595
15. Aberdeen 32.8% 8.3% (+24.6)#15 5.5% (+27.4)#602
16. Bogue Chitto 31.7% 8.3% (+23.5)#16 5.5% (+26.3)#658
17. Beulah 31.1% 8.3% (+22.9)#17 5.5% (+25.7)#698
18. Shubuta 30.8% 8.3% (+22.6)#18 5.5% (+25.4)#719
19. Lake 30.3% 8.3% (+22.1)#19 5.5% (+24.8)#747
20. Woodland 29.9% 8.3% (+21.7)#20 5.5% (+24.4)#772
21. Derma 28.3% 8.3% (+20.1)#21 5.5% (+22.8)#906
22. Grace 28.2% 8.3% (+20.0)#22 5.5% (+22.7)#919
23. Ethel 27.3% 8.3% (+19.0)#23 5.5% (+21.8)#997
24. Bruce 27.1% 8.3% (+18.9)#24 5.5% (+21.7)#1,018
25. Bassfield 26.1% 8.3% (+17.8)#25 5.5% (+20.6)#1,121
26. Satartia 25.9% 8.3% (+17.7)#26 5.5% (+20.5)#1,146
27. Louisville 25.4% 8.3% (+17.2)#27 5.5% (+19.9)#1,210
28. Baldwyn 25.2% 8.3% (+16.9)#28 5.5% (+19.7)#1,239
29. Hermanville 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#29 5.5% (+19.5)#1,250
30. Winstonville 25.0% 8.3% (+16.7)#30 5.5% (+19.5)#1,270
31. Wade 24.9% 8.3% (+16.7)#31 5.5% (+19.4)#1,289
32. Tchula 24.6% 8.3% (+16.3)#32 5.5% (+19.1)#1,336
33. Montrose 24.5% 8.3% (+16.2)#33 5.5% (+19.0)#1,352
34. Tishomingo 23.9% 8.3% (+15.6)#34 5.5% (+18.4)#1,437
35. Glen 23.7% 8.3% (+15.5)#35 5.5% (+18.3)#1,463
36. Agricola 23.6% 8.3% (+15.4)#36 5.5% (+18.2)#1,484
37. Taylorsville 23.5% 8.3% (+15.3)#37 5.5% (+18.0)#1,504
38. Hickory Flat 23.5% 8.3% (+15.2)#38 5.5% (+18.0)#1,505
39. Itta Bena 22.9% 8.3% (+14.7)#39 5.5% (+17.5)#1,601
40. De Soto 22.9% 8.3% (+14.7)#40 5.5% (+17.5)#1,602
41. Shannon 22.6% 8.3% (+14.4)#41 5.5% (+17.1)#1,656
42. Falcon 22.4% 8.3% (+14.2)#42 5.5% (+17.0)#1,682
43. Big Creek 22.4% 8.3% (+14.1)#43 5.5% (+16.9)#1,696
44. Beechwood 22.4% 8.3% (+14.1)#44 5.5% (+16.9)#1,700
45. Durant 21.8% 8.3% (+13.6)#45 5.5% (+16.3)#1,811
46. Nettleton 21.8% 8.3% (+13.5)#46 5.5% (+16.3)#1,816
47. Vardaman 20.7% 8.3% (+12.4)#47 5.5% (+15.2)#2,079
48. Rienzi 20.7% 8.3% (+12.4)#48 5.5% (+15.2)#2,093
49. New Houlka 20.6% 8.3% (+12.4)#49 5.5% (+15.2)#2,095
50. Crawford 20.3% 8.3% (+12.1)#50 5.5% (+14.9)#2,177
51. Blue Mountain 20.2% 8.3% (+12.0)#51 5.5% (+14.8)#2,201
52. Elizabeth 20.2% 8.3% (+11.9)#52 5.5% (+14.7)#2,217
53. Escatawpa 19.9% 8.3% (+11.6)#53 5.5% (+14.4)#2,308
54. Jumpertown 19.7% 8.3% (+11.4)#54 5.5% (+14.2)#2,355
55. Falkner 19.7% 8.3% (+11.4)#55 5.5% (+14.2)#2,360
56. Verona 19.5% 8.3% (+11.2)#56 5.5% (+14.0)#2,409
57. Okolona 19.1% 8.3% (+10.8)#57 5.5% (+13.6)#2,528
58. Cruger 19.0% 8.3% (+10.7)#58 5.5% (+13.5)#2,564
59. Silver City 19.0% 8.3% (+10.7)#59 5.5% (+13.5)#2,567
60. Metcalfe 18.8% 8.3% (+10.6)#60 5.5% (+13.4)#2,617
61. Gunnison 18.6% 8.3% (+10.4)#61 5.5% (+13.1)#2,698
62. Hollandale 18.6% 8.3% (+10.3)#62 5.5% (+13.1)#2,705
63. Conehatta 18.4% 8.3% (+10.2)#63 5.5% (+13.0)#2,756
64. Laurel 18.3% 8.3% (+10.1)#64 5.5% (+12.8)#2,801
65. Winona 18.2% 8.3% (+9.98)#65 5.5% (+12.8)#2,839
66. New Albany 17.9% 8.3% (+9.65)#66 5.5% (+12.4)#2,983
67. North Carrollton 17.6% 8.3% (+9.30)#67 5.5% (+12.1)#3,101
68. Big Point 17.3% 8.3% (+9.09)#68 5.5% (+11.9)#3,195
69. Toomsuba 17.2% 8.3% (+8.99)#69 5.5% (+11.8)#3,233
70. Paden 17.1% 8.3% (+8.89)#70 5.5% (+11.7)#3,289
71. Morton 17.1% 8.3% (+8.86)#71 5.5% (+11.6)#3,301
72. Yazoo City 17.0% 8.3% (+8.75)#72 5.5% (+11.5)#3,358
73. Smithville 16.9% 8.3% (+8.68)#73 5.5% (+11.5)#3,391
74. Bay Springs 16.9% 8.3% (+8.62)#74 5.5% (+11.4)#3,418
75. Walnut 16.7% 8.3% (+8.41)#75 5.5% (+11.2)#3,497
76. Brooksville 16.6% 8.3% (+8.32)#76 5.5% (+11.1)#3,577
77. Glendale 16.6% 8.3% (+8.31)#77 5.5% (+11.1)#3,583
78. Amory 16.5% 8.3% (+8.29)#78 5.5% (+11.1)#3,588
79. Pontotoc 16.5% 8.3% (+8.23)#79 5.5% (+11.0)#3,615
80. Burnsville 16.1% 8.3% (+7.83)#80 5.5% (+10.6)#3,817
81. Duck Hill 16.1% 8.3% (+7.81)#81 5.5% (+10.6)#3,834
82. Poplarville 15.6% 8.3% (+7.38)#82 5.5% (+10.2)#4,050
83. Boyle 15.5% 8.3% (+7.21)#83 5.5% (+9.99)#4,122
84. Walnut Grove 15.4% 8.3% (+7.18)#84 5.5% (+9.96)#4,142
85. Polkville 15.4% 8.3% (+7.13)#85 5.5% (+9.92)#4,159
86. Ripley 15.2% 8.3% (+6.92)#86 5.5% (+9.70)#4,294
87. Rosedale 15.0% 8.3% (+6.79)#87 5.5% (+9.57)#4,380
88. Marietta 15.0% 8.3% (+6.75)#88 5.5% (+9.53)#4,410
89. Blue Springs 14.9% 8.3% (+6.65)#89 5.5% (+9.44)#4,469
90. Artesia 14.8% 8.3% (+6.59)#90 5.5% (+9.38)#4,507
91. Greenwood 14.6% 8.3% (+6.38)#91 5.5% (+9.16)#4,654
92. Hickory 14.5% 8.3% (+6.27)#92 5.5% (+9.06)#4,707
93. Coahoma 14.5% 8.3% (+6.26)#93 5.5% (+9.05)#4,713
94. Magnolia 14.5% 8.3% (+6.23)#94 5.5% (+9.02)#4,729
95. West Point 14.4% 8.3% (+6.12)#95 5.5% (+8.91)#4,783
96. Newton 14.0% 8.3% (+5.73)#96 5.5% (+8.51)#5,021
97. Kosciusko 13.8% 8.3% (+5.54)#97 5.5% (+8.33)#5,136
98. Batesville 13.8% 8.3% (+5.50)#98 5.5% (+8.29)#5,159
99. Georgetown 13.8% 8.3% (+5.50)#99 5.5% (+8.28)#5,169
100. Dumas 13.6% 8.3% (+5.38)#100 5.5% (+8.17)#5,243

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi are:
#1
56.7%
#2
44.7%
#3
39.5%
#4
38.9%
#5
38.5%
#6
36.2%
#7
35.8%
#8
35.7%
#9
34.4%
#10
33.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi?
Louise has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi with 56.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Mississippi?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Mississippi is 8.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.