Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. Stonewall 75.8% 44.2% (+31.6)#1 44.0% (+31.8)#46
2. Saluda 70.1% 44.2% (+25.9)#2 44.0% (+26.1)#163
3. Fearrington Village 68.1% 44.2% (+23.9)#3 44.0% (+24.1)#257
4. Rodanthe 67.3% 44.2% (+23.1)#4 44.0% (+23.3)#304
5. Bald Head Island 66.7% 44.2% (+22.5)#5 44.0% (+22.7)#340
6. Bethania 66.4% 44.2% (+22.2)#6 44.0% (+22.4)#358
7. River Road 64.3% 44.2% (+20.1)#7 44.0% (+20.3)#574
8. Carolina Shores 64.2% 44.2% (+20.0)#8 44.0% (+20.2)#598
9. Elm City 63.6% 44.2% (+19.4)#9 44.0% (+19.6)#679
10. Millers Creek 63.4% 44.2% (+19.2)#10 44.0% (+19.4)#715
11. Cypress Landing 63.3% 44.2% (+19.1)#11 44.0% (+19.3)#733
12. Lake Waccamaw 63.2% 44.2% (+19.0)#12 44.0% (+19.2)#756
13. Saxapahaw 63.1% 44.2% (+18.9)#13 44.0% (+19.1)#784
14. Wanchese 62.7% 44.2% (+18.5)#14 44.0% (+18.7)#827
15. Sunset Beach 62.5% 44.2% (+18.3)#15 44.0% (+18.5)#855
16. Laurel Park 62.3% 44.2% (+18.1)#16 44.0% (+18.3)#913
17. Cameron 61.9% 44.2% (+17.7)#17 44.0% (+17.9)#1,005
18. Altamahaw 61.9% 44.2% (+17.7)#18 44.0% (+17.9)#1,006
19. Ocean Isle Beach 61.7% 44.2% (+17.5)#19 44.0% (+17.7)#1,037
20. Valdese 61.5% 44.2% (+17.3)#20 44.0% (+17.5)#1,062
21. Sea Breeze 61.4% 44.2% (+17.2)#21 44.0% (+17.4)#1,101
22. Nags Head 61.3% 44.2% (+17.1)#22 44.0% (+17.3)#1,122
23. Bryson City 61.3% 44.2% (+17.1)#23 44.0% (+17.3)#1,131
24. Bessemer City 61.1% 44.2% (+16.9)#24 44.0% (+17.1)#1,187
25. Blowing Rock 60.6% 44.2% (+16.4)#25 44.0% (+16.6)#1,296
26. Angier 60.4% 44.2% (+16.2)#26 44.0% (+16.4)#1,338
27. Germanton 60.4% 44.2% (+16.2)#27 44.0% (+16.4)#1,357
28. Pine Knoll Shores 60.2% 44.2% (+16.0)#28 44.0% (+16.2)#1,420
29. Staley 60.2% 44.2% (+16.0)#29 44.0% (+16.2)#1,429
30. Pinehurst 59.7% 44.2% (+15.5)#30 44.0% (+15.7)#1,526
31. Oak Island 59.6% 44.2% (+15.4)#31 44.0% (+15.6)#1,543
32. Roseboro 59.6% 44.2% (+15.4)#32 44.0% (+15.6)#1,554
33. Foxfire 59.5% 44.2% (+15.3)#33 44.0% (+15.5)#1,580
34. Beech Mountain 59.5% 44.2% (+15.3)#34 44.0% (+15.5)#1,598
35. Hot Springs 59.5% 44.2% (+15.3)#35 44.0% (+15.5)#1,606
36. Southport 59.3% 44.2% (+15.1)#36 44.0% (+15.3)#1,663
37. St James 59.2% 44.2% (+15.0)#37 44.0% (+15.2)#1,690
38. Belwood 59.2% 44.2% (+15.0)#38 44.0% (+15.2)#1,713
39. Lake Lure 59.0% 44.2% (+14.8)#39 44.0% (+15.0)#1,768
40. Whiteville 58.8% 44.2% (+14.6)#40 44.0% (+14.8)#1,810
41. Conover 58.6% 44.2% (+14.4)#41 44.0% (+14.6)#1,855
42. Forest City 58.6% 44.2% (+14.4)#42 44.0% (+14.6)#1,857
43. Highlands 58.5% 44.2% (+14.3)#43 44.0% (+14.5)#1,900
44. Selma 58.4% 44.2% (+14.2)#44 44.0% (+14.4)#1,926
45. Fruitland 58.3% 44.2% (+14.1)#45 44.0% (+14.3)#1,955
46. Valley Hill 58.2% 44.2% (+14.0)#46 44.0% (+14.2)#2,010
47. Franklin 58.1% 44.2% (+13.9)#47 44.0% (+14.1)#2,042
48. Oriental 58.1% 44.2% (+13.9)#48 44.0% (+14.1)#2,062
49. Atlantic Beach 58.0% 44.2% (+13.8)#49 44.0% (+14.0)#2,089
50. Fairfield Harbour 57.8% 44.2% (+13.6)#50 44.0% (+13.8)#2,136
51. Minnesott Beach 57.8% 44.2% (+13.6)#51 44.0% (+13.8)#2,148
52. Yanceyville 57.7% 44.2% (+13.5)#52 44.0% (+13.7)#2,160
53. Ahoskie 57.5% 44.2% (+13.3)#53 44.0% (+13.5)#2,206
54. Beaufort 57.3% 44.2% (+13.1)#54 44.0% (+13.3)#2,299
55. Lake Junaluska 57.3% 44.2% (+13.1)#55 44.0% (+13.3)#2,304
56. Broad Creek 57.3% 44.2% (+13.1)#56 44.0% (+13.3)#2,309
57. Bath 57.3% 44.2% (+13.1)#57 44.0% (+13.3)#2,340
58. Holden Beach 57.2% 44.2% (+13.0)#58 44.0% (+13.2)#2,375
59. Southern Shores 57.1% 44.2% (+12.9)#59 44.0% (+13.1)#2,404
60. Harkers Island 57.0% 44.2% (+12.8)#60 44.0% (+13.0)#2,457
61. Littleton 56.8% 44.2% (+12.6)#61 44.0% (+12.8)#2,510
62. Stanfield 56.6% 44.2% (+12.4)#62 44.0% (+12.6)#2,560
63. Weaverville 56.4% 44.2% (+12.2)#63 44.0% (+12.4)#2,652
64. Governors 56.3% 44.2% (+12.1)#64 44.0% (+12.3)#2,704
65. King 56.2% 44.2% (+12.0)#65 44.0% (+12.2)#2,739
66. Royal Pines 56.2% 44.2% (+12.0)#66 44.0% (+12.2)#2,742
67. Wrightsville Beach 56.2% 44.2% (+12.0)#67 44.0% (+12.2)#2,747
68. Smithfield 56.1% 44.2% (+11.9)#68 44.0% (+12.1)#2,773
69. Bailey 56.1% 44.2% (+11.9)#69 44.0% (+12.1)#2,810
70. Black Mountain 56.0% 44.2% (+11.8)#70 44.0% (+12.0)#2,817
71. Locust 55.9% 44.2% (+11.7)#71 44.0% (+11.9)#2,856
72. Pine Level 55.8% 44.2% (+11.6)#72 44.0% (+11.8)#2,886
73. Robersonville 55.7% 44.2% (+11.5)#73 44.0% (+11.7)#2,915
74. Newton Grove 55.7% 44.2% (+11.5)#74 44.0% (+11.7)#2,926
75. Brices Creek 55.6% 44.2% (+11.4)#75 44.0% (+11.6)#2,943
76. Dillsboro 55.6% 44.2% (+11.4)#76 44.0% (+11.6)#2,969
77. Maggie Valley 55.5% 44.2% (+11.3)#77 44.0% (+11.5)#2,995
78. Red Cross 55.5% 44.2% (+11.3)#78 44.0% (+11.5)#3,022
79. Washington Park 55.5% 44.2% (+11.3)#79 44.0% (+11.5)#3,027
80. Rocky Mount 55.3% 44.2% (+11.1)#80 44.0% (+11.3)#3,086
81. Grandy 55.2% 44.2% (+11.0)#81 44.0% (+11.2)#3,155
82. Beulaville 55.2% 44.2% (+11.0)#82 44.0% (+11.2)#3,164
83. Kill Devil Hills 55.0% 44.2% (+10.8)#83 44.0% (+11.0)#3,227
84. Rutherfordton 55.0% 44.2% (+10.8)#84 44.0% (+11.0)#3,234
85. Marion 54.9% 44.2% (+10.7)#85 44.0% (+10.9)#3,258
86. West Canton 54.9% 44.2% (+10.7)#86 44.0% (+10.9)#3,278
87. Wentworth 54.5% 44.2% (+10.3)#87 44.0% (+10.5)#3,417
88. Duck 54.5% 44.2% (+10.3)#88 44.0% (+10.5)#3,440
89. Four Oaks 54.4% 44.2% (+10.2)#89 44.0% (+10.4)#3,486
90. Caswell Beach 54.4% 44.2% (+10.2)#90 44.0% (+10.4)#3,503
91. Dunn 54.2% 44.2% (+10.0)#91 44.0% (+10.2)#3,580
92. Waynesville 54.1% 44.2% (+9.90)#92 44.0% (+10.1)#3,617
93. Polkton 54.0% 44.2% (+9.80)#93 44.0% (+10.0)#3,669
94. Walkertown 53.9% 44.2% (+9.70)#94 44.0% (+9.90)#3,701
95. Cedar Rock 53.9% 44.2% (+9.70)#95 44.0% (+9.90)#3,719
96. North Topsail Beach 53.8% 44.2% (+9.60)#96 44.0% (+9.80)#3,739
97. Emerald Isle 53.6% 44.2% (+9.40)#97 44.0% (+9.60)#3,817
98. Governors Club 53.6% 44.2% (+9.40)#98 44.0% (+9.60)#3,828
99. Sugar Mountain 53.5% 44.2% (+9.30)#99 44.0% (+9.50)#3,896
100. Carolina Beach 53.3% 44.2% (+9.10)#100 44.0% (+9.30)#3,987

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina?
Stonewall has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina with 75.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Carolina is 44.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.