Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. Prestonsburg 83.2% 44.2% (+39.0)#1 44.0% (+39.2)#10
2. Lebanon 81.4% 44.2% (+37.2)#2 44.0% (+37.4)#14
3. Salyersville 71.1% 44.2% (+26.9)#3 44.0% (+27.1)#123
4. Morganfield 68.3% 44.2% (+24.1)#4 44.0% (+24.3)#238
5. Edmonton 68.1% 44.2% (+23.9)#5 44.0% (+24.1)#259
6. Sandy Hook 67.2% 44.2% (+23.0)#6 44.0% (+23.2)#307
7. Ten Broeck 66.5% 44.2% (+22.3)#7 44.0% (+22.5)#353
8. Lewisport 66.2% 44.2% (+22.0)#8 44.0% (+22.2)#375
9. Sanders 65.5% 44.2% (+21.3)#9 44.0% (+21.5)#434
10. Campbellsville 65.4% 44.2% (+21.2)#10 44.0% (+21.4)#441
11. Warsaw 65.1% 44.2% (+20.9)#11 44.0% (+21.1)#492
12. Creekside 64.5% 44.2% (+20.3)#12 44.0% (+20.5)#554
13. Gamaliel 64.4% 44.2% (+20.2)#13 44.0% (+20.4)#570
14. New Haven 64.3% 44.2% (+20.1)#14 44.0% (+20.3)#584
15. Camargo 64.0% 44.2% (+19.8)#15 44.0% (+20.0)#636
16. Calhoun 63.3% 44.2% (+19.1)#16 44.0% (+19.3)#736
17. Cadiz 62.5% 44.2% (+18.3)#17 44.0% (+18.5)#857
18. Livermore 62.5% 44.2% (+18.3)#18 44.0% (+18.5)#866
19. Hustonville 62.3% 44.2% (+18.1)#19 44.0% (+18.3)#926
20. Catlettsburg 62.1% 44.2% (+17.9)#20 44.0% (+18.1)#962
21. Hindman 62.1% 44.2% (+17.9)#21 44.0% (+18.1)#972
22. Strathmoor Manor 62.0% 44.2% (+17.8)#22 44.0% (+18.0)#990
23. Taylorsville 61.8% 44.2% (+17.6)#23 44.0% (+17.8)#1,011
24. North Middletown 61.8% 44.2% (+17.6)#24 44.0% (+17.8)#1,018
25. Willisburg 61.3% 44.2% (+17.1)#25 44.0% (+17.3)#1,145
26. Smiths Grove 61.1% 44.2% (+16.9)#26 44.0% (+17.1)#1,207
27. Maysville 60.9% 44.2% (+16.7)#27 44.0% (+16.9)#1,236
28. Hendron 60.9% 44.2% (+16.7)#28 44.0% (+16.9)#1,238
29. Glasgow 60.4% 44.2% (+16.2)#29 44.0% (+16.4)#1,336
30. Science Hill 60.1% 44.2% (+15.9)#30 44.0% (+16.1)#1,460
31. Verona 59.7% 44.2% (+15.5)#31 44.0% (+15.7)#1,536
32. Whitesburg 59.5% 44.2% (+15.3)#32 44.0% (+15.5)#1,574
33. Sturgis 58.7% 44.2% (+14.5)#33 44.0% (+14.7)#1,849
34. Bellewood 58.3% 44.2% (+14.1)#34 44.0% (+14.3)#1,988
35. Rineyville 58.1% 44.2% (+13.9)#35 44.0% (+14.1)#2,047
36. Oakbrook 58.0% 44.2% (+13.8)#36 44.0% (+14.0)#2,076
37. Walton 58.0% 44.2% (+13.8)#37 44.0% (+14.0)#2,079
38. Ghent 57.5% 44.2% (+13.3)#38 44.0% (+13.5)#2,244
39. Fincastle 57.0% 44.2% (+12.8)#39 44.0% (+13.0)#2,460
40. Prospect 56.4% 44.2% (+12.2)#40 44.0% (+12.4)#2,651
41. Burkesville 56.4% 44.2% (+12.2)#41 44.0% (+12.4)#2,668
42. Simpsonville 56.3% 44.2% (+12.1)#42 44.0% (+12.3)#2,703
43. Ryland Heights 56.3% 44.2% (+12.1)#43 44.0% (+12.3)#2,715
44. Glenview 56.3% 44.2% (+12.1)#44 44.0% (+12.3)#2,724
45. Westwood 56.3% 44.2% (+12.1)#45 44.0% (+12.3)#2,726
46. Stamping Ground 56.1% 44.2% (+11.9)#46 44.0% (+12.1)#2,806
47. Pleasureville 56.0% 44.2% (+11.8)#47 44.0% (+12.0)#2,838
48. Green Spring 55.6% 44.2% (+11.4)#48 44.0% (+11.6)#2,964
49. Forest Hills 55.5% 44.2% (+11.3)#49 44.0% (+11.5)#3,029
50. Owingsville 55.4% 44.2% (+11.2)#50 44.0% (+11.4)#3,070
51. Bellemeade 55.4% 44.2% (+11.2)#51 44.0% (+11.4)#3,077
52. Douglass Hills 55.3% 44.2% (+11.1)#52 44.0% (+11.3)#3,093
53. Oakland 55.3% 44.2% (+11.1)#53 44.0% (+11.3)#3,130
54. Mayfield 55.1% 44.2% (+10.9)#54 44.0% (+11.1)#3,188
55. Manchester 54.8% 44.2% (+10.6)#55 44.0% (+10.8)#3,300
56. Briarwood 54.5% 44.2% (+10.3)#56 44.0% (+10.5)#3,452
57. Barbourville 54.3% 44.2% (+10.1)#57 44.0% (+10.3)#3,532
58. Munfordville 54.3% 44.2% (+10.1)#58 44.0% (+10.3)#3,542
59. Langdon Place 54.3% 44.2% (+10.1)#59 44.0% (+10.3)#3,552
60. Fleming Neon 54.3% 44.2% (+10.1)#60 44.0% (+10.3)#3,554
61. Nicholasville 54.0% 44.2% (+9.80)#61 44.0% (+10.0)#3,655
62. Leitchfield 54.0% 44.2% (+9.80)#62 44.0% (+10.0)#3,661
63. Bedford 53.9% 44.2% (+9.70)#63 44.0% (+9.90)#3,720
64. Pewee Valley 53.8% 44.2% (+9.60)#64 44.0% (+9.80)#3,731
65. Norwood 53.8% 44.2% (+9.60)#65 44.0% (+9.80)#3,747
66. Versailles 53.7% 44.2% (+9.50)#66 44.0% (+9.70)#3,759
67. Mockingbird Valley 53.5% 44.2% (+9.30)#67 44.0% (+9.50)#3,909
68. Albany 53.4% 44.2% (+9.20)#68 44.0% (+9.40)#3,941
69. Glenview Hills 53.2% 44.2% (+9.00)#69 44.0% (+9.20)#4,106
70. Falmouth 53.1% 44.2% (+8.90)#70 44.0% (+9.10)#4,133
71. Campbellsburg 53.1% 44.2% (+8.90)#71 44.0% (+9.10)#4,147
72. Seneca Gardens 53.0% 44.2% (+8.80)#72 44.0% (+9.00)#4,191
73. Hickman 52.8% 44.2% (+8.60)#73 44.0% (+8.80)#4,264
74. Coal Run Village 52.6% 44.2% (+8.40)#74 44.0% (+8.60)#4,367
75. Kingsley 52.6% 44.2% (+8.40)#75 44.0% (+8.60)#4,377
76. Perryville 52.5% 44.2% (+8.30)#76 44.0% (+8.50)#4,431
77. Grand Rivers 52.5% 44.2% (+8.30)#77 44.0% (+8.50)#4,455
78. Lakeview Heights 52.5% 44.2% (+8.30)#78 44.0% (+8.50)#4,461
79. Thornhill 52.5% 44.2% (+8.30)#79 44.0% (+8.50)#4,474
80. Monticello 52.2% 44.2% (+8.00)#80 44.0% (+8.20)#4,620
81. Russell 52.2% 44.2% (+8.00)#81 44.0% (+8.20)#4,627
82. Hazard 52.1% 44.2% (+7.90)#82 44.0% (+8.10)#4,675
83. Sharpsburg 52.1% 44.2% (+7.90)#83 44.0% (+8.10)#4,710
84. Cambridge 52.1% 44.2% (+7.90)#84 44.0% (+8.10)#4,714
85. Brownsboro Farm 51.8% 44.2% (+7.60)#85 44.0% (+7.80)#4,853
86. Trenton 51.6% 44.2% (+7.40)#86 44.0% (+7.60)#4,968
87. Reidland 51.5% 44.2% (+7.30)#87 44.0% (+7.50)#4,988
88. Northfield 51.5% 44.2% (+7.30)#88 44.0% (+7.50)#5,027
89. Fox Chase 51.5% 44.2% (+7.30)#89 44.0% (+7.50)#5,040
90. Auburn 51.3% 44.2% (+7.10)#90 44.0% (+7.30)#5,170
91. Philpot 51.2% 44.2% (+7.00)#91 44.0% (+7.20)#5,247
92. Benton 50.8% 44.2% (+6.60)#92 44.0% (+6.80)#5,467
93. Jeffersonville 50.6% 44.2% (+6.40)#93 44.0% (+6.60)#5,638
94. Union 50.5% 44.2% (+6.30)#94 44.0% (+6.50)#5,674
95. Murray Hill 50.5% 44.2% (+6.30)#95 44.0% (+6.50)#5,737
96. Middletown 50.3% 44.2% (+6.10)#96 44.0% (+6.30)#5,839
97. Hazel 50.3% 44.2% (+6.10)#97 44.0% (+6.30)#5,901
98. Williamstown 50.2% 44.2% (+6.00)#98 44.0% (+6.20)#5,943
99. Norbourne Estates 50.0% 44.2% (+5.80)#99 44.0% (+6.00)#6,075
100. Goose Creek 50.0% 44.2% (+5.80)#100 44.0% (+6.00)#6,081

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky are:
#1
83.2%
#2
81.4%
#3
71.1%
#4
68.3%
#5
68.1%
#6
67.2%
#7
66.5%
#8
66.2%
#9
65.5%
#10
65.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky?
Prestonsburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky with 83.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Kentucky is 44.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.