Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. New Leipzig 76.3% 45.0% (+31.3)#1 44.0% (+32.3)#37
2. Tolna 72.3% 45.0% (+27.3)#2 44.0% (+28.3)#93
3. Golden Valley 71.3% 45.0% (+26.3)#3 44.0% (+27.3)#109
4. Elgin 68.6% 45.0% (+23.6)#4 44.0% (+24.6)#228
5. Lehr 66.1% 45.0% (+21.1)#5 44.0% (+22.1)#389
6. Towner 63.7% 45.0% (+18.7)#6 44.0% (+19.7)#675
7. Maddock 63.5% 45.0% (+18.5)#7 44.0% (+19.5)#701
8. Lisbon 62.8% 45.0% (+17.8)#8 44.0% (+18.8)#813
9. Killdeer 61.6% 45.0% (+16.6)#9 44.0% (+17.6)#1,054
10. Verona 61.3% 45.0% (+16.3)#10 44.0% (+17.3)#1,153
11. Neche 60.5% 45.0% (+15.5)#11 44.0% (+16.5)#1,326
12. Christine 60.2% 45.0% (+15.2)#12 44.0% (+16.2)#1,438
13. Fingal 60.0% 45.0% (+15.0)#13 44.0% (+16.0)#1,495
14. New Rockford 59.5% 45.0% (+14.5)#14 44.0% (+15.5)#1,584
15. Bowbells 59.5% 45.0% (+14.5)#15 44.0% (+15.5)#1,615
16. Marion 58.4% 45.0% (+13.4)#16 44.0% (+14.4)#1,942
17. Portland 58.3% 45.0% (+13.3)#17 44.0% (+14.3)#1,978
18. Jamestown 57.7% 45.0% (+12.7)#18 44.0% (+13.7)#2,152
19. Drayton 57.4% 45.0% (+12.4)#19 44.0% (+13.4)#2,278
20. Wahpeton 57.3% 45.0% (+12.3)#20 44.0% (+13.3)#2,293
21. Hettinger 57.2% 45.0% (+12.2)#21 44.0% (+13.2)#2,374
22. Westhope 57.0% 45.0% (+12.0)#22 44.0% (+13.0)#2,463
23. Hazelton 56.8% 45.0% (+11.8)#23 44.0% (+12.8)#2,518
24. Max 56.3% 45.0% (+11.3)#24 44.0% (+12.3)#2,732
25. Steele 56.2% 45.0% (+11.2)#25 44.0% (+12.2)#2,764
26. Horace 56.0% 45.0% (+11.0)#26 44.0% (+12.0)#2,825
27. Mohall 55.9% 45.0% (+10.9)#27 44.0% (+11.9)#2,871
28. Thompson 55.3% 45.0% (+10.3)#28 44.0% (+11.3)#3,116
29. Gilby 55.3% 45.0% (+10.3)#29 44.0% (+11.3)#3,125
30. Casselton 54.5% 45.0% (+9.50)#30 44.0% (+10.5)#3,418
31. Langdon 54.4% 45.0% (+9.40)#31 44.0% (+10.4)#3,493
32. Pembina 53.5% 45.0% (+8.50)#32 44.0% (+9.50)#3,895
33. Underwood 53.3% 45.0% (+8.30)#33 44.0% (+9.30)#4,046
34. Reile S Acres 53.2% 45.0% (+8.20)#34 44.0% (+9.20)#4,098
35. Hatton 52.8% 45.0% (+7.80)#35 44.0% (+8.80)#4,281
36. Rugby 52.6% 45.0% (+7.60)#36 44.0% (+8.60)#4,361
37. Hunter 52.5% 45.0% (+7.50)#37 44.0% (+8.50)#4,467
38. Napoleon 52.3% 45.0% (+7.30)#38 44.0% (+8.30)#4,584
39. Harwood 51.8% 45.0% (+6.80)#39 44.0% (+7.80)#4,849
40. Oakes 51.5% 45.0% (+6.50)#40 44.0% (+7.50)#5,008
41. Frontier 51.5% 45.0% (+6.50)#41 44.0% (+7.50)#5,062
42. Granville 50.8% 45.0% (+5.80)#42 44.0% (+6.80)#5,511
43. Hillsboro 50.5% 45.0% (+5.50)#43 44.0% (+6.50)#5,706
44. Washburn 50.5% 45.0% (+5.50)#44 44.0% (+6.50)#5,710
45. Linton 50.3% 45.0% (+5.30)#45 44.0% (+6.30)#5,889
46. Parshall 50.1% 45.0% (+5.10)#46 44.0% (+6.10)#6,020
47. Oxbow 49.7% 45.0% (+4.70)#47 44.0% (+5.70)#6,256
48. Wing 49.6% 45.0% (+4.60)#48 44.0% (+5.60)#6,337
49. Wishek 48.9% 45.0% (+3.90)#49 44.0% (+4.90)#6,838
50. Mandan 48.7% 45.0% (+3.70)#50 44.0% (+4.70)#6,934
51. Wilton 48.5% 45.0% (+3.50)#51 44.0% (+4.50)#7,178
52. Arthur 48.5% 45.0% (+3.50)#52 44.0% (+4.50)#7,196
53. New Salem 48.3% 45.0% (+3.30)#53 44.0% (+4.30)#7,346
54. Cannon Ball 48.2% 45.0% (+3.20)#54 44.0% (+4.20)#7,425
55. Dickinson 47.6% 45.0% (+2.60)#55 44.0% (+3.60)#7,821
56. Gackle 47.5% 45.0% (+2.50)#56 44.0% (+3.50)#7,980
57. Glenburn 47.0% 45.0% (+2.00)#57 44.0% (+3.00)#8,333
58. Lidgerwood 46.9% 45.0% (+1.90)#58 44.0% (+2.90)#8,396
59. Bismarck 46.7% 45.0% (+1.70)#59 44.0% (+2.70)#8,497
60. Litchville 46.5% 45.0% (+1.50)#60 44.0% (+2.50)#8,755
61. Gladstone 46.4% 45.0% (+1.40)#61 44.0% (+2.40)#8,825
62. Burlington 46.3% 45.0% (+1.30)#62 44.0% (+2.30)#8,882
63. Kulm 46.2% 45.0% (+1.20)#63 44.0% (+2.20)#8,977
64. Edgeley 45.3% 45.0% (+0.300)#64 44.0% (+1.30)#9,711
65. Belfield 45.2% 45.0% (+0.200)#65 44.0% (+1.20)#9,787
66. Hazen 44.7% 45.0% (-0.300)#66 44.0% (+0.700)#10,155
67. Lincoln 43.4% 45.0% (-1.60)#67 44.0% (-0.600)#11,167
68. Ashley 43.2% 45.0% (-1.80)#68 44.0% (-0.800)#11,381
69. Walcott 43.0% 45.0% (-2.00)#69 44.0% (-1.00)#11,525
70. Leonard 42.0% 45.0% (-3.00)#70 44.0% (-2.00)#12,315
71. Berthold 41.7% 45.0% (-3.30)#71 44.0% (-2.30)#12,572
72. Colfax 41.3% 45.0% (-3.70)#72 44.0% (-2.70)#12,901
73. Ray 41.2% 45.0% (-3.80)#73 44.0% (-2.80)#12,957
74. White Shield 40.5% 45.0% (-4.50)#74 44.0% (-3.50)#13,465
75. Devils Lake 40.3% 45.0% (-4.70)#75 44.0% (-3.70)#13,566
76. Stanley 40.1% 45.0% (-4.90)#76 44.0% (-3.90)#13,691
77. Cooperstown 39.8% 45.0% (-5.20)#77 44.0% (-4.20)#13,889
78. Fargo 39.3% 45.0% (-5.70)#78 44.0% (-4.70)#14,165
79. Davenport 39.3% 45.0% (-5.70)#79 44.0% (-4.70)#14,214
80. Ellendale 39.2% 45.0% (-5.80)#80 44.0% (-4.80)#14,248
81. Kindred 39.0% 45.0% (-6.00)#81 44.0% (-5.00)#14,325
82. Richardton 39.0% 45.0% (-6.00)#82 44.0% (-5.00)#14,330
83. West Fargo 38.9% 45.0% (-6.10)#83 44.0% (-5.10)#14,345
84. Abercrombie 38.5% 45.0% (-6.50)#84 44.0% (-5.50)#14,704
85. Turtle Lake 37.6% 45.0% (-7.40)#85 44.0% (-6.40)#15,127
86. Carrington 37.5% 45.0% (-7.50)#86 44.0% (-6.50)#15,167
87. Mott 37.2% 45.0% (-7.80)#87 44.0% (-6.80)#15,321
88. Grand Forks 37.1% 45.0% (-7.90)#88 44.0% (-6.90)#15,326
89. Williston 37.0% 45.0% (-8.00)#89 44.0% (-7.00)#15,357
90. Flasher 36.9% 45.0% (-8.10)#90 44.0% (-7.10)#15,442
91. Bottineau 36.8% 45.0% (-8.20)#91 44.0% (-7.20)#15,482
92. Wyndmere 36.6% 45.0% (-8.40)#92 44.0% (-7.40)#15,597
93. Park River 36.2% 45.0% (-8.80)#93 44.0% (-7.80)#15,747
94. New England 35.9% 45.0% (-9.10)#94 44.0% (-8.10)#15,874
95. Surrey 35.8% 45.0% (-9.20)#95 44.0% (-8.20)#15,907
96. Minot 35.7% 45.0% (-9.30)#96 44.0% (-8.30)#15,940
97. Argusville 35.6% 45.0% (-9.40)#97 44.0% (-8.40)#16,014
98. Cando 35.5% 45.0% (-9.50)#98 44.0% (-8.50)#16,046
99. Valley City 35.2% 45.0% (-9.80)#99 44.0% (-8.80)#16,149
100. Strasburg 35.2% 45.0% (-9.80)#100 44.0% (-8.80)#16,160

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota are:
#1
76.3%
#2
72.3%
#3
71.3%
#4
68.6%
#5
66.1%
#6
63.7%
#7
63.5%
#8
62.8%
#9
61.6%
#10
61.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota?
New Leipzig has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota with 76.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in North Dakota is 45.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.