Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Chalybeate 100.0% 5.2% (+94.8)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#31
2. Tillatoba 65.8% 5.2% (+60.6)#2 5.0% (+60.8)#79
3. Grace 56.4% 5.2% (+51.2)#3 5.0% (+51.4)#115
4. Buckatunna 56.2% 5.2% (+51.0)#4 5.0% (+51.3)#117
5. Foxworth 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#5 5.0% (+45.0)#164
6. State Line 40.4% 5.2% (+35.2)#6 5.0% (+35.4)#274
7. Mclain 36.6% 5.2% (+31.4)#7 5.0% (+31.6)#350
8. Mount Pleasant 27.9% 5.2% (+22.7)#8 5.0% (+22.9)#648
9. Hamilton 25.2% 5.2% (+20.0)#9 5.0% (+20.2)#817
10. Mantee 24.8% 5.2% (+19.6)#10 5.0% (+19.8)#856
11. Seminary 24.5% 5.2% (+19.3)#11 5.0% (+19.5)#875
12. Beauregard 24.2% 5.2% (+19.0)#12 5.0% (+19.2)#903
13. Baxterville 23.3% 5.2% (+18.1)#13 5.0% (+18.3)#985
14. Escatawpa 23.1% 5.2% (+17.9)#14 5.0% (+18.1)#995
15. Bolton 22.4% 5.2% (+17.2)#15 5.0% (+17.4)#1,081
16. Ethel 22.2% 5.2% (+17.0)#16 5.0% (+17.2)#1,095
17. Maben 21.9% 5.2% (+16.7)#17 5.0% (+16.9)#1,144
18. Saucier 18.5% 5.2% (+13.3)#18 5.0% (+13.5)#1,621
19. Satartia 18.5% 5.2% (+13.3)#19 5.0% (+13.5)#1,624
20. Brooksville 18.3% 5.2% (+13.1)#20 5.0% (+13.3)#1,665
21. Glendale 18.0% 5.2% (+12.7)#21 5.0% (+13.0)#1,748
22. Georgetown 17.5% 5.2% (+12.3)#22 5.0% (+12.5)#1,839
23. Robinhood 17.5% 5.2% (+12.3)#23 5.0% (+12.5)#1,846
24. Roxie 17.3% 5.2% (+12.1)#24 5.0% (+12.3)#1,884
25. Conehatta 17.0% 5.2% (+11.8)#25 5.0% (+12.0)#1,954
26. Verona 16.9% 5.2% (+11.7)#26 5.0% (+11.9)#1,984
27. Vaiden 16.2% 5.2% (+11.0)#27 5.0% (+11.2)#2,183
28. Belzoni 15.8% 5.2% (+10.6)#28 5.0% (+10.8)#2,286
29. Woodville 15.3% 5.2% (+10.1)#29 5.0% (+10.3)#2,446
30. Silver Creek 15.2% 5.2% (+10.00)#30 5.0% (+10.2)#2,475
31. Oakland 15.0% 5.2% (+9.82)#31 5.0% (+10.1)#2,531
32. Vancleave 14.8% 5.2% (+9.62)#32 5.0% (+9.84)#2,607
33. Terry 14.0% 5.2% (+8.74)#33 5.0% (+8.97)#2,932
34. Darling 13.7% 5.2% (+8.50)#34 5.0% (+8.73)#3,043
35. Purvis 13.7% 5.2% (+8.47)#35 5.0% (+8.70)#3,057
36. Helena 13.7% 5.2% (+8.46)#36 5.0% (+8.69)#3,060
37. Isola 13.6% 5.2% (+8.35)#37 5.0% (+8.58)#3,106
38. Magee 13.4% 5.2% (+8.14)#38 5.0% (+8.37)#3,206
39. Rolling Fork 13.2% 5.2% (+7.93)#39 5.0% (+8.16)#3,310
40. Hickory 12.8% 5.2% (+7.63)#40 5.0% (+7.86)#3,463
41. Pearlington 12.7% 5.2% (+7.51)#41 5.0% (+7.74)#3,524
42. Puckett 12.6% 5.2% (+7.35)#42 5.0% (+7.58)#3,593
43. Farmington 12.3% 5.2% (+7.03)#43 5.0% (+7.26)#3,781
44. Carthage 11.8% 5.2% (+6.58)#44 5.0% (+6.81)#4,050
45. Gautier 11.4% 5.2% (+6.21)#45 5.0% (+6.44)#4,315
46. Paden 11.4% 5.2% (+6.21)#46 5.0% (+6.43)#4,325
47. Metcalfe 11.2% 5.2% (+5.96)#47 5.0% (+6.18)#4,507
48. Forest 11.2% 5.2% (+5.95)#48 5.0% (+6.18)#4,518
49. Standing Pine 11.1% 5.2% (+5.89)#49 5.0% (+6.12)#4,569
50. Bassfield 10.9% 5.2% (+5.65)#50 5.0% (+5.88)#4,768
51. Nicholson 10.9% 5.2% (+5.65)#51 5.0% (+5.87)#4,774
52. Belmont 10.7% 5.2% (+5.50)#52 5.0% (+5.73)#4,882
53. Eupora 10.7% 5.2% (+5.47)#53 5.0% (+5.70)#4,913
54. Taylor 10.5% 5.2% (+5.26)#54 5.0% (+5.49)#5,087
55. Pascagoula 10.4% 5.2% (+5.14)#55 5.0% (+5.36)#5,202
56. Big Point 9.6% 5.2% (+4.35)#56 5.0% (+4.57)#5,989
57. Macon 9.5% 5.2% (+4.26)#57 5.0% (+4.49)#6,091
58. Byhalia 9.5% 5.2% (+4.26)#58 5.0% (+4.49)#6,095
59. Pace 9.0% 5.2% (+3.75)#59 5.0% (+3.98)#6,674
60. Louin 8.9% 5.2% (+3.67)#60 5.0% (+3.89)#6,764
61. Lena 8.8% 5.2% (+3.55)#61 5.0% (+3.78)#6,931
62. Tutwiler 8.7% 5.2% (+3.53)#62 5.0% (+3.76)#6,950
63. Mize 8.7% 5.2% (+3.52)#63 5.0% (+3.74)#6,971
64. West Hattiesburg 8.7% 5.2% (+3.46)#64 5.0% (+3.69)#7,054
65. Hurley 8.6% 5.2% (+3.35)#65 5.0% (+3.58)#7,202
66. Pope 8.5% 5.2% (+3.29)#66 5.0% (+3.52)#7,306
67. Sidon 8.5% 5.2% (+3.29)#67 5.0% (+3.52)#7,312
68. D Iberville 8.5% 5.2% (+3.29)#68 5.0% (+3.51)#7,314
69. Sunflower 8.4% 5.2% (+3.21)#69 5.0% (+3.43)#7,417
70. Hollandale 8.4% 5.2% (+3.15)#70 5.0% (+3.37)#7,497
71. Braxton 8.2% 5.2% (+3.00)#71 5.0% (+3.23)#7,715
72. Sturgis 8.2% 5.2% (+3.00)#72 5.0% (+3.23)#7,716
73. Waveland 8.1% 5.2% (+2.91)#73 5.0% (+3.14)#7,857
74. Polkville 8.1% 5.2% (+2.86)#74 5.0% (+3.08)#7,941
75. Caledonia 8.0% 5.2% (+2.82)#75 5.0% (+3.04)#7,989
76. Tylertown 7.9% 5.2% (+2.69)#76 5.0% (+2.92)#8,187
77. Lake 7.7% 5.2% (+2.47)#77 5.0% (+2.70)#8,545
78. Sylvarena 7.7% 5.2% (+2.47)#78 5.0% (+2.70)#8,569
79. Port Gibson 7.7% 5.2% (+2.43)#79 5.0% (+2.66)#8,630
80. Crenshaw 7.6% 5.2% (+2.34)#80 5.0% (+2.57)#8,784
81. Fayette 7.5% 5.2% (+2.24)#81 5.0% (+2.47)#8,938
82. Crowder 7.5% 5.2% (+2.23)#82 5.0% (+2.46)#8,965
83. Waynesboro 7.4% 5.2% (+2.23)#83 5.0% (+2.45)#8,972
84. Sardis 7.3% 5.2% (+2.12)#84 5.0% (+2.34)#9,177
85. Columbia 7.3% 5.2% (+2.04)#85 5.0% (+2.27)#9,295
86. Morton 7.1% 5.2% (+1.90)#86 5.0% (+2.13)#9,539
87. Toccopola 7.1% 5.2% (+1.87)#87 5.0% (+2.10)#9,598
88. Florence 6.8% 5.2% (+1.61)#88 5.0% (+1.84)#10,083
89. Richton 6.8% 5.2% (+1.55)#89 5.0% (+1.78)#10,176
90. Fulton 6.7% 5.2% (+1.51)#90 5.0% (+1.73)#10,263
91. Schlater 6.7% 5.2% (+1.45)#91 5.0% (+1.67)#10,402
92. Kilmichael 6.6% 5.2% (+1.34)#92 5.0% (+1.57)#10,612
93. Dumas 6.5% 5.2% (+1.27)#93 5.0% (+1.50)#10,765
94. Moss Point 6.5% 5.2% (+1.24)#94 5.0% (+1.47)#10,846
95. Gulf Hills 6.5% 5.2% (+1.23)#95 5.0% (+1.46)#10,855
96. Lakeview 6.5% 5.2% (+1.23)#96 5.0% (+1.46)#10,861
97. Sebastopol 6.5% 5.2% (+1.23)#97 5.0% (+1.46)#10,867
98. Golden 6.4% 5.2% (+1.20)#98 5.0% (+1.43)#10,928
99. Courtland 6.4% 5.2% (+1.20)#99 5.0% (+1.42)#10,933
100. Lynchburg 6.4% 5.2% (+1.19)#100 5.0% (+1.42)#10,942

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi are:
#1
65.8%
#2
56.2%
#3
50.0%
#4
40.4%
#5
36.6%
#6
25.2%
#7
24.8%
#8
24.5%
#9
24.2%
#10
23.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi?
Tillatoba has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi with 65.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Mississippi?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Mississippi is 5.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.