Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Cullomburg 66.0% 5.2% (+60.8)#1 5.0% (+61.0)#77
2. Benton 58.8% 5.2% (+53.6)#2 5.0% (+53.8)#103
3. Abanda 45.0% 5.2% (+39.8)#3 5.0% (+40.0)#220
4. Valley Head 38.4% 5.2% (+33.2)#4 5.0% (+33.4)#307
5. Altoona 32.3% 5.2% (+27.1)#5 5.0% (+27.3)#465
6. Fruitdale 32.1% 5.2% (+26.9)#6 5.0% (+27.1)#473
7. Hanover 28.7% 5.2% (+23.5)#7 5.0% (+23.7)#603
8. Gilbertown 27.9% 5.2% (+22.7)#8 5.0% (+22.9)#649
9. Mentone 25.5% 5.2% (+20.3)#9 5.0% (+20.5)#802
10. Waldo 23.0% 5.2% (+17.8)#10 5.0% (+18.0)#1,013
11. Billingsley 21.7% 5.2% (+16.5)#11 5.0% (+16.7)#1,161
12. Coffeeville 21.6% 5.2% (+16.4)#12 5.0% (+16.6)#1,177
13. Vincent 21.1% 5.2% (+15.9)#13 5.0% (+16.1)#1,228
14. Nectar 21.0% 5.2% (+15.8)#14 5.0% (+16.0)#1,242
15. Lynn 20.8% 5.2% (+15.6)#15 5.0% (+15.8)#1,276
16. Hurtsboro 20.7% 5.2% (+15.5)#16 5.0% (+15.7)#1,283
17. Lipscomb 20.7% 5.2% (+15.4)#17 5.0% (+15.7)#1,289
18. Snead 20.3% 5.2% (+15.1)#18 5.0% (+15.3)#1,329
19. Holt 19.8% 5.2% (+14.6)#19 5.0% (+14.8)#1,400
20. Semmes 19.7% 5.2% (+14.5)#20 5.0% (+14.7)#1,410
21. Onycha 19.6% 5.2% (+14.4)#21 5.0% (+14.6)#1,428
22. White Hall 19.5% 5.2% (+14.3)#22 5.0% (+14.5)#1,453
23. Baileyton 19.4% 5.2% (+14.2)#23 5.0% (+14.4)#1,467
24. Fayetteville 19.3% 5.2% (+14.1)#24 5.0% (+14.3)#1,491
25. Steele 19.2% 5.2% (+14.0)#25 5.0% (+14.2)#1,504
26. Lookout Mountain 19.0% 5.2% (+13.8)#26 5.0% (+14.0)#1,540
27. Goldville 18.9% 5.2% (+13.7)#27 5.0% (+13.9)#1,551
28. Lester 18.3% 5.2% (+13.1)#28 5.0% (+13.3)#1,657
29. West Jefferson 17.8% 5.2% (+12.6)#29 5.0% (+12.8)#1,789
30. Carbon Hill 17.6% 5.2% (+12.4)#30 5.0% (+12.6)#1,825
31. Brundidge 17.3% 5.2% (+12.1)#31 5.0% (+12.3)#1,889
32. Cusseta 17.3% 5.2% (+12.1)#32 5.0% (+12.3)#1,890
33. Ladonia 17.2% 5.2% (+12.0)#33 5.0% (+12.2)#1,915
34. Eunola 17.1% 5.2% (+11.9)#34 5.0% (+12.1)#1,940
35. Libertyville 16.9% 5.2% (+11.7)#35 5.0% (+12.0)#1,977
36. Henagar 16.6% 5.2% (+11.4)#36 5.0% (+11.6)#2,072
37. Weaver 16.5% 5.2% (+11.3)#37 5.0% (+11.6)#2,086
38. Mulga 16.4% 5.2% (+11.2)#38 5.0% (+11.4)#2,137
39. Cedar Bluff 16.2% 5.2% (+11.0)#39 5.0% (+11.2)#2,168
40. Minor 16.2% 5.2% (+10.9)#40 5.0% (+11.2)#2,192
41. Sipsey 16.1% 5.2% (+10.9)#41 5.0% (+11.1)#2,198
42. Slocomb 16.1% 5.2% (+10.8)#42 5.0% (+11.1)#2,223
43. Talladega Springs 16.0% 5.2% (+10.8)#43 5.0% (+11.0)#2,230
44. Rogersville 15.6% 5.2% (+10.4)#44 5.0% (+10.7)#2,340
45. Rock Mills 15.6% 5.2% (+10.4)#45 5.0% (+10.6)#2,343
46. Hokes Bluff 15.6% 5.2% (+10.4)#46 5.0% (+10.6)#2,362
47. Malvern 15.4% 5.2% (+10.2)#47 5.0% (+10.4)#2,399
48. Creola 15.3% 5.2% (+10.1)#48 5.0% (+10.3)#2,443
49. River Falls 15.2% 5.2% (+9.96)#49 5.0% (+10.2)#2,494
50. Fruithurst 14.4% 5.2% (+9.24)#50 5.0% (+9.45)#2,762
51. Millry 14.4% 5.2% (+9.17)#51 5.0% (+9.38)#2,781
52. Allgood 14.2% 5.2% (+8.96)#52 5.0% (+9.17)#2,858
53. Horn Hill 14.1% 5.2% (+8.88)#53 5.0% (+9.09)#2,889
54. Rosa 13.9% 5.2% (+8.66)#54 5.0% (+8.87)#2,987
55. Shelby 13.8% 5.2% (+8.61)#55 5.0% (+8.82)#3,010
56. Hobson City 13.7% 5.2% (+8.48)#56 5.0% (+8.69)#3,059
57. Hackneyville 13.6% 5.2% (+8.43)#57 5.0% (+8.64)#3,080
58. Red Level 13.6% 5.2% (+8.43)#58 5.0% (+8.64)#3,081
59. Sanford 13.6% 5.2% (+8.37)#59 5.0% (+8.59)#3,102
60. Arley 13.6% 5.2% (+8.37)#60 5.0% (+8.58)#3,105
61. Paint Rock 13.5% 5.2% (+8.33)#61 5.0% (+8.55)#3,128
62. Lillian 13.3% 5.2% (+8.07)#62 5.0% (+8.28)#3,250
63. Pollard 13.0% 5.2% (+7.84)#63 5.0% (+8.05)#3,366
64. Thorsby 13.0% 5.2% (+7.81)#64 5.0% (+8.02)#3,386
65. Susan Moore 12.9% 5.2% (+7.64)#65 5.0% (+7.86)#3,462
66. Daviston 12.8% 5.2% (+7.56)#66 5.0% (+7.77)#3,508
67. Guin 12.7% 5.2% (+7.51)#67 5.0% (+7.72)#3,534
68. Stewartville 12.6% 5.2% (+7.41)#68 5.0% (+7.62)#3,570
69. Hollis Crossroads 12.6% 5.2% (+7.34)#69 5.0% (+7.56)#3,602
70. Brookside 12.5% 5.2% (+7.29)#70 5.0% (+7.51)#3,617
71. Maytown 12.5% 5.2% (+7.29)#71 5.0% (+7.51)#3,625
72. Section 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#72 5.0% (+7.46)#3,673
73. Woodville 12.3% 5.2% (+7.07)#73 5.0% (+7.28)#3,771
74. Garden City 12.3% 5.2% (+7.06)#74 5.0% (+7.27)#3,776
75. Russellville 12.2% 5.2% (+7.00)#75 5.0% (+7.22)#3,803
76. Perdido 12.1% 5.2% (+6.93)#76 5.0% (+7.14)#3,844
77. Bon Secour 12.1% 5.2% (+6.92)#77 5.0% (+7.13)#3,848
78. Elberta 12.1% 5.2% (+6.89)#78 5.0% (+7.11)#3,872
79. Waterloo 12.0% 5.2% (+6.79)#79 5.0% (+7.01)#3,921
80. Clio 12.0% 5.2% (+6.76)#80 5.0% (+6.98)#3,940
81. Napier Field 12.0% 5.2% (+6.75)#81 5.0% (+6.96)#3,955
82. Brantley 11.9% 5.2% (+6.72)#82 5.0% (+6.93)#3,975
83. Midland City 11.9% 5.2% (+6.70)#83 5.0% (+6.91)#3,989
84. Mckenzie 11.8% 5.2% (+6.56)#84 5.0% (+6.77)#4,077
85. Nauvoo 11.8% 5.2% (+6.56)#85 5.0% (+6.77)#4,087
86. Harpersville 11.5% 5.2% (+6.33)#86 5.0% (+6.54)#4,235
87. Pine Level 11.5% 5.2% (+6.29)#87 5.0% (+6.50)#4,268
88. Colony 11.5% 5.2% (+6.27)#88 5.0% (+6.48)#4,283
89. South Vinemont 11.5% 5.2% (+6.25)#89 5.0% (+6.47)#4,294
90. Flomaton 11.4% 5.2% (+6.15)#90 5.0% (+6.37)#4,365
91. Gu Win 11.3% 5.2% (+6.06)#91 5.0% (+6.27)#4,447
92. Reeltown 11.3% 5.2% (+6.05)#92 5.0% (+6.27)#4,449
93. Vance 11.1% 5.2% (+5.90)#93 5.0% (+6.12)#4,564
94. Citronelle 10.9% 5.2% (+5.74)#94 5.0% (+5.95)#4,696
95. Ardmore 10.8% 5.2% (+5.59)#95 5.0% (+5.81)#4,815
96. Vandiver 10.8% 5.2% (+5.57)#96 5.0% (+5.78)#4,836
97. Wilsonville 10.7% 5.2% (+5.52)#97 5.0% (+5.73)#4,881
98. Uniontown 10.3% 5.2% (+5.13)#98 5.0% (+5.34)#5,237
99. Crossville 10.3% 5.2% (+5.11)#99 5.0% (+5.33)#5,251
100. Oneonta 10.2% 5.2% (+5.02)#100 5.0% (+5.24)#5,326

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama are:
#1
66.0%
#2
58.8%
#3
38.4%
#4
32.3%
#5
32.1%
#6
27.9%
#7
25.5%
#8
23.0%
#9
21.7%
#10
21.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama?
Cullomburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama with 66.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Alabama is 5.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.