Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Trail 58.3% 4.4% (+54.0)#1 5.0% (+53.3)#104
2. West Roy Lake 55.6% 4.4% (+51.2)#2 5.0% (+50.6)#122
3. Solway 36.2% 4.4% (+31.8)#3 5.0% (+31.2)#357
4. Meadowlands 35.2% 4.4% (+30.8)#4 5.0% (+30.2)#385
5. Leonard 33.3% 4.4% (+29.0)#5 5.0% (+28.3)#431
6. Bock 30.4% 4.4% (+26.1)#6 5.0% (+25.4)#529
7. Mentor 27.3% 4.4% (+22.9)#7 5.0% (+22.3)#687
8. Genola 25.5% 4.4% (+21.2)#8 5.0% (+20.5)#796
9. Mizpah 25.0% 4.4% (+20.6)#9 5.0% (+20.0)#842
10. Wolf Lake 23.4% 4.4% (+19.0)#10 5.0% (+18.4)#973
11. Seaforth 23.3% 4.4% (+18.9)#11 5.0% (+18.3)#990
12. Myrtle 23.1% 4.4% (+18.7)#12 5.0% (+18.1)#1,008
13. Kilkenny 22.6% 4.4% (+18.2)#13 5.0% (+17.6)#1,059
14. Cromwell 22.2% 4.4% (+17.8)#14 5.0% (+17.2)#1,096
15. Hubbard 22.2% 4.4% (+17.8)#15 5.0% (+17.2)#1,113
16. Roscoe 21.8% 4.4% (+17.4)#16 5.0% (+16.8)#1,150
17. Gonvick 21.2% 4.4% (+16.8)#17 5.0% (+16.2)#1,216
18. Foxhome 21.1% 4.4% (+16.7)#18 5.0% (+16.1)#1,233
19. Fifty Lakes 20.9% 4.4% (+16.6)#19 5.0% (+16.0)#1,249
20. Good Thunder 20.0% 4.4% (+15.6)#20 5.0% (+15.0)#1,355
21. Vining 19.4% 4.4% (+15.1)#21 5.0% (+14.5)#1,459
22. Heidelberg 18.9% 4.4% (+14.5)#22 5.0% (+13.9)#1,555
23. Hillman 18.2% 4.4% (+13.8)#23 5.0% (+13.2)#1,701
24. Taunton 17.5% 4.4% (+13.2)#24 5.0% (+12.5)#1,830
25. Gary 17.4% 4.4% (+13.1)#25 5.0% (+12.5)#1,858
26. Grey Eagle 17.2% 4.4% (+12.9)#26 5.0% (+12.2)#1,895
27. Green Isle 17.1% 4.4% (+12.8)#27 5.0% (+12.1)#1,919
28. Brookston 17.1% 4.4% (+12.8)#28 5.0% (+12.1)#1,925
29. Sunburg 17.1% 4.4% (+12.8)#29 5.0% (+12.1)#1,926
30. Dundee 17.1% 4.4% (+12.8)#30 5.0% (+12.1)#1,927
31. Barrett 16.7% 4.4% (+12.3)#31 5.0% (+11.7)#2,040
32. Taopi 16.7% 4.4% (+12.3)#32 5.0% (+11.7)#2,064
33. Wanda 16.4% 4.4% (+12.0)#33 5.0% (+11.4)#2,136
34. Darfur 16.3% 4.4% (+11.9)#34 5.0% (+11.3)#2,143
35. Middle River 16.2% 4.4% (+11.8)#35 5.0% (+11.2)#2,174
36. Millerville 16.1% 4.4% (+11.7)#36 5.0% (+11.1)#2,201
37. Spring Grove 16.1% 4.4% (+11.7)#37 5.0% (+11.1)#2,217
38. Dent 15.9% 4.4% (+11.5)#38 5.0% (+10.9)#2,252
39. Sedan 15.8% 4.4% (+11.4)#39 5.0% (+10.8)#2,308
40. Soudan 15.7% 4.4% (+11.3)#40 5.0% (+10.7)#2,329
41. Mahtowa 15.7% 4.4% (+11.3)#41 5.0% (+10.7)#2,336
42. Sargeant 15.6% 4.4% (+11.2)#42 5.0% (+10.6)#2,350
43. Babbitt 15.6% 4.4% (+11.2)#43 5.0% (+10.6)#2,358
44. Iron Junction 15.6% 4.4% (+11.2)#44 5.0% (+10.6)#2,370
45. Sacred Heart 15.5% 4.4% (+11.1)#45 5.0% (+10.5)#2,379
46. Lake George 15.4% 4.4% (+11.0)#46 5.0% (+10.4)#2,405
47. Bellingham 15.4% 4.4% (+11.0)#47 5.0% (+10.4)#2,409
48. Forada 15.4% 4.4% (+11.0)#48 5.0% (+10.4)#2,414
49. Henriette 15.4% 4.4% (+11.0)#49 5.0% (+10.4)#2,424
50. Hancock 15.3% 4.4% (+10.9)#50 5.0% (+10.3)#2,444
51. Lucan 15.2% 4.4% (+10.8)#51 5.0% (+10.2)#2,487
52. Minneiska 15.2% 4.4% (+10.8)#52 5.0% (+10.2)#2,503
53. Callaway 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#53 5.0% (+10.1)#2,520
54. Danvers 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#54 5.0% (+10.1)#2,524
55. Canton 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#55 5.0% (+10.1)#2,525
56. Buckman 15.0% 4.4% (+10.7)#56 5.0% (+10.0)#2,532
57. East Bethel 15.0% 4.4% (+10.6)#57 5.0% (+10.0)#2,537
58. Frost 14.7% 4.4% (+10.3)#58 5.0% (+9.71)#2,665
59. Cokato 14.6% 4.4% (+10.2)#59 5.0% (+9.63)#2,699
60. Kingston 14.6% 4.4% (+10.2)#60 5.0% (+9.57)#2,724
61. Gilman 14.5% 4.4% (+10.1)#61 5.0% (+9.52)#2,741
62. Lutsen 14.5% 4.4% (+10.1)#62 5.0% (+9.51)#2,745
63. Ruthton 14.4% 4.4% (+10.0)#63 5.0% (+9.42)#2,769
64. Effie 14.3% 4.4% (+9.90)#64 5.0% (+9.29)#2,814
65. Tamarack 14.3% 4.4% (+9.90)#65 5.0% (+9.29)#2,818
66. Dovray 14.3% 4.4% (+9.90)#66 5.0% (+9.29)#2,826
67. Midway 14.3% 4.4% (+9.90)#67 5.0% (+9.29)#2,830
68. Florence 14.3% 4.4% (+9.90)#68 5.0% (+9.29)#2,832
69. Geneva 14.2% 4.4% (+9.84)#69 5.0% (+9.22)#2,844
70. Brownsville 14.2% 4.4% (+9.81)#70 5.0% (+9.20)#2,852
71. Halstad 14.0% 4.4% (+9.61)#71 5.0% (+9.00)#2,929
72. Goodridge 13.9% 4.4% (+9.51)#72 5.0% (+8.89)#2,977
73. Littlefork 13.7% 4.4% (+9.33)#73 5.0% (+8.71)#3,050
74. Henderson 13.7% 4.4% (+9.27)#74 5.0% (+8.66)#3,072
75. Ogema 13.6% 4.4% (+9.18)#75 5.0% (+8.57)#3,114
76. Warba 13.3% 4.4% (+8.95)#76 5.0% (+8.34)#3,222
77. Hadley 13.3% 4.4% (+8.95)#77 5.0% (+8.34)#3,227
78. Tracy 13.3% 4.4% (+8.94)#78 5.0% (+8.33)#3,232
79. St Stephen 13.3% 4.4% (+8.91)#79 5.0% (+8.30)#3,243
80. St Francis 13.3% 4.4% (+8.89)#80 5.0% (+8.27)#3,253
81. Oslo 13.2% 4.4% (+8.85)#81 5.0% (+8.24)#3,265
82. Lake Wilson 13.2% 4.4% (+8.83)#82 5.0% (+8.21)#3,280
83. Zumbro Falls 13.1% 4.4% (+8.75)#83 5.0% (+8.14)#3,320
84. Morgan 13.1% 4.4% (+8.75)#84 5.0% (+8.13)#3,324
85. Hendrum 13.1% 4.4% (+8.71)#85 5.0% (+8.10)#3,337
86. Brownsdale 13.0% 4.4% (+8.62)#86 5.0% (+8.01)#3,391
87. Plato 12.8% 4.4% (+8.44)#87 5.0% (+7.83)#3,478
88. Biwabik 12.8% 4.4% (+8.41)#88 5.0% (+7.80)#3,491
89. Clearwater 12.8% 4.4% (+8.41)#89 5.0% (+7.80)#3,497
90. Le Center 12.7% 4.4% (+8.31)#90 5.0% (+7.69)#3,542
91. Rush City 12.5% 4.4% (+8.14)#91 5.0% (+7.53)#3,611
92. Grasston 12.5% 4.4% (+8.12)#92 5.0% (+7.51)#3,638
93. Jenkins 12.4% 4.4% (+8.07)#93 5.0% (+7.46)#3,676
94. Vermillion 12.3% 4.4% (+7.96)#94 5.0% (+7.35)#3,728
95. Clements 12.3% 4.4% (+7.90)#95 5.0% (+7.29)#3,767
96. Proctor 12.2% 4.4% (+7.83)#96 5.0% (+7.22)#3,802
97. Milroy 12.2% 4.4% (+7.79)#97 5.0% (+7.18)#3,829
98. Pine Point 12.1% 4.4% (+7.69)#98 5.0% (+7.07)#3,886
99. West Concord 12.0% 4.4% (+7.65)#99 5.0% (+7.04)#3,898
100. Dakota 12.0% 4.4% (+7.64)#100 5.0% (+7.03)#3,905

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota are:
#1
58.3%
#2
55.6%
#3
36.2%
#4
35.2%
#5
33.3%
#6
30.4%
#7
27.3%
#8
25.5%
#9
25.0%
#10
23.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota?
Trail has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota with 58.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Minnesota is 4.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.