Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Le Roy 55.6% 5.0% (+50.6)#1 5.0% (+50.6)#125
2. Curlew 37.5% 5.0% (+32.5)#2 5.0% (+32.5)#324
3. Osterdock 37.1% 5.0% (+32.2)#3 5.0% (+32.1)#333
4. Chelsea 30.3% 5.0% (+25.3)#4 5.0% (+25.3)#535
5. Arcadia 29.6% 5.0% (+24.6)#5 5.0% (+24.6)#561
6. East Amana 29.0% 5.0% (+24.1)#6 5.0% (+24.0)#589
7. Redding 28.6% 5.0% (+23.6)#7 5.0% (+23.6)#612
8. Watkins 27.3% 5.0% (+22.3)#8 5.0% (+22.3)#690
9. Smithland 26.7% 5.0% (+21.8)#9 5.0% (+21.8)#733
10. Colwell 25.7% 5.0% (+20.8)#10 5.0% (+20.7)#786
11. Homestead 25.0% 5.0% (+20.0)#11 5.0% (+20.0)#832
12. Yale 24.5% 5.0% (+19.5)#12 5.0% (+19.5)#882
13. Colesburg 24.5% 5.0% (+19.5)#13 5.0% (+19.5)#883
14. Spring Hill 23.9% 5.0% (+19.0)#14 5.0% (+18.9)#927
15. Conroy 23.7% 5.0% (+18.7)#15 5.0% (+18.7)#952
16. Guernsey 22.2% 5.0% (+17.3)#16 5.0% (+17.2)#1,108
17. Blanchard 22.2% 5.0% (+17.3)#17 5.0% (+17.2)#1,112
18. Lynnville 22.1% 5.0% (+17.1)#18 5.0% (+17.1)#1,123
19. St Paul 22.0% 5.0% (+17.0)#19 5.0% (+17.0)#1,142
20. Graf 21.7% 5.0% (+16.8)#20 5.0% (+16.7)#1,163
21. Chatsworth 21.6% 5.0% (+16.7)#21 5.0% (+16.6)#1,179
22. Cumberland 21.6% 5.0% (+16.6)#22 5.0% (+16.6)#1,185
23. Runnells 21.2% 5.0% (+16.2)#23 5.0% (+16.2)#1,218
24. Rose Hill 21.1% 5.0% (+16.2)#24 5.0% (+16.1)#1,222
25. Macedonia 20.6% 5.0% (+15.6)#25 5.0% (+15.6)#1,304
26. Ainsworth 20.2% 5.0% (+15.2)#26 5.0% (+15.2)#1,343
27. Floyd 19.8% 5.0% (+14.8)#27 5.0% (+14.8)#1,406
28. Mcintire 19.5% 5.0% (+14.6)#28 5.0% (+14.5)#1,446
29. Barnum 19.4% 5.0% (+14.4)#29 5.0% (+14.4)#1,464
30. Gruver 19.2% 5.0% (+14.3)#30 5.0% (+14.2)#1,500
31. Mitchell 19.1% 5.0% (+14.2)#31 5.0% (+14.2)#1,515
32. Whitten 19.1% 5.0% (+14.2)#32 5.0% (+14.1)#1,521
33. Lawler 18.9% 5.0% (+13.9)#33 5.0% (+13.9)#1,552
34. Kellerton 18.6% 5.0% (+13.6)#34 5.0% (+13.6)#1,603
35. Luzerne 18.6% 5.0% (+13.6)#35 5.0% (+13.6)#1,611
36. Lone Tree 18.5% 5.0% (+13.6)#36 5.0% (+13.5)#1,617
37. Sharpsburg 18.2% 5.0% (+13.2)#37 5.0% (+13.2)#1,688
38. Lanesboro 18.2% 5.0% (+13.2)#38 5.0% (+13.2)#1,690
39. Battle Creek 18.0% 5.0% (+13.0)#39 5.0% (+13.0)#1,747
40. Spragueville 17.9% 5.0% (+13.0)#40 5.0% (+13.0)#1,751
41. Dolliver 17.8% 5.0% (+12.8)#41 5.0% (+12.8)#1,791
42. Varina 17.6% 5.0% (+12.7)#42 5.0% (+12.7)#1,821
43. Hartford 17.6% 5.0% (+12.6)#43 5.0% (+12.6)#1,826
44. St Olaf 17.5% 5.0% (+12.5)#44 5.0% (+12.5)#1,857
45. Westfield 17.4% 5.0% (+12.4)#45 5.0% (+12.4)#1,876
46. Allerton 17.2% 5.0% (+12.2)#46 5.0% (+12.2)#1,914
47. Stratford 17.1% 5.0% (+12.2)#47 5.0% (+12.1)#1,933
48. Joice 17.1% 5.0% (+12.2)#48 5.0% (+12.1)#1,937
49. Lockridge 16.5% 5.0% (+11.6)#49 5.0% (+11.6)#2,087
50. Quasqueton 16.3% 5.0% (+11.3)#50 5.0% (+11.3)#2,151
51. Lacona 16.1% 5.0% (+11.1)#51 5.0% (+11.1)#2,220
52. Wallingford 16.0% 5.0% (+11.1)#52 5.0% (+11.1)#2,225
53. Beacon 15.9% 5.0% (+11.0)#53 5.0% (+10.9)#2,254
54. Superior 15.8% 5.0% (+10.8)#54 5.0% (+10.8)#2,305
55. Clutier 15.7% 5.0% (+10.7)#55 5.0% (+10.7)#2,330
56. Hamilton 15.6% 5.0% (+10.7)#56 5.0% (+10.6)#2,348
57. Clayton 15.6% 5.0% (+10.7)#57 5.0% (+10.6)#2,349
58. Dexter 15.5% 5.0% (+10.6)#58 5.0% (+10.5)#2,373
59. Riceville 15.5% 5.0% (+10.5)#59 5.0% (+10.5)#2,384
60. Jamaica 15.4% 5.0% (+10.4)#60 5.0% (+10.4)#2,408
61. Garden Grove 15.3% 5.0% (+10.3)#61 5.0% (+10.3)#2,450
62. Springbrook 15.3% 5.0% (+10.3)#62 5.0% (+10.3)#2,461
63. Lansing 15.2% 5.0% (+10.2)#63 5.0% (+10.2)#2,501
64. Luxemburg 15.0% 5.0% (+10.0)#64 5.0% (+10.0)#2,548
65. Tingley 15.0% 5.0% (+10.0)#65 5.0% (+10.0)#2,549
66. Chester 14.9% 5.0% (+9.96)#66 5.0% (+9.93)#2,578
67. Minburn 14.9% 5.0% (+9.94)#67 5.0% (+9.91)#2,584
68. St Marys 14.9% 5.0% (+9.90)#68 5.0% (+9.87)#2,594
69. Patterson 14.8% 5.0% (+9.87)#69 5.0% (+9.84)#2,610
70. Popejoy 14.8% 5.0% (+9.85)#70 5.0% (+9.82)#2,624
71. High Amana 14.8% 5.0% (+9.85)#71 5.0% (+9.82)#2,625
72. Tennant 14.8% 5.0% (+9.85)#72 5.0% (+9.82)#2,628
73. Milo 14.7% 5.0% (+9.73)#73 5.0% (+9.70)#2,673
74. St Charles 14.7% 5.0% (+9.70)#74 5.0% (+9.66)#2,682
75. Farmersburg 14.6% 5.0% (+9.67)#75 5.0% (+9.64)#2,696
76. Luther 14.6% 5.0% (+9.65)#76 5.0% (+9.61)#2,706
77. Bode 14.6% 5.0% (+9.61)#77 5.0% (+9.58)#2,717
78. Grand River 14.5% 5.0% (+9.53)#78 5.0% (+9.50)#2,746
79. Ossian 14.5% 5.0% (+9.50)#79 5.0% (+9.47)#2,752
80. Meservey 14.4% 5.0% (+9.46)#80 5.0% (+9.43)#2,766
81. Beaman 14.3% 5.0% (+9.32)#81 5.0% (+9.29)#2,811
82. Rathbun 14.3% 5.0% (+9.32)#82 5.0% (+9.29)#2,828
83. Wesley 14.1% 5.0% (+9.18)#83 5.0% (+9.15)#2,864
84. Luana 14.1% 5.0% (+9.11)#84 5.0% (+9.08)#2,894
85. Mccausland 14.0% 5.0% (+9.05)#85 5.0% (+9.02)#2,917
86. Crawfordsville 14.0% 5.0% (+8.99)#86 5.0% (+8.96)#2,940
87. Orient 13.9% 5.0% (+8.98)#87 5.0% (+8.95)#2,945
88. Steamboat Rock 13.9% 5.0% (+8.95)#88 5.0% (+8.92)#2,966
89. Oxford 13.8% 5.0% (+8.88)#89 5.0% (+8.85)#3,001
90. Miles 13.8% 5.0% (+8.81)#90 5.0% (+8.78)#3,025
91. Lehigh 13.7% 5.0% (+8.70)#91 5.0% (+8.66)#3,070
92. Derby 13.6% 5.0% (+8.68)#92 5.0% (+8.64)#3,089
93. Ackworth 13.5% 5.0% (+8.50)#93 5.0% (+8.47)#3,163
94. Modale 13.3% 5.0% (+8.37)#94 5.0% (+8.34)#3,216
95. Maysville 13.3% 5.0% (+8.37)#95 5.0% (+8.34)#3,221
96. Mingo 13.3% 5.0% (+8.33)#96 5.0% (+8.30)#3,240
97. Westgate 13.2% 5.0% (+8.27)#97 5.0% (+8.24)#3,267
98. Olds 13.2% 5.0% (+8.23)#98 5.0% (+8.19)#3,293
99. Wadena 13.2% 5.0% (+8.20)#99 5.0% (+8.16)#3,306
100. Frederika 13.1% 5.0% (+8.18)#100 5.0% (+8.15)#3,317

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa are:
#1
55.6%
#2
37.5%
#3
37.1%
#4
30.3%
#5
29.6%
#6
29.0%
#7
28.6%
#8
27.3%
#9
26.7%
#10
25.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa?
Le Roy has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa with 55.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Iowa is 5.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.