Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Bristow 53.3% 5.2% (+48.1)#1 5.0% (+48.3)#137
2. Cushing 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#2 5.0% (+45.0)#171
3. Obert 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#3 5.0% (+45.0)#178
4. Keystone 50.0% 5.2% (+44.8)#4 5.0% (+45.0)#179
5. Martell 41.7% 5.2% (+36.5)#5 5.0% (+36.8)#255
6. Barneston 40.0% 5.2% (+34.8)#6 5.0% (+35.0)#280
7. Bazile Mills 37.5% 5.2% (+32.3)#7 5.0% (+32.5)#325
8. Eddyville 35.8% 5.2% (+30.6)#8 5.0% (+30.9)#366
9. Loretto 35.8% 5.2% (+30.6)#9 5.0% (+30.9)#367
10. Martinsburg 29.7% 5.2% (+24.5)#10 5.0% (+24.7)#558
11. Archer 29.4% 5.2% (+24.2)#11 5.0% (+24.4)#571
12. Stella 28.6% 5.2% (+23.3)#12 5.0% (+23.6)#606
13. Roscoe 28.6% 5.2% (+23.3)#13 5.0% (+23.6)#609
14. Aten 28.3% 5.2% (+23.0)#14 5.0% (+23.3)#630
15. Whitney 26.7% 5.2% (+21.4)#15 5.0% (+21.7)#739
16. Newport 25.6% 5.2% (+20.4)#16 5.0% (+20.6)#790
17. Elyria 25.0% 5.2% (+19.8)#17 5.0% (+20.0)#845
18. Gurley 24.6% 5.2% (+19.3)#18 5.0% (+19.6)#870
19. Elba 24.2% 5.2% (+18.9)#19 5.0% (+19.2)#902
20. Virginia 23.1% 5.2% (+17.8)#20 5.0% (+18.1)#1,007
21. Ericson 21.7% 5.2% (+16.5)#21 5.0% (+16.7)#1,158
22. Ong 21.4% 5.2% (+16.2)#22 5.0% (+16.4)#1,193
23. Kennard 21.0% 5.2% (+15.7)#23 5.0% (+16.0)#1,245
24. Dunbar 20.2% 5.2% (+14.9)#24 5.0% (+15.2)#1,344
25. Plymouth 19.9% 5.2% (+14.6)#25 5.0% (+14.9)#1,386
26. Sterling 19.8% 5.2% (+14.5)#26 5.0% (+14.8)#1,399
27. Overton 19.5% 5.2% (+14.2)#27 5.0% (+14.5)#1,454
28. Rogers 19.2% 5.2% (+14.0)#28 5.0% (+14.2)#1,499
29. Salem 19.0% 5.2% (+13.8)#29 5.0% (+14.1)#1,527
30. Pleasanton 18.6% 5.2% (+13.4)#30 5.0% (+13.6)#1,598
31. Du Bois 18.3% 5.2% (+13.1)#31 5.0% (+13.3)#1,662
32. Cornlea 18.2% 5.2% (+12.9)#32 5.0% (+13.2)#1,700
33. Glenvil 18.1% 5.2% (+12.9)#33 5.0% (+13.1)#1,712
34. Anoka 17.9% 5.2% (+12.6)#34 5.0% (+12.9)#1,772
35. Colon 17.7% 5.2% (+12.5)#35 5.0% (+12.7)#1,803
36. Pilger 17.3% 5.2% (+12.1)#36 5.0% (+12.3)#1,885
37. Steinauer 17.1% 5.2% (+11.9)#37 5.0% (+12.1)#1,924
38. Center 17.0% 5.2% (+11.8)#38 5.0% (+12.0)#1,959
39. Alexandria 17.0% 5.2% (+11.8)#39 5.0% (+12.0)#1,960
40. Diller 16.2% 5.2% (+10.9)#40 5.0% (+11.2)#2,184
41. Oakland 16.1% 5.2% (+10.9)#41 5.0% (+11.1)#2,205
42. Gresham 16.0% 5.2% (+10.8)#42 5.0% (+11.0)#2,228
43. Odessa 16.0% 5.2% (+10.8)#43 5.0% (+11.0)#2,234
44. Washington 15.5% 5.2% (+10.3)#44 5.0% (+10.5)#2,376
45. Lynch 15.4% 5.2% (+10.1)#45 5.0% (+10.4)#2,410
46. Otoe 15.0% 5.2% (+9.75)#46 5.0% (+10.0)#2,544
47. Wilber 15.0% 5.2% (+9.71)#47 5.0% (+9.96)#2,569
48. Memphis 14.9% 5.2% (+9.64)#48 5.0% (+9.90)#2,590
49. Herman 14.8% 5.2% (+9.58)#49 5.0% (+9.84)#2,613
50. Mccool Junction 14.8% 5.2% (+9.58)#50 5.0% (+9.83)#2,614
51. Dunning 14.7% 5.2% (+9.46)#51 5.0% (+9.71)#2,670
52. Shubert 14.6% 5.2% (+9.33)#52 5.0% (+9.59)#2,714
53. Abie 14.3% 5.2% (+9.04)#53 5.0% (+9.29)#2,822
54. Carroll 14.2% 5.2% (+8.92)#54 5.0% (+9.18)#2,857
55. Melia 13.7% 5.2% (+8.48)#55 5.0% (+8.73)#3,044
56. Greeley Center 13.5% 5.2% (+8.26)#56 5.0% (+8.52)#3,137
57. Butte 13.4% 5.2% (+8.20)#57 5.0% (+8.45)#3,169
58. Verdel 13.3% 5.2% (+8.08)#58 5.0% (+8.34)#3,229
59. Callaway 13.3% 5.2% (+8.06)#59 5.0% (+8.32)#3,237
60. Genoa 13.3% 5.2% (+8.04)#60 5.0% (+8.30)#3,244
61. Henry 12.8% 5.2% (+7.57)#61 5.0% (+7.83)#3,483
62. Brady 12.7% 5.2% (+7.49)#62 5.0% (+7.74)#3,520
63. Valentine 12.7% 5.2% (+7.41)#63 5.0% (+7.67)#3,549
64. Hildreth 12.6% 5.2% (+7.32)#64 5.0% (+7.57)#3,597
65. Bushnell 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#65 5.0% (+7.51)#3,636
66. Belvidere 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#66 5.0% (+7.51)#3,649
67. Crab Orchard 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#67 5.0% (+7.51)#3,655
68. Hendley 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#68 5.0% (+7.51)#3,656
69. Tarnov 12.5% 5.2% (+7.25)#69 5.0% (+7.51)#3,659
70. Brainard 12.4% 5.2% (+7.19)#70 5.0% (+7.45)#3,678
71. Heartwell 12.3% 5.2% (+7.03)#71 5.0% (+7.29)#3,769
72. Lyons 12.0% 5.2% (+6.76)#72 5.0% (+7.02)#3,910
73. Venango 11.7% 5.2% (+6.42)#73 5.0% (+6.67)#4,158
74. Nehawka 11.7% 5.2% (+6.40)#74 5.0% (+6.66)#4,171
75. Chapman 11.5% 5.2% (+6.27)#75 5.0% (+6.52)#4,258
76. Crawford 11.5% 5.2% (+6.26)#76 5.0% (+6.51)#4,261
77. Douglas 11.4% 5.2% (+6.15)#77 5.0% (+6.41)#4,339
78. Byron 11.4% 5.2% (+6.11)#78 5.0% (+6.37)#4,364
79. Wann 11.3% 5.2% (+6.07)#79 5.0% (+6.33)#4,408
80. Arlington 11.3% 5.2% (+6.05)#80 5.0% (+6.31)#4,416
81. Valparaiso 11.2% 5.2% (+5.90)#81 5.0% (+6.16)#4,533
82. Glenwood 11.1% 5.2% (+5.89)#82 5.0% (+6.15)#4,542
83. Waterloo 11.1% 5.2% (+5.89)#83 5.0% (+6.14)#4,547
84. Adams 11.1% 5.2% (+5.86)#84 5.0% (+6.12)#4,570
85. Royal 11.1% 5.2% (+5.86)#85 5.0% (+6.12)#4,609
86. Riverton 10.9% 5.2% (+5.69)#86 5.0% (+5.94)#4,716
87. Fordyce 10.9% 5.2% (+5.66)#87 5.0% (+5.92)#4,735
88. Springfield 10.8% 5.2% (+5.58)#88 5.0% (+5.83)#4,797
89. Inglewood 10.8% 5.2% (+5.50)#89 5.0% (+5.76)#4,854
90. Wallace 10.7% 5.2% (+5.44)#90 5.0% (+5.69)#4,920
91. Marquette 10.7% 5.2% (+5.41)#91 5.0% (+5.66)#4,950
92. Louisville 10.6% 5.2% (+5.30)#92 5.0% (+5.56)#5,017
93. Phillips 10.4% 5.2% (+5.15)#93 5.0% (+5.40)#5,158
94. Bloomfield 10.4% 5.2% (+5.10)#94 5.0% (+5.36)#5,205
95. Chester 10.3% 5.2% (+5.07)#95 5.0% (+5.32)#5,255
96. Shickley 10.3% 5.2% (+5.01)#96 5.0% (+5.26)#5,301
97. Humboldt 10.2% 5.2% (+4.97)#97 5.0% (+5.22)#5,337
98. Curtis 10.1% 5.2% (+4.88)#98 5.0% (+5.14)#5,415
99. Palmyra 10.1% 5.2% (+4.88)#99 5.0% (+5.13)#5,423
100. Beaver Crossing 10.1% 5.2% (+4.88)#100 5.0% (+5.13)#5,425

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska are:
#1
53.3%
#2
50.0%
#3
50.0%
#4
50.0%
#5
40.0%
#6
37.5%
#7
35.8%
#8
35.8%
#9
29.7%
#10
29.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska?
Bristow has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska with 53.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Nebraska is 5.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.