Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Renfrow 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#21
2. Cooperton 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#2 5.0% (+95.0)#33
3. Lakeside 78.6% 6.1% (+72.5)#3 5.0% (+73.6)#49
4. Stidham 72.7% 6.1% (+66.6)#4 5.0% (+67.7)#61
5. Moyers 68.0% 6.1% (+61.9)#5 5.0% (+63.0)#66
6. Smith Village 57.6% 6.1% (+51.5)#6 5.0% (+52.6)#110
7. Lovell 52.0% 6.1% (+45.9)#7 5.0% (+47.0)#149
8. Proctor 51.1% 6.1% (+45.0)#8 5.0% (+46.1)#159
9. Sour John 50.0% 6.1% (+43.9)#9 5.0% (+45.0)#170
10. Eagle 50.0% 6.1% (+43.9)#10 5.0% (+45.0)#183
11. Avard 50.0% 6.1% (+43.9)#11 5.0% (+45.0)#185
12. Oak Grove 48.6% 6.1% (+42.6)#12 5.0% (+43.7)#191
13. Maramec 40.9% 6.1% (+34.8)#13 5.0% (+35.9)#266
14. Centrahoma 40.0% 6.1% (+33.9)#14 5.0% (+35.0)#282
15. Mcbride 39.3% 6.1% (+33.2)#15 5.0% (+34.3)#292
16. Rentiesville 37.3% 6.1% (+31.2)#16 5.0% (+32.3)#329
17. Johnson Prairie 36.5% 6.1% (+30.4)#17 5.0% (+31.5)#354
18. Flute Springs 36.1% 6.1% (+30.0)#18 5.0% (+31.1)#359
19. Elmer 35.0% 6.1% (+28.9)#19 5.0% (+30.0)#390
20. Hastings 34.6% 6.1% (+28.5)#20 5.0% (+29.6)#396
21. Slick 33.3% 6.1% (+27.3)#21 5.0% (+28.3)#415
22. Emet 33.3% 6.1% (+27.3)#22 5.0% (+28.3)#425
23. Utica 33.3% 6.1% (+27.3)#23 5.0% (+28.3)#426
24. Ballou 32.6% 6.1% (+26.5)#24 5.0% (+27.6)#448
25. Burlington 32.4% 6.1% (+26.3)#25 5.0% (+27.4)#457
26. Cement 31.7% 6.1% (+25.6)#26 5.0% (+26.7)#481
27. Blue 31.4% 6.1% (+25.3)#27 5.0% (+26.4)#488
28. Felt 31.0% 6.1% (+25.0)#28 5.0% (+26.0)#501
29. Notchietown 30.7% 6.1% (+24.6)#29 5.0% (+25.7)#518
30. Deer Lick 30.0% 6.1% (+23.9)#30 5.0% (+25.0)#551
31. Durham 30.0% 6.1% (+23.9)#31 5.0% (+25.0)#553
32. Clarita 29.0% 6.1% (+23.0)#32 5.0% (+24.0)#586
33. Cornish 28.8% 6.1% (+22.8)#33 5.0% (+23.9)#597
34. Strong City 28.6% 6.1% (+22.5)#34 5.0% (+23.6)#616
35. Honey Hill 28.3% 6.1% (+22.2)#35 5.0% (+23.3)#629
36. Wainwright 28.2% 6.1% (+22.1)#36 5.0% (+23.2)#633
37. Wilson 26.2% 6.1% (+20.2)#37 5.0% (+21.2)#759
38. Peckham 25.9% 6.1% (+19.8)#38 5.0% (+20.9)#776
39. May 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#39 5.0% (+20.0)#847
40. Rosedale 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#40 5.0% (+20.0)#849
41. Knowles 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#41 5.0% (+20.0)#852
42. Lambert 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#42 5.0% (+20.0)#853
43. Sterling 24.5% 6.1% (+18.5)#43 5.0% (+19.5)#874
44. Fox 24.0% 6.1% (+17.9)#44 5.0% (+19.0)#918
45. Barber 23.9% 6.1% (+17.8)#45 5.0% (+18.9)#930
46. Rocky 23.9% 6.1% (+17.8)#46 5.0% (+18.9)#931
47. Albion 23.8% 6.1% (+17.7)#47 5.0% (+18.8)#938
48. Fanshawe 23.8% 6.1% (+17.7)#48 5.0% (+18.8)#943
49. Schulter 23.5% 6.1% (+17.4)#49 5.0% (+18.5)#968
50. Fittstown 23.3% 6.1% (+17.3)#50 5.0% (+18.3)#980
51. Teresita 23.1% 6.1% (+17.0)#51 5.0% (+18.1)#1,003
52. Taft 23.1% 6.1% (+17.0)#52 5.0% (+18.1)#1,005
53. Reydon 23.0% 6.1% (+16.9)#53 5.0% (+18.0)#1,017
54. Leedey 22.9% 6.1% (+16.9)#54 5.0% (+17.9)#1,021
55. Olive 22.7% 6.1% (+16.6)#55 5.0% (+17.7)#1,046
56. Nescatunga 22.5% 6.1% (+16.4)#56 5.0% (+17.5)#1,066
57. Tenkiller 22.4% 6.1% (+16.3)#57 5.0% (+17.4)#1,077
58. Marble City 22.2% 6.1% (+16.1)#58 5.0% (+17.2)#1,099
59. Sparrowhawk 22.0% 6.1% (+16.0)#59 5.0% (+17.0)#1,130
60. Hanna 21.7% 6.1% (+15.7)#60 5.0% (+16.7)#1,159
61. Dotyville 21.5% 6.1% (+15.5)#61 5.0% (+16.5)#1,187
62. Skedee 21.4% 6.1% (+15.3)#62 5.0% (+16.4)#1,194
63. Cleo Springs 21.4% 6.1% (+15.3)#63 5.0% (+16.4)#1,197
64. Indiahoma 21.2% 6.1% (+15.1)#64 5.0% (+16.2)#1,214
65. Bridge Creek 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#65 5.0% (+16.1)#1,227
66. Cottonwood 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#66 5.0% (+16.1)#1,234
67. Swink 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#67 5.0% (+16.1)#1,237
68. Carlton Landing 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#68 5.0% (+16.1)#1,238
69. Sportmans Shores 20.8% 6.1% (+14.8)#69 5.0% (+15.8)#1,266
70. Christie 20.7% 6.1% (+14.7)#70 5.0% (+15.7)#1,282
71. Wakita 20.6% 6.1% (+14.5)#71 5.0% (+15.6)#1,299
72. Pickett 20.0% 6.1% (+14.0)#72 5.0% (+15.0)#1,351
73. Dover 19.8% 6.1% (+13.8)#73 5.0% (+14.9)#1,392
74. Lucien 19.8% 6.1% (+13.7)#74 5.0% (+14.8)#1,408
75. Lamar 19.7% 6.1% (+13.6)#75 5.0% (+14.7)#1,419
76. Eldorado 19.6% 6.1% (+13.5)#76 5.0% (+14.6)#1,434
77. Elk City 19.6% 6.1% (+13.5)#77 5.0% (+14.6)#1,435
78. Eakly 19.6% 6.1% (+13.5)#78 5.0% (+14.6)#1,436
79. Baker 19.4% 6.1% (+13.3)#79 5.0% (+14.4)#1,465
80. Greenville 19.2% 6.1% (+13.2)#80 5.0% (+14.2)#1,498
81. Deer Creek 18.9% 6.1% (+12.8)#81 5.0% (+13.9)#1,550
82. Canadian Shores 18.8% 6.1% (+12.8)#82 5.0% (+13.8)#1,563
83. Colbert 18.8% 6.1% (+12.7)#83 5.0% (+13.8)#1,572
84. Beaver 18.7% 6.1% (+12.7)#84 5.0% (+13.7)#1,592
85. Custer City 18.6% 6.1% (+12.5)#85 5.0% (+13.6)#1,608
86. Cedar Crest 18.3% 6.1% (+12.2)#86 5.0% (+13.3)#1,668
87. Monroe 18.2% 6.1% (+12.1)#87 5.0% (+13.2)#1,684
88. Kildare 18.2% 6.1% (+12.1)#88 5.0% (+13.2)#1,687
89. Hitchita 18.2% 6.1% (+12.1)#89 5.0% (+13.2)#1,693
90. Ravia 18.1% 6.1% (+12.1)#90 5.0% (+13.1)#1,709
91. Whitesboro 17.9% 6.1% (+11.9)#91 5.0% (+13.0)#1,750
92. Johnson 17.9% 6.1% (+11.8)#92 5.0% (+12.9)#1,762
93. Aline 17.8% 6.1% (+11.7)#93 5.0% (+12.8)#1,781
94. Redbird Smith 17.8% 6.1% (+11.7)#94 5.0% (+12.8)#1,795
95. Jennings 17.5% 6.1% (+11.4)#95 5.0% (+12.5)#1,848
96. Cimarron City 17.5% 6.1% (+11.4)#96 5.0% (+12.5)#1,856
97. Norge 17.1% 6.1% (+11.1)#97 5.0% (+12.1)#1,921
98. Phillips 17.1% 6.1% (+11.0)#98 5.0% (+12.1)#1,948
99. Dustin 16.9% 6.1% (+10.9)#99 5.0% (+12.0)#1,974
100. Rocky Ford 16.8% 6.1% (+10.8)#100 5.0% (+11.8)#1,991

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
72.7%
#4
57.6%
#5
51.1%
#6
50.0%
#7
48.6%
#8
40.9%
#9
40.0%
#10
37.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma?
Renfrow has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Oklahoma is 6.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.